Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • it a voluntary arrangement, you cant simply stop paying and IGNORE everyone. block and bounce all their email addresses. do not reply! there nothing really legal they can do at all. sorry but you've been had blind from day one. its a real shame you didnt come here when the debts started going legal, you wouldn't have CCJ's at all as i bet all your debts are Credit cards loans etc - all simple consumer credit. and i bet you've not had any bailiffs but powerless DCA claiming to be a bailiff (as they do!) . a bailiff is sent by a court not a DCA. incidentally, even if they were court sent bailiffs,  there not right of forced entry on CCJ debts anyway.... see if you meet the DRO criteria if not just ignore them and stop paying. you can deal with your creditors directly with help from us not thru a IVA.
    • No need to post photos and no need to add names of people you have had dealings with. Just provide a short summary of what problem you are facing and a chronological list of what has happened until now. 
    • If that is the first final notice you have received you can probably expect two or thee more to follow. This to test your resolve. They are hoping that these frightening 😃 letters will scare you into paying. After the third or fourth final demand they then have to decide  whether to actually proceed with a court claim or forget about you for a while. You were not the driver, their PCN is non compliant .No biggy.Slam dunk win for you.
    • This journo thinks Trump wants a Mafia state. I wonder if his supporters really want him to be immune if he orders a political assassination? The surest sign yet that Donald Trump wants to run the US like the mafia INEWS.CO.UK The Trumps want to make sure nothing like the rule of law stops them  
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Blackhorse car finance Help!!


pascha
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 5483 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Hi there. My partner bought a Ford Focus last Feb for 4000 i think. He got the finance through Black horse. We hit financial trouble last year and came to an agreement with Black horse to reduce the monthly payments from 133.12pcm to 80.00 via a payment book. They gave no time limit to this agreement.

Then January 09 he got a letter from solicitors, he rang black horse who said the agreement was only temporary. He explained he was still not in a position to up the payments just yet. The girl said she would ring back this month to review with him and take it from there. Today he had a phone call from another person saying that they want him to go to a meeting with them tomorrow to discuss his payments.

 

CAn you help with this?

my understanding was theyt have to take you to court first to assess your repayments before taking the car. He is paying all he can afford at the moment. He missed one payment last year but caught up with that and then made this agreement which he has not faulted on.

 

Any advice?

 

Thanks

Link to post
Share on other sites

Presuming that the finance agreement is Conditional Sale or Hire Purchase, then if the total amount paid is less than 1/3 of the total amount payable then they can repossess without a court order (providing the vehicle is not on private property etc etc) upon the expiry of a Default Notice.

 

I'd probably go to the meeting if I was him, but perhaps it would be wise to attend by public transport. Has he received a valid NOD?

 

RM

Link to post
Share on other sites

NOD is a Notice of Default. Sorry, should have made that a bit clearer. In proportion to the total amount payable, how much has been paid. If it's over 1/3 they will need to get a Return of Goods Order through the Court.

 

In any event your partner could apply to the court for a Time Order to give him time to pay the agreement.

 

MM

Link to post
Share on other sites

No he hasnt had that. He has never missed a payment. Only one which his mum gave him the money to catch up. They said that all the time he is paying 80 pound which they said he could, he was falling behind and this would only be temporary. Troubl ei s, they never said it was temporary when he made the agreement with them. They sent him two payment books to keeop hoim going.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Yes, if the Agreement is regulated and there is a breach (i.e. the debtor stops paying) then there has to be a notice served specifying what the breach is, and providing its one that can be remedied (i.e. by making payment) then specifying the time in which the debt can be remedied. Can't repo until expiry of the Default Notice.

 

Mark

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 4 weeks later...
  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...