Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Thank you very much for your letter in regard to the above mentioned shipment.  Due to the high volume of parcels coursing through the courier network each day, undergoing continuous processing and handling, certain packages may experience delays or even can get lost in the course of this journey. Please note that due to the time that has passed, this shipment has been declared as lost.  I have today processed the claim and made offers to the value of £75 as a goodwill gesture without prejudice. I do acknowledge that you have mentioned in your letter that the value was higher, however, you did not take out any protection to that amount. The protection for this shipment was £20 and we will not be increasing our goodwill offer any further.    Please log into your account online in order to accept our offer. Once accepted, our accounts department will process the claim accordingly. The claim payment will be processed and received within 7 working days.                                  In addition, a refund of the carriage fee will be processed as a separate payment and will be received within 3 working days.  If I can further assist, please feel free to contact me.   I have also just noticed that yesterday afternoon they sent me an email stating that "after my request" they have refunded the cost of shipping. I did not request the refund so will mention that in my letter as well.
    • Hi I had to leave Dubai back in 2011, during the financial crisis. And only now have I received a letter from IDRWW. Is this anything to worry about about as I have 2 years left until it’s been 15 years(statute barred in Dubai). Worried as just got a mortgage 2 years ago. Could they force me in to bankruptcy? Red lots of different threads on here. And unsure what true and what isn’t. 
    • Not that TOR will see this now he's thrown in the hand grenade. Rayner has plenty of female supporters on X, for a start. As for the council and HMRC, fair enough and I thought Rayner was already in touch with them. That's where it should be dealt with, not the police force. @tobyjugg2 Daniel Finkelstein thinks the same as you about tax. The Fiver theory. How the Fiver Theory explains this election campaign ARCHIVE.PH archived 28 May 2024 17:36:51 UTC  
    • Often with the Likes of Lowells/ Overdales that 'proof' doesn't stand up to scrutiny.   Think about it like a game of poker, they want to intimidate you into folding and giving up as soon as possible, and just get you to pay up and roll over, that is their business model, make you think your cards are rubbish. What they don't expect, and their business isn't set up for it, is for a defendant to find this place and to learn that they have an amazing set of cards to play. Overdales don't have an infinite number of lawyers, paralegals etc, and the time / money to spend on expensive court cases, that they are highly likely to lose, hence how hard they will try to get you to roll over.  Even to the extent of faking documents, which they need to do because the debts that they purchased were so cheap, in the first place. Nevertheless it works in most cases, most people chicken out, when they are so close to winning, and a holding defence is like slowly showing Overdales your first card, and a marker of intention that this could get tricky for them. In fact it may be,  although by no means guaranteed that it won't even go any further than that.  Even if it does, what they send you back will almost certainly have more holes than Swiss Cheese, and if with the help you receive here, you can identify those weaknesses and get the whole thing tossed in the bin.
    • So Rayner who is don’t forget still being investigated by the local council and HMRC  is now begging to save her seat Not a WOMAN in sight in this video other than Rayner  Farage is utterly correct this country’s values are non existent in her seat   Rayner Pleads With Muslim Voters as Pressure From Galloway Grows – Guido Fawkes ORDER-ORDER.COM Guido has obtained a leaked tape from inside a meeting between Angela Rayner and Muslim voters in Ashton-under-Lyne...  
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
        • Thanks
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

off road parking


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 5510 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

I realise this may be unusual and not often seen in these hallowed pages but we have a problem with unauthorised parkers using our parking spaces. As expected, the local police have confirmed they are powerless to stop this happening as "its not a public highway" and as the Scottish Courts have outlawed clamping in Scotland, we can't use that tactic either.

 

We are becoming quietly demented by a combination of things: not being able to use the designated parking space we paid handsomely to buy and continue to pay both maintenance and council tax on and not being able to do much about it.

 

The problem is magnified by the inertia of our property factors whose stock answer is to contact DVLA to get the owners details and then write asking them to desist from parking inside our security controlled, locked garage area.

 

Whilst we suspect that they may be ex-property owners who kept hold of their garage entry "plips", or friends of same, it doesn't alter the fact that they shouldn't be in there.

 

Any ideas anyone?

Link to post
Share on other sites

helpful and entertaining idea but it would inconvenience those neighbours who legitimately use their own spaces.

 

The local police suggested we install bollard in each space but we already have an electric roller door (maintained at great expense) and pay for insurance, lighting and general maintenance proportionate to how many spaces we own.

 

My logic was that is as wrong as if someone had parked in own driveway or garage so surely I should be able to do something?

Link to post
Share on other sites

The roller door is controlled by remote controlled plips which we bought at the same time as buying the flat. There is a delay when leaving and my neighbours tell me that there are a number of chancers who sit in the lane near the garage waiting for us to leave and then quickly drive in before the door closes. Others simply retained their plip when they sold the flat and the new owners bought replacements from the building's factors.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I dont understand how these things work, but is there anyway that they can all be re programmed along with the baseon the door itself, so that only property owners can use them?

Lula

 

Lula v Abbey - Settled

Lula v Abbey (2) - Settled

Lula v Abbey (3) - Stayed

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Would it be possible to change the frequency of the plips which would make any old ones redundant?? Perhaps if enough residents complained to the property factor then they may be willing to do it??

 

Otherwise, I would be inclined to wait until the garage door closed behind me before moving off. A lockable/collapsable bollard is again an option, as suggested by the Police.

If you feel I've helped then by all means click my star to the left...a simple "thank you" costs nothing! ;)

 

Restons MBNA -v- WelshMam

 

MBNA Cards

 

CitiCard

M&S and More

Link to post
Share on other sites

unbelievable! Whilst we've been discussing this my wife has come back to find a car in our space and another parked just inside the garage door partially obscuring the access and making it extremely difficult to get in and out of the garage! I'm sorely tempted to go down there with a hammer, but realise this won't help our case at all......

Link to post
Share on other sites

Let the tires down on the offending cars. All four of the tires. I had this problem in the past with a stupid woman parking in my space. I left notes on her windscreen and confronted her in person but she continued to park there.

 

Consistently letting her tires down every night for a week or so soon sorted the situation out.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Now that's what I call a good idea!

 

Its non damaging but incredibly time consuming for the miscreant. Lets hope they don't take it out on my car! Maybe I should buy a compressor to inflate my tyres?

Link to post
Share on other sites

We had this in an u/g car park in central Glasgow, primarily previous owners who retained their remotes and used any old space. Bollards are not a solution as they're a pain, but you will already have adequate access control, you just need to tighten it up!

 

Our access was controlled by a 'rolling code' receiver that opened the shutter to let the cars in, exiting was automatic. The agents (bless 'em) were technically illiterate and simply 'cloned' a new transmitter from an adjacent one and passed it on to the owner.

 

By reading the manual of the device, we discovered there were 4 individually addressable buttons authorised to use the roller, with the last one supporting 218 cloned key fobs. (This, in a development of just 80 parking spaces!).

 

The solution was to knock out Keyfob 4, which took out all the 218 clones. Owners had already been told of coding changes and asked to leave their fob (which was then explicitly enabled, rather than cloned) this got around 50 done, then the cloned codes were deleted. They mayhem in the street as cars who had no right to be there were trying to get their fobs to work was a sheer joy.

 

The agents then blocked the system from accepting cloned fobs - it cost £180 to get the machine that codes the fobs, but each flat only gets the same number of fobs, they have parking spaces, and if the fob is lost, it is disabled and a fresh one coded.

 

Solved the probem, and apart from some folk parking in the wrong bays, at least they're all owners, than the free for all you appear to be suffering!

Link to post
Share on other sites

wow that's a real result! I don't suppose your agents are Peverel by any chance?

 

I can't believe we could be that lucky to have a rolling code, but its worth a try. We've a committee meeting coming up so that would be the ideal time to discuss this. Our idea was similar, with all existing fobs deleted from the system and each owner visiting the concierge to get theirs coded with the new code. One of our issues is that the concierge may be part of the problem as we suspect he may be assisting people with "spare" spaces but haven't been able to prove anything

Link to post
Share on other sites

Guest lipupfatty

perhaps you could clamp the offending vehicles but no charge a release fee, release the vehicles at your own leisure

Link to post
Share on other sites

nice thought, but one of our wonderful sheriffs set a legal precedent making it illegal to clamp anywhere in scotland and classifying clamping as depriving the owner of the use of his/her vehicle punishable by a hefty fine if the victim decides to press charges - crazy isn't it? How about depriving the use of my parking space?

Link to post
Share on other sites

Ah - but what would you prefer...? The same anarchy that exists in England?

 

Our agents were Ross+Liddle, but it's easy to tell if your fob is rolling code or not - open it up, if there is a row of switches, then it isn't - all it takes is is to find the right combo, and they'll all work when switched to it. Even if you need to switch to a new receiver system, it'll cost only £80 for the receiver and £20 for each fob, but this is assuming your own system doesn't has the intelligence already built into it - just that they're not using it!

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...