Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Resume payments with the debt collectors? You say not to pay dca though do you not? 
    • yes they mostly would be enforceable, but that wasnt the point. even if they get a CCJ the very worst they could have done is get a restriction k which is useless to them. doesnt hurt anything. the CCJ would remain on file for 6yrs yes, but then gone same as a DN. the rest k charge does not show at all. and even so, the idea was to get your debts issued a default notice ASAP, them RESUME payments.. the advise is NOT conflicting, just you don't read things properly or understand.  oh well. dx
    • This is the dilemma I had then and still have it. The bit that stopped me was the post 2015 comments about them being enforceable now in most instances which I feel hasn’t been answered unless I am missing something. the bonus I guess is not all credit agreements now will be chasing me so less people chasing me down so to speak. this is the problem as there is conflicting messaging out there it is hard to plan a strategic way forward 
    • In 2017 my wife was given PIP and I finally, officially, became her carer. In 2019 she was reviewed and we were told it would be done by phone to make it easier for her as she has mobility issues and anxiety. The review was very simple, Has anything changed? No, ok, we'll stay as you are then. In 2022 a second review, this time by phone again but with an awkward given at the end for 5 years. Today, we got a new review letter (I know wait lists are bad, but I dont think the wait will take til 2027 for a decision). We're a bit confused because it's a letter, not a phone call as before. The form is just questions that ask "has anything changed" Now, since 2017, nothing has changed except we had our home adapted via disability grant. This was noted in the phone calls. So we should really write that nothing has changed in the last 2 years. The adaptations have been mentioned in both previous phone reviews, but not in writing so I guess we should bring it up. But we feel that they want us to explain everything as if it were a new claim again... And are worried if we miss something in the original claim or the phone calls she will risk losing part of the award (a 2 point swing could be really bad) It does just say "has anything changed?" But in dealing with ESA prior to getting PIP, answering the question asked "has your condition worsened or improved" at a review process with a simple "no, I'm still the same" somehow led to ESA ending and needing appeal. So just want a bit of guidance. How much detail is needed? Is minimal ok? Or should we be blunt with the fact nothing has changed, and bullet point the things she struggles with in each section?   I know the obvious thing is to just explain it all,but over 10 years the sheer amount of times the poor woman has had ESA or PIP stopped/refused just because something was missed out in their report, or they felt it meant a new claim should be made, or that they judged her healthy because we missed a tiny thing in our forms. During COVID it finally seemed like it was all just going to be smooth, especially with the phone reviews and the 5 year reward, but here we are. We just want to make sure we have the least chance to trip ourselves up, but making sure we have what is expected if you get me? I wish I still had a copy of the forms from 2017, because I could just verbatim copy them and add in about the adaptation, but (ironically) we lost our photocopies we kept of them when the house was being adapted
    • might of been better to have got them all defaulted 2yrs ago as we carefully explained before then you'd already be 1/3rd there and your current issue would not be one.    
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
        • Like
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
        • Like
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

kia v abbey2


kia
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 4870 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

hi im back again and its time to go after them again right im not sure how to go after them under the new hardship rules do i write or is it better to phone and ask for the income expenditure form to be sent out dont suppose theres a link on here for one :-|need to do the spready first though not sure what the charges are think there at least £1000 so suppsoe need to get thumb out and yes i know charely im gonna do it promise if i dont get another late nite :Dxxkia

Link to post
Share on other sites

put him down and get your spready out girl, there's money involved in this:D

 

Golden rule.......write don't phone,it's much better, then you've got copies of everything that's said.

  • Haha 1

All advice offered here is my opinion only based on what I would do in a given situation. If you wish to act on it you do so at your own discretion

......................................................

I have no legal expertise or qualification, and give advice on the basis of my own experience and nothing else.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi Kia

 

Don't ever phone them, keep a paper trail throughout your claim, and don't sign anything.

 

If you are unable to meet your basic needs with the money you have coming in, or if you are facing repossession, arrears or non payment of council tax/fines, your income has recently fallen by over 45%, or if you live solely on benefits, this is classed as hardship.

 

The main points are to get your claim going are:

 

1) Get your bank statements or transaction lists for the history of your account from your bank. Use the Data Protection Act Subject Access Request letter to do this.

 

2) Input all your figures on the simple interest spreadsheet, with the dates and reasons for the charges.

 

3) Send your preliminary request for repayment letter and include some information about your hardship and a basic outline of your circumstances.

 

4) You should receive a letter back from the bank telling you about the test case. This might have an income/expenditure form with the letter from them, if they have looked at your hardship request. If so, complete the form and attach evidence as requested, then return it to the bank. If they havent sent the form, then write back to the bank reiterating your request and concentrate on the hardship aspect of your claim.

 

5) Give them a couple weeks to reply. If you have'nt heard anything after say 14 days, then telephone the bank to check that they are dealing with your claim under hardship.

 

The bank has 8 weeks from when a claimant informs the bank that they believe they are a hardship case. You don't have to put in a separate complaint to your bank about the hardship element of your claim.

 

If the bank goes over the 8 week complaints time limit, the Financial Ombudsman will take up your case. In the instances where a bank does not agree that a claimant is a hardship case, then go straight to the Financial Services Authority, who will look at your claim. If they agree you have hardship status they will make a reccomendation to the bank on whether they should refund the charges.

 

The hardship criteria the Financial Ombudsman Service would use is the Financial Services Authority waiver guidance. These are the definitions of financial hardship as suggested by the FSA in the updated Waiver.

 

1. The firm will be sympathetic and positive when considering any financial difficulties claimed by the complainant. Firms will not subject a complainant to harassment or undue pressure when discussing their problems.

 

2. In making an assessment of financial difficulty the firm will take into account:

 

a. evidence of changes in lifestyle, including loss of employment; disability; serious illness; imprisonment; relationship breakdown; death of a partner; starting a lower paid job; parental/carer leave; and starting full-time education;

 

b. evidence of the following events:

 

i. items repeatedly being returned unpaid due to lack of available funds;

 

ii. failing to make loan repayments or other commitments;

 

iii. discontinuation of regular credits;

 

iv. notification of some form of insolvency or court proceedings;

 

v. regular requests for increased borrowing or repeated rescheduling of debts;

 

vi. making frequent cash withdrawals on a credit card at a non-promotional rate of interest; and

 

vii. repeatedly exceeding a credit card or overdraft limit without agreement (and, in this regard, where a complainant has incurred over £500 in unauthorised overdraft charges in the previous 12 months, that is to be treated as indicative of financial difficulty).

 

3. If during the handling of the complaint the firm becomes aware (including by notification from the complainant) that the complainant may be in, or heading towards financial difficulties, the firm will contact the complainant to outline their approach to financial difficulty cases and to encourage the customer to contact the firm if the customer is worried about their position. The firm will also provide signposts to sources of free, independent money advice.

 

4. The firm will make available to complainants straightforward information in plain English on the firm’s procedures and systems for dealing with customers in financial difficulty.

 

5. If it becomes clear to the firm that the complainant needs specialist assistance, the complainant will be referred promptly to a specialist team that deals with customers in financial difficulties, if one exists. The firm will give a phone number on all communications that will put the customer in contact with a named person or a team dedicated to dealing with cases of financial difficulty.

 

6. Where the firm does not have sufficient evidence to assess whether or not the complainant is in fact in financial difficulty, the firm will seek such further relevant information as is reasonably required to make that assessment. In the event that the firm reasonably requires relevant information to be provided by the complainant and the complainant does not provide the requested information within a reasonable period of time, the firm shall not be obliged to treat such a complainant as being in financial difficulty.

 

You have nothing to lose by doing this, as the FSA Waiver states :-

 

 

(16) if the firm attempts to resolve a relevant charges complaint after 27 July 2007:

 

(a) the firm must not seek agreement from the complainant that the resolution is in full and final settlement of the matter;

 

(b) in relation to such complaints, if the outcome of the test case produces a result that is more favourable to the complainant, the firm must take all reasonable steps to pay any difference in the amount of compensation actually received by the complainant and that that the complainant would have been entitled if his claim has not been settled by the firm then; and

 

© the firm must explain the implications of its approach and commitment;

 

 

ALSO

 

(15) to the extent that sums are ultimately to be paid to complainants in respect of relevant charges complaints that have been stayed, the firm must include in these sums an element of compensation in respect of interest charged to or lost by the customer as a result of being out of money during the stay period;

 

Right now get cracking, i will have a look tomorrow to see how you are getting on.

  • Haha 1

WARNING TO ALL

Please be aware of acting on advice given by PM .Anyone can make mistakes and if advice is given on the main forum people can see it to correct it ,if given privately then no one can see it to correct it. Please also be aware of giving your personal details to strangers

Link to post
Share on other sites

tomorrow :eek:omg slave driver i did try this with alliance and leicester with there charges but got the standard test case argument letter fob off i think and didnt know what to do next but ill need to get a pen first to hi light it with nicked my dads one last time and lost it :confused:thanks though both of u im onto it its gets done in time u know me ;)xxkia

  • Haha 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

and keep out of that Chatroom until you've got your homework done;)

All advice offered here is my opinion only based on what I would do in a given situation. If you wish to act on it you do so at your own discretion

......................................................

I have no legal expertise or qualification, and give advice on the basis of my own experience and nothing else.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I bet she's in that chatroom again. . . .

 

Update please madame. . . :rolleyes:

WARNING TO ALL

Please be aware of acting on advice given by PM .Anyone can make mistakes and if advice is given on the main forum people can see it to correct it ,if given privately then no one can see it to correct it. Please also be aware of giving your personal details to strangers

Link to post
Share on other sites

omg what a load of grasses can hardly do homework at 2 in the morning :Dtis not slave labour well got the pens do the spreadies tomorrow as im about to pop the wine :pglass anyone ;)xxkia

Link to post
Share on other sites

Are you still boozing Kia?

 

How are you getting on?

WARNING TO ALL

Please be aware of acting on advice given by PM .Anyone can make mistakes and if advice is given on the main forum people can see it to correct it ,if given privately then no one can see it to correct it. Please also be aware of giving your personal details to strangers

Link to post
Share on other sites

no im sober now uk no more drink for me i think youll find. Now got a bit of a problem whats new eh ive done all the charges hi_ lighted them but i cant remember to what date i claimed the last amount ill need to search and see when the last charge i claimed back cos this is claim number 2 i had kept copies on the puter that was nicked dohhh :confused:and dont wanna do a double in case they twig and through it out there are a lot of charges on it but got horrible feeling most will already ahve been claimed back xxkia

Link to post
Share on other sites

How are you getting on Kia?

WARNING TO ALL

Please be aware of acting on advice given by PM .Anyone can make mistakes and if advice is given on the main forum people can see it to correct it ,if given privately then no one can see it to correct it. Please also be aware of giving your personal details to strangers

Link to post
Share on other sites

just gotta input all the stuff no ive had to kinda use guess work as i dont know when the date i last claimed well kinda guesswork as last written statement i got was for oct 2006 so kinda figgered that if i start it from nov 2006 that will have to do not had chance to do it though im stressed atm dealing with my dad so need to chill a bit plus keep gettinh headcahes excuses i know but there u go itll be done sometime over weekend promise :)xxkia

Link to post
Share on other sites

You need to calm down Kia. All of this running around will make you ill. You are stressed out by the look of your last post.

WARNING TO ALL

Please be aware of acting on advice given by PM .Anyone can make mistakes and if advice is given on the main forum people can see it to correct it ,if given privately then no one can see it to correct it. Please also be aware of giving your personal details to strangers

Link to post
Share on other sites

I reckon so Kia. If they continue, go and see the Doc and get your blood pressure checked out....

WARNING TO ALL

Please be aware of acting on advice given by PM .Anyone can make mistakes and if advice is given on the main forum people can see it to correct it ,if given privately then no one can see it to correct it. Please also be aware of giving your personal details to strangers

Link to post
Share on other sites

its not that uk im just under stress atm my dad is not so good so starting the process of getting him assessed but its not easy and its all falling on me atm so everything else is getting pushed to the back right now including bank stuff but ill try get time tomorrow to at least input them but by nightime i just wanna chill as u can understand dont worry though ill do it need the money xxxkia

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 7 months later...

:eek:i know events have over taken me but i must get that broom out now where did i put it ohh yes i remember now :pwheres that uk gone now cos ive heard of mu1ti tasking but thats ridiucu1ous :Dxxkia

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 4 weeks later...
  • 1 year later...
  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...