Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • I disagree with the charge and also the statements sent. Firstly I have not received any correspondence from DVLA especially a statutory notice dated 2/5/2024 or a notice 16/5/2024 voiding my licence if I had I would have responded within this timeframe. The only letter received was the single justice procedure notice dated the 29.5.2024 this was received on 4.6.2024. I also disagree with the statement that tax was dishonoured through invalid indemnity claim. I disagree that the licence be voided I purchased the vehicle in Jan 2024 from RDA car sales Pontefract with agreement to collect the car on the 28.1.2024. The garage taxed the vehicle on the 25.1.24 for eleven payments on direct debit  using my debit card on my behalf. £62.18 was the initial payment on 8.2.24  and £31 per month thereafter the second payment was 1.3.24.This would run from Jan 24 to Dec 24 and a total of £372.75, therefore the car was clearly taxed before  I took the car away After checking one of my vehicle apps  I could see the vehicle was showing as untaxed it later transpired that DVLA had cancelled my tax , without reason and I did not receive any correspondence from DVLA to state why it was cancelled or when. The original payment of £62.18 had gone through and verified by my bank Lloyds so this payment was not declined. I then set up the direct debit again straight away at my local post office branch on 15.2.2024 the first payment was £31 on 1.3.2024 and subsequent payments up to Feb 2025 with a total of £372.75 which was the same total as the original DD that was set up in Jan, Therefore I claimed the £62.18 back from my bank as an indemnity claim as this payment was from the original cancelled tax from DVLA and had been cancelled . I have checked my bank account at Lloyds and every payment since Jan 24  up to date has been taken with none rejected as follows: 8.2.24 - £62.15 1.3.24 - £31.09 2.4.24 - £31.06 1.5.24 - £31.06 3.6.23-£31.06 I have paper copies of the original DD set up conformation plus a breakdown of payments per month , and a paper copy of the second DD setup with breakdown of payments plus a receipt from the post office.I can also provide bank statements showing each payment to DVLA I also ask that my licence be reinstated due to the above  
    • You know hes had it when they call out those willing to say anything even claiming tories have reduced taxes on live tv AS Salmonella says: The Conservative Party must embrace Nigel Farage to “unite the right”, Suella Braverman has urged, following a disastrous few days for Rishi Sunak. The former home secretary told The Times there was “not much difference” between the new Reform UK leader’s policies and those of the Tories, as senior Conservatives start debating the future of the party. hers.   AND Goves replacement gets caught booking in an airbnb to claim he lives locally .. as of yesterday you can rent it yourself in late July - as he'll either be gone or claiming taxpayer funded expenses for a house Alongside pictures of himself entering a house, Mr McGuinness said Surrey Heath residents “rightly expect their MP to be a part of their community”. - So whens farage getting around to renting (and subletting) a clacton beach hut?   Gove’s replacement caught out on constituency house claim as home found on Airbnb WWW.INDEPENDENT.CO.UK Social media users quickly pointed out house Ed McGuinness had posted photos in was available to rent     As Douglas Ross says he'll stand down in scotland - if he wins a Westminster seat - such devotion.
    • I've completed a draft copy to defend and will post up here for review.  Looking over the dates and payments this all stemmed from DVLA cancelling in Feb , whereby I set up a new DD in Feb hence the overlap, why they cancelled when I paid originally in Jan I have no idea. Anyway now stuck with pending court action and a suspended licence . I am also firing off a letter to DVLa recorded disputing the licence revoke
    • Thank you both for your expert knowledge and understanding. You're fighting the good fight by standing up for people like me and others with limited knowledge of this stuff. I thank you. I know all my DVLA details are good. I recently (last year) renewed my license, and my car's V5 is current with the correct details; the same is valid for my partner. I'll continue to ignore the love letters 😂 and won't let it bother either me or my partner.  I'll revisit this post if/when I get a letter of claim.  F**k ém.
    • Please check back later on today for a fuller response and some edits
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

CL Finance & HSBC


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 5471 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

In circa 2000, unknown to me my wife managed to get into a financial tangle after becoming redundant which resulted in her going overdrawn on a current account with the HSBC. She was continually stung with penalty charges which dramatically increased the amount owed (an original overdraft of something like £2000 is now a debt of £6300, even after 9 or so years regular payments). HSBC then apparently offered her a personal loan to pay off the overdraft (all over the telephone - no paperwork). She accepted the 'offer' and of course, she was unable to keep up on the repayments, the debt spiralled and ultimately ended up assigned to CL Finance in September 2007.

 

I became involved when my wife owned up to me and told me CL were putting her under severe pressure to keep increasing repayments she could not afford. My first move was to try to determine indebtedness and how much was due to penalty charges, which was impossible due to lack of paper trail. At this time I am sure anyone could have written to my wife demanding money and she would have been so frightened she would have paid without any query.

 

Because I could not verify how much the original debt or charges were for, or indeed find any details whatsoever I CCA'd CL Finance in March this year. They failed to respond until this morning when they sent a letter (plus the usual red-print Final Demand for the whole outstanding balance).

 

They acknowledged my CCA request and have stated that 'this account is an amalgamation of personal loan and an overdraft' and they state, an overdraft is exempt from Part V of the Consumer Credit Act 1974 because an overdraft does not require a formal written agreement to be enter into, therefore there are no documents available.

 

In respect of the personal loan element, they claim the HSBC has reported to them that as the agreement was opened more than 6 years ago they, the HSBC, have no documents available because they are not obliged to retain records after 6 years. This, they report, does not make the original agreement void or unenforceable. However, my wife is certain she never signed any agreements whatsoever anyway.

 

Is a debt that cannot be verified properly enforceable? We have no idea whatsover what the original amounts involved were for and how much has been added in charges, and how much has been paid.

 

Any advice would be most helpful.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Firstly, hello and welcome to CAG.

 

This shows why the financial institutions got themselves into so much bother.

 

Starting at the beginning, to discover what/if any charges have been applied to the account you would need to send a SAR to the original creditor, the new owner or the DCA responsible for the management of the account will generally have little more than contact details and amount outstanding. The SAR will cost £10.

 

On the legalities of the CCA etc. Nice try but no cigar!!!

 

When each of these arrangements was orginally entered into they would have been covered by the terms and conditions of an agreement. in the case of the overdraft this may have been little more than a letter from the bank explaining the T&C of the overdraft facility.

 

Whilst the DCA is correct about the Overdraft not being covered by the CCA, the account ceased to be an overdraft when they "Amlagamated" it, the same is true for the Personal Loan.

 

The agreements (whether covered by the CCA or not) would have been terminated at the point of amalgamation, those accounts would cease to exist and therefore any liabilities attached to them would be transferred to the new "amalgamation" agreement.

 

Still with me? Good!!

 

Since both the Overdraft and the personal loan were both contracts in law, any changes applied by the lenders to the terms and conditions of either contract must be documented. If the change to the contract is fundamental it would require the permission of all parties concerned ie a new agreement.

 

So to clarify:

 

Either the debt is two debts and half is covered by the CCA and the other by the T&C of the overdraft facility and you have a right to see both documents.

 

or

 

The debt is a single entity and is covered by the original T&C and the newly revised agreement for the amalgamated amount and you still have a right to see all documents pertaining to:

The original accounts,

The closure of the original accounts

The creation of a new credit facility and the CCA covering it.

 

In other words they should have a perfect paper trail showing where the money went and how it was handled.

 

They are b*llsh*tting you, you have rights and they are denying you those rights - I would suggest that you send them another letter requesting all documents from all three agreements

 

As the wise and wonderful Bart Man said "damned if you do and damned if you don't"

Link to post
Share on other sites

Fantastic! You've eased my and more importantly my wife's minds considerably.

 

I'll write as you suggest and post any replies they may send (I don't suppose they'll give up easily!)

 

I am very grateful.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Don't be surprised if they do come up with something equally ludicrous, These people are paid on commission so they will keep on trying.

 

Standard CAG rules apply - nothing on the phone, everything in writing and keep copies of everything. If they've already stated one case in writing and they then realise oops.....and put another excuse in writing, you have a cast iron, solid, bomb proof case if they should stupidly take you to court.

 

Also remember if they are stating that the debts have been amalgamated, then the original accounts have been cancelled and you are no longer liable for them, only for the new amount (if there is an agreement)

 

You need to request copies of the original agreements, the document that your wife signed to agree to the amalgamation of the accounts and the terms and conditions for the new amalgamated amount.

Link to post
Share on other sites

It might also be worth sending a SAR to HSBC too - you can find this here - http://www.consumerforums.com/resources/templates-library/86-debt-collectors/576-subject-access-request-debt-a-dca Unfortunately this costs £10 - send postal orders and send recorded / special delivery to the Data Compliance Manager at their head office....

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...