Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • wont go near it with a barge pole as its ex gov't debt.  
    • Thanks, I've had my fill of this lot. What makes me so mad is that I had to take out student loan to get any DHSS help. And then when I tried to help myself and family they presented obstacles. Might be worth passing story to RIP off Britain?
    • there is NO exposure if you simple remove your name address/ref numbers etc from docs, over 10'000 pdf uploads are here. which then harvests IP addresses off of the people that then do so..which is why we do not allow hosting sites. read our rules and upload carefully thats exactly why we say capture as JPG, redact, then convert/merge to one mass PDF. then online sites to achieve that we list do not leave watermarks.  every once in a while we have a user like you that thinks they know better...we've been doing it since 2006 with not one security issue. thank you.
    • was at the time you ticked it  but now they've still not complied . if you read up, here , you'll see thats what everyone does,  
    • no they never allow the age related get out, erudio are masters at faking supposed 'arrears' fees which were levied before said date and thus null its write off. 1000's of threads here on them!! scammers untied that lot. i can almost guarantee they'll state it's not SB'd too re above, but just ignore them once sent. dx    
  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 5590 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Just a quickie, and dont worry too much about speed, the wally can stand there all day if he likes.

 

We had a council tax bill outstanding from our old house that was repossessed last year that they sent to bailiffs.

 

Much as it pained us to do it, we made arrangement to pay the bill at £115 a month, since we did owe the money after all and were in a slightly more stable position. They wouldnt leave regardless of this, telling me the council were demanding a walking possession order which I refused to do. In the end, he wrote down the jewellery I was wearing and gave me a bit of paper, but I refused to sign, but apparently it's still valid?

 

My husband paid the £115 every month without fail, (plus the £1.50 charge for paying via debit card) every month. The last payment was made 25th January. The original bill was £921. It works out we've paid £920. So yes, I think we might be a £1 out. (The £921 covered their charges as well)

 

Anyways, today they just turned up at my door telling me I owe another £21! Obviously we say we don't. He's handed me a letter telling me my arrangement is now 'void' (well big whoop since i owe sod all) but adding a £65 calling fee.

 

Is the calling fee legal? Is the walking possession order legal??

 

Ta

 

Rach

 

(PS: Don't hurry, it's raining here and I have no porch)

 

I clearly don't!

Link to post
Share on other sites

LMAO - Jacobs by any chance??

 

Leave him there - if the levy hasn't been signed I don't think it's valid and walking pocession charge if I remember correctly is £12 - coucil tax visits can be charged at £24.50 for the 1st and £18.00 2nd nothing after that unless they are levying goods which he is clearly not.

So ring the council now and pay the £1 outstanding then tell him the debt has been satisfied and he can now whistle for the rest.

Link to post
Share on other sites

you could also stick a letter through the door telling him you are revoking his right under English common law to visit your house and if he's still there in 10 mins you're calling the police and pressing charges for tresspassing :)

 

 

i think you would get short change from the police on this one though

Link to post
Share on other sites

Spoken to council and we don't owe them a penny. They've been paid in full.

 

So we paid £920 in installments and £200 when they came the first time.

 

Which means £131 in fees.

 

If they think I'm paying another penny they are sadly mistaken!

Link to post
Share on other sites

ashmk love your answer

rachie1973 does the £131 fees include a levy

 

 

Apparently so. They 'levied' on the jewellery I was wearing, against my wishes and I refused to sign their levy.

 

I don't know if that makes it a true levy or not.

Link to post
Share on other sites

If you have any doubt about that read this:

The Council Tax (Administration and Enforcement) Regulations 1992

 

In particular I'm referring to this section

Distress

45.—(3) If, before any goods are seized, the appropriate amount (including charges arising up to the time of the payment or tender) is paid or tendered to the authority, the authority shall accept the amount and the levy shall not be proceeded with.

Link to post
Share on other sites

if the levy hasn't been signed I don't think it's valid

 

Actually all a bailiff has to do is touch an item, or express a wish to levy upon an item that he can touch and it is seized.

 

Of course he must generate some paperwork (a list saying what he's done is enough) to show WHAT he has seized, but it doesn't require a signature.

 

On the other hand a walking possession order/agreement isn't valid unless it's signed by the debtor.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I would do more than that.

 

In your position I would start the process of a form 4 complaint, on the grounds that the bailiff is attempting to charge unlawfully after the liability order has been satisfied.

 

Before you do that though, check with the council that the liability order has definitely been satisfied. You are entitled to a printout of your account.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Actually all a bailiff has to do is touch an item, or express a wish to levy upon an item that he can touch and it is seized.

 

Of course he must generate some paperwork (a list saying what he's done is enough) to show WHAT he has seized, but it doesn't require a signature.

 

On the other hand a walking possession order/agreement isn't valid unless it's signed by the debtor.

 

Surely if a Debtor refuses to sign, the bailiff must take the goods there and then, or the levy is invalid - ie how would he prove he has levied without a signature?

 

And surely they are not allowed to levy on things you are wearing at the time? If that were the case then every bailiff would be levying on ear rings, or trainers or whatever :eek:

[sIGPIC][/sIGPIC]

Link to post
Share on other sites

Is this correct? The bailiff levied upon jewellery!!

 

If so, I have NEVER EVER come across this before. Can you say which company this was?

 

He can charge a levy fee which is on a sliding scale and in this case would have been around £40. Have you requested a full breakdown?

 

Did you get a copy of the Walking Possession /Seizure Notice.

 

What Jewellery is he saying that he levied upon?

 

I would be VERY interested in your response to this.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Is this correct? The bailiff levied upon jewellery!!

 

If so, I have NEVER EVER come across this before. Can you say which company this was?

 

Ross & Roberts

 

 

He can charge a levy fee which is on a sliding scale and in this case would have been around £40. Have you requested a full breakdown?

 

No

 

 

Did you get a copy of the Walking Possession /Seizure Notice.

 

Yes, I have a copy of the walking possession order. Where my signature should be he wrote 'refused to sign'

 

 

What Jewellery is he saying that he levied upon?

 

The walking possession order quotes my engagement ring, and 2 others (one of which got lost about a month ago) and my watch. Also some naff garden furniture.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...