Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Thank you very much for your letter in regard to the above mentioned shipment.  Due to the high volume of parcels coursing through the courier network each day, undergoing continuous processing and handling, certain packages may experience delays or even can get lost in the course of this journey. Please note that due to the time that has passed, this shipment has been declared as lost.  I have today processed the claim and made offers to the value of £75 as a goodwill gesture without prejudice. I do acknowledge that you have mentioned in your letter that the value was higher, however, you did not take out any protection to that amount. The protection for this shipment was £20 and we will not be increasing our goodwill offer any further.    Please log into your account online in order to accept our offer. Once accepted, our accounts department will process the claim accordingly. The claim payment will be processed and received within 7 working days.                                  In addition, a refund of the carriage fee will be processed as a separate payment and will be received within 3 working days.  If I can further assist, please feel free to contact me.   I have also just noticed that yesterday afternoon they sent me an email stating that "after my request" they have refunded the cost of shipping. I did not request the refund so will mention that in my letter as well.
    • Hi I had to leave Dubai back in 2011, during the financial crisis. And only now have I received a letter from IDRWW. Is this anything to worry about about as I have 2 years left until it’s been 15 years(statute barred in Dubai). Worried as just got a mortgage 2 years ago. Could they force me in to bankruptcy? Red lots of different threads on here. And unsure what true and what isn’t. 
    • Not that TOR will see this now he's thrown in the hand grenade. Rayner has plenty of female supporters on X, for a start. As for the council and HMRC, fair enough and I thought Rayner was already in touch with them. That's where it should be dealt with, not the police force. @tobyjugg2 Daniel Finkelstein thinks the same as you about tax. The Fiver theory. How the Fiver Theory explains this election campaign ARCHIVE.PH archived 28 May 2024 17:36:51 UTC  
    • Often with the Likes of Lowells/ Overdales that 'proof' doesn't stand up to scrutiny.   Think about it like a game of poker, they want to intimidate you into folding and giving up as soon as possible, and just get you to pay up and roll over, that is their business model, make you think your cards are rubbish. What they don't expect, and their business isn't set up for it, is for a defendant to find this place and to learn that they have an amazing set of cards to play. Overdales don't have an infinite number of lawyers, paralegals etc, and the time / money to spend on expensive court cases, that they are highly likely to lose, hence how hard they will try to get you to roll over.  Even to the extent of faking documents, which they need to do because the debts that they purchased were so cheap, in the first place. Nevertheless it works in most cases, most people chicken out, when they are so close to winning, and a holding defence is like slowly showing Overdales your first card, and a marker of intention that this could get tricky for them. In fact it may be,  although by no means guaranteed that it won't even go any further than that.  Even if it does, what they send you back will almost certainly have more holes than Swiss Cheese, and if with the help you receive here, you can identify those weaknesses and get the whole thing tossed in the bin.
    • So Rayner who is don’t forget still being investigated by the local council and HMRC  is now begging to save her seat Not a WOMAN in sight in this video other than Rayner  Farage is utterly correct this country’s values are non existent in her seat   Rayner Pleads With Muslim Voters as Pressure From Galloway Grows – Guido Fawkes ORDER-ORDER.COM Guido has obtained a leaked tape from inside a meeting between Angela Rayner and Muslim voters in Ashton-under-Lyne...  
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Urgent Advice Needed


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 5481 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Hello i am in court on tuesday 12-05-2009 . It is regarding a loan with tesco.It is a joint loan, but tesco are only chasing me.We are paying our debts through payplan.

 

I already have a ccj from tesco but it was for the exact amount paypal suggested.Tesco immideatly asked for tit to go back to court which is tuesday.

 

tesco solicitors sent me some paperwork today stating they dont accept the ccj payment and want the whole amount, so they can go for a charging order.They are also asking the court to vary the order forthwith.

It also says if the court is minded to grant an installment order, leave is requested to apply for a charging order but not to be enforced if payments are maintaned.

 

If our home is sold there wouldbe no money left as we have a secured loan.We also have 2 young childern, and my wife is sick and has been for 10 years now.

 

Any help welcome please

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi, yes they did get a ccj granted it was for exactly the same amount as I pay on payplan. But tesco immidiatly applied to go back to court.Paypal asked for it to be heard in my local court. That is this coming wednesday.I put wrong date on initial post.

 

Tesco are going for the whole amount so they can get a charging order.

 

Just like to know what i could say to the judge in my defence.I have acted as responsibly as i can by getting advice and help from paypal and have paid on time for the last 6 months since my plan started.

 

All my other creditors 12 of them have been ok, its just tesco.

Link to post
Share on other sites

The ccj was granted 2 months ago in northampton, im happy with the ccj as much as i can be.It was for the exact amount i can afford.CCJ's arnet good but my credit is ruined anyway now.

 

I just fear being made homeless by tesco, i have a sick wife and 2 small children

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi there,

 

I'm presuming you admitted to the debt or passed the Court paperwork onto Payplan to deal with.

 

Firstly, you won't be made homeless.

 

Judges have been advised in the current economic climate to be cautious about giving Charging Orders and then issuing Enforcement of Sale orders..........you will NOT be homeless !

 

So try not to worry about your home.

 

Moving on to what you wish to do about the situation you are in.

You have three options :-

 

1/ You could apply for a set aside of the Count Court Judgment. This would cost £75.00 though.

 

2/ You could oppose the Order to vary and thus the Charging Order.

 

3/ Do nothing and let the situation run its course.

 

 

If you opt to set aside the CCJ, you would need to demonstrate why you did not oppse the CCJ at the time.........their could be numerous reasons for this e.g. you didn't know your legal rights, poor advice from Payplan etc. If you did go for this option, it would cost £75.00 for the set aside application and some letter writing.

 

If you don't wish to oppose the CCJ but decide to oppose the Order to vary, then you have several points you can make to the court. You can ask for an installment order, which is where you pay an amount set by the court to the creditor every month.

 

There are several other points you can make to the court as well to oppose Tesco's wish for a Charging Order.

 

Have a look at the links below on Charging Orders and what grounds you may oppose them-

 

Debt Factsheets - Charging orders in the county court

 

National Debtline England & Wales | Debt Advice | Factsheet 15 Charging Orders In The County Court

 

and this gem of a post ( Courtesy of FunkyFox ) -

 

http://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk...t-1848474.html

 

 

From your original post, option 3 is a non starter.

Edited by supasnooper
typo

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Yes.

 

Object strenuously and ask that the judge opts for an instalment order for a monthly payment you can afford. !!

 

Complete the I&E form ( make sure it leaves you paying what you can afford - add a bit extra on all the items to cover inflation ;) ) in the link below, print two copies ( one for the judge and one for you - Tesco's don't get one as they aren't entitled to one !) and take them with you.

 

http://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/forum/attachment.php?attachmentid=1712&d=1199396120

 

 

If the installment order is granted, get the bank details straight away.

 

If they can't supply them in front of the judge, ask for the first payment to be set 28 days after receipt of the bank details being furnished and then get a date set for regular payment.

This must be done in front of the judge as it will then be on the court records.

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hello all,

 

Just come back from court.i was absolutly terrified, why I dont know.When i got there its was just a waiting area in some offices.There were lots of other people from all walks of life waiting to be seen.

 

Tesco solicitor came and had a word, she was very nice.So I went into see the judge and she was very nice.

 

So what the judge decided was I think ?. An installment order for the same amount I offered. She gave permision for tesco to apply for a charging order if I didnt pay the installment order.She also noted that the sale of the house would not be aloud.

 

I think that is basically what was said.I was so nervous, its escaped me a bit.

 

So will they send a new judgment out??

 

Thanks for the reply's

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hello all,

 

 

So what the judge decided was I think ?. An installment order for the same amount I offered. She gave permision for tesco to apply for a charging order if I didnt pay the installment order.She also noted that the sale of the house would not be aloud.

 

well dun. did u do as Snoops said above? if not get those payment details asap, set up the payment and dont miss a any.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hello all,

 

Just come back from court.i was absolutly terrified, why I dont know.When i got there its was just a waiting area in some offices.There were lots of other people from all walks of life waiting to be seen.

 

Tesco solicitor came and had a word, she was very nice.So I went into see the judge and she was very nice.

 

So what the judge decided was I think ?. An installment order for the same amount I offered. She gave permision for tesco to apply for a charging order if I didnt pay the installment order.She also noted that the sale of the house would not be aloud.

 

I think that is basically what was said.I was so nervous, its escaped me a bit.

 

So will they send a new judgment out??

 

Thanks for the reply's

 

Well done, that's excellent news !!

 

Hope you managed to get all the payment details from Tesco's.

 

The court will send out a Judgment Order stating what was decided today so both sides are aware.

 

If you have not got the payment details from Tesco's, then write to them and ask for them.

 

If they do not respond, within 28 days from today, send them a cheque by Recorded Delivery at least and another request for payment details.

 

If they refuse to comply, write the court for the attention of the Judge who heard your case asking them to order tesco's to disclose the details required.

 

 

If \ Once the payment details are disclosed , then do feel free to set up a Standing Order for the amount (do NOT do a Direct debit).

 

Enjoy your evening.

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...