Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Hi Guys, well a year on and my friend has just received this in the post today, obviously a little scared so looking for more of your advice.  Letter from the NCC dated 1-May-2024 is as follows.......   Before deputy district judge Haythorne sitting at the national business centre, 4th floor st Kathrine's house Northampton Upon reading an application from the claimant  it is ordered that  1. The claim be sent to the county court at #### (Friends local Court) Because this order has been made without a hearing, the parties have the right to apply to have the order set aside, varied or stayed.  A party making such an application must send or deliver the application to the court (together with any appropriate fee) to arrive within seven days of service of this order.  If the application is one which requires a hearing, and a) the party making the application is the defendant: and b) the defendant as an individual, then upon filing of the application the claim will be transferred to the defendants home court.  In all other cases requiring a hearing the claim will be transferred to the preferred court.    As a result of an order made on the 1 May 2024, this claim has been transferred to the county court at ##### (friends local court) 
    • I am heading over to hers tomorrow so I will find out.  Will there be something written in the agreement or does it depend on the agreement its self ? Just so I know what to look for, so I can provide as much information as possible on here. 
    • The answer to this is going to depend on what the agreement your friend signed says. Or contact the housing provider and ask them.  
    • Thank you all for the responses, to answers a few questions  - she has had the car since Jan 23 on a 5 year term.  - She is unsure what the agreement is called, but at the end she has the option to make a payment to "buy" the car - she recieves benefits for her young children alongside the ssp (normally she would be on NLW for a 16 hr a week job)  - Yes she would like to keep the car  She has not responded to the last email from them asking her to call and it'll be followed up in an email. I told her to hold off until atleast Wednesday so I can read a few posts on here and get some more information.  I will ensure she follows up with a letter, that has not been signed but instead her name written.   Thank you  
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Landlord demanding rent for after we've left!


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 6453 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Hello,

 

We've just had a nightmare year of renting. in a reasonably expensive flat we've experienced periods without heating, periods without hot water, periods without any water and a major flood mostly due to an old and ill maintained boiler. We've had requests for things to be repaired ignored and despite having paid a cleaner to come for 3 hours a week every week have been accused of keeping the flat on a "filthly" condition (we are 3 pretty tidy girls).

 

As we approached moving out - mostly to get away from this landlord we anticipated problems so offered to have the place professionally cleaned (it wasn't when we moved in but we figured this good will gesture might avoid further problems).

 

We agreed with our landlady that since she hadn't relet the property the cleaning team would come in a couple of days after we left so they could do the most thorough job with our stuff out of the way. She was thrilled at this idea.

 

The cleaning team missed the first appointment to do the house as they had a car crash on the way there. The agency organised a replacement team for the next day but the landlady is now demanding rent for the half week between us leaving and the cleaning being done as the property was in an "unrentable condition".

 

She agreed to this and made no noises about extra rent - otherwise we obviously would have had it done before we left. Can she do this?

 

Also, she is claiming lots on the damage front. There is a small mark on the wooden floor from a high heel (we which concede was probably us) but she wants to sand down and revarnish the whole floor!

 

Finally the large sash window in my room was broken when we moved in, i told her about this last november and she said she's fix it (it was broken such that when you released the catch to open the window the top pane of the sash window crashed down to the window sill as the catch was the only thing holding it up).

 

She hasn't had it fixed, despite us having a massive heatwave and me repeatedly saying the problem was the hot weather. On the day we were moving out someone helping us move opened the window to air the room and the pane of glass broke. She wants us to pay for the repairs. Our friend couldn't have known the window was broken by looking at it but she is saying it was carelessness. This seems unreasonable to us - what can we do?

 

Is there anything we can do? All advice appreciated.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Has she got a deposit from you? If not tell her to whistle.

 

If she has, unfortuantely you are probably going to have to pay for the window and a sum for the floor (but no more than about £50). As to the hlaf weeks rent just state plainly NO, if she had no tennants to move in then she is not out of pocket.

 

If she doesn't give your deposit back (if she has one) ask for a detailed list of charges with invoices/receipts from whoever carried out the work and if there is a difference between what she can prove and what she has refunded request it back (pointing out you have no problems with taking it to court) and failing that issue a small claims court proceeding.

Link to post
Share on other sites

fiona_coady,in reply to your posting and in my opinion:

 

REGARDING THE CLEANING:

 

1.That is a bit over the top for wanting three days rent.I would suggest that you see that has the flat cleaned at your expense deducted from you deposit monies because at the end of the day you should vacate the flat to be as reasonably tidy as possible.

 

REGARDING THE DAMAGE:

 

1.You are liable for the high heel mark in the flooring.This would probably involve replacing the wooden floor board and not a massive project.Again this repair would be deducted from your deposit monies.Rent out carpeted properties in the future!

 

2.The window pane again you broke it and therefore you should pay for a replacement from your deposit monies.

 

 

Now I Also read in your posting that you had suffered times with no hot water etc

 

Remember it is a criminal offence for a landlady not provide a yearly Landlord Certificate for the boiler and all the other gas appliances in the propertry.

 

There is nothing stopping you from suing this former landlady for not providing an adequate service i.e.rubbish boiler and damaged sash which caused you to have to pay for the broken pane etc.

 

Finally this should teach her a lesson not to treat here tenants with contempt.

 

I hope you find this information useful.

 

If you need any help or have any questions,just ask.

 

Keep us posted.

 

All the best!

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...

I wouldnt agree to pay anything for the floor as you are entitled to leave the flat having caused reasonable wear and tear. If a heel mark in the floor is the only problem then I would think that is fine. Can they prove it was one of you that did it and not a cleaner or anyone else?

Its my money and I'm making sure I get it back.:razz:

25/09/06 Letter from Robert Udy saying tough, sue us!

14/09/06 letter from cap 1 robert udy offering difference of £8 per charge. sent LBA and refusal back

14/09/06 letter from halifax returning £10 cheque but still going to send me my statements!!

cap one LBA sent 29/08/06 £360

Halifax Data Protection Act sent 29/08/06

 

There will be a 10% donation to this site when I win.

If it wasnt for you then none of us would have anything back

 

 

www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk free forum with advice and templates for reclaiming bank charges

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...