Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Hello Friends. I cannot believe it but im being evicted again, i was given a section 48 notice 4 months into my tenancy. I already went through this process last year, i overstayed in my last place by a few months and left on 6th Oct 2023. I knew to check all the documentation that they sent to see if the notice is legal, it looks like it is. I took this place out of desperation as i had to vacate that last place. I hate this place so im not bothered about leaving it.    These cowboys lied to me when i viewed the house. I told the agent that i was evicted from my last house and naturally i dont want this to happen again. She said  the landlord has no plans to sell the house. What she did not tell me was that the landlord had tried to sell the house last year and failed. So it looks like they have used me to fill in the short period of time until its time to sell again. I did see it advertised online.   I told them im not in a strong enough financial position to find another property, cost of a deposit, 1 months rent and moving costs.   They have told me they are starting legal proceedings. They have sent me an invoice for £395 but i have not even received the court paperwork.    I dont like the job im in so i have decided to relocate to a better job and hopefully find cheaper rentals.   I can post a copy of the notice if needed.  
    • yes a judgement sorry I used the wrong word before
    • Hi So on Friday I received a copy on email from the claimants solicitors with an attached relief from sanctions application - on the basis that the solicitor missed the deadline for the additional directions and it was an oversight on their part and that the claimant should therefore not suffer.   They then attached a copy of the deed of assignment and a new witness statement.  They stated that they would be happy to delay the court date by 28 days but that they believed both parties were ready for the court case on 7th June. My first question, is there anything I need to do or do I just sit and wait to see what is decided?  Secondly, is it likely the judge will be aware that the claimants solicitors did exactly the same in the set aside court case (ie they filed their court bundle late and applied for relief from sanctions on the morning of the court date, and my solicitors had no choice but to agree because they threatened to strike my case out because my solicitors had only filed their court bundle by email and not post).  This is a clear pattern of how these solicitors work rather than it being a one off oversight! 
    • I shall find the link later this evening. It was about couples not living together but being liable for council tax. I was never married or in an official civil partnership. We lived together for 18 months, I then left for 6 months for work but continued to pay my half of the bills and rent.   We then split up I gave up my tenancy she took it all in her name. She then decided to move in with me 5 months later. She then banned me from going back to my house eventually let me back in then called the police. Took over my house and is now only paying the rent not the bills so I will be landed with those to. So over the course of our relationship I have ended up paying her debts for 5 different addresses, personal loans and credit cards. If I refuse to pay them she makes more accusations.
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Can student loans still register a default if the debt is statute Barred?


WhiskeyGee
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 5254 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Hi this is my first forum so any help/advice is appreciated.

 

I have unpaid student loans from pre 1998 and went through years of poor credit after dropping out of Uni which i presumed was related to these. the SLC has recently tried contacting me again (standard letters and phone calls twice a day for two weeks) but I have not spoken to them or aknowledged the debt for over 10 years. From reading other posts it appears I may have a case for Statute barred in which case is it worth contacting them to state this or shall I wait for them to demand money first?

 

Also I've read recently that they may report me to the CRA's as having defaulted on the loans which means bad credit for at least 6 years - can they still do this even if the loans are Statute Barred?

 

I've Just started getting my credit back I dont want to lose it all again.

 

many thanks,

Link to post
Share on other sites

it is well statute barred

 

there is nothing they can do to you

 

its a phishing letter.

 

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...

Have just recieved the letter and it makes no mention of defaults or credit reporting agencies. It reads very much like a phishing letter asking me to contact them but makes no mention of what will happen if I dont. Is it worth sending the staute barred letter or will that just let them know they have the right contact details for me and so make them more determined?

Link to post
Share on other sites

no ignore them

 

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Letter states the following:

 

IMPORTANT - YOU SHOULD READ THIS CAREFULLY

 

Notice of Sums of Arrears

 

Dear Sir

 

Your Loan Agreement(s) with us ref#

The opening balance under your Loan Agreement(s) as at 01/05/09 £xxxxxx.

 

1. This notice is given in compliance with the Consumer Credit Act 1974 because you are behind with your payments under your Loan Agreement(s). IF YOU CURRENTLY HAVE AN AGREED ARRANGEMENT IN PLACE, YOU DO NOT NEED TO TAKE ANY ACTION, If you do not have such an arrangement in place, we would encourage you to contact us on 0870XXXXXXX to discuss the state of your account.

 

2. By condition 4.1 of each of the above Agreement(s) you undertook to repay the loan(s) (with interest) by monthly instalments; staeting the month of April following the date you ceased to attendyour course, and on the dates notified to you.

 

3. tou have breached that condition in each of those Agreemens by failing to pay maintain monthly installmentsor in whole commencing on.

 

4. Total Due under all the Adreement(s) taken togeather : £xxxxxxx

 

5. (a) Payments recieved to date:0 last recieved :0

© interest amounts 0 last applied 0

(d) Court fees:0

 

6. to remedy the breach in respect of each Agreement you must pay us the amount of the arrears due under that Agreement on or before 16 days from the date of this letter. IF YOU HAVE ALREADY MADE AN ARRANGEMENT TO DO SO, THEN NO FURTHER ACTION IS REQUIRED.

 

7. Default sums and interest

 

You maty have to pay default sums and interest in relation to the missed or partly made payments refered to in this notice. Please contact us if you would like further details. This notice does not take account of any payments recieved after the date of the notice in addition to any default sums and interest included in this notice.

 

8. Notices

 

For so long as you continue to be behind with your payments by any amount, you will be sent notices about this at least every six months. We are not required tosend you any notices more frequently than this even if you get further behind with your payments in between notices.

 

to contact us Tel 0870xxxxxx

 

etc etc.

 

 

Phew I haven't typed that much since I was at Uni !

 

Thanks in advance for any help and advice on this.

Link to post
Share on other sites

In my inexperienced opinion:

 

1) Sleep well tonight

2) There too many 'Ifs' and 'Mays' in this letter for it to be anything other than a cheap phishing exercise

3) Keep it for your records or use it if you run out of toilet paper.

4) Don't reply to it.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi Craig.

 

Its a pre-98 loan: no acknowledgement for 6 years + no payment = Statute Barred. The issue is about SLC putting defaults on credit files.

 

The "Government money" line is the cheap shot that DCAs and the Student loan company use, over the phone, but they'll never put it in writing.

 

Hmmmm...... I wonder why?????

Link to post
Share on other sites

I stand corrected! Very interesting.

 

"Student Loans are an unusual case, as they changed in September 1998. Any Student Loan taken out before this date was a consumer credit agreement, which means the Limitation Act 1980 applies. But any Student Loan taken since then is an ‘income contingent’ loan – so repayments can be deducted from your wages without any court involvement, regardless of how old the debt is."

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 1 month later...

Ok i've recived same letter recently, i own money from student loan i took out. I've done the statute barred letter and now to be honest the sacre tactics of filing bad credit against me is working... i'm tempted to pay it off just to be rid of it. Its the only dept i have and i have left it as i find SLC a bunch of t055ers to be frank.

 

So i'm going to pay it off.....at any point will they 'give up' on this?

 

Also i was told by a mortgage advisor that the main thing they look down apon is the CCJ's other defaults they pretty much dont take into account.:-|

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 6 months later...
  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...