Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • If you're set on pursuing the receiver then a complaint to his governing body (if any) might be a sensible low risk first step. You need to confirm what qualifications he actually has. I don't believe an LPA Receiver necessarily needs to be a licensed insolvency practioner, although he may be. Or he may a chartered surveyor. I note you say "LPA" and "fixed charge" receiver, but aren't those two different appointments with different remits? What relevant powers are given in the mortgage terms and security? Or if that's unclear then how was the appointment described to you? Ducking back to the comment I made earlier, you consulted a solicitor who advised a claim against the receiver. How did he advise that you do so?   Some background reading (accepting it's from 2013 and you may be working off more recent preceded overturning this) .. LPA receivers owe very limited duty to borrowers; a reminder WWW.WRIGHTHASSALL.CO.UK As lenders rely more and more on their powers to appoint an LPA Receiver, a recent case has clarified the Receiver’s obligations, both to the lender and its borrower.  
    • Good Law Project are trying to force HMG to release details of how Sunak's hedge fund made large profits from Moderna. Government ordered to disclose Sunak’s hedge fund emails - Good Law Project GOODLAWPROJECT.ORG Good Law Project has won a battle with the Treasury after it tried to suppress emails between Rishi Sunak and the hedge fund he founded.  
    • Nick Wallis has written up the first day of Angela van den Bogerd's evidence to the inquiry. I thought she was awful. She's decided to go with being not bright enough to spot what was happening over Fujitsu altering entries on the Horizon system, rather than covering up important facts. She's there today as well. The First Lady of Flat Earth – Post Office Scandal WWW.POSTOFFICESCANDAL.UK Angela van den Bogerd, on oath once more It is possible that Angela van den Bogerd and her senior colleagues (Rodric Williams, Mark Davies, Susan...  
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like

PPI claim - Alliance & Leicester


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 3738 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

I took out a loan with Alliance & Leicester back in 2006. It was for £4,500 over 18 months and is fully repaid. When I originally applied for the loan I selected that I didn't want the PPI, but I am 99% sure that when I sent the paperwork back to them they wrote back saying I had to accept the PPI or they couldn't process the loan - as I needed the money quickly I agreed to it. Now, I don't have much paperwork left from this loan, just a confirmation letter, one showing I received £10 as an "annual moneyback payment for protecting my personal loan repayment", and one confirming that the loan has been repaid.

 

I am a bit confused by the calculator that I have seen on here to work out how much PPI I should be able to claim back - could anyone explain it a bit more? Can it be calculated using the below figures, or will I need to do a SAR & find the figures off that?

 

Loan amount: £4500

APR: 5.9%

Monthly payment: 18 months @ £293.59

Total repayment: £5284.62

Halifax Credit Card : PPI Claim Successful! :D

 

Freemans : CCA request sent - ACCOUNT WRITTEN OFF :D

 

Alliance & Leicester: PPI Claim Successful! :D

Link to post
Share on other sites

I took out a loan with Alliance & Leicester back in 2006. It was for £4,500 over 18 months and is fully repaid. When I originally applied for the loan I selected that I didn't want the PPI, but I am 99% sure that when I sent the paperwork back to them they wrote back saying I had to accept the PPI or they couldn't process the loan - as I needed the money quickly I agreed to it. Now, I don't have much paperwork left from this loan, just a confirmation letter, one showing I received £10 as an "annual moneyback payment for protecting my personal loan repayment", and one confirming that the loan has been repaid.

 

I am a bit confused by the calculator that I have seen on here to work out how much PPI I should be able to claim back - could anyone explain it a bit more? Can it be calculated using the below figures, or will I need to do a SAR & find the figures off that?

 

Loan amount: £4500

APR: 5.9%

Monthly payment: 18 months @ £293.59

Total repayment: £5284.62

 

I would advise to alway start with a Subject Access Request. It is best to gather information then prepare then start the action to recover.

 

Have a good read through the stickies at the top of this forum and also read on other similare threads dealing with A & L to get assistance from other A & L claimants.

 

Did you know they have been fined £7m for mis-selling PPI?

 

Alliance & Leicester to pay £7 million fine for PPI failings

 

 

Mis-sold PPI? Want your money back? use these links to help

 

aa

I have no legal training and the advice I offer is a matter of support. Before you commit to any Legal action you are advised to contact a qualified legal practitioner.

------------------------------------------------

Bank charge successes:

Halifax - Full settlement incl interest.

HSBC - Settlement, goodwill no admission of liability about 75% of claim.

RBS - Settlement, goodwill no admission of liability about 70% of claim.

2 ongoing claims for bank charges with HSBC with more to come. (Supreme Court ruling could have upset these claims) They did :mad:

PPI Successes

PPI 4 settlements on 9 loans. FOS involvement on 7 added on the 8 % Statutory interest another 30% to both.

2 claims settled in full with LV without FOS involvement.

2 claims settled in full with HSBC without FOS involvement

 

PPI Claims ongoing with:

Cap one Now with the FOS

Barclays. Paid up today 24/04/10 cheque received for over £4,500 and in the bank.

LTSB still have to decide on this as their SAR production was abysmal. Papers data mixed up documents missing etc

 

1 Complaint not upheld by FOS they said it was ICO issue. Complaint upheld by ICO. See this..

Post 290 from

***RBS PPI Claim Long fight but, WON***

 

Please do not PM me for advice as it may be sometime before I can respond.

 

Keep at them. Do not give way and do not accept all they tell you, they will delay and stall for as long as they can to prevent repaying you your mis-sold PPI.

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 3 weeks later...

Well I wrote to A&L at the beginning of the month about my PPI claim and have received a reply today.

 

They say that they "have not been able to establish whether you were provided with sufficient details to allow you to make an informed decision when the policy was taken out" but have offered me a refund of £681.71 (£582.66 monthly premiums & £99.05 interest to 31/08/09) Quite suprised to hear from them so quickly! Just got to sign & return a form to them so they can send me a cheque.

Halifax Credit Card : PPI Claim Successful! :D

 

Freemans : CCA request sent - ACCOUNT WRITTEN OFF :D

 

Alliance & Leicester: PPI Claim Successful! :D

Link to post
Share on other sites

They settled with me very quickly too. Maybe due to them already being fined.

 

Well done!!

IF YOU FEEL I HAVE HELPED YOU AT ALL PLEASE FEEL FREE TO TIP MY SCALES.

 

NATWEST PPI SUCCESS £490 25/08/09

 

NATWEST PPI 2nd CLAIM WON £1135 02/10/09

 

A & L PPI £395 WON

 

CREATION CLAIM PARTIAL REFUND £1825 01/04/10 NOW OFF TO FOS FOR THE REST

 

BARCLAYCARD STILL PENDING

 

LITTLEWOODS DCA . DEBT WIPED OUT AND CREDIT FILE UPDATED 23/09/09

Link to post
Share on other sites

Well I wrote to A&L at the beginning of the month about my PPI claim and have received a reply today.

 

They say that they "have not been able to establish whether you were provided with sufficient details to allow you to make an informed decision when the policy was taken out" but have offered me a refund of £681.71 (£582.66 monthly premiums & £99.05 interest to 31/08/09) Quite suprised to hear from them so quickly! Just got to sign & return a form to them so they can send me a cheque.

 

Nice one, let me know when you get the cheque and I will stick a **WON** tab on you thread title

 

aa

I have no legal training and the advice I offer is a matter of support. Before you commit to any Legal action you are advised to contact a qualified legal practitioner.

------------------------------------------------

Bank charge successes:

Halifax - Full settlement incl interest.

HSBC - Settlement, goodwill no admission of liability about 75% of claim.

RBS - Settlement, goodwill no admission of liability about 70% of claim.

2 ongoing claims for bank charges with HSBC with more to come. (Supreme Court ruling could have upset these claims) They did :mad:

PPI Successes

PPI 4 settlements on 9 loans. FOS involvement on 7 added on the 8 % Statutory interest another 30% to both.

2 claims settled in full with LV without FOS involvement.

2 claims settled in full with HSBC without FOS involvement

 

PPI Claims ongoing with:

Cap one Now with the FOS

Barclays. Paid up today 24/04/10 cheque received for over £4,500 and in the bank.

LTSB still have to decide on this as their SAR production was abysmal. Papers data mixed up documents missing etc

 

1 Complaint not upheld by FOS they said it was ICO issue. Complaint upheld by ICO. See this..

Post 290 from

***RBS PPI Claim Long fight but, WON***

 

Please do not PM me for advice as it may be sometime before I can respond.

 

Keep at them. Do not give way and do not accept all they tell you, they will delay and stall for as long as they can to prevent repaying you your mis-sold PPI.

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 4 years later...

Hi, I'm new to this sort of forum thing, however I'll do my best, I have tried making a claim against the Alliance and Leicester for PPI.

I do have some supporting documentation from the alliance and Leicester which dates back to the original start date of my mortgage in 1978 (long time I know).

the building society suggests they cannot continue with my claim as PPI was not sold by them at that time, but I'm pretty sure it was

Could anybody please verify if indeed PPI was sold by them at that time, possibly someone is in a similar situation to me, any help would be most grateful.

Many thanks

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...