Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Labour Party has increased its poll lead over Prime Minister Rishi Sunak's Conservatives to stand 30 points ahead, according to a YouGov poll for the Times newspaper. A previous YouGov/Times poll, published on May 2, gave Labour a 26 point lead.   reuters.com WWW.REUTERS.COM  
    • rather than reducing the levels of c02 and nox in the atmosphere A VERY large increase   Record-breaking increase in CO2 levels in world’s atmosphere | Greenhouse gas emissions | The Guardian WWW.THEGUARDIAN.COM Experts issue warning after finding global average concentration in March was 4.7ppm higher than same period last year Global Monitoring Laboratory - Carbon Cycle Greenhouse Gases GML.NOAA.GOV The Global Monitoring Laboratory conducts research on greenhouse gas and carbon cycle feedbacks, changes in clouds, aerosols, and...   Global Monitoring Laboratory - Carbon Cycle Greenhouse Gases GML.NOAA.GOV The Global Monitoring Laboratory conducts research on greenhouse gas and carbon cycle feedbacks, changes in clouds, aerosols, and...    
    • This is the info that I have. Name of seller... Thomas Stone. Reg LG51UOV Driven 109,000 2001 ford escort van 55 Price paid £500. (I know that that's stupidly cheap for a van, but my son wanted to take it apart, and put it to gether again) His address st margarates drive gillingham kent. We live swindon, so over 2 hours away. My oldest sons machanic inspected it . Sorry I don't know if I'm reading this right, but NSR wheel cylinder leaking NSR Shock mounting corroded  Rear cross member corroded  Rear number plate light missing Brake compressor valve seized Hand break cables insecure O/S Seal to floor repairs are very badly done Dash lights are painted out Bonnet ( This is all he wrote here.) Brake pipes are covered in black doodoo ( This is what the machanic wrote). My son asked Thomas Stone if it would need lots of work, for it to pass its next mot,  Thomas Stone said , " I can't see it needing mega amounts of work, for it to pass, it isn't rotten and it starts and drives ok, and the brakes work well".             
    • Alan Bates is in the Guardian today. Our Post Office victory is being twisted by those who don’t want to see its like again | Alan Bates | The Guardian WWW.THEGUARDIAN.COM Litigation funders didn’t ‘exploit’ subpostmasters, they helped us. Those who attack them have corporate interests at heart, says former subpostmaster...  
    • Discover 8 skills you develop when you explore different points of view that are essential for life and work.View the full article
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Natwest ATM giving out fake £20 notes - advice needed please


Caz1974
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 5368 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

This is quite a long one so please bare with me.

Any advice greatly appreciated.

My sister withdrew her money from her local atm machine ( The Natwest ) even though she banks with the Halifax - it's just that this atm is closer to home for her.

Anyway she withdrew an amount of cash with a reciept and crossed over the road, going into a shop to purchase some cat food. The shop owner noticed her £20 note was a fake and refused to take it.

So in shock she went straight back to the Natwest ( she was a little shook up because she's never done anything illegal or out of sorts in her life and the shop owner telling her that the note was a fake embarrassed her tremendously ).

Inside the Natwest she was told that because her actual account is with the Halifax that they would have to deal with it and was sent there ( myself I would have argued that the £20 note came out of their machine so was their problem ).

At the Halifax my sister explained the situation and a member of staff checked all the notes , 3 x £20 notes were found to be fake so were taken off her and a slip was filled out to say they had recieved them.

She was told that the money would be credited back into her account soon.

Today she decided to chase it up because she had still had no funds credited to her account.

The manager at the Halifax is now saying it is the responsibility of the Natwest to refund the money because it was their ATM it was withdrawn from and the Natwest are saying that it is the Halifax who should pay because it is their branch where the account is held.

So in the meantime my sister is £60 out of pocket ( she lives on disability benefits so it is a large amount of her income ) and she was so upset on the telephone earlier she doesn't know which way to go with this.

She's always trusted the banks and cannot belive that money in their machines was counterfeit.

She feels like £60 as been stolen from her because of the ATM and that nobody cares.

Is she within her rights to call the police, I'm asking this because she's worried this might happen at the ATM to other innocent people and she also would like some advice of what to do next.

Any suggestions greatly appreciated

NatWest : £857.00 won! March/07

Natwest : Witholding my statements & adding defaults etc , S.A.R sent Jan/08

Natwest for my partner : £2,101.00 won! Feb/07

Studio Cards : Refund for admin charges £108 Won! Dec/07

Complaint made to FOS for P.P.I Jan/08

Nationwide: S.A.R - (Subject Access Request) sent for statements Nov/07 ( waiting to see what happens in the OFT test case )

Littlewoods : defaulted on CCA request Feb/07

DCA's that crawled out from the woodwork and have crawled back : 28 so far!!

My favourite link on CAG:

Click here: Can't Find What You're Looking For? Here's A Complete A-z Index - The Consumer Forums

Link to post
Share on other sites

This is quite a long one so please bare with me.

Any advice greatly appreciated.

My sister withdrew her money from her local atm machine ( The Natwest ) even though she banks with the Halifax - it's just that this atm is closer to home for her.

Anyway she withdrew an amount of cash with a reciept and crossed over the road, going into a shop to purchase some cat food. The shop owner noticed her £20 note was a fake and refused to take it.

So in shock she went straight back to the Natwest ( she was a little shook up because she's never done anything illegal or out of sorts in her life and the shop owner telling her that the note was a fake embarrassed her tremendously ).

Inside the Natwest she was told that because her actual account is with the Halifax that they would have to deal with it and was sent there ( myself I would have argued that the £20 note came out of their machine so was their problem ).

At the Halifax my sister explained the situation and a member of staff checked all the notes , 3 x £20 notes were found to be fake so were taken off her and a slip was filled out to say they had recieved them.

She was told that the money would be credited back into her account soon.

Today she decided to chase it up because she had still had no funds credited to her account.

The manager at the Halifax is now saying it is the responsibility of the Natwest to refund the money because it was their ATM it was withdrawn from and the Natwest are saying that it is the Halifax who should pay because it is their branch where the account is held.

So in the meantime my sister is £60 out of pocket ( she lives on disability benefits so it is a large amount of her income ) and she was so upset on the telephone earlier she doesn't know which way to go with this.

She's always trusted the banks and cannot belive that money in their machines was counterfeit.

She feels like £60 as been stolen from her because of the ATM and that nobody cares.

Is she within her rights to call the police, I'm asking this because she's worried this might happen at the ATM to other innocent people and she also would like some advice of what to do next.

Any suggestions greatly appreciated

 

This is what is commonly known as buck passing. I think Halifax can refund the amount since they have effectively taken responsibility of the notes and can then argue the toss with NatWest. I think you need to get her to put in a formal complaint in writing asking for a written response.

 

 

As a complete aside, I have to say that it is a very odd situation that an ATM has given out fake notes since all ATM money comes from large bullion centres which effectively sort fake notes from legit notes however I suspect I know how they got into the ATM machine but it is irrelevant to how the money is refunded.

.

FSA Waiver on Bank Charges:http://www.fsa.gov.uk/pages/Doing/Regulated/Notify/Waiver/pdf/dir_quart_0709.pdf

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 3 weeks later...

I ve had very similar encounter recently. Here s what happened:

 

my girlfriend withdraw £200 from one of NatWest cash machine in London before we go on holiday. the withdraw was from her HSBC card though she has a saving account with natwest. we found out several days later that 3x£20 pound notes looks very odd with heavy ink stains all over them. One of the notes in particular were extremely suspicious with lots of details missing and very blur printings. All the retailers refuse to accept this 3 notes as expected.

 

We went back to the branch where the ATM located and ask them to exchange it, (with her bank statement from HSBC clearing stating the time,amount and branch of the withdraw). The cashier refuse to do so as the card was not NatWest based. (and claimed after very rough examination that the oddest note was fake and they would definitely not able to do anything about it). We insisted the cash was from their machine, and hence its their responsibility, and insisted on speaking to a manager.

 

When speaking to the manager, we were told (similar to other stories we ve heard so far) the cash in cash machines are not from only NatWest Vault but from a centralized processing centre for all LINK banks, hence they would not be able to accept responsibility.

 

I basically told them that if that's the case, they should all the more treat this case extremely serious and should investigate how on earth did a fake notes manage to penetrate into operation system. I said I would complain and alert FSA directly if I am in the manager's position.

 

The manager said they will need to examine the notes and see if all 3 are fakes. If anyone of them are genuine currency they would be able to swap it straight away, otherwise they will need to submit it to higher level and see what comes back. She took the notes away and came back in a couple of minutes and claimed that all three notes are actually real and offered to exchange them. I don't know if they actually did test or what test they did with those suspicious notes (particularly the one that the cashier claimed "defintely fake") but in the end we got all £60 back in new currency.

 

I think your sister should have inisited on Natwest's responsibility at the very first instance. However, since she has now given the notes to Halifax, it is halifax's responsibility to give her the money back. There are several things she should consider doing:

 

1) going back to the halifax branch with a detail account of the chain of events and copies of all documents, including atm mini statement/bank statement, slips from halifax for accepting the fake notes (do not give them the original copies) and demand a reply (and insist on their respoinsibily for accepting the notes)

 

2)write the halifax complain department with all the details.

 

3) write to halifax compliance department with the detail account and copies of documents, copy Natwest compliance department on the same letter.

 

4)inform Financial Ombudsman Service with the detail account of events, photocopies of documents, person/branch involved, and the fact that neither bank is claiming responsibilities.

our complaints procedure and how to complain

 

 

 

Hope your sister will get her money bank soon.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...