Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Items for sale include five rare Ferraris and a pair of Air Jordan sneakers signed by Michael Jordan.View the full article
    • TECHZONE BUXTON LTD overview - Find and update company information - GOV.UK FIND-AND-UPDATE.COMPANY-INFORMATION.SERVICE.GOV.UK TECHZONE BUXTON LTD - Free company information from Companies House including registered office address, filing history, accounts, annual... thread title updated. dx
    • next time dont upload 19 single page pdfs use the sites listed on upload to merge them into one multipage pdf.. we aint got all day to download load single page files 2024-01-15 DBCLegal SAR.pdf
    • If you have not kept the original PCN you can always send an SAR to Excel and they have to send you all the info they have on you within a month. failure to do so can lead to you being able to sue them for their failure.......................................nice irony.
    • Thank you and well done  for posting up all those notices it must have have taken you ages.. The entrance sign is very helpful since the headline states                    FREE PARKING FOR CUSTOMERS ONLY in capitals with not time limit mentioned. Underneath and not in capitals they then give the actual times of parking which would not be possible to read when driving into the car park unless you actually stopped and read them. Very unlikely especially arriving at 5.30 pm with possibly other cars behind. On top of that the Notice goes on to say that the terms and conditions are inside the car park so the entrance sign cannot offer a contract it is merely an offer to treat. Inside the car park the signs are mostly too high up and the font size too small to be able to read much of their signs. DCBL have not shown a single sign that can be read on their SAR. Although as they show photographs which were taken the year after your alleged breach we do not know what the signs were when you were there. For instance the new signs showed the charge was then £100 whereas your PCN was for £85. Who knows, when you were there perhaps the time was for 3 hours. They were asked to produce  planning permission which would have been necessary for the ANPR cameras alone and didn't do so. Nor did they provide a copy of the contract-DCBL  "deeming them disproportionate or not relevant to the substantive issues in the dispute" How arrogant and untruthful is that? The contract and planning permission could be vital to having the claim thrown out. I can find no trace of planning permission for the signs nor the cameras on Tonbridge Council planning portal. and the contract of course is highly relevant since some contracts advise the parking rouges that they cannot take motorists to Court. I understand that Europarks are now running that car park which means that nexus didn't  last long before being thrown out.....................................
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
        • Like
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
        • Like
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Insurance claim nightmare


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 5461 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Hi

Not sure if you can help or not but I have a query regarding a car insurance claim I am currently putting in for.

On 18th May 2009 I was approaching a roundabout on a main road where I was driven into the back of by the car behind me. The insurance repair estimates have been between £1k and £1.5k. I have 2 witnesses to the incident and reported the accident to the Police plus my insurance company within 1 hour (earliest opportunity). The other driver did stop and we had a brief chat.

After reporting the accident, my insurance company have managed to contact the 3rd party insurance company successfully who identified it as one of their customers who to this day have not acknowledged any communication by his insurance company. As a result the claim is still up in the air although I do appreciate these things aren’t sorted over night.

My concern is that I have since been told by the solicitor acting on behalf of my insurance company that the 3rd party insurance company have a 4month window in which they have to get in contact with their customer and report back to my insurance company. Because I am only 3rd PF&T cover I can’t claim on my insurance in the interim to get my car fixed. My MoT runs out on 25th June 2009 and I am not in a financial position to pay for the repairs myself, therefore leaving me without a car from 25th June.

I find this frustrating as the accident was not my fault, yet I am the one being inconvenienced and potentially without transport for anything up to 4 months.

Where do I stand with this and is there anything I can do to speed things up? I have been told NOT to contact the 3rd Party insurers OR my own insurance company during this period and that my insurers will contact me when they hear something. The solicitor also told me there is nothing I can do and if I want to get my car on the road I have to pay for it myself and try and claim it back when things get moving.

Any advice appreciated.

Many thanks

Link to post
Share on other sites

OK firstly the 4 month window your solicitor refers to is common among most (but not all insurers), basically an insurance company cannot act until they receive a report (usually a claim form) from their policyholder. Some Companies will refuse to grant indemnity (ie sort out a claim) if the accident isn't reported within this period, others will take a more lenient view.

 

So unless and until the other party fills in a claim form and notifies their insurers they will not (and can not) do anything.

 

There is no point in you contacting your own insurers since you are TPF&T, you have a duty to notify them about the claim but after that it's down to you to sort out the repairs to your car.

 

You can speed it up by persuing the third party direct, write to them hold them responsible and send them an estimate. Give them 14 days to respond and tell them if you don't hear from them in this period you will assume they accept the estimate and will authorise repairs.

 

If you still don't hear anything your ultimate action is to issue County Court Proceedings direct on the third party, either before or after repairs have been carried out.

 

Mossy

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks very much for the reply. Useful info.

 

Just one thing. The solicitor activing on behalf of my claim/insurance company told me categorically not to contact the third party insurer as it might compromise my claim. I personally find this unsupportive and unhelpful advice but as a result, so far, have not contacted them as the solicitor as mentioned above is already getting annoyed with me for chasing her up! even told me she was fed up with hearing my voice! charming!

 

Cheers

Link to post
Share on other sites

If you have appointed a solicitor to act on your behalf and recover your uninsured losses then if you start contacting the other party's insurance company it will COMPLICATE and DUPLICATE things, it will in no way compromise or prejudice your claim.

 

Your solicitor needs to be more proactive and chase the third party up by writing threatening letters that will prompt them into informing their insurers.

 

Mossy

Link to post
Share on other sites

See this is what I thought! The solicitor was allocated to me as my insurance company works in partnership with Minster Law Solicitors. Therefore, is not one i appointed myself. I agree they should be chasing and taking my intersts as their priority regarding my claim.

 

However...........She said she won`t do this as they have a policy that states the third party insurers have a 4 month period in which to respond to my claim. Then, and only then, will this solicitor chase the 3rd party insurance. in the meantime I have to sit and wait!

 

I appreciate the advice you have supplied and shall ponder on which why to appraoch this based on what you have said. One thing for sure is that I won`t be insuring my car with Smart People Budget next year!

Link to post
Share on other sites

See this is what I thought! The solicitor was allocated to me as my insurance company works in partnership with Minster Law Solicitors. Therefore, is not one i appointed myself. I agree they should be chasing and taking my intersts as their priority regarding my claim.

 

However...........She said she won`t do this as they have a policy that states the third party insurers have a 4 month period in which to respond to my claim. Then, and only then, will this solicitor chase the 3rd party insurance. in the meantime I have to sit and wait!

 

I appreciate the advice you have supplied and shall ponder on which why to appraoch this based on what you have said. One thing for sure is that I won`t be insuring my car with Smart People Budget next year!

 

Oh my God Minster Law!!!!!

 

I had a really bad experience with them when they were appointed to recover unisured losses for a good friend of mine, they gave bad advice and only when I rang and told them they were wrong did they finally get their finger out and do something.

 

I'll wish you the very best of luck (I think you will need it)

 

Mossy

Link to post
Share on other sites

Duely noted! Hope for my sake you didn`t have the same person i have got then! won`t inciminate her on the tinterweb but she doesn`t fill me with confidence!

 

Thanks for your advice though :-)

 

cheers

Link to post
Share on other sites

Me again, you mentioned about taking County Court preceedings against the 3rd party if he still fails to get in contact. Could i do this through his insurance company as I don`t have his address details as I guess data protection will prevent them from giving it to me otehrwise.

 

Alan

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...