Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • wont go near it with a barge pole as its ex gov't debt.  
    • Thanks, I've had my fill of this lot. What makes me so mad is that I had to take out student loan to get any DHSS help. And then when I tried to help myself and family they presented obstacles. Might be worth passing story to RIP off Britain?
    • there is NO exposure if you simple remove your name address/ref numbers etc from docs, over 10'000 pdf uploads are here. which then harvests IP addresses off of the people that then do so..which is why we do not allow hosting sites. read our rules and upload carefully thats exactly why we say capture as JPG, redact, then convert/merge to one mass PDF. then online sites to achieve that we list do not leave watermarks.  every once in a while we have a user like you that thinks they know better...we've been doing it since 2006 with not one security issue. thank you.
    • was at the time you ticked it  but now they've still not complied . if you read up, here , you'll see thats what everyone does,  
    • no they never allow the age related get out, erudio are masters at faking supposed 'arrears' fees which were levied before said date and thus null its write off. 1000's of threads here on them!! scammers untied that lot. i can almost guarantee they'll state it's not SB'd too re above, but just ignore them once sent. dx    
  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
        • Thanks
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like

Chaasing a Debt Abroad


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 5626 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Hi,

My Wife and I moved abroad almost a year ago and while I have an agreement with the Consumer Credit Counselling Service for my difficulties my Wife has tried in vain to pay off her debts.

She has recently sought the advice of the CCCS and they are in the process of combining our plans to ease the pressure on her.

She has today received a letter from Allied International Credit on behalf of Lloys TSB informing her that the matter has been "passed to their legal representatives in our country of residence".

The CCCS have advised her that any UK debt cannot be collected legally abroad so my question is, is this true and if not is this simply a scare tactic on behalf of the DCA?

Regards

Tack

Link to post
Share on other sites

The CCCS have advised her that any UK debt cannot be collected legally abroad so my question is, is this true and if not is this simply a scare tactic on behalf of the DCA?

Regards

Tack

 

It really depends on where you are, and if a CCJ already exists.

CCA'74 is subject to UK law and courts, so not much to worry about anywhere else, courts in other countries won't be interested and have no jurisdiction if it's unsecured UK debt.

If a CCJ already existed before you left the UK it may be possible to get it enforced in another EU member state, elsewhere it's not worth worrying about. CCA 2006 gives other possibilities within the EU, so beware DCA's quoting '06 stuff if you're actually '74.

 

I think you can be 99% certain it's just a scare tactic. Prepare for more to come, but generally speaking it's likely to be a load of old namby-pamby, shandy drinking, big girls blouse toadie pap.

HOIST BY THEIR OWN PETARD.

 

Blimey it works....:-)

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi Tack

Dont worry, they'll send you threatograms worded exactly the same as they would to uk residents. They wont work, for instance, if youre in USA, you'll get a letter maybe from Canada, (Still no juristiction there) But they cant enforce anything.

Its up to you how you proceed, But basically, they know where you live, thats abroad. So they'd look pretty stupid applying for a CCJ against you in a foreign land:D.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi,

Thanks, that will really help. My Wife was really scared yesterday.

Tack

 

I've been trying to think what could further put your mind at rest, and I vaguely remember a comment by Judge Gordon Lingard made to the 'other place',........

 

Q168

Chairman:

Presumably cross-border claims are few and far between?

 

 

District Judge Walker:

Yes.

 

 

District Judge Lingard:

Very few and far between. I do not think I have had one in 12 years.

 

Source http://www.publications.parliament.uk/pa/ld200506/ldselect/ldeucom/118/118.pdf A rather long winded, tough going document, but there are sure to be a few interesting titbits to those at home and abroad, along with http://www.publications.parliament.uk/pa/ld200506/ldselect/ldeucom/210/210i.pdf

 

 

 

 

Secondly, a particular favorite of mine,....

 

"Bulk mail collection letters typically cost 30 pence apiece. U.K. collectors, including NCO Europe, typically send out four to six letters per account to make contact. About 5% of accounts in the UK are suitable for litigation. The point is to go after can-pay or can-pay-more accounts, says Locke, referring to debtors who refuse to pay or who won’t pay an

appropriate amount relative to their financial wherewithal."

 

 

 

 

 

5% ?? What about the other 95% ??

;)

 

 

 

 

 

It's not impossible - just highly unlikely, as the evidence shows.

Relax, and don't lose any sleep over it.

 

HOIST BY THEIR OWN PETARD.

 

Blimey it works....:-)

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi I'm in the same boat as it were, Just ignore them, most of their threats sent to UK addresses are just that threats,As for those sent abroad they aren't worth the paper there printed on. They soon give up wasting their time and money. I even got an SD sent to me abroad (had to laugh at that one, SD sent second class to an unconfirmed overseas address, talk about a waste of money). They really are just a bunch of sad ignorant bullies.

So please don't worry

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...