Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • just to be clear here..... the DVLA do not send letters if a drivers licence address differs from any car's V5C that shows the same driver as it's registered keeper.
    • sorry she is a private individual, the cars are parking on her land. she can clamp the cars. only firms were outlawed from doing it bazza. thats what the victims of people dumping cars on their drives near airports did and they didn't not get prosecuted.    
    • The DVLA keeps two records of you. One as a driver and one for your car. If they differ you might find out in around a month when they will send you a reminder as well as to your other half for their car. If you receive nothing then you can be fairly sure that you were tailgating though wouldn't explain why they didn't pick up your car on one of drive past their cameras. However even if you do get a PCN later then your situation will not change. The current PCN does not comply with the Protection of Freedoms Act 2012 Schedule 4 which is the main law that covers private parking. It doesn't comply for two reasons. 1. Section 9 [2][a] states  (2)The notice must— (a)specify the vehicle, the relevant land on which it was parked and the period of parking to which the notice relates; The PCN states 47 minutes which are the arrival and departure times not the time you were actually parked. if you subtract the time you took to drive from the entrance. look for a parking place  park in it perhaps having to manoeuvre a couple of times to fit within the lines and unload the children reloading the children getting seat belts on  driving to the exit stopping for cars pedestrians on the way you may well find that the actual time you were parked was quite likely to be around ten minutes over the required time.  Motorists are allowed a MINIMUM of ten minutes Grace period [something that the rogues in the parking industry conveniently forget-the word minimum] . So it could be that you did not overstay. 2] Sectio9 [2][f]  (ii)the creditor does not know both the name of the driver and a current address for service for the driver, the creditor will (if all the applicable conditions under this Schedule are met) have the right to recover from the keeper so much of that amount as remains unpaid; Your PCN does not include the words in brackets and in 2a the Act included the word "must". Another fail. What those failures mean is that MET cannot transfer the liability to pay the charge from the driver to the keeper. Only the driver is now liable which is why we recommend our members not to appeal. It is so easy to reveal who was driving by saying "when I parked the car" than "when the driver parked the car".  As long as they don't know who was driving they have little chance of winning in court. This is partly because Courts do not accept that the driver and the keeper are the same person. And because anyone with a valid motor insurance policy is able to drive your cars. It is a shame that you are too far away to get photos of the car park signage. It is often poor and quite often the parking rogues lose in Court on their poor signage alone. I hope hat you can now relax and not panic about the PCN. You will receive many letters from Met, their unregulated debt collectors and sixth rate solicitors threatening you with ever higher amounts of money. The poor dears have never read the Act which states quite clearly that the maximum sum that can be charged is the amount on the signs. The Act has only been in force for 12 years so it may take a  few more years for the penny to drop.  You can safely ignore everything they send you unless or until they send you a Letter of Claim. Just come back to us if they do send one of those love letters to you and we will advise on a snotty letter to send them. In the meantime go on and enjoy your life. Continue reading other threads and if you do get any worrying letters let us know. 
    • Hopefully the ANPR cameras didn't pick up the two vehicles, but I don't think you're out of the woods just yet. MET's "work" consists of sending out hundreds of these invoices every week so yours might be a few days behind your partner's. There is also the matter of Royal Mail.  I once sold two second-hand books to someone on eBay.  Weirdly the cost of sending them separately was less than the cost of sending them in one parcel.  So to save a few bob I sent them seperately.  One turned up the next day.  One arrived after four days.  They were  sent from the same post office at the same time! But let's hope I'm being too pessimistic. Please update us of any developments.
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

dcas


ck&ll
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 5577 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

ive been here before for advice about dcas but when I send a cca the debt just get passed to another dca is there any way to stop this happening or do I just keep sending a cca

 

also ive had an argos card with protection cover but when i became ill and couldnt work the said i wasnt covered as they dont cover depression or forms of mental illness but i also have renal probs diabetes and very high uncontrolled blood pressure also not covered they refunded my premiums and credited them against the account and left me with the debt and now i have a dca saying they are going to apply to the court plus costs etc etc etc any help most welcome are these people allowed to do this:sad:

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi,

As you have CCA'd the original DCA and got passed to another DCA, it says to me that they don't have a valid agreement and are passing the buck to some other poor DCA.

 

HAve a look at this letter and send it to your new DCA

 

http://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/forum/mbna/175283-dtjim-mbna.html#post1906713

 

You will have to edit it to suit but should do the trick (hopefully :))

 

fox

  • Haha 1

If you are asked to deal with any matter via private message, PLEASE report it.

Everything I say is opinion only. If you are unsure on any comment made, you should see a qualified solicitor

Please help CAG. Order this ebook. Now available on Amazon. Please click HERE

Link to post
Share on other sites

if you haven't CCA'd Argos then the account isn't technically in dispute. this DCA will send out threat-o-grams on a regular basis so hit back with a CCA request.

 

How long have you had the Argos card?

Roughly how much do you owe Argos? (no exact figures please)

Which DCA is chasing you?

 

Once you have more experience of DCA tactics, you will realise that they send these letters out on a regular basis to scare the uninitiated into paying.

 

Even if the unlikely happened and they did take you to court, the judge would take your income and expenditure into account before making an order of how much to pay which will be much less than the DCA wants (and they can't up it without going back to court) which is why they don't like going to court, just make threats of doing so.

 

fox

If you are asked to deal with any matter via private message, PLEASE report it.

Everything I say is opinion only. If you are unsure on any comment made, you should see a qualified solicitor

Please help CAG. Order this ebook. Now available on Amazon. Please click HERE

Link to post
Share on other sites

Chances are they will have an agreement. Whether it's valid or not is another matter.

Did you receive a default notice from Argos?

Did you receive a notice of assignment from Argos or Freds?

 

fox

If you are asked to deal with any matter via private message, PLEASE report it.

Everything I say is opinion only. If you are unsure on any comment made, you should see a qualified solicitor

Please help CAG. Order this ebook. Now available on Amazon. Please click HERE

Link to post
Share on other sites

If you haven't done so, Keep all envelopes as well as the letters.

 

Demanding payment on a debt without first telling you that they have been assigned the account is in contravention of the Law of Property Act 1925 section 196(4). It has to be sent to you by recorded delivery before they can commence enforecement action.

This is a letter I'm sending to my errant DCA which covers this exact topic

 

http://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/forum/debt-collection-industry/164356-lowells-again-14.html#post1992212

 

You should have had a default notice from Argos as well giving you a specific time to make up the missing payments.

If you haven't received one of them either, as I see it, Argos shouldn't have passed the account on as you have to be given the chance to put matters right first.

 

If you can afford it, send Argos a SAR but stipulate what you require from them:

A valid copy of your agreement

A default notice

A letter of Assignment and proof it was sent

Statements

Any written correspondence between you and them

Tanscripts of recorded phone calls (if any exist).

 

SAR's cost £10

Send by recorded delivery

send only postal orders

Give them 40 days to reply

 

This is a link to the SAR

http://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/forum/bank-templates-library/516-1-data-protection-act.html#post2480

 

fox

If you are asked to deal with any matter via private message, PLEASE report it.

Everything I say is opinion only. If you are unsure on any comment made, you should see a qualified solicitor

Please help CAG. Order this ebook. Now available on Amazon. Please click HERE

Link to post
Share on other sites

thanks fox sorry for being a bit thick sed to ARGOS not the DCA

 

S'alright.

I was a bit fick whem I first came here :). Yes send it to argos. No point sending one to the DCA as all they buy is a list of "debtors".

If you are asked to deal with any matter via private message, PLEASE report it.

Everything I say is opinion only. If you are unsure on any comment made, you should see a qualified solicitor

Please help CAG. Order this ebook. Now available on Amazon. Please click HERE

Link to post
Share on other sites

PS. thanks for the click. All very welcome

  • Haha 1

If you are asked to deal with any matter via private message, PLEASE report it.

Everything I say is opinion only. If you are unsure on any comment made, you should see a qualified solicitor

Please help CAG. Order this ebook. Now available on Amazon. Please click HERE

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...

hi silverfox

sent cca last week today they returned letter with my p.o.stating they are contacting the original creditor and they have 40days to respond? I thought they had only 12 any Ideas maybe whats going on

Link to post
Share on other sites

Now I am confused.

 

Did you send an SAR to Freds or did you send it to Argos?

 

If you CCA'd freds then they have 12 working days from receipt of your letter to respond. If they are saying anything different then they are full of s**t.

 

Give them the time to hang themselves.

 

fox

If you are asked to deal with any matter via private message, PLEASE report it.

Everything I say is opinion only. If you are unsure on any comment made, you should see a qualified solicitor

Please help CAG. Order this ebook. Now available on Amazon. Please click HERE

Link to post
Share on other sites

sorry fox gave you the wrong info i wrote to both stating that im disputing because no default notice or assignment nothing back yet

the cca i mentioned was to Meritforce for a debt which keeps getting passed around it started at 1st credit then connaught who returned my p.o last year when i sent them a cca now meritforce have done the same

Link to post
Share on other sites

sorry fox gave you the wrong info i wrote to both stating that im disputing because no default notice or assignment nothing back yet

the cca i mentioned was to Meritforce for a debt which keeps getting passed around it started at 1st credit then connaught who returned my p.o last year when i sent them a cca now meritforce have done the same

Aha, confusion sorted :D

 

I think a bemused letter should have been enough. This is one I have:

ACCOUNT IN DISPUTE

Dear Sir or Madam,

Account number: XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX

 

I must admit that I am rather bemused as to why this account has been passed to yourselves, as it is in dispute with the **original creditor** and has been since DATE.

Not only is this a breach of OFT collection guidelines, but also in breach of the Consumer Credit Act 1974, the Data Protection Act 1998, the Banking Code and the Consumer Protection from Unfair Trading Regulations 2008.

 

As **original creditor** are now in default of my Consumer Credit Act request, and have also breached s10 Data Protection Act request , I consider this account to be in SERIOUS DISPUTE.

 

As you are aware while my Consumer Credit Act request remains in default enforcement action is NOT permitted, under s127 this constitutes a complete defence at law.

 

Now I would respectfully suggest that this account is returned to the **original creditor** for resolution of these defaults and breaches, as **DCA** cannot lawfully pursue any enforcement activities.

If **DCA** chooses to ignore my dispute and attempt enforcement, I will initiate legal action and file reports with the appropriate authorities, including, but not limited to, Trading Standards, Office of Fair Trading, Information Commissioners Office, Financial Ombudsman Service and possible court action. Please also note that any debt collector attending my premises will be removed, if necessary by the police.

 

After taking advice, I am also of the opinion that any continued pursuit is in violation of the Administration of Justice Act 1970 section 40 as well as breaching a number of the OFT Collection Guidelines

 

I hope that the foregoing will not be necessary and an acceptable solution can be accomplished.

 

I would appreciate your due diligence in this matter.

 

I look forward to hearing from you in writing informing me that this matter is now closed. I would also request that you resist the temptation to send me any more of your standard template letters.

 

Yours faithfully

 

 

 

Once a DCA has been CCA'd and returned to OC, you shouldn't need to CCA any other DCA again

 

fox

If you are asked to deal with any matter via private message, PLEASE report it.

Everything I say is opinion only. If you are unsure on any comment made, you should see a qualified solicitor

Please help CAG. Order this ebook. Now available on Amazon. Please click HERE

Link to post
Share on other sites

thanks again fox

so even though i ccad connaugh and they returned my p.o. last year they are technically in the wrong to pass it to another dca for collection for not providing the request or have they got out by returning it

Link to post
Share on other sites

Absotively(!):D It is against the rules to sell or pass on an account that is in dispute. You don't have to tell them it is in dispute, by the fact of no agreement puts the account into dispute. We just do so to make sure they are aware of our rights.

They can return as many P.O's as they like. Once the request has been made, the DCA have an obligation to supply it. If they can't supply it, they shouldn't be doing any more to it until a valid CCA turns up. They know it but that doesn't stop them flouting the rules.

If you are asked to deal with any matter via private message, PLEASE report it.

Everything I say is opinion only. If you are unsure on any comment made, you should see a qualified solicitor

Please help CAG. Order this ebook. Now available on Amazon. Please click HERE

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...