Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • You can easily argue your case with no sign on the nearest parking sign
    • Same issue got a fine yesterday for parking in suspended bay which was ending at 6:30 yesterday, next thing I see a fine 15 minutes before it. The sign was obstructed 
    • Hi all, an update on the case as the deadline for filing the WS is tomorrow i.e., 14 days before the hearing date: 7th June. Evri have emailed their WS today to the court and to myself. Attached pdf of their WS - I have redacted personal information and left any redactions/highlights by Evri. In the main: The WS is signed by George Wood. Evri have stated the claim value that I am seeking to recover is £931.79 including £70 court fees, and am putting me to strict proof as to the value of the claim. Evri's have accepted that the parcel is lost but there is no contract between Evri and myself, and that the contract is with myself and Packlink They have provided a copy of the eBay Powered By Packlink Terms and Conditions (T&Cs) to support their argument the contractual relationship is between myself and Packlink, highlighting clause 3a, e, g of these T&Cs. They further highlight clause 14 of the T&Cs which states that Packlink's liability is limited to £25 unless enhanced compensation has been chosen. They have contacted Packlink who informed them that I had been in contact with Packlink and raised a claim with Packlink and the claim had been paid accordingly i.e., £25 in line with the T&Cs and the compensated postage costs of £4.82. They believe this is clear evidence that my contract is with Packlink and should therefore cease the claim against Evri. Evri also cite Clause 23 of the pre-exiting commercial agreement between the Defendant and Packlink, which states:  ‘Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 A person who is not a party to this Agreement shall have no rights under the Contracts (Right of Third Parties) Act 1999 to rely upon or enforce any term of this Agreement provided that this does not affect any right or remedy of the third party which exists or is available apart from that Act.’ This means that the Claimant cannot enforce third party rights under the Contract (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 and instead should cease this claim and raise a dispute with the correct party.   Having read Evri's WS and considered the main points above, I have made these observations: Evri have not seen/read my WS (sent by post and by email) as they would have recognised the claim value is over £1000 as it includes court fees, trial fees, postage costs and interests, and there is a complete breakdown of the different costs and evidence. Evri accepts the parcel is lost after it entered their delivery network - again, this is in my WS and is not an issue in dispute. Evri mentions the £25 and £4.82 paid by Packlink - Again, had they read the WS, they would have realised this is not an issue in dispute. Furthermore to the eBay Powered By Packlink T&Cs that Evri is referring to, Clauses 3b and c of the T&Cs states:  (b)   Packlink is a package dispatch search engine that acts as an intermediary between its Users and Transport Agencies. Through the Website, Users can check the prices that different Transport Agencies offer for shipments and contract with the Transport Agency that best suits their needs on-line. (c)  Each User shall then enter into its own contract with the chosen Transport Agency. Packlink does not have any control over, and disclaims all liability that may arise in contracts between a User and a Transport Agency   This supports the view that once a user (i.e, myself) selects a transport agency (i.e Evri) that best suits the user's needs, the user (i.e, myself) enters into a contract with the chosen transport agency (i.e, myself). Therefore, under the T&Cs, there is a contract between myself and Evri. Evri cites their pre-existing agreement with Packlink and that I cannot enforce 3rd party rights under the 1999 Act. Evri has not provided a copy of this contract, and furthermore, my point above explains that the T&Cs clearly explains I have entered into a contract when i chose Evri to deliver my parcel.  As explained in my WS, i am the non-gratuitous beneficiary as my payment for Evri's delivery service through Packlink is the sole reason for the principal contract coming into existence. Clearly Evri have not read by WS as the above is all clearly explained in there.   I am going to respond to Evri's email by stating that I have already sent my WS to them by post/email and attach the email that sent on the weekend to them containing my WS. However, before i do that, If there is anything additional I should further add to the email, please do let me know. Thanks. Evri Witness Statement Redacted v1 compressed.pdf
    • Thank you. I will get on to the SAR request. I am not sure now who the DCA are - I have a feeling it might be the ACI group but will try to pull back the letter they wrote from her to see and update with that once I have it. She queried it initially with 118 118 when she received the default notice I think. Thanks again - your help and support is much appreciated and I will talk to her about stopping her payments at the weekend.
    • you should email contact OCMC immediately and say you want an in person hearing.   stupid to not
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
        • Like
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
        • Like
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

roko20650 v Tesco Visa


roko20650
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 5420 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Help please,

 

My husband is self employed and has been laid off his sub-contract work and there is nothing out there, we are homeowners with a mortgage and are unable to pay our credit card debt to Tesco Visa, thinking of debt management but would like first to try going it alone, any help would be appreciated.

 

Ta muchly

Edited by roko20650
Link to post
Share on other sites

well you could write to them explaining your current situation and offer a reduced payment, sit down and work out what you can afford. go into the letter template section there are letters there you can use to write to your creditors good luck and come back with any questions you may have

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks for the response, at present can't afford anything thats the problem and I have never not paid before. I have been pointed in the direction of Payplan or CCCS so I will give them a ring and see what they suggest and then weigh up my optionsl. It feels good to start taking control though.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 4 weeks later...

The fee for a CCA request is £1

 

Request for information under section 77 of the Consumer Credit Act 1974

 

Dear Sir/Madam

 

Re:- Account/Reference Number: XXXXXXXXXX

 

With reference to the above agreement, I would be grateful if you would send me a true copy of this particular credit agreement.

 

I understand that under the Consumer Credit Act 1974 (Section 77), I am entitled to receive a true and legible copy of my credit agreement (containing all the required prescribed terms) on request.

I enclose a payment of £1.00 which represents the statutory fee payable under section 77 of the Consumer Credit Act.

 

 

I look forward to hearing from you.

 

Yours faithfully

Link to post
Share on other sites

Sorry I'm a little confused, I sent them a cheque for the £1 and in the first paragraph, although its a little disjointed it acknowledges it. What they sent to me is what they have. I left some detail showing and have therefore removed the attachments and I will have to re-attach and post tomorrow. Do I still need to send your letter above, or another?

Link to post
Share on other sites

It's an application form which does not contain the prescribed terms within the four corners of the signed page, also it gives no links to them so it is unenforceable. You can send them the following letter;

 

I DO NOT ACKNOWLEDGE ANY DEBT

 

Dear Sir/Madam

 

RE: Agreement/Account number

 

Thank you for your response to my letter dated xxxxxx 2009, making a formal request for a true copy of the original credit agreement for the above account under the Consumer Credit Act 1974 (Sections 77-79).

 

The documents you supplied me appear to be no more than an application form, and as such are not a satisfactory response to my request. Nowhere on the front of the document is there any reference to the prescribed terms and conditions that such an agreement must contain. I must assume that these are unconnected documents and once again inadequate to satisfy your obligations.

 

I also I note that you have replied to the above by sending your companies Terms and conditions I must inform you that this is not sufficient to comply with the request and that your company is still in default under the act.

 

To clarify, just sending the Terms and Conditions is a breach of the Act and Regulations as, apart from the information that the Regulations provide that you may exclude, the copy must be a “true copy” of the agreement.

 

As you are aware you are obliged to provide me with a true copy of my agreement as defined under Section 189 of the CCA 1974. and I consider that you have failed to comply with my request for these documents

 

 

Under the terms of the above Act, a creditor has 12 working days to provide the requested documents. This deadline has now passed and I have not received the requested documents from you.

 

As I am sure you are aware, an agreement that does not contain all of the prescribed terms, and/or is not signed by the debtor, is completely unenforceable & I therefore consider that this account is in dispute with immediate effect & it follows that all payments to this account are suspended forthwith.

 

I draw your attention to the legal requirement that a creditor is not permitted to take any action against an account whilst it remains in dispute. The lack of a credit agreement is a very clear dispute and therefore the following applies:

You must not demand any payment on this account, nor am I obliged to offer any payment to you.

You must not add any further interest or charges to this account.

You must not pass this account to any third party.

You must not register any information in respect of this account with any of the credit reference agencies.

You must not issue a default notice on this account

I hereby give you notice that if you proceed with any of the above actions, I will file reports with the appropriate authorities, including, but not limited to, Trading Standards, Office of Fair Trading, Information Commissioners Office, Financial Ombudsman Service.

 

Yours faithfully

Print name do not sign

Link to post
Share on other sites

I have now re-attached the letter with CCA and another letter received from them charging me £12. late payment fee. Is this enforceable? What do I do next.

 

Roko20650

 

I got the exact same thing, signed application form plus loads of gumph.

 

Not enforceable as it is only the application not an agreement.

 

Sent a similar letter to 'cerberusalert's' and will cancel my DD soon! ;)

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thank you so much, Cerberusalert and basa48, I am very relieved. I will send the letter to them today. Will they start to hassle me on the phone do you think? Have you had an calls yet basa48?

Link to post
Share on other sites

If they do start 'phoning you send this;

 

Dear Sir or Madam

 

Harassment by telephone

 

I am writing in relation to the quantity and frequency of telephone calls that I have received from your company, which I deem to be personally harassing.

 

I have verbally requested that these stop, but I am still receiving calls. (Delete if necessary)

I now require all further correspondence from your company to be made in writing only. [if you Want Them to]

I am of the view that your continued harassment of me by telephone puts you in breach of Section 40 of the Administration of Justice Act 1970, and the Protection from Harassment Act 1997.

If you continue to harass me by telephone, you will also be in breach of the Communications Act (2003) s.127 and I will report you to OFCOM, Trading Standards and The Office of Fair Trading, meaning that you will be liable to a substantial fine.

Be advised that any further telephone calls from your company will be recorded. (**Even if you don‘t yet have recording equipment!!**)

 

Yours faithfully, **Print name do not sign**

Link to post
Share on other sites

Quite a few telephone calls from them now, one caller told me to make an official complaint if I felt the calls were excessive! Believe it or not I received a replacement credit card from them today! Left hand does not know what the right hand is doing obviously. I have now sent a telephone harrassment letter to them.

Roko20650

Link to post
Share on other sites

No phone calls for me yet, but received this:

 

tescoreply1.jpg

tescoreply1lastpage.jpg

 

And this will be my response:

I am in receipt of your letter of 13/03/09. I have indeed taken most adequate advice and whilst I note you you have expressed you do not wish further correspondence on this matter, I feel it is my duty to advise you further of your breach of the law and any remedies I may pursue.

 

Unfortunately whilst you may argue you have supplied an agreement pursuant to s78 CCA 1974, the actual terms of s78 required you to provide a true copy of an executed agreement. Your argument is therefore flawed in so much as the document you provided, whilst it may be a true copy of what is in your possession, as I pointed out, it does not comply with the requirements of the Consumer Credit Act 1974 Section 61(1) and Consumer Credit (Agreements) Regulations 1983 Schedule 1 in that clearly not all the ‘prescribed terms’ are present and thus is not properly executed.

 

It is the lack of a properly executed agreement that is a very clear dispute and it is for these reasons that I DISPUTED (and still dispute) the alleged agreement.

 

I should also remind you it is not your decision whether or not this account is in dispute. The fact that I have queried the legality of any alleged agreement on which this account is based and you have thus far not provided a signed and compliant credit agreement for the account, automatically makes it disputed in law.

 

Again you should note that in the opinion of the Office of Fair Trading, creditors should not suggest that they have a signed compliant credit agreement where they are unable to provide evidence to support this – to do so could be a ‘misleading action’ under Reg.5 of the Consumer Protection from Unfair Trading Regulations.

 

You are again strongly reminded that the following applies in relation to this alleged agreement whilst it is in dispute.

 

You: * are not entitled, while the dispute continues, to enforce the agreement.

* may not demand any payment on the account, nor am I obliged to offer any payment to you.

* may not add further interest or any charges to the account.

* may not pass the account to a third party.

* may not issue a default notice related to the account.

* may not register any information in respect of the account with any credit reference agency.

 

In clarification of the last point: To register information with a credit reference agency, you must have written consent from the data subject to collate and share such information. This consent is given in the form of a signed and compliant credit agreement and is a clear requirement of the Data Protection Act 1998, so until you produce a valid agreement, you may not share my data. Any attempts to share my data without my consent will be met with a complaint to the Information Commissioners Office. You may also note that sharing my data with credit reference agencies whilst an account is in dispute is contrary to The Banking Code para. 13.6.

 

If you do issue a default notice against a disputed agreement or persist in sharing my data with third parties regarding a disputed agreement, I will instigate court proceedings to have the alleged agreement declared unenforceable, the default removed and the information removed from my credit file. This may well result in the costs of the action being awarded against you.

 

In that respect I draw your attention to CCA 1974 s127(3): 'The court shall not make an enforcement order under section 65(1) if section 61(1)(a) (signing of agreements) was not complied with unless a document (whether or not in the prescribed form and complying with regulations under section 60(1)) itself containing all the prescribed terms of the agreement was signed by the debtor or hirer (whether or not in the prescribed manner)'. [see Ref: Lord Nicholls (The Opinions of the Lords Of Appeal for Judgment in the Cause: Wilson and others v. Secretary of State for Trade and Industry (Appellant) 10/07/2003) and Ref: HHJ Overend: Central Trust Plc v Spurway [2005] CCLR).].

 

Obviously if any agreement is improperly executed I would be entitled to ask the court to consider the agreement and make a declaration of the rights of the parties to the agreement.

 

To that end I again respectfully request that you provide me by return a copy of any compliant and properly executed credit agreement, other than that you have already supplied, relating to the disputed agreement, that bears my signature.

 

I do not view this as an unreasonable request given that by supplying the document which I have asked for will allow me to assess if any case for enforceability has merit and will help to resolve matters possibly without the need to involve the court which would undoubtedly save time and costs on both sides.

 

You will be aware of course that I am entitled to request this information pursuant to the Civil Procedure Rules (Disclosure & Inspection of Documents, Part 31.16 - Disclosure before proceedings start) should you not respond with either a compliant agreement or alternatively that you cannot produce a compliant agreement.

 

I would be happy therefore for you contact me further in writing and in any case within 14 days with your intentions to resolve this matter, which remains a formal complaint. In the absence of a signed compliant agreement, I would again invite you to consider reducing any alleged debt to £0 and enter a ‘full and final settlement’ as discharged on the alleged account and with any third parties.

 

To sum up, I am not obliged to make any further payments to you until you provide me with the document I have requested.

 

 

Yours faithfully

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi Roko, et al....

 

We have a CCA paper identical to your Tesco cca, the only difference being ours is dated July 2000 - they are just a few months apart

 

So, my missus was all for handing it over to a solicitor to tackle it, but,

I just saw your response to them.

 

This is fantastic, absobloodylutely fantasic, it's taken me weeks to get my head round these prescribed terms, now I have them printed and pinned on the wall..

 

It's coming to me slowly, but gaining speed... just another 9 to go for my family.. wow - as they say, slowly slowly catchee monkey.

 

Thanks ever so much, at my extreme age there's no chance that I could ever do the research to come up with letters like this.

 

Good luck to us all...

 

charlie*

Link to post
Share on other sites

If there are any site admins looking in.

 

Can we start a new section under 'Other Institutions' for Tesco credit cards.

 

There are three threads running now under 'General Debt Issues' and they are hard to track.

 

The threads are:

 

this one

 

http://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/forum/other-institutions/185671-tesco-personnel-finance.html

 

http://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/forum/general-debt-issues/188930-tesco-credit-card-cca.html

 

http://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/forum/general-debt-issues/189210-tesco-credit-card-cca.html

 

The last two threads could be merged.

 

Oh .. and I will probably start one soon as Tesco reply to my last letter ! ;-)

Edited by basa48
Link to post
Share on other sites

Hey all,

Hope you're all succeeding with your problems.

Just a quick note to say don't forget about my thread as well, lol

http://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/forum/debt-collection-industry/186898-tesco-c-card-response.html

Looks to be the same responses as Roko20650's

Will be posting more details soon to my thread along with the response letter i'll be sending.

Best wishes

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 3 weeks later...

Hi roko

 

I have received very similar documentation from tesco

 

Your application form looks similar to mine. does it have your address printed on the top, ie a form sent to you inviting you to apply. some forms on other threads don't have this but have a "moisten and fold" instruction on the bottom, ie possible an application form picked up in store, this type would not have anything on the back of importance other than the address to return the form.

 

My worry with your application and mine is that i wonder if the agreement was on the back of the form, although there is no ref on app form as to " see overleaf" i worry that if it went as far as court a judge may say look the correct agreement is overleaf.

 

what are your thoughts

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...