Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Hi Guys, well a year on and my friend has just received this in the post today, obviously a little scared so looking for more of your advice.  Letter from the NCC dated 1-May-2024 is as follows.......   Before deputy district judge Haythorne sitting at the national business centre, 4th floor st Kathrine's house Northampton Upon reading an application from the claimant  it is ordered that  1. The claim be sent to the county court at #### (Friends local Court) Because this order has been made without a hearing, the parties have the right to apply to have the order set aside, varied or stayed.  A party making such an application must send or deliver the application to the court (together with any appropriate fee) to arrive within seven days of service of this order.  If the application is one which requires a hearing, and a) the party making the application is the defendant: and b) the defendant is an individual, then upon filing of the application the claim will be transferred to the defendants home court.  In all other cases requiring a hearing the claim will be transferred to the preferred court.    As a result of an order made on the 1 May 2024, this claim has been transferred to the county court at ##### (friends local court) 
    • I am heading over to hers tomorrow so I will find out.  Will there be something written in the agreement or does it depend on the agreement its self ? Just so I know what to look for, so I can provide as much information as possible on here. 
    • The answer to this is going to depend on what the agreement your friend signed says. Or contact the housing provider and ask them.  
    • Thank you all for the responses, to answers a few questions  - she has had the car since Jan 23 on a 5 year term.  - She is unsure what the agreement is called, but at the end she has the option to make a payment to "buy" the car - she recieves benefits for her young children alongside the ssp (normally she would be on NLW for a 16 hr a week job)  - Yes she would like to keep the car  She has not responded to the last email from them asking her to call and it'll be followed up in an email. I told her to hold off until atleast Wednesday so I can read a few posts on here and get some more information.  I will ensure she follows up with a letter, that has not been signed but instead her name written.   Thank you  
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

My statutory rights, used car breakdown.


theyseenmecoming
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 5234 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Hello everyone, my first post here, so I hope this is the right place to post. :D

 

I have a problem, I bought my car from a dealer a week ago Saturday and it has broken down twice, I have researched the problem online and found out this may lead me to a very sizable garage bill.

 

Where do I go from here?

 

I bought it trade from a garage so no warranty.

 

I called and advised them of the first break down but they never returned my call.

 

I know I have statutory rights, but how do I remind him of this if he is unwilling to help?

 

I'm really rubbish at all of this, so help would be very appreciated :D

 

thanks

 

 

Please help if ya can, I need to call him tomorrow, but I don't know how to go about the conversation. Do need to ask him to repair it? Is this something I can do under my Statutory rights?

Edited by theyseenmecoming
I can't spell
Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi

 

I would call up the garage and ask them to either fully repair the car under SOGA (Sale Of Goods Act) or for a full refund under the same act. If you go the refund option you need to write to the garage and explain that you are REJECTING the car under the SOGA and you expect a full refund within 14 days or you will take the dealer to court.

If you get no reply come back and we will tell you what letter you need to write and how to go about court etc.

 

To break down twice in a week would indicate that the car was not fit for purpose and should not have been sold in that condition.

  • Haha 1

If any of my posts are helpful, please feel free to click my scales. All information is given as my opinion only, based on my own personal Experiences/Mistakes lol...

Link to post
Share on other sites

I bought it trade from a garage

 

this is an interesting point.

 

When you buy from a motor trader your legal rights under SOGA cannot be taken away or reduced. "Trade sale" is a classic example of trying to evade the buyers rights, another is "sold as seen".

 

such phrases are meaningless and do not alter your rights.

 

how much was the car, and what is the fault/faults?

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks for the replies :)

 

I paid 3k, its a mondeo and the fault is a dying starter, coupled with other symptoms looks like it has been caused by the dreaded dual mass flywheel starting fail (leaving debris and swarf in the starter and generally killing it!)

 

I have since spoken to the garage, no joy, called consumer direct and was advised exactly the same as what you have said majik and also what you said HSBCrusher.

 

I then left it to mull over and was called by the MD who told me he is quite happy to fix with secondhand parts EEEEEEEK but if I wanted new parts I would have to pay. I then called consumer direct and ask if this was right, and was advised that this WAS a suitable repair!

 

So he can nip down the scrapies get some rotten parts and stick them in. greeeeat, thats reassuring.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I then called consumer direct and ask if this was right, and was advised that this WAS a suitable repair!

 

 

the parts in the car were second hand to start with, so replacing them with second hand parts I suppose would be OK as long as the parts were good ones.

 

However, if those parts fail sometime soon you can go back again as the fault hasnt been fixed.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Ya know what, I think I am going to suck it in and go to a trusted garage to get the work done, at least I can be assured the same problem (hopefully!) will not come back!

 

It sucks sometimes being self employed and being totally reliant on my car. :(

 

Thanks for all the help and support.. Awesome site, awesome people... "I vill be back"

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 10 months later...
Hi

 

I would call up the garage and ask them to either fully repair the car under SOGA (Sale Of Goods Act) or for a full refund under the same act. If you go the refund option you need to write to the garage and explain that you are REJECTING the car under the SOGA and you expect a full refund within 14 days or you will take the dealer to court.

If you get no reply come back and we will tell you what letter you need to write and how to go about court etc.

 

To break down twice in a week would indicate that the car was not fit for purpose and should not have been sold in that condition.

Hi Majik

 

I was reading the post in connection with consumer rights with the purchase of a used car.

 

I am having a very similar problem with a car I purchased 2nd Dec which I had to take back on the 5th due to it smoking, loss of power, not increasing above 2000 revs etc.

I am still without the car at the moment with no idea of when it will be fixed, what parts will be used, what state the car will be in etc.

 

Bought through dealer, with 3 months guarantee no warranty, we are not being charged for repairs at the moment, spoke to the seller many times about issues. We have sent letter asking for full refund within 7 days which they should receive Mon morning.

Can you please forward me a copy of the legal letter I would need to send to them if I get no reply from them please?

Many Thanks

K

Link to post
Share on other sites

Ya know what, I think I am going to suck it in and go to a trusted garage to get the work done, at least I can be assured the same problem (hopefully!) will not come back!

 

It sucks sometimes being self employed and being totally reliant on my car. :(

 

Thanks for all the help and support.. Awesome site, awesome people... "I vill be back"

If it's DMF problems, how do you know they won't reappear even if present work is done by good garage. Suggest that you find out if a kit is available to convert back to normal flywheel. On another site, someone wrote that you can weld up DMF!

Link to post
Share on other sites

My thoughts are that the selling garage would more than likely either try cleaning or fit a second hand starter and that would be it rather than addressing the issue of the failing dmf, purely as replacing the dual mass flywheel is a labour intensive job, if you havent lost all faith in the garage you could see whether if you where to supply a solid flywheel, starter motor, clutch kit and slave cylinder they would fit these gratis for you given that to repair the car properly these are the items that need replacing, i have added the clutch kit as this will need to be removed whilst they change the dmf and its a wise move to get it done at the same time as is the clutch slave

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 3 weeks later...

hi I bought a Vauxhall Vectra elite cdti (56) on 11/12/2009 51000 miles £8650 the car drove fine for the first week after that i started hearing strange noises from the clutch area, after christmas i foun an open garage who inspected the car an tol me flywheel was broken and woul need a new flywheel/clutch, I than contacted the garage i bought the car from and told them this and the fact they had promssied me a full service (had oil change) , a full 12 month mot got 10months, all tyres between 5-6 mm (passenger front an rear 2mm and 3mm), and the garage had front bumper painted and the paint does not match. So the garage tol me if I had come to them 1 or 2 days after purchase he would have paid for it but as a cluch is a perishable part he would not do anything, he refused to do anything at all. so i sent him a letter (soga) reminding him of my legal rights of which he has used same excuse as before.

 

what should i do next ?

ive driven 500miles since had the car and ive been more than resonable with him.

user_online.gifreputation.gif report.gif digg.gifdelicious.giftechnorati.giffurl.gif

progress.gifedit.gif

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...