Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like

Capp Vs Clydesdale Finance scottish charges reclaim


Capp
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 6347 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

This is for a Jessops store card.

 

I have followed all the steps and used the letter templates so helpfully provided on this site and gotten to the point where I was about to fill out the moneyclaim form and move forward with that. It was at this point that I received what appears to be a pretty standard partial offer, half the amount I was claiming for etc etc.

 

I've searched the forums, but not had much luck finding how to handle this. The consensus is that you accept the offer but inform them that you will still be claiming for the remainder. I'm not sure how to go about this.

 

How do I ensure that if I use moneyclaim for the remainder that they will honour their offer and pay the half that they said they would? Should I write the letter accepting their offer but informing them I'm still going to claim, then wait for a response...or just go straight to money claim for the amount outstanding. Is there a template letter for this partial offer situation that I have some how managed to miss?

 

Any advice on how to proceed would be most appreciated.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I have one more question about this partial offer situation. If I accept the parital offer as partial only and then start proceedings, I assume I claim for just the half that they still owe me. What do I do to ensure that they pay the other half. I would hate to find myself in the situation where I win but end up with less than the full amount.

 

So do I claim for the full amount whilst accepting the partial offer?

Or do I claim for the remainder left after the parital offer?

 

Treacles Dad - there is a template letter in the library section of the forum.

Link to post
Share on other sites

They will probably withdraw their offer of half if you refuse to take it in full and final settlement.

 

If you haven't sent the letter yet, say you'll give them 7 days to reimburse the full amount before you start court proceedings.

 

If you have sent it already, just give them a few days to respond then claim the full amount through the court. Amounts can always be changed up until the allocation questionnaire stage I believe.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 4 weeks later...

Time for an update and another question.

 

I sent a reply to Clydesdale saying that I would only accept their offer of half the amount as a partial settlement. Then last week I recieved a letter appologising and stating that there was no more they could do. So off to money claim I went to start filling out the forms.

 

On Thursday I was suprised to get yet another correspondence including a cheque for the amount they originally offered!

 

My question is this. If I pay the cheque in will I still be able to go for the other half? I'm assuming that my letter to them accepting it as a partial settlement only is enough to allow me to do this.

Link to post
Share on other sites

You didn't say whenther you lodged the claim, or whether you were still form-filling. If you are certain that the payment you received is not conditional (ie full and final settlement) there's no problem with you accepting this as a payment to account and modifying your original claim to reflect the reduction of amout due to you.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I'm still form filling. I sent a letter saying that I would accept it as a partial payment only and that I would pursue the balance, a reference to this letter (i.e. "with regards to your letter dated 11th August") was made in a subsequent correspondence they sent me apologising for not being able to help with my complaint. I then received the cheque after that letter (it would appear that their left hand doesn't know what the right is doing). I'm pretty sure that covers me for going after the rest.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Another quick question for those more knowledgable than myself.

 

For my claim I want to claim interest. Having received payment for half the amount from Clydesdale, can I claim interest for the whole amount or just the remaining half? If its just for the remaining half should it be for the oldest of the charges or the newest?

Link to post
Share on other sites

If its just for the remaining half should it be for the oldest of the charges or the newest?

 

We're talking about the interest they've charged you in this transaction, or what you want to recover from them if successful? IMHO you have to be seen to be fair and reasonable, therefore if you declared a figure and they paid half to account, you cannot add additional interest until judgement is passed in your favour. So, if there was £50 that you're still pursuing them for, it STAYS at £50, and you note as part of the action you are also claiming costs and interest (usually 8% in Scotland). On a successful judgement, the court calculates the costs and interest at that time, you don't do anything.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 1 month later...

Ok then update and summary time. So the order of events is as follows.

 

*Sent out the data request.

*Got the details and totalled up all the charges for sending a letter. £405.

*Sent the letter requesting the charges be refunded.

*Received a standard replying denying any wrong doing.

*Sent the letter before Action.

*Received an offer for half the amount.

*Sent a letter accepting the offer as partial payment only.

*They declined paying anything.

*Then surprisingly receive a cheque for the partial amount which we then bank.

*Start money claim proceedings to get the remaining half back.

*They've just posted a defence. "The Defendant disputes the whole amount you have claimed."

 

Does anyone know what exactly it means when they dispute the whole amount? Are they doing this because they have already paid half? I'm just waiting for the documents to come through the post, and in the mean time starting to search the forum for the rather scary prospect of facing them in the small claims court (any links as to documents I should prerpare etc would be great).

 

Any advice would be helpful.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Did you modify the claim so that you acknowledged they had made a part payment? If you did - there's not a problem. If you kept the original amount as the claim and accespted their part-payment, I can see why they would be upset!

Link to post
Share on other sites

No, the claim was intiated after we received the part payment and only went after the remainder. The full amount was mentioned to ensure completeness, but definitely not claimed for.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 1 month later...

Time for an update and another query. So it was all going ahead as expected until this week. It would appear that Clydesdale have failed to file their AQ by the deadline of the 22nd November. I phoned the court yesterday and they haven't received it.

 

So what do I do now? Reading the forum it seems that a default judgement is not the way to go as they will just ask (and get) an aside (I think thats what its called). Is there anyway that I can use their failure to submit to my advantage to get the remaining money from them? Any advice on what my next step should be from those more knowledgeable than myself would be great.

 

Thanks.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I have just received a letter from the court that says the following;

 

"Upon reading the court file

 

IT IS ORDERED THAT

 

1. Upon the defence having been struck out the claimant be at liberty to enter judgement."

 

Erm....so what do I do now? I've done a quick search of the forum but there weren't any obvious links, so does anyone have any advice as to what this means and where it leaves me? What is my next step?

 

Any help would be very welcome.

Link to post
Share on other sites

in a nutshell youve won, you take the notice of issue (specified amount) you should have got back from the court, give it to the clerk, I worked out how much interest was owed, you can ask them to work it out for you. give it to them, you should get back in a couple of days an order for them to pay.

 

if it says forthwith you can apply for a warrant of execution then and there. I asked clydesdale when they were going to pay, they didnt answer so now have the bailiffs to get it. this costs 55.00 pound more but you just add it to the amount owed. the court will not tell you what to do, it is your decision. if you want to ask clydesdale when they are going to pay speak to this person

 

[email protected]

Legal Clerk

Litigation & Disputes

Tel: 0207116 4664

Fax: 01452 638430

 

if you want to quote any warrant numbers your aware of T0000865, this is my warrant number against them.

 

well done.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Was this in response to a non-appearance, or after the Return date and before the Hearing date? From what you've outlined, you just await the Decree in your favour, make a copy of it and send it by RD to the Defender, saying your action has been successful and formally call upon them to pay the amount due, plus the fees and costs shown on the decree. Give them 14 days to comply, and if you hear nothing, you can enforce the judgement with a Sheriff Officer or Bailiff (as appropriate).

Link to post
Share on other sites

Many thanks for the replies.

 

Buzby, it was in response to them failing to return their AQ by the deadline. No hearing date had yet been set.

 

So just to summarise...I should shortly receive a second letter from the court (the Decree in my favour), which I send a copy of to Clydesdale with my formal call upon them to pay the amount. After 14 days, if there is no reply, I then decide how to proceed with getting my money.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • dx100uk changed the title to Capp Vs Clydesdale Finance scottish charges reclaim
  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...