Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Well we can't predict what the judge will believe. PE will say that they responded in the deadline and you will say they don't. Nobody can tell what a random DJ will decide. However if you go for an OOC settlement you should still be able to get some money
    • What do you guys think the chances are for her?   She followed the law, they didnt, then they engage in deception, would the judge take kindly to being lied to by these clowns? If we have a case then we should proceed and not allow these blatant dishonest cheaters to succeed 
    • I have looked at the car park and it is quite clearly marked that it is  pay to park  and advising that there are cameras installed so kind of difficult to dispute that. On the other hand it doesn't appear to state at the entrance what the charge is for breaching their rules. However they do have a load of writing in the two notices under the entrance sign which it would help if you could photograph legible copies of them. Also legible photos of the signs inside the car park as well as legible photos of the payment signs. I say legible because the wording of their signs is very important as to whether they have formed a contract with motorists. For example the entrance sign itself doe not offer a contract because it states the T&Cs are inside the car park. But the the two signs below may change that situation which is why we would like to see them. I have looked at their Notice to Keeper which is pretty close to what it should say apart from one item. Under the Protection of Freedoms Act 2012 Schedule 4 Section 9 [2]a] the PCN should specify the period of parking. It doesn't. It does show the ANPR times but that includes driving from the entrance to the parking spot and then from the parking place to the exit. I know that this is a small car park but the Act is quite clear that the parking period must be specified. That failure means that the keeper is no longer responsible for the charge, only the driver is now liable to pay. Should this ever go to Court , Judges do not accept that the driver and the keeper are the same person so ECP will have their work cut out deciding who was driving. As long as they do not know, it will be difficult for them to win in Court which is one reason why we advise not to appeal since the appeal can lead to them finding out at times that the driver  and the keeper were the same person. You will get loads of threats from ECP and their sixth rate debt collectors and solicitors. They will also keep quoting ever higher amounts owed. Do not worry, the maximum. they can charge is the amount on the sign. Anything over that is unlawful. You can safely ignore the drivel from the Drips but come back to us should you receive a Letter of Claim. That will be the Snotty letter time.
    • please stop using @username - sends unnecessary alerts to people. everyone that's posted on your thread inc you gets an automatic email alert when someone else posts.  
  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like

Landy_alert v MBNA PPI **WON**


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 5191 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

i got the bump ouch !!! i will reply to this one after dinner ok PF

Finally if you succeed with your claim please consider a donation to consumer action group as those donations keep this site alive.

 R.I.P BOB aka ROOSTER-UK you have always been a Gent on these boards and you will be remembered for that.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Replies 99
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

Right firstly I can appreciate you wanting to bank it to pay bills.

 

But knowing how MBNA works if you do that is considered by them as final.

 

How long ago did you send them the letter ?

 

PF

Finally if you succeed with your claim please consider a donation to consumer action group as those donations keep this site alive.

 R.I.P BOB aka ROOSTER-UK you have always been a Gent on these boards and you will be remembered for that.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Right ill go to the FOS page that stipulates how redress should be paid. ill post the link here.

 

Then send that it MBNA along with a covering letter stating that as you can see from the FOS print outs this is how redress should be paid and what you are offering does not return me to the position i should be in.

 

Ill be back with the link in a while

 

PF

Finally if you succeed with your claim please consider a donation to consumer action group as those donations keep this site alive.

 R.I.P BOB aka ROOSTER-UK you have always been a Gent on these boards and you will be remembered for that.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Right here is one for a credit card it clearly states any interest and or charges should be returned.

 

To that end, I require the firm to:

(A) reconstruct Mr D’s credit card account, by removing any premiums in respect of the PPI and any interest or charges in respect of those premiums;

(B) if that produces a credit balance for any period, to credit interest on that balance for that period at 8% simple per year; and

© send Mr D a statement showing the resulting balance on the account (with details of how it was calculated).

 

http://www.financial-ombudsman.org.uk/publications/technical_notes/omb-decision-D.pdf

Finally if you succeed with your claim please consider a donation to consumer action group as those donations keep this site alive.

 R.I.P BOB aka ROOSTER-UK you have always been a Gent on these boards and you will be remembered for that.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Here is another:

 

(A) reconstruct Mr E’s credit card account by removing any premiums in relation to the PPI, and any interest or charges in relation to those premiums;

(B) if that produces a credit balance for any period, credit interest on that balance for that period at 8% simple per year; and

© send Mr E a statement showing the resulting balance on the account (with details of how it was calculated).

 

http://www.financial-ombudsman.org.uk/publications/technical_notes/omb-decision-E.pdf

 

Have a read though those two and send a copy of one to MBNA

 

PF

  • Haha 1

Finally if you succeed with your claim please consider a donation to consumer action group as those donations keep this site alive.

 R.I.P BOB aka ROOSTER-UK you have always been a Gent on these boards and you will be remembered for that.

Link to post
Share on other sites

So you send a letter to MBNA stating that what you have offered does not return you to the position you should be in due to the contractual interest you have charged me and the FOS PRINTOUTS clearly shows what is a fair redress

 

simple

 

PF

Finally if you succeed with your claim please consider a donation to consumer action group as those donations keep this site alive.

 R.I.P BOB aka ROOSTER-UK you have always been a Gent on these boards and you will be remembered for that.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Well you could bank it and return the acceptance form back to MBNA clearly stating this is accepted as part payment for the following reasons then enclose with that the covering letter and FOS PRINTOUTS.

 

PF

Finally if you succeed with your claim please consider a donation to consumer action group as those donations keep this site alive.

 R.I.P BOB aka ROOSTER-UK you have always been a Gent on these boards and you will be remembered for that.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Also include in the covering letter the amount that is still outstanding in bold lettering.

 

Spell it out for them

 

PF

Finally if you succeed with your claim please consider a donation to consumer action group as those donations keep this site alive.

 R.I.P BOB aka ROOSTER-UK you have always been a Gent on these boards and you will be remembered for that.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Does that all make sense Landy ?

 

By sending the print outs i gave you you are proving that they are wrong.

 

PF

Finally if you succeed with your claim please consider a donation to consumer action group as those donations keep this site alive.

 R.I.P BOB aka ROOSTER-UK you have always been a Gent on these boards and you will be remembered for that.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thank You Landy I must admit i could really do with that chq now.

 

I did phone the FOS again but got put threw to someone who was not dealing with my case and again all they said was it is being dealt with and you should here soon.

 

I did say that I do not understand why it has already taken a year because surely they have already admitted they where wrong by making a half baked offer so this case is only to establish the correct redress.

 

Anyway do not worry i will keep at them so long as i get the money in time for xmas i will be happy.

 

You take care

 

Regards

 

PF

Finally if you succeed with your claim please consider a donation to consumer action group as those donations keep this site alive.

 R.I.P BOB aka ROOSTER-UK you have always been a Gent on these boards and you will be remembered for that.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Landy I am merely carrying out Alanalana and Maroondevo52 instuctions and covering the PPI forum while Alanalana is away on holiday but i will still of course be here when he returns this week as its Alanalana that calls for my help with interest calculations lol;)

 

PF

Finally if you succeed with your claim please consider a donation to consumer action group as those donations keep this site alive.

 R.I.P BOB aka ROOSTER-UK you have always been a Gent on these boards and you will be remembered for that.

Link to post
Share on other sites

if they send mail to your address that should be prove enough if it is not id be asking the question why they they are sending your mail there

Finally if you succeed with your claim please consider a donation to consumer action group as those donations keep this site alive.

 R.I.P BOB aka ROOSTER-UK you have always been a Gent on these boards and you will be remembered for that.

Link to post
Share on other sites

By the way, forgot to add - we've sent a letter accepting the refund in part settlement only, enclosing the FOS printout and copies of the letters sent from FOS explaining how redress is calculated and should be repaid.

 

Did you send this to bank or FOS if it was the bank i would also copy it to the FOS with a covering letter.

 

PF

Finally if you succeed with your claim please consider a donation to consumer action group as those donations keep this site alive.

 R.I.P BOB aka ROOSTER-UK you have always been a Gent on these boards and you will be remembered for that.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Landy,

 

Your Welcome sorry if im creating more paperwork for you but as the FOS was handling this complaint for you its only right you keep them informed.

 

Also if they see you have sent the bank there FOS printouts there is no argument on both sides.

 

PF

Finally if you succeed with your claim please consider a donation to consumer action group as those donations keep this site alive.

 R.I.P BOB aka ROOSTER-UK you have always been a Gent on these boards and you will be remembered for that.

Link to post
Share on other sites

No, don't worry - no probs at all - although most of my correspondence at the moment seems to be winging its way to the FOS. They're probably going to be mighty sick of me by the time I'm finished, but it's what they are there for I suppose so I shouldn't feel guilty!

 

Do not feel guilty at all if MBNA sorted out this complaint in the first place you would not have the need to complaint to the FOS besides have a smile that every complaint the FOS deal with MBNA get charged.

 

PF

Finally if you succeed with your claim please consider a donation to consumer action group as those donations keep this site alive.

 R.I.P BOB aka ROOSTER-UK you have always been a Gent on these boards and you will be remembered for that.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 2 months later...

Hiya Landy,

 

I have done the same as you letter ready to send of in the morning in my case I feel they have only looked at one side i.e. agreed with the bank there offer is fair lol far from it I have spent time and money for them to investigate both sides.

 

And there medical guidelines they are supposed to follow is hogwash.

 

There is a new chief ombubsman at the fos now as from the 1st November so lets see if he has teeth.

 

Good Luck.

 

PF

Finally if you succeed with your claim please consider a donation to consumer action group as those donations keep this site alive.

 R.I.P BOB aka ROOSTER-UK you have always been a Gent on these boards and you will be remembered for that.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Landy,

 

Yes i have been busy with the MBNA/OPTIMA case lately, cannot do anymore now with that until i have had a response to the N244 aplication.

 

So time to get back on with the CO-OP/FOS.

 

Regards

 

PF

Finally if you succeed with your claim please consider a donation to consumer action group as those donations keep this site alive.

 R.I.P BOB aka ROOSTER-UK you have always been a Gent on these boards and you will be remembered for that.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...