Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • "Care to briefly tell someone who isn't tech savvy - i.e. me! - how you did this?" Its pretty simple although not obvious. You open the google maps app > click your profile picture > Click Timeline from the list > click today > choose the date you want to see the timeline from. Then you'll see your timeline for that day. Often, places you have visited will have a question mark beside them where google wants you confirm you have actually visited. You either click 'yes' if you have, or you click 'edit' to enter the actual place you visited. Sometimes, you'll see 'Missing visit' This probably happens if your internet connection has dropped out at that time. You simply click 'Add visit' and enter the place. The internet on my crappy phone often loses connection so I have to do that alot.   OK dx, understood mate. 
    • I have now been given a court date vs Evri, 4th Sept 2024. I have completed my court bundle, when am I expected to send copies to the court and Evri and should it be in hard copy or electronic? The Notice of Allocation states that no later than 7 days before the directions hearing both parties must send to the other party their final offers to settle. Does this mean I will have to tell Evri what I'm willing to settle? Rgds, J
    • Ok how about this to the CEO? I know it sounds super desperate but lets call a spade a spade here, I am super desperate: Dear Sir, On 29th November 2023 I took out a loan of £5000 with you. Unfortunately very early into 2024 I found myself in financial difficulty (unexpected bills and two episodes of sickness and the tax office getting my tax code wrong resulting in less pay for two months) and I contacted you (MCB) on 13th February 2024 asking if there was any way I could extend the length of my loan to 36 months. I fully explained why I was requesting this and asked for your help. I did not receive a reply to that email so I again contacted you on 7th March 2024 to advise you of a change in my circumstances which resulted in me having to take out a DMP and asking you to confirm that the direct debit had been cancelled. You would have also received confirmation of this DMP from StepChange but you did not acknowledge receipt of my email. I have only managed to make one payment from my loan but did try and contact MCB to discuss extending my loan, help etc.  I have now therefore fallen behind on several of my debts, yours included, and as a result you have lodged a Cifas marker against my name for "evasion of payment", which has resulted in me having to change banks, which has been an extremely difficult process because of the Cifas marker. I do not feel you have been fair or given me the opportunity to fully explain my situation to you before you lodged the marker against my name. I appreciate it is a business and you have acted accordingly, but I did try to make contact to arrange alternative arrangements and at no point, not even to this day, did I ever intend to not repay my loan. I cannot stress to you enough how much this has affected my mental health. I am having trouble sleeping and my existing health condition has been exacerbated by all of this. What I would like you to do is to please, please remove the Cifas marker and let me make arrangements to pay the loan back through a DMP.  Please sir, I am begging for your help here. I am not a dishonest person and I have never been in a situation like this before. I am desperately trying to make things right but this marker is killing me. Please can you help me? I look forward to hearing from you. Yours faithfully,
    • Just be careful with your language on what you post here - Keep it above board Lets see what you send to the big boss. 
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
        • Like
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

DarkNova and Old Debt


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 5343 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Morning Folks

 

I have a query...

 

I recently recieved a letter from Mackenzie hall acting on behalf of cabot, now I recently was contacted by cabot about a debt for £953, so I asked cabot to clarify whothe debt was for and from when, cabot repeatedly ignored my contact but continued to write to me, despite my contacting them and informing them I required clarification, so I finally contacted them telling them that if they did not furnish me with detais I woud enter into no more contact. That was almost a year ago, so now this letter from mackenzie hal who in fairness replied to my email and said the charged off date was 2003, now as far as i'm concerned I never once accepted liability for this debt as I didn't recognise it, and cabot never sent me the detais i needed.

 

Woud I be correct in considering this debt as statute barred?

 

Cheers

 

Additional

 

I emailed them and asked for a copy of the original credit agreement they replied.....

 

Thank you for your reply. I have contacted Cabot Financial and requested a copy of the original agreement to be sent to Mackenzie Hall.

Unfortunately I can’t guarantee this will be available due to the age of the debt but we have requested this anyway and will keep you updated.

 

Should they even be pursuing this if they don't have that?

Edited by DarkNova
Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi Dark Nova and welcome to CAG,

 

Please confirm if you're in Scotland or not - this thread was specific to Scotland.

 

We can then start you a new thread in the right forum.

 

They will pursue a debt, even with little or no paperwork - until challenged :mad:

We could do with some help from you

                                                                PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING

EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

 

                                            Have we helped you ...?  Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

 

Please give something if you can. We all give our time free of charge but the site has bills to pay.

 

Thanks !:-)

Link to post
Share on other sites

Moved your posts into your own thread.

 

The DCA's will try anything if you let it go unchallenged.

 

See what they come back with. And warn them off if they continue to make demands in the meantime.

We could do with some help from you

                                                                PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING

EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

 

                                            Have we helped you ...?  Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

 

Please give something if you can. We all give our time free of charge but the site has bills to pay.

 

Thanks !:-)

Link to post
Share on other sites

Howdy again :grin:

 

They have told me that they have put my account on hold until they get a response from cabot, but I was under the impression they shod aready hold these details.

 

NOVA

Link to post
Share on other sites

so you haven't made any payment in over 5 years? if so send them:

 

Dear Sir/Madam

Acc/Ref No 4563210025897412

You have contacted me regarding the account with the above reference number, which you claim is owed by myself.

I would point out that under The Prescription and Limitation (Scotland) Act 1973 Part 1 Section 6 "If, after the appropriate date, an obligation to which this section applies has subsisted for a continuous period of 5 years:

(a) without any relevant claim having been made in relation to the obligation, and

(b) without the subsistence of the obligation having been relevantly acknowledged,

then as from the expiration of that period the obligation shall be extinguished:"

I would also point out that the OFT say under their Debt Collection Guidance on statute barred debt that "it is unfair to pursue the debt if the debtor has heard nothing from the creditor during the relevant limitation period".

The last acknowledgement of this alleged debt was made over five years ago. Unless you can provide evidence of payment or written contact from myself in the relevant period under Part 1 Section 6 of The Prescription and Limitation (Scotland) Act 1973 , I would respectfully suggest that you are no longer able to take any court action against myself to recover the alleged amount claimed.

Should you continue to pursue this account without providing this evidence I shall seek an interdict and damages accordingly. A formal complaint will also be made to Trading Standards along with a report to the OFT questioning your fitness to hold a consumer credit license.

I await your written confirmation that this matter is now closed and that no further contact will be made concerning the above account after that last letter.

I look forward to your reply.

Yours faithfully

Mr A N Other

 

ida x

Please contact a member of the site team if you are offered help off the forum for a a paid or no win no fee service.

 

Please consider making a small donation to help keep this site running

Click here to donate through PayPal (opens in a new window)

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 4 months later...

Hey All

 

UPDATE

 

I recieved a letter from a Mackenzie Hall (after a considerable wait) which contained what appeared to be a badly photocopied credit agreement.

 

I still have no recollection of this and the debt is from back in 2003 which is obviously statute barred. However I emailed them informing of this and got a reply saying that I had made a payment on 25/10/2004. I did reply informing him that I do not recall the debt and will not formally acknowledge it asking for details of any payments I had made and any correspondance. I got another email stating "I have supplied all information I am required to supply regarding this account(signed application)" and that if i think the signature is fraudulent to contact the police. However this is not what I said, I simply said I don't recall it, which could just as easily mean that I cant remember eight years ago filling out this application.....

 

Now I would assume it is their responsability to prove that the debt is not statute barred am I correct?

 

Now he states he has sent me a letter about the next steps to be taken in resolving this debt, the upshot is it enters statute barring on 25 October so should I just sit back and see what they do as to regards of enforcing and are they required to provide me details of the payment they claim I made?

 

Thankees

 

Dark Nova

Link to post
Share on other sites

Their response, when you asked for detail or proof of the pay't made which was, "I have supplied all information I am required to supply regarding this account"

I suggest you now do nothing and leave them to prove that any payment was made in October 2004.

 

Ignore any calls or letters, unless from the courts.

We could do with some help from you

                                                                PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING

EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

 

                                            Have we helped you ...?  Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

 

Please give something if you can. We all give our time free of charge but the site has bills to pay.

 

Thanks !:-)

Link to post
Share on other sites

For reference I am pretty sure I have made no payment, and as I asked for information they hold onme which was basically refused, I am sorely tempted to no longer communicate with them until they pester me again at which point to send an SAR, which I believe they must comply with. This has been outstanding for some time and they have ignored my requests for quite some time then this,so to be honest i'm not inclned to do them any favours. Does this sound like a reasonable stance?

 

NOVA

 

Posted as slick posted lol

Link to post
Share on other sites

Haha,

 

Looks like the plan is to do........

 

 

.............nothing !! ;)

 

They may try and whack in a court claim before this goes 5 years past the alleged payment. If this happensyou should either SAR them or use whatever is the Scottish equivalent of CPR 31.14.

We could do with some help from you

                                                                PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING

EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

 

                                            Have we helped you ...?  Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

 

Please give something if you can. We all give our time free of charge but the site has bills to pay.

 

Thanks !:-)

Link to post
Share on other sites

Evening all

 

Another update,

 

received another letter today, the standard despite repeated attempts........ We may need to instruct our clients to seek court action..... Which is just a general letter we have all seen except with my name at top :D

 

Now I have asked for details of the last payment and was told they don't need to give me them, however i'm pretty sure under the Data Protection Act any data they hold on me including account history should be available to me on request, but ho hum.

 

Should I just continue with my previous philosophy of silence now that they are refusing my requests for information?

 

NOVA

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi DN,

 

Yes, I think in this case, your best plan is to say and do nothing for now.

 

:)

We could do with some help from you

                                                                PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING

EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

 

                                            Have we helped you ...?  Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

 

Please give something if you can. We all give our time free of charge but the site has bills to pay.

 

Thanks !:-)

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...