Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Euro have got a lot wrong and have failed to comply with the Protection of Freedoms Act 2012 Schedule 4.  According to Section 13 after ECP have written to Arval they should then send a NTH to the Hirer  which they have done.This eliminates Arval from any further pursuit by ECP. When they wrote to your company they should have sent copies of everything that they asked Arval for. This is to prove that your company agree what happened on the day of the breach. If ECP then comply with the Act they are allowed to pursue the hirer. If they fail, to comply they cannot make the hirer pay. They can pursue until they are blue in the face but the Hirer is not lawfully required to pay them and if it went to Court ECP would lose. Your company could say who was driving but the only person that can be pursued is the Hirer, there does not appear to be an extension for a driver to be pursued. Even if there was, because ECP have failed miserably to comply with the Act  they still have no chance of winning in Court. Here are the relevant Hire sections from the Act below.
    • Thank-you FTMDave for your feedback. May I take this opportunity to say that after reading numerous threads to which you are a contributor, I have great admiration for you. You really do go above and beyond in your efforts to help other people. The time you put in to help, in particular with witness statements is incredible. I am also impressed by the way in which you will defer to others with more experience should there be a particular point that you are not 100% clear on and return with answers or advice that you have sought. I wish I had the ability to help others as you do. There is another forum expert that I must also thank for his time and patience answering my questions and allowing me to come to a “penny drops” moment on one particular issue. I believe he has helped me immensely to understand and to strengthen my own case. I shall not mention who it is here at the moment just in case he would rather I didn't but I greatly appreciate the time he took working through that issue with me. I spent 20+ years of working in an industry that rules and regulations had to be strictly adhered to, indeed, exams had to be taken in order that one had to become qualified in those rules and regulations in order to carry out the duties of the post. In a way, such things as PoFA 2012 are rules and regulations that are not completely alien to me. It has been very enjoyable for me to learn these regulations and the law surrounding them. I wish I had found this forum years ago. I admit that perhaps I had been too keen to express my opinions given that I am still in the learning process. After a suitable period in this industry I became Qualified to teach the rules and regulations and I always said to those I taught that there is no such thing as a stupid question. If opinions, theories and observations are put forward, discussion can take place and as long as the result is that the student is able to clearly see where they went wrong and got to that moment where the penny drops then that is a valuable learning experience. No matter how experienced one is, there is always something to learn and if I did not know the answer to a question, I would say, I don't know the answer to that question but I will go and find out what the answer is. In any posts I have made, I have stated, “unless I am wrong” or “as far as I can see” awaiting a response telling me what I got wrong, if it was wrong. If I am wrong I am only too happy to admit it and take it as a valuable learning experience. I take the point that perhaps I should not post on other peoples threads and I shall refrain from doing so going forward. 🤐 As alluded to, circumstances can change, FTMDave made the following point that it had been boasted that no Caggers, over two years, who had sent a PPC the wrong registration snotty letter, had even been taken to court, let alone lost a court hearing .... but now they have. I too used the word "seemed" because it is true, we haven't had all the details. After perusing this forum I believe certain advice changed here after the Beavis case, I could be wrong but that is what I seem to remember reading. Could it be that after winning the above case in question, a claimant could refer back to this case and claim that a defendant had not made use of the appeal process, therefore allowing the claimant to win? Again, in this instance only, I do not know what is to be gained by not making an appeal or concealing the identity of the driver, especially if it is later admitted that the defendant was the driver and was the one to input the incorrect VRN in error. So far no one has educated me as to the reason why. But, of course, when making an appeal, it should be worded carefully so that an error in the appeal process cannot be referred back to. I thought long and hard about whether or not to post here but I wanted to bring up this point for discussion. Yes, I admit I have limited knowledge, but does that mean I should have kept silent? After I posted that I moved away from this forum slightly to find other avenues to increase my knowledge. I bought a law book and am now following certain lawyers on Youtube in the hope of arming myself with enough ammunition to use in my own case. In one video titled “7 Reasons You Will LOSE Your Court Case (and how to avoid them)” by Black Belt Barrister I believe he makes my point by saying the following, and I quote: “If you ignore the complaint in the first instance and it does eventually end up in court then it's going to look bad that you didn't co-operate in the first place. The court is not going to look kindly on you simply ignoring the company and not, let's say, availing yourself of any kind of appeal opportunities, particularly if we are talking about parking charge notices and things like that.” This point makes me think that, it is not such a bizarre judgement in the end. Only in the case of having proof of payment and inputting an incorrect VRN .... could it be worthwhile making a carefully worded appeal in the first instance? .... If the appeal fails, depending on the reason, surely this could only help if it went to court? As always, any feedback gratefully received.
    • To which official body does one make a formal complaint about a LPA fixed charge receiver? Does one make a complaint first to the company employing the appointed individuals?    Or can one complain immediately to an official body, such as nara?    I've tried researching but there doesn't seem a very clear route on how to legally hold them to account for wrongful behaviour.  It seems frustratingly complicated because they are considered to be officers of the court and held in high esteem - and the borrower is deemed liable for their actions.  Yet what does the borrower do when disclosure shows clear evidence of wrong-doing? Does anyone have any pointers please?
    • Steam is still needed in many industries, but much of it is still made with fossil fuels.View the full article
    • Less than 1% of Japan's top companies are led by women despite years of efforts to address the issue.View the full article
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 5538 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Just a quickie, and dont worry too much about speed, the wally can stand there all day if he likes.

 

We had a council tax bill outstanding from our old house that was repossessed last year that they sent to bailiffs.

 

Much as it pained us to do it, we made arrangement to pay the bill at £115 a month, since we did owe the money after all and were in a slightly more stable position. They wouldnt leave regardless of this, telling me the council were demanding a walking possession order which I refused to do. In the end, he wrote down the jewellery I was wearing and gave me a bit of paper, but I refused to sign, but apparently it's still valid?

 

My husband paid the £115 every month without fail, (plus the £1.50 charge for paying via debit card) every month. The last payment was made 25th January. The original bill was £921. It works out we've paid £920. So yes, I think we might be a £1 out. (The £921 covered their charges as well)

 

Anyways, today they just turned up at my door telling me I owe another £21! Obviously we say we don't. He's handed me a letter telling me my arrangement is now 'void' (well big whoop since i owe sod all) but adding a £65 calling fee.

 

Is the calling fee legal? Is the walking possession order legal??

 

Ta

 

Rach

 

(PS: Don't hurry, it's raining here and I have no porch)

 

I clearly don't!

Link to post
Share on other sites

LMAO - Jacobs by any chance??

 

Leave him there - if the levy hasn't been signed I don't think it's valid and walking pocession charge if I remember correctly is £12 - coucil tax visits can be charged at £24.50 for the 1st and £18.00 2nd nothing after that unless they are levying goods which he is clearly not.

So ring the council now and pay the £1 outstanding then tell him the debt has been satisfied and he can now whistle for the rest.

Link to post
Share on other sites

you could also stick a letter through the door telling him you are revoking his right under English common law to visit your house and if he's still there in 10 mins you're calling the police and pressing charges for tresspassing :)

 

 

i think you would get short change from the police on this one though

Link to post
Share on other sites

Spoken to council and we don't owe them a penny. They've been paid in full.

 

So we paid £920 in installments and £200 when they came the first time.

 

Which means £131 in fees.

 

If they think I'm paying another penny they are sadly mistaken!

Link to post
Share on other sites

ashmk love your answer

rachie1973 does the £131 fees include a levy

 

 

Apparently so. They 'levied' on the jewellery I was wearing, against my wishes and I refused to sign their levy.

 

I don't know if that makes it a true levy or not.

Link to post
Share on other sites

If you have any doubt about that read this:

The Council Tax (Administration and Enforcement) Regulations 1992

 

In particular I'm referring to this section

Distress

45.—(3) If, before any goods are seized, the appropriate amount (including charges arising up to the time of the payment or tender) is paid or tendered to the authority, the authority shall accept the amount and the levy shall not be proceeded with.

Link to post
Share on other sites

if the levy hasn't been signed I don't think it's valid

 

Actually all a bailiff has to do is touch an item, or express a wish to levy upon an item that he can touch and it is seized.

 

Of course he must generate some paperwork (a list saying what he's done is enough) to show WHAT he has seized, but it doesn't require a signature.

 

On the other hand a walking possession order/agreement isn't valid unless it's signed by the debtor.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I would do more than that.

 

In your position I would start the process of a form 4 complaint, on the grounds that the bailiff is attempting to charge unlawfully after the liability order has been satisfied.

 

Before you do that though, check with the council that the liability order has definitely been satisfied. You are entitled to a printout of your account.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Actually all a bailiff has to do is touch an item, or express a wish to levy upon an item that he can touch and it is seized.

 

Of course he must generate some paperwork (a list saying what he's done is enough) to show WHAT he has seized, but it doesn't require a signature.

 

On the other hand a walking possession order/agreement isn't valid unless it's signed by the debtor.

 

Surely if a Debtor refuses to sign, the bailiff must take the goods there and then, or the levy is invalid - ie how would he prove he has levied without a signature?

 

And surely they are not allowed to levy on things you are wearing at the time? If that were the case then every bailiff would be levying on ear rings, or trainers or whatever :eek:

[sIGPIC][/sIGPIC]

Link to post
Share on other sites

Is this correct? The bailiff levied upon jewellery!!

 

If so, I have NEVER EVER come across this before. Can you say which company this was?

 

He can charge a levy fee which is on a sliding scale and in this case would have been around £40. Have you requested a full breakdown?

 

Did you get a copy of the Walking Possession /Seizure Notice.

 

What Jewellery is he saying that he levied upon?

 

I would be VERY interested in your response to this.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Is this correct? The bailiff levied upon jewellery!!

 

If so, I have NEVER EVER come across this before. Can you say which company this was?

 

Ross & Roberts

 

 

He can charge a levy fee which is on a sliding scale and in this case would have been around £40. Have you requested a full breakdown?

 

No

 

 

Did you get a copy of the Walking Possession /Seizure Notice.

 

Yes, I have a copy of the walking possession order. Where my signature should be he wrote 'refused to sign'

 

 

What Jewellery is he saying that he levied upon?

 

The walking possession order quotes my engagement ring, and 2 others (one of which got lost about a month ago) and my watch. Also some naff garden furniture.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...