Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Farage rails and whines about not being allowed on the BBC ... ... but pulls out at the last minute of a BBC Panorama interview special. It was denied it was anything to do with his candidates being outed as misogynists and Putin apologists, or that farage was afraid Nick Robinson might throw some difficult questions at him ... despite farages recent practice at quickly cowering in fear.   It was claimed 'it wasn't in Nigels diary'     Nigel Farage pulls out of BBC interview at last minute amid Hitler row WWW.INDEPENDENT.CO.UK ‘Panorama’ special postponed as Reform UK party faces row over candidate who claimed UK would have been ‘better off’ if it had...   Waaahhhh
    • i'd say put lowells to strict proof of where the payment came from. cant hurt to send SB letter, even if proved not. at least they get your correct address. they'd have to link the old IVA times scale to a payment  these IVA F&F pots (if thats where it came from) most mugs dont even know they are not only taking most of your payments on fees but also creaming money off to supposedly offer F&F's.  funny when the IVA fails or is complete these sums of money in F&F pots never get given back or even mentions... these IVA firm directors esp with regard to knightsbridge and creditfix were fined and struck off more times than Paul Burdell of Link Fame and still managed to continue to scam people.
    • Hi everyone, I received a charge certificate with a charge of £165  in April 2022 however I never received a PCN and NTO before that. I responded by requesting original PCN reissued in the hope of getting discounted rate which was refused however I was offered to pay £110. I received an Order of Recovery in May 2023 and submitted a witness statement on time by email to get the original PCN re-issued. I received a Notice of Enforcement in February 2024 I contacted TEC that I had submitted TE9 on time and they advised me to submit a late witness statement and TE7. I did as advised and also attached the original email and witness statement as proof to show that I had submitted my witness statement on time. The council disputed my late witness statement by saying that I likely received the PCN and that I did not submit a valid late witness statement without specifying why it's not valid. The court refused my late witness statement without giving any reasoning behind their decision (so much for the transparency). This is really outrageous as I did attach the proof of submitting the witness statement on time and it seems like the court just decided without looking at the case files. Can someone please advise me what should I do now? Any help is appreciated. I have attached all the documents below.   Documents.pdf
    • Will the real criminals please stand   Biden 🤣GUILTY on all counts    Come September remember Americans don’t like tax dodgers 🤣
    • You of course ignore the fact that Farage actually helped raise £100,000 so that WW11 Veterans could actually attend the celebrations    Meanwhile oh to be in France 🤣  
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Hello to the group - I'm new and in need of help!!!


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 6519 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Hi to everyone. my name is Mo and I'm need of help and advice concerning a certain debt collection agency. It is a very long winded story so thank you for taking the time to read it.

Here goes .........

In 1999 my husband took out a loan with Welcome finance for £500. The repayments were £79 per month for 12 months. Everything was going great and the repayments were made on time but did fall behind with a payment when he changed jobs. Then in August 1999 out of the blue he suffered a huge heart attack and had to a by-pass op. The job he was doing at the time was comission based and was probationary so sick pay was out of the question.Our income went down to £60 per week at one point until benefits were sorted out. The loan had payment protection on so we made a claim for sickness. The policy didn't cover the first 30 days and we didn't have any money to bring it up to date but it was the least of our wories at the time. Every month he had to produce sick notes which continued until the loan was paid by the insurance. But there were still 2 payments outstanding. We then received a letter & statement from them informing us he owed them £750. We thought they had overlooked the fact that the insurance had paid it off BUT this was the interest acrued on the 2 missed payments. We didn't fully understand and still don't know how this worked as to us the £79 monthly payment included the interest.

 

In the end we took it to a solicitor (with all the associated paperwork) and even he couldn't fully understand but he put our case to them that we owed them only the 2 missed payments totalling £158. after much to-ing and fro-ing they agreed to accept £159 but wanted it in a lump sum. Well we couldn't afford to pull this amount out as we were on rock bottom and asked if we could pay by installements but they refused - it had to be paid in full. The solicitor lost interest in the case and it was never resolved. I can't really remember what correspondance we got from them after that but whenever we got any we responded with the fact we only owed £159 not the £750 they were asking for.

Then it all went quiet................

 

Until last year. My husbands son got a letter from a debt collection agency called Ruthbridge demanding £751. He lives 30 miles away from us. He rang them asking what the hell it was all about and in the end they admitted he wasn't the person they were after. He shares the same first name but not the same birthday (obviously). They had done a trace looking for my husband at his previous address and linked his son's address. But we hadn't gone anywhere to warrant them looking for him. He was on the electoral register, was at home most of the time if they wanted to do a doorstep visit ???? Anyway it caused a lot of upset and his son was promised that it wouldn't happen again and he would not be linked to the case.

But it did happen again at exactly the same time this year - again his son rang and complained. Only this time I rang them to tell them that he had never moved from the original address and to send all correspondance to him.

So they sent him a letter dated 31st July demanding £751 and that if he didn;t contact them in 7 days then they would take it to court. They didn't even give him a chance to respond in the 7 days because 3 days later another letter arrived from them dated 2nd August informing him that they had advised their client (Welcome) to commence bankruptcy proceedings. He rang up and asked them to talk to me on his behalf to be told they are proceeding to bankruptcy regardless. I argued with her about what happened all those years ago but she wouldn't budge. I asked if we could sort this by installments but all she could offer was a settlement figure of £563 to be paid by 18th August. If it wasn't paid by then it would be the original figure of £751 by the end of August and if no payment is received by this date then they would proceed to bankruptcy.

 

Can anyone out there advise me how we stand on this. I feel that there are a lot of unfair practices taken place here including the recent letters (2 in one week stating different things) and the data protection act (pursuing the wrong person). This is really scaring me and I would appreciate any help.

Link to post
Share on other sites

What you need to do is write to them this:

 

 

"I do not acknowledge ANY debt to your company. I require you to supply the following documentation before I will correspond further on this matter:

 

 

1. You must supply me with a true copy of the alleged agreement you refer to. This is my right and your obligation to supply a copy of the agreement under the legislation contained within s.78 (1) Consumer Credit Act 1974 (s.77 (1) for fixed sum credit) - your obligation also extends to providing a statement of account. I enclose a £1 postal order in payment of the statutory fee, PO Serial Number xxxxx.

 

 

2. A signed true copy of the deed of assignment of the above referenced agreement that you allege exists. *

 

3. You are notified that you are obliged to supply these documents, whether you are the original creditor or not under S189 of the CCA 1974.

 

 

Non-compliance with my request is a criminal offence under the above Act and will result in a report being submitted to the relevant statutory authorities.

 

 

As you are aware, a credit agreement that is not properly documented and signed by the customer is totally unenforceable under the CCA and therefore is a complete defence to any court claim that is issued.

 

Take note at this stage, that any legal action you may contemplate will be both vigorously defended and contested. "

 

 

*The deed of assignment line should only be used if the debt has been purchased by a debt collection agency.

If they fail to provide the copy agreement within 12 days then court action can only take place with permission of a judge. After 30 days the creditor commits a criminal offence and can be reported to the OFT and Trading Standards.

Go from there, and let us know how you get on. Don't let them intimidate you, and do NOT phone them, or accept any phone call from them! If they call you, tell them you will only accept communications in writing and put the phone down. When you write to them, do NOT give them any phone numbers.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi there,

Thank you so much for replying so quickly. I will do that tomorrow and send it recorded delivery. What a fantastic site. I will keep you up to date with the progress.

Thanks again.

Mo.;):)

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...