Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Yes you should take this view, but this is nothing to worry about you will be fine. you have a very well edited WX im sure although I haven't actually looked at it because I can't seem to work out which one is the new one anymore, although I do remember something previously. however if i remember it right its just a lost parcel via packlink and no insurance which frankly is pretty straightforward and should be a copy of farooq v evri. Have I understood the case right? Please tell me if not as there is rather a lot on this forum
    • well in every other thread advocate or not evri always send a cpr27.9 because they never turn up. I don't think we've seen a thread here without one. Maybe @BankFodder can tell me if i've missed one, but all of the ones I can remember there has been a cpr 27.9 notice even when an advocate has attended and from my own knowledge also I've always had CPR 27.9 advocate or not. I dont think there is a single thread on this forum where evri have shown up themselves and similarly I don't think there is a single thread where they dont send notice (aside from this)
    • OK, thanks.  Jake Burgess is well known to us - and well despised. Friday would be great as then there would be the weekend to tweak things. 👍
    • Thanks FTMDave.  VCS's WS was from Jake Burgess.  I will draft my WS and share with copies of court order, and VCS's exhibits asap.  I'm away tomorrow so more likely Friday.  Thanks again for the advice   
    • Thanks. Time to move on this. 1.  You need to tweak the magnificent WS that dx suggested.  Adapt it to your case.  It should take you about half an hour (I recently wrote a WS from scratch during a train journey which wasn't optimum 😂 with lots of cross referencing and it took me an hour an half, you have one already cooked thanks to dx). 2.  We will add bits to ridicule VCS's WS - it's rich that they moan about your defence being standard when their Particulars of Claim are too and also include the rubbish about keeper/driver that has been criticised numerous times by the courts. 3.  Who wrote their WS?  Was it Mohammed Wali or Ambreen Arshad or have they got someone new? 4.  We need to see a good chunk of VCS's exhibits.  I don't get why we have to keep asking you for things rather than them being volunteered.  Isn't it obvious that we can't help you compile a decent WS if we can't see what the other side is arguing?  All their silly signs aren't needed, but any contract with the landowner is important as are all the photos of your vehicle. 5.  You've never shown us the court order which fixes the hearing date.  It should be obvious we need to see what the court has ordered.  This is the second time we've asked. 6.  VCS were using Elms Legal.  Are Elms Legal still involved? 
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

full and final settlement offer


twirlypen
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 5287 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Hello advice please

 

I have had a response to my preliminary claim for a refund from HSBC for a full anf final settlement of £800 my claim is for £940.50.

 

The guidance says I should accept this amount but proceed with my claim (I have sent the LBA, they crossed over in the post). Should I include a covering letter when I accept the settlement letting them know that I plan to proceed with a county court claim unless they offer the full amount? Is there a form of words I should use?:?:

 

Have tried to get an answer looking through the forum and FAQ's etc and can't see anything specific. Really don't want to get it wrong.

 

many thanks. :)

twirlypen :)

Link to post
Share on other sites

Guest Lueeze

If you have sent the LBA then they will know you are proceeding to claim. They will not pay you anything even if you write to them saying you I accept the £800 but still claim the remainder.

 

Just file in court when the 14 days are up, and if you have not done so please start your own diary thread to ask these questions as this is only for meeting and greeting newbies

 

Good Luck

 

Lou xxxx

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 2 years later...

I am vry interested in this matter of full and final settlement. I paid council tax (a payment of recovered beneft) with a cheque stating in FFS in the back and wrote a letter confirming this. The council cshed the cheque both four months later claimed a whole lot more. It seems that everything hinges on how long after they informed me of their intentions. Does anyone know anything about this?

Link to post
Share on other sites

I was researching the same thing cos I got fed up with Lloyds not even responding to my offers of decent full and finals so - as a hurry up - said I'd put in the Jan payments on three debts as F&Fs and - if they cashed them - that would be the end of the matter. They cashed them late December and haven't come back to me in any way - yet. (Too busy counting their bonuses.) But I looked this up online and most of these 'de facto' rather than properly negotiated full and finals related to the building industry, as you might expect. There the time limit seems to be around two weeks: someone got a cheque, kept it for two weeks, then banked it and still held out their hand. The judge ruled that they should have returned it immediately if they didn't agree it was a full and final, or told the giver of the cheque when they banked it that he was taking it on account and didn't agree to it being a full and final. But the fact he kept it two weeks without returning it and banked it was significant. (Do some googling on the subject, it will give you the ruling where he says that.) And he said the fact they banked it meant they accepted it was a full and final.

 

A barrister friend of mine said Lloyds will come back when they realise they haven't got the Feb payments and they probably will - but I will give them a run for the money with the fact they banked them knowing the terms - if they did it not taking enough care or a menial doing it then I will say that I wrote to the head honcho and I can hardly be expected to factor in their own incompetence. If I find the refs for the judge's quote on banking f&f's and then coming back with hands open I'll get back to you, Linda

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks for your message. Everything I have read seems to point to the fact that because they did not say it was being cashed as a payment on account and they did not ask for more money until nearly four months later - they do not have a right to claim any more. I have put this to the clerk to the Tribunal and she is going to ask the judge for directions. Keep your fingers crossed for me!

Link to post
Share on other sites

I certainly will! Let me know how you get on. I did try and find that ruling that I mentioned where the judge deffo says: 'if you banked a cheque that was given as a full and final that means you accepted the terms' - but I couldn't locate it. But they surely have to do their jobs right and look at what they're banking? I know I tried that with EDF and they sent the cheque back by return of post! I sometimes wonder if even asking for more money after cashing a full and final is potentially fraudulent (kind of extortionate) under the new Fraud Act 2006 - as they're really asking for money they're no longer due after entering into a contract whereby they've accepted a full and final payment. Good luck! Linda

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 9 months later...

I will move your thread over to the Hsbc forum. :)

HOW TO...DUMMIES GUIDE TO CAG...Read here

STEP BY STEP GUIDE...Read here

F&Q's... Read here

EVERYTHING YOU NEED THE A~Z GUIDE...Read here

 

Go to our Cag Toolbar Download page here

 

Please don't forget this site is run on DONATIONS If this site has helped in any way, then please give a little back. ;-)

Any opinions are without prejudice & without liability. All I know has come from this site. If you are unsure, please seek professional advice. .

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...