Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Thank you for taking your time and helping me on this. Would you recommend I also send a letter tomorrow to both BMW and Motonovo?
    • she and  johnson need to be kicked off the taxpayers credit card - for starters I'm certain there is cause - taking up 'jobs' when they shouldn't, bringing the nation into disrepute with their antics .. I'm sure it would be a very popular act from a new labour guv
    • Please have a look at this draft letter. It is modelled on yours but I have cut out a load of the unnecessary information. Also, the responsibility lies with the finance company because the vehicle was brought on hire purchase. You send it to them and a copy to big motoring world.   Let us know if there's anything that you disagree with, which is wrong, which you think should be added
    • According to Alastair Campbell on Twitter, anti-Le Pen parties are pointing to RN's fiscal policies and saying they'll cause a 'Truss-style market meltdown'. Liz Truss charged taxpayers for Amazon Prime subscription - Mirror Online WWW.MIRROR.CO.UK The subscription costing £95 gives the ex-PM free shipping from the retail giant, as well as the ability to stream films and TV shows such as My Fault...  
    • Thank-you @BankFodder, your statement is a correct understanding of my position and I agree, it is actually really what I was looking for in starting this thread, as I too believed that the maximum I could claim for is that which I sold it for, even though this was substantially below market value at the time. And so, this sold value is what I shall be claiming for + the other expenses. @dx100uk I get your point, but this is just not what I want to expose myself to. Unfortunately I was one of the unlucky ones to have my details stolen in the Peoples Energy hack, and in 2020 I discovered that those details had been used to take out car insurance, and that the insured was then involved in a collision and my details were dragged through the mud. Despite Aviva cancelling the claim and treating as though it never were, even though I have the letters from them to say that they have removed this claim from the insurance database, I still get refused insurance and credit products to this day until I send across the letter from Aviva which explains that I was a victim of fraud. So you'll forgive me for not jumping up and uploading my data to a server utility for which I have no control over its retention policy, or where the server is located globally, its legal jurisdiction, or its security protocols.
  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like

Tesco C/Card - Response to CCA request.


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 5169 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Hello everyone,

 

New Thread Starting...

 

On the 9th Feb we sent Tesco a CCA request regarding a c/card.

On the 27th feb we sent an account in dispute letter

On the 27th feb we also received a response from Tesco.

This response included:

Covering letter

Application form(?)

Copy of terms and conditions (presumably applicable at the time of the alleged agreement, although not dated)

Latest Statement

Copy of terms and conditions (presumably current as supplied as a leaflet)

 

Having read STBINNZ's thread

http://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/forum/debt-collection-industry/171243-me-tesco-rbos.html

 

I wanted to check on the validity of the documents and do the following apply:

 

1. Misappropriation of funds, by crediting the £1 to the account instead of the intended purpose.

2. Contravene 2.2(h) of the OFT guidlines by asking to contact a premium rate number (0870 ?)

3. Does not conform to sections 60(1) and 61(1) of the CCA 1974 and is therefore unenforceable under section 127(3) of the CCA 1974.

 

I have attached the covering letter and application form (minus personal details) for you to comment on.

 

Many thanks for your help.

All comments welcome

Best regards.

Tesco Response Letter - Edited.jpg

Tesco Application Form - Edited.jpg

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Replies 74
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

Posted Images

Thumbnails are not enlarging. It doesn't matter what they do with the £1 as long as you made it clear it was to cover the CCA request and have a copy of the letter you sent making that clear. All that matters is that you sent the £1 to fulfil your legal obligations.

Link to post
Share on other sites

is there anything on the back of this? this is just an application form and not a cca the font is very difficult to read i belive that this is not a valid cca asi cant see any apr or signature of the creditor others might say diffrent but this cca in my opinion is not valid

Link to post
Share on other sites

Send this letter back to them:

 

DO NOT ACKNOWLEDGE ANY DEBT

 

Dear Sir/Madam

 

RE: Agreement/Account number

 

Thank you for your response to my letter dated xxxxxx 2009, making a formal request for a true copy of the original credit agreement for the above account under the Consumer Credit Act 1974 (Sections 77-79).

 

The documents you supplied me appear to be no more than an application form, and as such are not a satisfactory response to my request. Nowhere on the front of the document is there any reference to the prescribed terms and conditions that such an agreement must contain. I must assume that these are unconnected documents and once again inadequate to satisfy your obligations.

 

I also I note that you have replied to the above by sending your companies Terms and conditions I must inform you that this is not sufficient to comply with the request and that your company is still in default under the act.

 

To clarify, just sending the Terms and Conditions is a breach of the Act and Regulations as, apart from the information that the Regulations provide that you may exclude, the copy must be a “true copy” of the agreement.

 

As you are aware you are obliged to provide me with a true copy of my agreement as defined under Section 189 of the CCA 1974. and I consider that you have failed to comply with my request for these documents

 

 

Under the terms of the above Act, a creditor has 12 working days to provide the requested documents. This deadline has now passed and I have not received the requested documents from you.

 

As I am sure you are aware, an agreement that does not contain all of the prescribed terms, and/or is not signed by the debtor, is completely unenforceable & I therefore consider that this account is in dispute with immediate effect & it follows that all payments to this account are suspended forthwith.

 

I draw your attention to the legal requirement that a creditor is not permitted to take any action against an account whilst it remains in dispute. The lack of a credit agreement is a very clear dispute and therefore the following applies:

You must not demand any payment on this account, nor am I obliged to offer any payment to you.

You must not add any further interest or charges to this account.

You must not pass this account to any third party.

You must not register any information in respect of this account with any of the credit reference agencies.

You must not issue a default notice on this account

I hereby give you notice that if you proceed with any of the above actions, I will file reports with the appropriate authorities, including, but not limited to, Trading Standards, Office of Fair Trading, Information Commissioners Office, Financial Ombudsman Service.

 

Yours faithfully

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 3 weeks later...

Hi Ghostdebt and everyone else, Just read your thread, which is very similar to mine, I have sent the letter "I DO NOT ACKNOWLEDGE ANY DEBT". And they put my £1 to my account as well. No correspondence but copious phone calls, I have asked them to desist and have now sent telephone harrassment letter, trying to get a recording device now as money is very tight can't afford to buy anything, its a beg or borrow job.

Roko20650

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi everyone on this thread, Just received the attached letters, 18th in reply to my "do not acknowledge debt", followed same day by £12 default charge and finally reply to my harassment letter, and I've received a new card in the mail this morning!! Now have a recorder which works and will record any calls I get from them. Comments on their letters would be welcome.

Ltr 18Mar09 reply to breach of CCA.jpg

ltr 18Mar09 default charge.jpg

Ltr 20Mar09 reply to tel harassment.jpg

Edited by roko20650
Could not read attachments
Link to post
Share on other sites

Send the muppets this;

 

Dear Sirs,

 

Account no xxxxxxxxxxxxxx

 

 

Re: my request under the Consumer Credit Act 1974

 

This account is in Dispute .

 

On xx/xx/2007 I wrote to xxxxxxxxx requesting that xxxxxxx supply me a true copy of the executed credit agreement for this account.

In response to this request I was supplied a mere application form which did not comply with the requirements of the Consumer Credit Act 1974.

 

The document sent purporting to be a credit agreement does not contain any of the prescribed terms as required by section 60(1) Consumer Credit Act 1974. The Consumer Credit (Agreements) Regulations 1983 (SI 1983/1553) made under the authority of the “1974 Act” sets out what the prescribed terms are, I refer you to Schedule 6 Column 2 of SI 1983/1553 for the definition of what is required. Suffice to say none of the terms are present in the document

 

Since this document does not contain the required prescribed terms it is rendered unenforceable by s127 (3) consumer Credit Act 1974, which states

 

127(3) The court shall not make an enforcement order under section 65(1) if section 61(1)(a)(signing of agreements) was not complied with unless a document (whether or not in the prescribed form and complying with regulations under section 60(1)) itself containing all the prescribed terms of the agreement was signed by the debtor or hirer (whether or not in the prescribed manner).

 

This situation is backed by case law from the Lords of Appeal in Ordinary (House of Lords) the highest court in the land. Your attention is drawn to the authority of the House of Lords in Wilson-v- FCT [2003] All ER (D) 187 (Jul) which confirms that where a document does not contain the required terms under the Consumer Credit Act 1974 the agreement cannot be enforced.

 

In addition should you continue to pursue me for this debt you will be in breach of the OFT guidelines, I draw your attention to the Office of Fair Trading’s guidance on debt collection

The OFT guidance which was issued July 2003 (updated December 2006) relating to debt collections and what the OFT considers unfair, I refer to page 5 of the guidance which states;

 

2.6 Examples of unfair practices are as follows:

 

h. Ignoring and/or disregarding claims that debts have been settled or are disputed and continuing to make unjustified demands for payment.

 

I require you to produce a compliant copy of my credit agreement to confirm I am liable to you or any organisation, which you represent for this alleged debt, if you cannot do so I require written clarification that this is the case. Should you ignore this request I will report you to the Office of Fair Trading to consider your suitability to hold a credit licence in addition to a complaint to Trading Standards, as you will be in breach of the Administration of Justice Act 1970 section 40

 

Since the agreement is unenforceable and the default notice is non compliant, it would be in everyone’s interest to consider the matter closed and for your client to write the debt off. I suggest you give serious consideration to this as any attempt of litigation will be vigorously defended and I will counter claim for all quantifiable damages

 

I respectfully request a response to this letter in 14 days

 

 

I trust this out lines the situation

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi Roko, seems like your now ahead of me....

Tesco haven't yet replied to my account in dispute letter so at the moment just waiting on a response from them. They did phone me, but I wouldn't answer the security questions so they said they would write to me. That was over a week ago and still not had a letter.

Let us know if you get a response from the letter Cerberus drafted for you. It's a work of art. Thanks for posting that up Cerberus I'll keep it handy just in case they decide to send me a response..

 

Many thanks to all, lets keep each other informed.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Evening all,

 

the following response has been received from tesco.

 

As you have failed to respond to the bank's previous demands, we have no alternative but to commence further proceedings for the recovery of the outstanding balance.

We would urge you to call this office on 08701 541 173 in order to resolve this matter.

Failure to do so may result in your account being transferred to external debt collecting agents without further warning or delay.

If you have recently increased your payments or made contact with us, please disregard this letter....

 

So, in response to this I was thinking of sending the following.

 

Dear,

 

I do not acknowledge any debt to your company.

 

Further to your correspondence dated xx/xx/xx I draw your attention to my previous correspondence dated xx/xx/xx.

I re-iterate that until my request for information under the consumer credit act 1974 has been complied with, this account remains in dispute.

As a result of this dispute, you may not:

* demand any payment on the alleged account, nor am I obliged to offer any payment to you.

* add further interest or any charges to the alleged account.

* pass the alleged account to a third party.

* register any information in respect of the alleged account with any credit reference agency.

* issue a default notice related to the alleged account.

 

I also take this recent correspondence to indicate that you are still continuing to process my personnal data, which puts you in breach of the data protection act.

 

If any further correspondence is received from yourself without full compliance with my request for information under the consumer credit act

I will report you to the regulatory authorities and issue court proceedings for this breach.

 

Yours faithfully.

 

 

Any comments please, would be greatly appreciated before I send this off.

 

Many thanks

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 3 weeks later...

Hi Ghost debt and Andbrat, No response in writing from Tesco's but been a bit bombarded with tel calls, despite their letter saying they were taking my number off their system, Ha!! I writen sent a second tel harrassment letter and started recording their calls now. 3 calls to my mobile in one evening is a bit much wouldn't you say? Roko

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...

Latest response from Tesco:

 

Thank you for your recent letter dated .....

 

Regarding the Banks alleged breach of the CCA, I would advise you of the following.

Any request for a copy of an executed agreement under s78(1), states that the company must meet it's statutory requirements by providing a 'true copy' of the agreement relevant to the card product at the dte the card agreement was made, plus a copy of the terms of the card product. These copies should be accompanied by the statement of financial information relating to the account.

When responding to requests under s78 we are compliant if we provide a 'true copy' of the agreement in accordance with regulations 3(2) and 7(1)(b) of the Consumer Credit (ancellation Notices and Copies of Documents) Regulations 1983. This means that there is no obligation for us to provide a copy of the original agreement bearing signatures. Additionally under regulation 3(2) a true copy does not need to contain all personal information relating to the borrower, nor does it need to include a signature box or dates of signatures.

We have supplied a copy of the credit agreement that you agreed to after which you then received your credit card. We have also supplied a copy of the original terms and conditions of that card product with the prescribed terms and a statement showing the outstanding balance. We have advised you who you need to contact to discuss amounts due and owing and future payments that must be paid. We have therefore met our obligations under s78(1) to provide a copy of the executed agreement and again we are satisfied that what was provided complied with the regulations expressly made for controlling what is a true copy.

I must therefore inform you that we see no reason to enter into further correspondence with you about the alleged CCA breaches. If you are not satisfied with this response, you may seek whatever legal redress you consider is open to you.

We do not consider this account to be in dispute and your indebtedness on this account remains due and payable and we will be pursuing for the full repayment.

All non payments have been recorded on your credit file as has the default due to non payment. I suggest that you take advice from your local citizens advice bureau or other similar organistaion if you continue to doubt the veracity of what we have told you about our having complied with our obligations under s78(1)

I trust this clarifies the matter for you

---------------------------------

 

My comments to this letter would be:

They have admitted that the application they sent to me is a copy of the executed agreement.

They have admitted breaching section 10 data protection act by processing data with the credit reference agencies.

They have admitted registering a default with the CRA's although I don't recall having seen a default notice.

 

So, I am planning to draft and send a letter stating the following:

Account in dispute.

Haven't complied with request as they have sent an application form.

LBA re the breach of the data protection act

no default notice issued, therefore have breached ? for registering the default.

Dispute remains unresolved.

Only acceptable resolution is for them to fulfill my request or acknowledge that they cannot.

If they cannot fulfill the request must remove data from CRA's within 14 days or they will be in breach of data protection and proceedings will begin.

If they do not respond within 14 days proceedings will begin for breach of data protection.

Formal complaint lodged with Information Commisioner Office and OFT, FSA, FOS.....

 

Will draft the letter up and post for comments before I send it, but any comments on what they have written or I have proposed in te meantime would be greatly appreciated.

 

Many thanks

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...