Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like

La2006 VS, Wonga


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 5294 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

This company makes the FSA a laughing stock. What gives them the right to completely ignore complaints/correspondence, what gives them the right to lie about so called "solicitors". My complaint with the fla has got no where because Wonga refuse to cooperate.

 

Its about time the Government took action against these sorts of companies.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Lets not forget their use of Marstons to collect debts which have not been to court - that rather fell flat (and must have cost them a bit). Sending out an email with over 600 names on it must be illegal - but of course they know the 'loopholes' and their employees aren't employed directly so that is another [problem].

Link to post
Share on other sites

I have used them and they were fine ?

Summary backgorund:

 

In November 2008 took a £87.00 loan out with Wonga.com, the repayment amount was meant to be £119.00 after 30days. I lost my job ( temporary contract) in December so could not repay this loan back.

 

Wonga in the space of 9 weeks have taken this from 92.50 to 320.00

 

I wrote to them on 15 Jan with a formal complaint - which they have not replied to. other than sending further demands for payments via Chainey D'Amato Shannon Consumer Litigation department.

.................

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 1 month later...

Well finally I got the FOS assessment on my complaints regarding the extra £400 plus charges WONGA tried to get from.

 

Basically, FOS agreed that WONGA was in breach of OFT DC guidelines instructing third parties to collect the debt after I offered a repayment plan, and disputed their charges and not providing a breakdown of charges or a statement of account.

 

FOS said that I didn't provide them with enough evidence regarding my unemployment ( so if you offer a payment plan, send a copy confirming your recieving benefits letter ( in my case JSA), and by recorded delivery so you have proof).

 

On conclusion FOS said " Overall, it seems clear to me that the business has fallen short in its obligations to you...."

 

The important bit: Wonga have agreed to remove all the extra interest and charges and agree to the offer of full and final settlement of the original loan amount ( the same amount I had offered in March).

Link to post
Share on other sites

Congratulations, they sent the alleged debt I had to Gothia Limited, who sent a 'statement' stating

 

Debt £875.00 Original Sum £450.00 Special Discount Price £250.00

 

and after much emailing on my part settled for £100... I did point out that their 'client' took money from an account I had and didn't let them know this, and had money from a DMP which they refused (which I still must chase up what happened to that) and eventually caved in.

 

I think that the more the FOS are aware of these companies and their 'fees' and 'habits' the better.

 

I am continuing to get emails and texts from this type of company and have no need of their services anymore. I am not going to fall into the other trap of getting a clean credit rating to build up credit again, it just is not worth the hassle.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...