Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • See what you think of the attached. I have to do some proofreading of an English grammar book for an Italian publisher this weekend - for money! - so I'm afraid corrections and suggestions will come in dribs & drabs.  I've totally knackered the layout, the numbering and the order of your Exhibits but there will be several versions done so don't worry about that ATM. Your arguments are superb. What is less superb is the way you jump from one to the other and back again, so I haven't changed your words, but I have moved the paragraphs around and given each section a heading. New bits are shown in red. Crossed out crossed out in black is something you've quoted from the government Code of Practice, but that has since been withdrawn so unfortunately that argument has to go. Your paras 7 & 8 don't harm your case but to me are waffle and can go.  Keeping the arguments clear & concise will always impress a judge. IMPORTANT - did you ever send Simple Simon a CPR request? Defendant's WS - version 2.pdf
    • Hi Schipoo and thanks for the update. This is a brilliant result as rergards your fight with HMRC. If you can manage a Donation to the site, it would be greatly appreciated. Let us know how it goes as regards the fees being sought by Independant Tax.
    • A never ending torrent of **it Outrage as ‘tidal wave’ of sewage floods historic market town’s unique chalk river WWW.INDEPENDENT.CO.UK Exclusive: Water firm pumps sewage into river Misbourne, Amersham on 21 ‘dry days’ during nearly five month period  
    • Worth noting that all of these firms - either the alleged EIS investment, the rebate company themselves or the payee were all registered to the same address. Clavering House is 3 miles away from HMRC Benton Park view offices.   Wardrop - unfortunately unsuccessful due to late appeal - assessments opened by HMRC in March 2019. Scammed by Richard Hall (Capital allowances consultants ltd - Clavering House) investments into Cryoblast Limited 15/16 (Paul Huggins - Clavering House) and Eco Cooling solutions 16/17 (Anthony Fitches - Clavering House).    Mccuminsky - scammed by Capital Allowances after providing his details to Stefan Brown Alpha Tax Consultants (Clavering House) payment made to Eco Cooling Solutions.    Robson - scammed by Capital Allowances - 15/16 paid to Cryoblast 16/17 paid to Eco Cooling.    Myself - scammed by Allan Maxwell - MaxTax (other business Maxwell electronics) registered to Clavering House.   Cryoblast Solutions and Fast Tax - Alan O’Hara    Please note there are two Cryoblasts involved - Cryoblast limited (Paul Huggins and Clavering House) and Cryoblast Solutions Limited (Alan O’Hara also director of Fast Tax).    My return simply said “Cryoblast” another thing that should have been clarified as part of HMRC guidelines before paying out the claim.    Cryoblast limited was already suspected to be involved in fraudulent claims before my investment as Huntly had open assessments issued in November 2018.    Cryoblast Solutions, the same company director as Fast Tax where my money was sent was dissolved before my claims were submitted. 
    • On the d-day issue, * we know sunaks shameful self-interest preferring a hope at using lies for self-promotion over honoring our heroes, * we know Starmer demonstrated his statesmanship with other statesmen and women,  ** BUT where was Farage? Was he in a pub looking for self-promotion? .. Surely as a wannabe statesman - he should have spent a bit of his (someone elses?) cash attending the ceremonies? or wasn't he offered a seat near enough the front to interest him?   mind you .. "I said I wanted my county back. Well now I want my life back ... I am not a career politician... I won't be changing my mind again, I promise you" - Nigel Farage, stepping down from public life. 5 July 2016  
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Im in a mess advise please


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 5436 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Morning WAM I'm here today so will get back to you later.

 

John

I do very little but I do it very, very well :cool:

 

If I've helped give my scales a click

:smile:

 

I have no legal experience and all advice given is based on the knowledge I've gained from this site.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Replies 137
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

Morning Tendogs,

Ok I really need your help, I cannot get the CCA on here but have been doing my research with all the information you have given me (thanks) and this is what i have come up with, please let me know if you think my CCA is Unenforcable:

 

The terms and conditions are on the back page of the agreement the terms consist of:

Schedule of default & costs

Data protection act notice

Customer data

Is this what you mean by proscribed terms?

 

Also I have notice there is nothing on the agreement that tells me I have a right to cancel, does this make it unenforcable?

 

Last but not least:

Im confused with the amount of APR, my borrowing was £7500, they have charged me £1866 for the the loan, and the total to pay back is £9366, at a rate of 6.4% - Does this sound right to you.

 

This is my last shot at this, to find out once and for all if this one is unenforcable.

Thanks again for all you help :)

 

 

WAM I've sent you a PM

I do very little but I do it very, very well :cool:

 

If I've helped give my scales a click

:smile:

 

I have no legal experience and all advice given is based on the knowledge I've gained from this site.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I’ve posted the agreement for whatamess here if anyone wants to take a look and offer an opinion I would be grateful. I cannot see any mention of a right to cancel and I understand that the omission might make the agreement unenforceable.

whatamess.pdf

I do very little but I do it very, very well :cool:

 

If I've helped give my scales a click

:smile:

 

I have no legal experience and all advice given is based on the knowledge I've gained from this site.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi WAM, I've had a look and the only thing that might make it unenforceable is the lack of information regarding your right to cancel. They do have a section about your rights but I'm not sure that a right to cancel is one of them and so I'm off to do a little research. I have also PMed steve and asked him to have a look. Be back later.

I do very little but I do it very, very well :cool:

 

If I've helped give my scales a click

:smile:

 

I have no legal experience and all advice given is based on the knowledge I've gained from this site.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I did wonder if that was one of the things that should have been on there, thanks again tendogs and will speak to you when you know more.

 

Keeping my fingers and Toes crossed with this one.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I had a look at the agreement and it seems completely OK - that is, it is enforceable.

 

Thanks for looking in, I had a feeling that it was well put together.

I do very little but I do it very, very well :cool:

 

If I've helped give my scales a click

:smile:

 

I have no legal experience and all advice given is based on the knowledge I've gained from this site.

Link to post
Share on other sites

WAM I'd trust steven on this, it looks enforceable. Make them a reasonable and afordable offer of repayment and see what they comeback with.

I do very little but I do it very, very well :cool:

 

If I've helped give my scales a click

:smile:

 

I have no legal experience and all advice given is based on the knowledge I've gained from this site.

Link to post
Share on other sites

You are more than welcome, I'm sorry that the outcome was not as you might have wished. Remeber to be reasonable and realistic with your offer, make it and then let them do the work, As I've said before even if they do sell it on and a DCA takes you to court, no Judge will make you pay more than you can afford. Do not give up on the other debts, if you need any agreements checked we can do the same as we did with this one. Let us know how things turn out.

 

John

I do very little but I do it very, very well :cool:

 

If I've helped give my scales a click

:smile:

 

I have no legal experience and all advice given is based on the knowledge I've gained from this site.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Maybe you might give stevens scales a click :)

I do very little but I do it very, very well :cool:

 

If I've helped give my scales a click

:smile:

 

I have no legal experience and all advice given is based on the knowledge I've gained from this site.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I know your right, I have had one debt written off so far because of an unenforcable agreement so i have to be greatful for that.

 

I do have another question for you, HFC (the dreaded) they have said they are going to be sending someone round to my house if i dont keep up repayments, and to stop that i need to make a payment, I have sent them a CCA with no reply but they say that even with an account dispute they can still send someone round is that right?

Link to post
Share on other sites

No they can't, there's a template letter on the forum somewhere but you just need to send them a note saying that you revoke any implied licence to call at your property and that if anyone does come to your property you will call the police and prosecute them for trespass.

I do very little but I do it very, very well :cool:

 

If I've helped give my scales a click

:smile:

 

I have no legal experience and all advice given is based on the knowledge I've gained from this site.

Link to post
Share on other sites

If they have defaulted in a request under s77(1) (loans) or 78(1) (credit cards) of the CCA 1974 then the CCA is quite specific - they are "not entitled, while the default continues, to enforce the agreement" (s77(4) and s78(6)). End of.

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 1 month later...

Hi

I have offered one of my creditors a reduced payment (after CCA being enforcable I think) the payment is just under half of what my full monthly payment is and relistically its what i can afford, they have sent me a letter back to say they cannot accept this and wont freeze interest or stop charges unless i go onto a payment plan with CCCS, Problem is i already contacted payplan back in Jan and they couldnt take me on as i didnt have enough surplus money. Any advice as to what to do now?

 

Thanks

Link to post
Share on other sites

are you still making the reduced payments you proposed? did you put it in writing?

 

 

ida x

Please contact a member of the site team if you are offered help off the forum for a a paid or no win no fee service.

 

Please consider making a small donation to help keep this site running

Click here to donate through PayPal (opens in a new window)

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hello

 

Thanks for your replies.

 

Ida - I am still making payments i started last month and will be sending another one next week as promised. I have everything in writting the letter i sent them with my offer and the letter I sent back, they have stopped the PPI and im wondering if i can claim back what i have already paid, any ideas?

 

loobyloo85 - After Payplan going through all my out goings and incomings and looking at what i owed all my creditors it worked out that i would need £220 surplus to go onto their plan, they said i could do it myself by offering relistic payments so this is what i have done but dont seem to be getting anywhere with them.

 

Thanks x

Link to post
Share on other sites

good, just keep making the payments and on time with your schedule, looks better for you ;)

 

to reclaim ppi:

 

Payment Protection Insurance (PPI) - The Consumer Forums

 

hae a read around there and it will give you the info you need

 

 

ida x

Please contact a member of the site team if you are offered help off the forum for a a paid or no win no fee service.

 

Please consider making a small donation to help keep this site running

Click here to donate through PayPal (opens in a new window)

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi

 

One of my creditors wrote to me 2 months ago to let me know they didnt have a CCA for me, and i knew they wouldnt as this debt has been going on for years and company has changed over since.

 

Then they wrote to me again to say they are dealing with my complaint and please give them another 30 days

 

I wrote to them last month to say that the account is in legal dispute and i would not pay another penny until i recieved my cca, this morning i get a letter to say they cant respond with out my signature as authority. Obviously they are going to try and use my signature to try and fake a cca, why else would they need it now, why didnt they say in the first place they wanted it.

 

Any advice, obviously im not giving it to them i have come this far and wont be made a fool off by them, the debt is such a little amounth and they are being the worst out the lot. What should i do now?

 

Thanks

Link to post
Share on other sites

Simple answer. Give it to them!;)

 

You could get a picture, print it on the letter and sign on top of that OR sign your signature as you usually do but put a flourish on it to make it positively identifiable, photocopy your signature so that if the creditor happened to lift it, you would have proof of their tactics.

 

 

fox

If you are asked to deal with any matter via private message, PLEASE report it.

Everything I say is opinion only. If you are unsure on any comment made, you should see a qualified solicitor

Please help CAG. Order this ebook. Now available on Amazon. Please click HERE

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi Fox

 

What do you mean by get a picture, do you mean any old picture? What i dont understand is how ever i do my signature, if they really wanted to they can still copy it cant they?

 

Thanks

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...