Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like

MBNA Credit Card PPI claim


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 5525 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Have received a standard template No letter regarding refund of PPI due to self employment - with a copy of the original application form which has a tick highlighted in the Yes box. However have looked very closely at the tick it is different to all the other ones.

 

Should I go back to MBNA again or directly to the FSO?

 

Thanks in advance

 

Ollie Bollie

Link to post
Share on other sites

Have just received an acknowledgement of safe receipt of correspondence from FOS - however warned they are currently have high volumes of enquiries and that they will provide a full response as soon as they can. Allocated a case number - so its a start to what I think will be a very long process - but hopefully worth it in the long run.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Sorry Ollie it is a long wait - started mine for MBNA and Barclaycard with FOS in December 2007 now with an adjudicator in January 2009.

 

All I can say that for the price of a stamp its hopefully worth the wait. ;-)

Ripped v Barclaycard - WON!!! :D

Ripped v MBNA - with FOS since Jan 08 with adjudicator ;)

 

I owe my attitude to Gene Hunt :cool:

Link to post
Share on other sites

Oh no - I hadn't realised it was going to be as long a wait as that - but as you say if the outcome is positive, it's worth it for the price of stamp.

 

Hope your results work out in your favour.

 

Ollie

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 3 weeks later...

Latest update

 

Today received a polite letter from the FOS advising that they are contacting MBNA for further information. Then as soon as they can they will pass the complaint to one of their adjudicators.

 

Advised it may take a while due to number of claims etc but did promise that they will write again as soon as possible - and certainly within the next 2 months to keep in touch.

 

So whilst I appreciate it is likely to be a very very long wait - I remain hopeful!

Link to post
Share on other sites

 

Advised it may take a while due to number of claims etc but did promise that they will write again as soon as possible - and certainly within the next 2 months to keep in touch.

 

 

I've had three "within two months" letters now on my MBNA claim. The last time I spoke with them, I was told realistically another six months (from late Feb) before it get's to an adjudicator. That's providing MBNA play ball with their responses.

 

I guess all we can do is be patient. It's provided a nice little diversion while many of us await the lifting of the Bank Charges stays.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 3 weeks later...

Today I have received a letter from the FOS advising that MBNA have provided them with an offer prior to the FOS completing their view of the case.

 

MBNA have confirmed its offer will be based on a full refund of premiums, along with associated interest, plus interest @ 8% in full and final settlement of the complaint.

 

It has also confirmed that part of the refund will be placed against the outstanding debt on the card to reduce the balance to zero with the remainder being issued in the form of a cheque.

 

My only concern is that I do not have all the statements dating back to 2000 so how will I be sure that the amount offered is correct?

 

I think this is a great result for the price of a couple of stamps and letters - and think I should probably accept the offer - but just wonder why MBNA have responded so quickly when normally they seem very difficult to get money out of.

 

Any views would be appreciated.

 

Many thanks

 

Tracy

Link to post
Share on other sites

My only concern is that I do not have all the statements dating back to 2000 so how will I be sure that the amount offered is correct?

 

I think this is a great result for the price of a couple of stamps and letters - and think I should probably accept the offer - but just wonder why MBNA have responded so quickly when normally they seem very difficult to get money out of.

 

I would like to say trust them but that would be foolish if you have some statements and your original cca you could do a quick check to see if it seems right.

 

It is a good result no more debt and a bit of money back. Why would mbna respond with an offer my guess is there are thousands of complaints against them and they will want to avoid the FSA imposing a large fine. The last one was £7m so they are probably a bit scared and now a lot of banks are offering goodwill settlements without admission of liability to get them of the potential FSA hook.:eek:

 

aa

I have no legal training and the advice I offer is a matter of support. Before you commit to any Legal action you are advised to contact a qualified legal practitioner.

------------------------------------------------

Bank charge successes:

Halifax - Full settlement incl interest.

HSBC - Settlement, goodwill no admission of liability about 75% of claim.

RBS - Settlement, goodwill no admission of liability about 70% of claim.

2 ongoing claims for bank charges with HSBC with more to come. (Supreme Court ruling could have upset these claims) They did :mad:

PPI Successes

PPI 4 settlements on 9 loans. FOS involvement on 7 added on the 8 % Statutory interest another 30% to both.

2 claims settled in full with LV without FOS involvement.

2 claims settled in full with HSBC without FOS involvement

 

PPI Claims ongoing with:

Cap one Now with the FOS

Barclays. Paid up today 24/04/10 cheque received for over £4,500 and in the bank.

LTSB still have to decide on this as their SAR production was abysmal. Papers data mixed up documents missing etc

 

1 Complaint not upheld by FOS they said it was ICO issue. Complaint upheld by ICO. See this..

Post 290 from

***RBS PPI Claim Long fight but, WON***

 

Please do not PM me for advice as it may be sometime before I can respond.

 

Keep at them. Do not give way and do not accept all they tell you, they will delay and stall for as long as they can to prevent repaying you your mis-sold PPI.

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks for coming back so soon aa. I didn't have an original SAR - do you think it would be worth while getting one to double check the amount? Also in our opinion do you think I would be better to settle as opposed to continue?

Thanks in advance

Tracy

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks for coming back so soon aa. I didn't have an original Subject Access Request - do you think it would be worth while getting one to double check the amount? Also in our opinion do you think I would be better to settle as opposed to continue?

Thanks in advance

Tracy

 

You are a little late to send a SAR as the offer is there, but IMO I would send one anyway...here is the template...

 

http://www.consumerforums.com/resources/templates-library/86-debt-collectors/576-subject-access-request-debt-a-dca.html

 

The statutory fee is £10.00 and they must respond within 40 days failure to respond results in you sending a Non compliance letter and an formal complain to the Information Commissioner Office.:D

I have no legal training and the advice I offer is a matter of support. Before you commit to any Legal action you are advised to contact a qualified legal practitioner.

------------------------------------------------

Bank charge successes:

Halifax - Full settlement incl interest.

HSBC - Settlement, goodwill no admission of liability about 75% of claim.

RBS - Settlement, goodwill no admission of liability about 70% of claim.

2 ongoing claims for bank charges with HSBC with more to come. (Supreme Court ruling could have upset these claims) They did :mad:

PPI Successes

PPI 4 settlements on 9 loans. FOS involvement on 7 added on the 8 % Statutory interest another 30% to both.

2 claims settled in full with LV without FOS involvement.

2 claims settled in full with HSBC without FOS involvement

 

PPI Claims ongoing with:

Cap one Now with the FOS

Barclays. Paid up today 24/04/10 cheque received for over £4,500 and in the bank.

LTSB still have to decide on this as their SAR production was abysmal. Papers data mixed up documents missing etc

 

1 Complaint not upheld by FOS they said it was ICO issue. Complaint upheld by ICO. See this..

Post 290 from

***RBS PPI Claim Long fight but, WON***

 

Please do not PM me for advice as it may be sometime before I can respond.

 

Keep at them. Do not give way and do not accept all they tell you, they will delay and stall for as long as they can to prevent repaying you your mis-sold PPI.

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...