Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • 05.05.24 Ever so sorry if I have entered this in the wrong part of this website.   My grandfather is in his 70's and retired.  He asked me to help him find a work pension that he was paying into when he was working. From 1967 - 1982 he worked for a Fabric Dying Company, Celanese, Spondon Derby UK. I have already used the GOV.uk Trace Pension Scheme. It listed a few pension companies : Akzo Nobel (CPS) Pension Scheme formerly Courtaulds Pension Scheme.  I do not fully understand how this works but I think this scheme is administer by a company called Willis Tower Watson. We have called this company, got through to the pension department submitted all my grandfather's details (D.O.B. , N.I. no. etc.) but that agent tells that they have no record of my grandfather and ask what is the name of the pension scheme. Here is the problem, his home was burgalled in 2005 and a briefcase which contained his legal documents was stolen. So he does not know who was the Pension Scheme company. I have a this phone number 01332 681 210 for Celanese but it just rings and never gets answered. So I am asking for help if anyone can tell us where we can try next. I am also hoping for a massive long shot that one of them members on this website, worked for or knows someone who worked for British Celanese Spondon Derby and could tell us of any pension company. Thanks for any help.
    • Well I sent them the letter of claim, the only responses so far was a few emails reopening the claims on the parcels where they asked for information such as proof of value (which I get) but other things like photos of the parcels, which I haven't got as I never took photos of them. It's been well over the 14 days since I sent the letter now anyway, so what do you think I should do now?
    • Know it has already been answered, but? Does not explain why JCI has registered a different default date when they get the information from the original creditor, Virgin
    • Since you were stopped at the time there is no requirement for the police give you anything there and then or to send you anything before they have decided how to deal with the offence.  They have three choices: Offer you a course Offer you a fixed penalty (£100 and three points) Prosecute you in court  The only option that has a formal time limit is (3). They must begin court proceedings within six months of the date of the alleged offence. Options (1) and (2) have no time limit but since the only alternative the police have if you decline those offers is (3) they will not usually offer a course beyond three months from the date of the offence and will not usually offer a fixed penalty beyond four months from that date. This is so as to allow time for the driver to accept and comply with their offer and to give them the time to go to option (3) if he declines or ignores it.  Unless there is a good reason to do otherwise, the action they take will usually be in accordance with the National Police Chiefs' Council's guidance on speeding enforcement. In a 40mph limit this is as follows Up to 45mph - no action. Between 46mph and 53mph - offer a course Between 54mph and 65mph - offer a fixed penalty Over 65mph - prosecution in court So you can see that 54mph should see you offered a fixed penalty. Three weeks is not overly long for a fixed penalty offer to arrive. As well as that, there has been Easter in that period which will have slowed things down a bit. However, I would suggest that if it gets to about two months from the offence date and you have still heard nohing, I would contact the ticket office for the area where you were stopped to see if anything has been sent to you. Of course this raises the danger that you might be "stirring the hornets' nest". But in all honesty, if the police have decided to take no action, you jogging their memory should not really influence them. The bigger danger, IMHO, is that your fixed penalty offer may have been sent but lost and if you do not respond it will lapse. This will see the police revert to option (3) above. Whilst there is a mechanism in these circumstances  to persuade the court to sentence you at the fixed penalty level (rather than in accordance with the normal guidelines which will see a harsher penalty), it relies on them believing you when you say you did not received an offer. In any case it is aggravation you could well do without so for the sake of a phone call, I'd enquire if it was me.  I think I've answered all your questions but if I can help further just let me know. Just a tip - if you are offered a fixed penalty be sure to submit your driving licence details as instructed. I've seen lots of instances where a driver has not done this. There will be no reminder and no second chance; your £100 will be refunded and the police will prosecute you through the courts.
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Barclays Select Agreement and PPI


Sunshine54
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 5195 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 66
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

Posted Images

hmmm what do you make of that then?

 

I suppose that I could push the issue but as I said, got more urgent things to deal with

S

=================================================================

remember

 

the Sun is always shining, it's just that you can't see it sometimes

Link to post
Share on other sites

hi BB

 

thanks for that

I'll check my rating but may write to them anyway about stopping the PPI (I didn't agree to it in the first place and have paid it for years (eejit or what?))

regards

=================================================================

remember

 

the Sun is always shining, it's just that you can't see it sometimes

Link to post
Share on other sites

good morning

 

a question - if the account is unenforceable due to the lack of an appropriate agreement, can I reclaim the PPI premiums? (I expect that they would just keep them to reduce the outstanding loan balance but might be interesting to take that path...)

any thoughts appreciated

=================================================================

remember

 

the Sun is always shining, it's just that you can't see it sometimes

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi Sunshine,

 

I don't see that PPI and the enforceability of the a/c are linked.

 

If PPI has been mis-sold, you should do whatever you can to get it refunded, with interest.

 

Even if the a/c was enforceable with a valid credit agreement, the PPI should still be reclaimed if it was mis-sold.

 

But you won't get any PPI back just because the a/c is unenforceable. Just the same with payments made to clear the a/c each month, which you wouldn't get refunded just because of no valid agreement. :)

Edited by slick132
typo

We could do with some help from you

                                                                PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING

EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

 

                                            Have we helped you ...?  Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

 

Please give something if you can. We all give our time free of charge but the site has bills to pay.

 

Thanks !:-)

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hello Slick

I've just looked through my rather slim Barclays Select file and double checked the 'agreement'. Whilst there is a section relating to PPI and statements re 'I do..' or 'I do not want..' PPI there's nothing at all to suggest that either of those options was selected. As far as I am concerned it was added without discussion so I believe that it ought to be refunded.

what do you think?

=================================================================

remember

 

the Sun is always shining, it's just that you can't see it sometimes

Link to post
Share on other sites

another interesting thing to note that I would have been happy about if I had found this site a few months earlier than I did. The DN from October 2008 was defective due to only allowing 14 days from the date of the DN for remedy of the default. Unfortunately I paid them a few hundred pounds after receiving that. :(

 

The final DN was dated 1st December and the remedy date was before 18th December so is this ok or is it one day short? (assuming 2nd class post)

regards

S

=================================================================

remember

 

the Sun is always shining, it's just that you can't see it sometimes

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi Sunshine,

 

If you have yet done so, start a new thread in the PPI forum to d/w the PPI aspects.

 

The DN matter may not be so relevant, for a few reasons.

 

1. A judge may not consider the accuracy of the DN to be too important and may overlook any error when deciding if the debt is enforceable or not.

 

2. Unless you can show the DN was posted 2nd Class so insufficient time was allowed for remedy, the bank will argue it WAS posted 1st Class.

 

3. You made further payments to the a/c after the DN was issued.

Edited by slick132

We could do with some help from you

                                                                PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING

EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

 

                                            Have we helped you ...?  Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

 

Please give something if you can. We all give our time free of charge but the site has bills to pay.

 

Thanks !:-)

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 1 month later...

Guys

 

After 3 months I have finally recieved back the agreement from Barclays Select...I am not sure if this is unenforeable, but for the last 3 months I havent paid them out of protest that they did not send my CCA, they have still reported this on my credit file.

 

Could you please look through this and add comments?

 

Thanks

page 1 select agreement.jpg

page 2 select agreement.jpg

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi BB,

 

Way too small to read !!

 

Use PhotoBucket - http://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/forum/welcome-consumer-forums/107001-how-do-i-dummies.html

Edited by slick132

We could do with some help from you

                                                                PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING

EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

 

                                            Have we helped you ...?  Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

 

Please give something if you can. We all give our time free of charge but the site has bills to pay.

 

Thanks !:-)

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 3 months later...
I had a quick look and this obviously isn't an agreement (despite what it says at the top). It should have a title like "credit agreement regulated by the consumer credit act 1974", which it doesn't. Neither does it have any of the prescribed terms relevant for a loan agreement - amount of loan, how loan is to be repaid, rate of interest. It doesn't have cancellation rights. Need I go on?

 

This is not a properly executed agreement and it is not enforceable under s65 either.

 

Hi, I have posted a thread on this subject, as I have a very similar agreement

http://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/forum/barclays-bank/247175-calling-all-barclayloan-select.html#post2766727

 

Just to clarify though, the APR is quoted on the back of the document, under section 5.... am I reading this the wrong way?

Also on the back are a bunch of clauses related to repayment etc.... though credit limit is missing for sure.

 

One thing that struck me is that this Flexiloan is really two products

1) a fixed term loan, with a lower rate

2) a running credit agreement, like a line of credit, with a higher APR

Steven4064, I read your post on enforceability of agreements, and it clearly said that multiple agreements have to be reflected as such in the credit agreement...

 

Sunshine: How are things going with your agreement? Have you written to Barclays and if so, have you had any success?

 

Thanks!!!

Tinsie

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi Tinsie

 

It's ages since I did anything with this Barclay's agreement. (been busy on Egg lol)

 

I wrote and told them that they hadn't provided a conformant CCA and they stopped charging interest, I haven't paid, they don't chase and I just receive the monthly statement which I file safely.

 

Not sure whether I need to do anything else at all in the short term as I've got a MBNA card to deal with next.

 

oh dear - it's all go ....

 

don't think that this helps you but good luck

S

=================================================================

remember

 

the Sun is always shining, it's just that you can't see it sometimes

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks Sunshine

 

did you check what happened with your credit rating? surprisignly, Barclays never seemed to post any entries on these loans to the bureaus...

 

Anyway, looks like it helped in stopping the harassment, so I will try that for my husband first and see how it goes

 

Thanks and good luck with your other agreements

Tinsie

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...