Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • My ex blamed me for her not paying her bills she says I controlled her money. So I have been told I need to pay them as it was my fault. She has not paid the bills where she lives now which was my house. I'm not allowed contact with her and again she is blaming me. As in this type of case it is victim led so no matter what stupid thing she says she is believed. It is for me to prove otherwise.
    • No SAR yet but they have confirmed via email that they have everything and will supply it by this month end.    When you say the FOS considered it a personal loan due to personal guarantee who is the FOS? Financial Ombudsman?  But then that doesn’t make sense as they haven’t been involved yet.    Santander in their final response to my original complaint did not agree to it. They turned my complaint down and specified that the selling dealership had agreed to treat it as personal for settlement purposes.    I guess they could not agree to it as then they would be guilty of miss selling but they gave me what I wanted by saying I would not get treated as a business customer in regards to finance charges.    Awful bank to deal with. Will never touch them again. 
    • Background I am in dispute with Clerical Medical over, amongst other things, statements that I haven't received. They didn't resolve my complaint in time so invited me to complain to the FOS, which I did The FOS investigator in his findings has written that  Clerical Medical have mow provided all missing statements apart from two. One of these is for the policy year 2021 - 2022, which they say is unavailable due to a system migration. I have twice asked the FOS investigator for a copy of his screen shot to try and resolve this discrepancy but they have ignored me so today I submitted a subject access request. I said I was primarily interested in the screen shot but I also asked for everything they held against the complaint reference number. The response I got from firstly the Data Protection Operations Senior Coordinator, then secondly the investigator was that  The investigator expanded on this and said I'll wait the 40 days and see what they come back with then make a decision on next steps at that point, but I want to make sure I've got my facts in the right order before I start arguing with them. They seem to be saying that my SAR doesn't cover the screen shot because it isn't personal data but I disagree. I have a reference number that identifies my complaint and therefore indirectly identifies me. I think that means everything that is held against that reference number, including the screen shot, is my personal data and is in scope of my SAR (subject to exemptions). Who is right?
    • Fraudsters copy the details of firms we authorise to try and convince people that their firm is genuine. Find out why you shouldn’t deal with this clone firm.View the full article
    • You sure it's a Section 48 notice? Section 48 notice is just telling you who your landlord is. Have they sold and they're just telling you who your new landlord is or is it an actual eviction notice? Might be best scanning it up just in case here.
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

HELP, FIRST CAPITAL CONNECT HAVE ACCUSED ME and are PROSECUTING ME OF FARE EVASION


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 5558 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Please please help me. I've just recieved a court summons on behalf of first capital connect stating that I was travelling last month from Denmark Hill to Elephant and Castle in the morning and that I bought a child ticket instead of an adult ticket. The thing is that I never do that, I wasn't travelling that morning, my lecturer can confirm that I was in a lecture. I just don't know what to do, I'm so scared that someone has been using my details, it isn't the first time that I've been a victim of fraud. Ijust don't know what to do and I'm really scared, I'm a medical student and I'm scared that I'm going to get a criminal record and have to stand up in court and this is going to ruin my career even though I'm innocent. I'm absolutely terrified. Please please help me

Link to post
Share on other sites

Its reasonably simple to resolve. Get a signed statement from the UNI that you were in fact present in lectures (presumably some kind of register taken )and send it both to the company, and to the court.

 

If the case still goes to court, do not panic, simply go along and quietly and calmly again explain (with your evidence) that you were not travelling that day and that you have witnesses to prove you were in lectures.

 

The case should be dismissed

Link to post
Share on other sites

again not necessarily - it could be someone who works in the post office and has seen you name and address (not suggesting it is), it could be someone who has a website you filled in a form for, it could be someone who simply trawled the electoral roll for a name and address.

 

there are many possibilities - so dont go accusing your pals :)

Link to post
Share on other sites

Please please help me. I've just recieved a court summons on behalf of first capital connect stating that I was travelling last month from Denmark Hill to Elephant and Castle in the morning and that I bought a child ticket instead of an adult ticket. The thing is that I never do that, I wasn't travelling that morning, my lecturer can confirm that I was in a lecture. I just don't know what to do, I'm so scared that someone has been using my details, it isn't the first time that I've been a victim of fraud. Ijust don't know what to do and I'm really scared, I'm a medical student and I'm scared that I'm going to get a criminal record and have to stand up in court and this is going to ruin my career even though I'm innocent. I'm absolutely terrified. Please please help me

 

I fail to see how a credit company can sue you over a matter which concerns the rail company , unless the rail company has tried to recover the funds from first capital connect.

 

You must respond to the court summons and prepare your defence and join the rail company in the action . You do not want a judgment by default.Ask First capital for a copy of the voucher which will give the time and date that the purchase was made and then go back to the supplier and ask them to prove that you purchased that ticket at that time whether in person or over the

phone. If in person then they should have ccv Tve to prove your counter purchase. Whet evidence do you have that your were the purchaser of the ticket.

 

As are fearful of identity fraud cancel the card immediately and ask for a replacement since you beleive that this has happened to you and that you are being pursued under false pretences.

 

Look up on the internet court procedure and buy a few books if you are legally minded

 

Keep fighting and to do let them get you down

 

backroom lawyer exit 3

Link to post
Share on other sites

The advice you have been given thus far is spot on. Don't pancic but there are a couple of things you can do to help yourself.

 

Did you get any letters regarding this before you received a summons and if so, why didn't you answer it.

 

Now, more importantly, try to save yourself a lot of time and worry.

 

Get a copy of the university register that shows you were present there at the material time.

 

If you cannot do that and have a recent facial photo of yourself, sign your name on the back of it and send it to the prosecutors office with your letter stating that you have been the victim of an impostor.

 

Ask for your photograph to be returned to you within 10 days.

 

This will allow the reporting staff to confirm that you were not the traveller and should close the case immediately with the rail company withdrawing their allegation.

 

By the way exit3, you've lost me completely. Where did suing any credit company come into this??

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thank you so much everyone. I shall do everything that you have advised. No I haven't had any letters regarding this before, not unless something has come through, and my housemates or I have chucked out if it has been mixed in with junk mail. I usually get quite excited when I recive mail, as I hardly get anythig other than bank statements, but this wasn't exciting, it was upsetting. I'm always fearful about identity fraud, it's happened before ( someone had been making top ups using my card details for an orange mobile phone (I'm with T-mobile, so this was obvious) and then when I had made a withdrawal at uni in Bristol, 2 mins later someone had made a withdrawal in Hull). So ever since then I am very very paranoid about everything. I just seem to be very unlcuky :(

Link to post
Share on other sites

The advice you have been given thus far is spot on. Don't pancic but there are a couple of things you can do to help yourself.

 

Did you get any letters regarding this before you received a summons and if so, why didn't you answer it.

 

Now, more importantly, try to save yourself a lot of time and worry.

 

Get a copy of the university register that shows you were present there at the material time.

 

If you cannot do that and have a recent facial photo of yourself, sign your name on the back of it and send it to the prosecutors office with your letter stating that you have been the victim of an impostor.

 

Ask for your photograph to be returned to you within 10 days.

 

This will allow the reporting staff to confirm that you were not the traveller and should close the case immediately with the rail company withdrawing their allegation.

 

By the way exit3, you've lost me completely. Where did suing any credit company come into this??

The credit company are suing her for a an fraudulent transaction which must emanate from the fact that the tuve/rail company is seeking recovery of paymnet of what they consider a frudulent transaction . So the first action would be to defend the action brought to squiglly by frist connect and then also she needs to bring the tube.rail company into the action as they are the ones who are the accusers.

 

Sorry, I am not a lawyer but have had some experience of being sued for a debt which was not our debt and had to bring the person from whom the money was due into the action . In squiggly case it is because she has been falsely been accused of fraud by the rail/tube company who are the originators of the accusation, which they have passed on to the credit company by reclaiming the money, which squiggly needs to prove is teh case so she must get the voucher and confirmation of htis fact. It is a case of the "buck passing" and getting to the accuser and the claimant:confused:! who is the credit compnay. If a credit company is advised by a merchant that a fraudulent transaction has taken place the credit company will endevour to recover the money, and in this instance appears to have taken on the repsonsilbility of suing for funds for a purchase of an alleged fraudulent transaction.It is very importatn for Sqiglly to be very proactive on this. We have had experience of this but have recovered the money and no further action was needed. :!:

Link to post
Share on other sites

I'm sorry exit3 but YOU have got this all wrong!!

 

First Capital Connect are a train operating company running passenger rail services in the home counties, London and the south of England.

 

There is no mention of a credit card nor a credit card transaction in any of this until you mentioned it.

 

First Capital Connect have issued a summons because a person giving squiggly1's name and details was caught fraudulently avoiding a rail fare.

Edited by Old-CodJA
Link to post
Share on other sites

I'm sorry exit3 but YOU have got this all wrong!!

 

First Capital Connect are a train operating company running passenger rail services in the home counties, London and the south of England.

 

There is no mention of a credit card nor a credit card transaction in any of this until you mentioned it.

 

First Capital Connect have issued a summons because a person giving squiggly1's name and details was caught fraudulently avoiding a rail fare.

apoligies stand corrected I tought it was connercted with Capital one, the issue is much simpler!:)
Link to post
Share on other sites

The advice given so far is good.

 

As you can prove that you were in lectures at the time 'the imposter' was stopped you can really show FCC up in court.

However this is not a matter of showing whoever up.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thank you everyone for your help. You have all been very helpful. I got a letter from my tutors saying that I was present in lectures, along with the copy of the attendance sheet that was signed that day by everyone present (which I have signed myself). Also, after reading the summons sent out to me correctly, it's titled as Mr, so it turns out that the imposter was a man, whilst I am very clearly not a man (I just saw my name on the letter and panicked and didn't read the name address bit properly, and completely missed out the Mr bit). So I'm hoping that I do not have any problems :) Thank you everyone once again for your help

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...