Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Thanks, that's clear Andy! Just to check - what does hearsay mean? Is it that a layer is representing Eruidio instead of them being there themselves?
    • Your points are fine but as I am late to this topic I am not aware of the finer details. Sums in Arrears Notices must be provided if the claimant wishes to enforce an agreement and claim any interest. The relevant section of the CCA1974 is sec 86B  https://www.legislation.gov.uk/ukpga/1974/39/part/VI/crossheading/sums-in-arrears-and-default-sums (2)The creditor or owner— (a)shall, within the period of 14 days beginning with the day on which the conditions mentioned in subsection (1) are satisfied, give the debtor or hirer a notice under this section; and (b)after the giving of that notice, shall give him further notices under this section at intervals of not more than six months. Regards Andy     .  
    • Hi All, PRA Group are chasing an old Barclaycard unpaid from 4 years ago. They are threatening court action - CCJ unless I respond before last Saturday. Which I did not. I'm unsure but reckon the Barclaycard was applied for about 30 years ago. What's the best next step approach ? Best, P.       
    • Can you please also have a look at points 20-27? The sent me a remediation pack with not only statements but sums of arrears they haven't sent for 2 years, so I didn't know I was in arrears. Then they defaulted me after they apologised for their cca breach. I truly didn't understand what that pack was about. I thought it was some kind of a mistake they will make right later as SLC used to do this. Genuinely I thought that but I don't know if that's an OK defence?  
    • Thank you for posting the full sar.  So they definitely did place the PCN on your vehicle only to remove it 10 minutes later apparently because of a possible problem with the driver which seems highly unlikely [the reason for the PCN removal ]. Did the driver even see the warden at all while they were photographing the car . They did take several pictures spread over 12 minutes or so using a flash so the driver would have seen the car being photographed had they been there.   Very strange. You said that you had an onboard camera -are you able to go back and see what happened? Was the warden wearing UKPC clothing? In any event that PCN has not complied with the Protection of Freedoms Act 2012 Schedule 4.  That should be a Notice to Driver and the follow up PCN should not be sent until 28 days AFTER the day the first PCN  was given were it a postal PCN. Instead the knuckleheads have issued the follow up PCN on the 28th day of their dodgy first PCN and so totally blowing all their machinations to get over the fact that  the windscreen ticket wasn't a windscreen ticket. In neither case, even if they had been sent properly, they were non compliant. neither of them showed the period of parking which is specified in the Act. Both just show a time of issue at 20.02 but no end period. Their  "mistake" in not giving 29 days  before issuing their keeper Liability notice, makes the PCN more than just non compliant. It means that the PCN was unlawful and probably deliberate as had UKPC waited until the correct time to send that Notice, it would have delayed it until the Monday. And as they probably knew that had not received the original windscreen PCN perhaps they thought it better to rewrite the Law. Part of that is conjecture but the basic fact is correct-the Notice was unlawful. And for that there should be repercussions. My first thought was the ICO but  as it isn't really a breach of data protection it goes higher than that. Perhaps the Site Team would know. I did look at the Legal Ombudsman but they are for complaints against lawyers.  I cannot imagine a decent lawyer even countenancing such a thing though were are dealing with third rate ones when involved with some parking companies.   For reference PoFA Schedule 4 S8 and S9 [2][f] f)warn the keeper that if, at the end of the period of 28 days beginning with the day after that on which the notice to keeper is given— Their PCN dated 12/04/24 states "as 28 days have now elapsed since the Notice to Keeper was given, Parking Control management [UK] Ltd. [the creditor] are now able ...........to recover the unpaid parking charge from......... the registered keeper. The original PCN was marked by them as being deemed delivered 15/03/2024 so 28 days +1 =13/04/24. Their letter was sent one day early which means they altered or ignored the law . I have never seen that "error" on any other Notice from any of the parking companies. As the Member did not receive the original PCN which was originally a Windscreen ticket but they then changed it to a postal one for some fanciful reason the whole scenario reeks of skullduggery. I am going to ask again from Hamz why their warden might have felt scared about a confrontation with the driver but even if there was a chance the PCN was placed on the windscreen and not removed for around a minute but pictures had already been taken so why remove it? And then why produce a brand new keeper Liability Notice the like of which I have not seen before.  
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Nationwide Froze my Account to Pay for outstanding charges on an Old Account .


Heppy
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 5363 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

I have a Nationwide account which I use and keep going just for paying bills etc and also for use abroad .

Yesterday went to a cashpoint and my card was impounded .

I tel Nationwide immediately as I knew that I had sufficient funds in the account . Going through all of the security questions , I was aked how many accounts I had , my response was one . The person on the other end then decided to transfer me to ''another dept'' which I held on for 15 mins and then put the phone down.

So this morning I went into my branch to be told that I have 2 accounts , and that my account has been froze as there is an outstanding amount on the 2nd account . It transpires that this other account was an account that I was under the impression was ceased a long time ago , when I split with my partner for a while as it was in joint names . If I remember correctly it went into the red as charges were added because a DD was applied for before its due date and the salary had not been payed in until its due date .

Anyway I am sure that it is all charges that are on the account .But I was assured by a branch member who is no longer there who I took the matter up with over 5years ago that the charges would be dropped , it now seems to appear that this has not happened .

They have actually froze over and above the amount that they say is outstanding on the other account and I cannot access any of the remaining money , thereby putting me into hardship over the weekend as the collections team who I am told I need to deal with are not available until Monday.

They also appear only to have targetted me for the recovery of this amount and not my partner .

Can anyone offer any advice as to my next move please

Link to post
Share on other sites

Get an account opened with a bank not connected to Nationwide, furthermore write a letter and state that the account from 5 years ago(and be very precise) was due to have charges refunded and the account closed, right?

Ask them to do as they should have done 5 years ago and to give you your money back.

.

FSA Waiver on Bank Charges:http://www.fsa.gov.uk/pages/Doing/Regulated/Notify/Waiver/pdf/dir_quart_0709.pdf

Link to post
Share on other sites

I quite agree it doesn't seem to add up that they did bugger all for five years then took action. I would assume it would be best practice to try to contact the person prior to taking this sort of action. Given that you had an active account this wouldn't have been difficult.

 

Kick up a fuss, make reference to the FOS if needs be that should get it in front of someone with authority. It costs them severel hundred pounds for every complaint made to FOS so with something like this its probably cheaper for them to just sort it out.

 

Don't mention the costs of the FOS.

 

I'd just send a brisk letter, in addition to any phone calls you make (as it is urgent) pointing out that you were assured this matter was resolved five years ago. Mention the person you spoke to, its not your fault they are not there, and point out that you've had no contact about the matter and if you had it would've been sorted out.

 

That should do for starters...

The views I express here are mere speculation based on my experience. I am not qualified nor insured to give legal advice and any action you take will be at your own risk.

Link to post
Share on other sites

After posting this morning , a letter , obviously computer generated arrived , dated 4 August 09 , Again addresses ed to both myself and my partner .

sent by UK Mail , S postage so time was not of the essence when it was posted . As it looks as if they wanted the letter to arive AFTER they had froze the account .

I quote from thie correspondence ,

Despite previous attempts to contact you , Ive had no acceptable payment proposals to re-pay the outstanding balance on your FlexAccount.

 

Due to this unpaid balance , I've frozen your FlexAccount.

 

This may result in Direct debits or standing orders set up from your FlexAccount not being honoured .

 

Please pay the outstanding balance in full within the next 14 days . If you dont I'll transfer the frozen funds from your FlexAccount to reduce this debt without further reference to you .

 

Please call the above number if you have any queries.

 

Yours sincerely

un decipherable squiggle name

 

Unsecured Debt Recovery .

un quote .

 

I most certainly have an issue with the language of this letter . Who is the ''I'' as I am under the impression that the Nationwide is supposed to be a ''we'' .

 

Again they have targeted me , yet have made no reference to my partners account .

 

One of the staff in the branch today told that it was written into the terms and conditions of the society that they are allowed to do this .Im wondering if this is so as this account was taken out about 22 years ago principally to pay the mortgage that we had with them , although the mortgage is long gone .

 

One of my arguments is that why have they froze ALL of my money , why not just the amount that they are saying is owed on the other account .

They have caused me hardship by doing this and yesterday I was left stranded with my 5 grandchildren ,because of my inability to buy petrol to get home .

Edited by Heppy
Link to post
Share on other sites

If the old account was in joint names then the account they have just frozen must be in joint names too for the funds to be offset. Similarly if the old account was just in your name then they cannot lawfully offset funds from a joint account

You may receive different advice to your query as people have different experiences and opinions. Please use your own judgement in deciding whose advice to take.

 

If in doubt seek advice from a qualified insured professional. Any advice I have offered you is done so on an informal basis, without prejudice or liability.

 

If you think I have been helpful PLEASE click the scales

 

court bundles for dummies

Link to post
Share on other sites

The account that they have frozen is in my name only . The account where they are saying there is a debt is in joint names . Are you saying that what they have done is unlawful.

Link to post
Share on other sites

4 + 14 is 18, so they've done the opposite of thier own letter, also they cannot have made much effort to contact you since you were a customer with another active account and you knew nothing about it.

 

"The account that they have frozen is in my name only . The account where they are saying there is a debt is in joint names . Are you saying that what they have done is unlawful."

 

Quite the reverse, with a joint account or loan, both parties are jointly and severally liable which means they can pursue both of you for the full balance. In thier eyes and the eyes of the law they want to be paid and its a third party dispute as regards who owes what.

 

There is a right of set off which means they can use an amount in another account against a debt on another account, however I am not well up ont his area. I know of its existance and hopefully others can advise what the rules are with regards to the names etc.

 

Fortunately there are at least two avenues you can persue here if no such answers are forthcoming:

 

1. Thier procedures seem to be lacking given this is the first you have heard of this, and the letter makes reference to 14 days yet they've frozen the account anyway.

 

2. You took steps to resolve this sometime ago, I would definately pursue this with a complaint, moreso that the issues with thier (seemingly non-existent) attempts to contact you because this caused the problem.

 

As regards them freezing the whole account it does seem heavy handed for the reasons I've previously given, I believe they do this to get your attention but it should only ever be a last resort. Thier systems aren't the best so they may not have had a facility to simply limit transactions on the account or 'freeze' the amount they claim you owe.

 

Surely if they could find you to send the letter you recieved they could've sent others asking you to contact them... This is really not on to put it mildly.

The views I express here are mere speculation based on my experience. I am not qualified nor insured to give legal advice and any action you take will be at your own risk.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks for your replies , before I make contact with them this morning would it be worth making a call to the FSO ,to log this with them. One other thing I forgot my current mortgage is now due and with the account being frozen I will now go into arrears , (BARCLAYS) , so should they refuse to un freeze the account I will have no access to my funds and could potentially be in a lot of bother .

Link to post
Share on other sites

Have finally managed to get in touch with the Nationwide , what an obnoxious bunch they are .

The woman I spoke to ,was adamant that I had to pay the £381 .86 saying that I knew that I owed it. I asked her what the debt was for and she replied that she didnt have to tell me , it was an outstanding amount on an account .

I asked politely at this point , for them to send me proof of the debt ,again she said they didnt have to , I had to prove that I didnt owe it .?? How can I possibly do that after all this time , when Ive been under the illusion that this account was closed .

She admitted that I had been into a branch years ago to sort this out , but again wouldnt accept the fact that on that occasion I had closed the account,even though there has been no activity on the account ,only the charges that they have put on it.

She also said that the debt had been passed to a debt collection agency who had passed it back to them as they saw that I had another account with funds in after them not being successful contacting me .

I asked why when they knew that I had another account that they had never put a note on the account to speak to me when I went into a branch .

She also said that they had spoken to me in 2003 , to be honest I cant recall ever speaking to them about it in 2003 as the account must have been closed by then ..

One other thing she said was that the account had been frozen on the 4th Aug , which is the date that was on the letter I received on the 9th.

So basically they had already taken action before allowing me to refute any debt.

I have contacted the FOC who is writing to them , but it can take up to 8 weeks and I am now in a pretty poor position as regards being able to pay my mortgage etc .

Link to post
Share on other sites

"I asked her what the debt was for and she replied that she didnt have to tell me , it was an outstanding amount on an account ."

 

Typical collections muppet, I had a dispute with a Utility company and they said I had to prove I didn't take out the contract. This is just as much non-sense as what Nationwide have told you.

 

If they took you to court, which is thier ultimate threat, they would have to prove the debt they claim exists, and it wouldn't be seen as reasonable that they witheld this information from you.

 

I have a few more questions

 

Where have the statements been going notifying of the charges?

 

How long is it since you recieved any information in relation to this account?

 

Have you spoken to someone from customer services and raised a formal complaint in relation to thier handling of this matter? You'll need to have done this if you plan to go to the FOS.

 

Personally I'd be tempted to speak to the branch manager to try to alleviate the current situation pointing out that, not only will you dispute the charges because you believe they are unlawful, you will also claim any charges incurred as a result of this (ie missed payments for mortgage and other regular payments). Also point out your earlier visit, and your understandting was that the account was closed.

 

"She also said that the debt had been passed to a debt collection agency who had passed it back to them as they saw that I had another account with funds in after them not being successful contacting me ."

 

The above doesn't make Nationwide seem very astute, why couldn't they simply send a letter with the old account details on asking that you urgently contact them...

 

Can anyone advise re the off-set thing? Are they actually allowed to do what they have done?

 

Now here is what I think happened, when you went to the branch I think somebody may have tried to close the account but there was a charge pending, so it wouldn't have let them close it. They should have advised you of this.

 

This is what caused the charges and interest to go into overdrive.

 

The FOS are slow, so really you are campaigning on two fronts, getting hold of someone in authority at Nationwide to get you access to YOUR money, and getting the 'debt' resolved once and for all.

 

The statement issue is potentially important, have they been sending your info to someone else? When you go into the branch why doesn't this old account show up, do you have two totally different customer id's?

 

Lots to think about but I'd be firm on this their collections processes seem deplorable and inept, you shouldn't suffer because of this.

The views I express here are mere speculation based on my experience. I am not qualified nor insured to give legal advice and any action you take will be at your own risk.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 4 weeks later...

The whole situation is somewhat absurd the 'debt' is thier doing and, with the ammo provided above, I would've thought it'll cost them more to try and stand thier ground on this one. Let us know how you are getting on if/when you hear anything.

The views I express here are mere speculation based on my experience. I am not qualified nor insured to give legal advice and any action you take will be at your own risk.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...