Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Thanks for your responses.  I feel a little bit better now.  I really got the wind put up me when I read about 'bad character and reprehensible behaviour of non-defendant witnesses' and the press guidelines from the Independent Press Standards Organisation. court-reporting-public.pdf (ipso.co.uk) Reporting Restrictions in the Criminal Courts (July 2023) (judiciary.uk) It's a tricky one because, without going into too much detail, all of the victims are of bad character already, otherwise they never would have met the accused, and I fear that the very much tumultuous relationship I have had with the victim that connects me to this case is going to be broadcast for all to hear. The accused isn't going to be anonymous, his name and even his home address were reported in the national press in the preliminaries.    Thank you.
    • How long is the finance arrangement for and how much has been paid?
    • From their own terms and conditions on the website... https://www.carfinance247.co.uk/terms-and-conditions 6.1 CarFinance247 Limited offers a: 6.1.1  web chat service ("Web Chat"); and 6.1.2  SMS chat service ("SMS Chat"), which, provided your application for finance has been approved and you have created a MyCarFinance247 account in accordance with these Terms, enable you to chat either online or via text message (as applicable) to one of our customer service specialists, without having to make a phone call.
    • I've had a text and email from MCB: "Dear XXXXX Please contact us today. Your payment has not been brought up to date and we would like to discuss your account with you as a matter of urgency. Our telephone number is 02039236888"   " Early investigations confirm you are resident at the above address. Despite this, we have not managed to speak to you about your now, seriously overdue debt.   We are now instructing our external debt collectors to contact you directly in relation to your loan account. If you want to avoid this course of action, contact us today on 0203 923 6888"
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
        • Thanks
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Buildings Insurance


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 5335 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Hi I hope someone can help me with a few queries re my claim.

I had a leak from my shower which came through kitchen ceiling, we employed Dino Rod to repair leak. Their plumber said leak had been dripping for some time, tiles in shower area came off wall in his hand! Kitchen ceiling needs replacing and tiles on part of kitchen wall also need replacing. (They were also loose)

Two kitchen units are warped and one side of kitchen worktops has to be replaced.

Now insurance company has come up with the usual, they will only replace parts which are damaged, this is in my policy so I understand where they are coming from.

They have offered to renew damaged units and work top plus pay 50% to replace all cupboard doors to match the ones they are replacing and 50% to cost of undamaged worktop to match the one they are replacing.

They will only pay for tiles which are damaged.

We cannot match up tiles in either room so this means we have to find cost to retile other walls.

Kitchen fitters we have asked to give quotes have all said it is not viable to refit sink etc. and they thought the idea of just replacing doors was not a very good one. Existing plinths and cornices will not match, plus open end shelving units will be odd.

The insurance company surveyor was worse than useless, his advice was to go for a completely different unit so it looks like we meant it to look different! He also didn't see what was wrong in having different worktops.

I'm not saying I have the best kitchen in the world but it is certainly decent and although it wasn't top of the range when bought neither was it the cheapest.

I have submitted 2 qoutes for the kitchen, one B& Q and one a local firm,

The insurance company say both these are far to high.

I am really upset and can see the kitchen is going to end up a mis -matched mess. We are going to have to find money to put to repairs which at present we cannot afford - I'm beginning to wonder why I'm insured?

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi, can anybody advised if I have any argument with insurance company regarding their level of liability. I understand that there is a clause in policy re only replacing what is damaged but surely a fitted kitchen or tiled wall is different?

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi, can anybody advised if I have any argument with insurance company regarding their level of liability. I understand that there is a clause in policy re only replacing what is damaged but surely a fitted kitchen or tiled wall is different?

 

I'm afraid to say the "Pairs, Sets and Suites" clause does also apply to fitted kitchens and wall tiles. The clause applies to any item of a uniform nature, design or colour.

Rather than getting your own quotes for the kitchen, it's probably best to let your buildings insurers deal with that, especially as they've already rejected 2 of your quotes. They will probably have special deals with approved contractors.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...

This is turning into a nightmare. Insurance company sent their contractor today. He said whole ceiling will have to come down which will bring off wall tiles, plus ceiling cannot be removed without removing all wall cupboards first, he said we have not got a prayer of matching up damaged cupboards with undamaged ones. Who pays for all wall cupboards to be removed and put back?

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...