Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Firstly, I would like to thank everyone for their help in this matter. Since my last post I have received a reply from Plymouth Council Insurance Team concerning my wife’s accident (please see enclosed letter and photo of the offending Badminton post) which they deny any responsibility for the said accident. I feel that the Council is in breach of their statutory duties under the following acts: The Leisure Centre was negligent in its duty of care and therefore, in breach of the statutory duty owed under section 2 of the Occupiers’ Liability Act 1957. Health and Safety at Work Act 1974 (the Act) to ensure, so far as is reasonably practicable, the health, safety and welfare at work of all their employees, and others who might be affected by its undertaking, e.g. members of the public visiting the Leisure Centre to use the facilities. The Management of Health and Safety at Work Regulations 1999 that requires employers to assess risks (including slip and trip risks) and, where necessary, take action to address them. The Provision and Use of Work Equipment Regulations (PUWER) require the risk to people’s health and safety from equipment that is used at a Leisure Centre be prevented or controlled. I would like some advice to see if my assumptions are correct and my approach to obtaining satisfactory outcome to this matter are accurate. Many thanks   PLM23000150 - Copy Correspondence.pdf post docx.docx
    • Talking to them does not reset the time limit, although they will probably tell you it does, they'd be lying. Dumbdales are the in-house sols for Lowlife, just the next desk along. If Lowlifes were corresponding with you at your current address then Dumbdales know your address. However, knowing that they are lower than a snake's belly, you would be well advised to send them a letter, informing them of your current address and nothing else. Get 'proof of posting' which is free from the PO counter, don't sign it, simply type your name. That way then they have absolutely no excuse for attempting a back door CCJ.   P.S. Best course of action, IGNORE them, until or unless you get a claim form......you won't.
    • A 'signed for' Letter of Claim has been sent today so they have 14 days from tomorrow... Lets wait and see what happens but i suspect judging by their attitude they wont reply 
    • I am extremely apprehensive about burning our files.... I do not know why, so it is becoming an endless feedback loop. Scared to pull the trigger to speak in the desire not to mess up my file. 
    • Hi All, So brief outline. I have Natwest CC debt £8k last payment i made was 7th November 2018 Not a penny since. So coming up to the 6 year mark. Can't remember when i took out the  credit card would be a few years before everythign hit the fan. Moved house 2020 - updated NatWest as I still have a current account with them. Then Lowells took over from Moorcroft and were writing to me at my current address. I did get a family member to speak to them 3 years ago regarding the debt explained although it may be in my name I didn't rack it up then went contact again. 29th may received an email from overdales saying they were now managing the debt. I have not had any letter yet which i thought is odd?  Couple of questions 1. Does my family member speaking to lowell restart statute barred clock? 2. Do you think overdales aren't writing to me because they will back door CCJ to old address even though Lowells have contacted me at current address never at previous? ( have no proof though stupidly binned all letters  ) Should I write to them and confirm my address just incase? Does this restart statute barred clock? 3. what do you think best course of action is?   Any help/advice is appreciated I am aware they may ramp up the process now due to 7th December being the 6 year mark.   Many Thanks in advance! The threads on here have been super helpful to read.  
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

repo order cancellation


fool on the hill
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 5611 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Hi

I am helping friends whom i find have been put through the wringer and court by GE Money for mortgage arrears.By 200 + phone calls [injunctional harrasment] and other flouting of the protocol GE pushed them into shock.

Without taking advice no defense was offered ,they just showed on form N11M that apparently the mortgage was unaffordable. The judge had little option but to grant a 42 day outright possession order for mid January .

 

Now a detailed rework of expenses shows they can afford the mortgage and pay the arrears off over 4 years. Rather than live under the stress of an instant action suspended order, with other help they can repay all the arrears now and go for a cancellation at court.

Do we do this via form N244 ? Would a direct approach to GE be of any use to save on court costs? I guess not .

I assume the order will not be placed on the Register of Judgements etc so speeding their credit repair .

Also GE seem to be adding charges to the arrears not the principle .

 

Thanks in anticipation of any help.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi there, you can apply to the court to have the possession suspended on an N244 form which you can download here Her Majesty's Courts Service - Home. Select Forms and Guidance from the menu on the left hand side and enter N244 in the box. You will then be taken to the page where you can download the form. If you need any help with Q.10 (the most important part) please let me know.

 

They should also complete a budget form to go with the N244 and I have affixed one to this post.

 

Kind Regards

 

Ell-enn

Budget Sheet.xls

Help us to keep on helping

Please consider making a donation, however small, if you have benefited from advice on the forums

 

 

This site is run solely on donations

 

My advice is based on my opinion and experience only. It is not to be taken as legal advice - if you are unsure you should seek professional help.

Link to post
Share on other sites

OK, as I read the post you are saying that all the arrears can be cleared immediately. In that case I would apply to the court to change the Order from a 42 day outright order to a suspended order based on the arrears being paid within x days. Once the arrears have been paid, then you can apply to the Court for the Order to be set aside, the claim dismissed etc.

 

In any event in order to evict the borrowers GE would have to apply for a warrant, which would be suspended if the arrears were cleared.

 

You are right in that the Order is not recorded.

 

Hope that helps

 

RM

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi -slight delay due to festivities .

Repoman thanks for the reply . I understand your suggestion but want to avoid two court hearings . Could we not in N244 Q3 state 'cancellation of repossesion order',file the form plus attachments , obtain a hearing date,then immediatly pay arrears by bank transfer so at the hearing all arrears are cleared - the judge checks the mortgage is affordable and cancels the order there and then?

 

Ell-en, thanks to your [and other CAGers ] brilliant work i had already found the form, and done a budget sheet etc ready for the suspension route. Its only late on Tuesday night i thought of cancelling the order hence my somewhat unclear post - too much cider .

In pre CAG days I spent many stressfull 'sword of Damaclees' years under a suspended order not realising it should have been cancelled when the arrears were paid off. Lenders hide this fact. Hence i am anxious my friends don't do the same.

Incidentaly the download form is N244 Application Notice [05.08] but the local CAB are handing out version N244 Aplication Notice [6.00].This is very different with the whole of the reverse side available for evidence .Is it an earlier or later version ?

Also i have just heard mention of a money order with the order for possession. What is it ? I dont think they have one - what do we look for?

 

Happy New Year All

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi there, as far as I am aware the version on the HMCS site is the version which should be used and has Questions 1- 10 to complete. The previous version had Parts A,B & C (no numbered questions) and is no longer used.

 

What date is possession due to take effect?

 

If they can pay the arrears now then they should do that without question, then as you say - if you apply for a hearing you can show that the mortgage is affordable going forward and that the possession order should be cancelled.

 

If you need any help with the text for Q.10 of the N244 please let me know.

 

Ell-enn

Help us to keep on helping

Please consider making a donation, however small, if you have benefited from advice on the forums

 

 

This site is run solely on donations

 

My advice is based on my opinion and experience only. It is not to be taken as legal advice - if you are unsure you should seek professional help.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks Ell-en.Just what we wanted to hear. I will use latest version. CAB must be using old stock. Possession date is 15/1/09. Funds will be in GE's account by 8/1/09 . Will brush up paperwork over weekend .Would like to get Q10 answer to you for scrutiny. How do i do that?

Want to deliver to court on Monday 5/10/9. Any advice re money order ?

Link to post
Share on other sites

The claimant can ask the court for a money judgment to be registered against you. This allows the lender to recover all of the money owed under the mortgage, not just the arrears. You should ask for this to be changed in your application as the arrears have been cleared and you can prove the mortgage is affordable going forward.

 

Ell-enn

Help us to keep on helping

Please consider making a donation, however small, if you have benefited from advice on the forums

 

 

This site is run solely on donations

 

My advice is based on my opinion and experience only. It is not to be taken as legal advice - if you are unsure you should seek professional help.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi Ell-en. Have now seen their order for possession.The court made a mistake and never posted it! I think they are overun. It had to be picked up by hand this week and states the court orders that:

1] the defendant give the claimant possession of ------

2] the money claim is adjourned generally with liberty to restore

Is this a money judgement ? I read it as because possession has been granted the money claim for all the mortgage is ajourned .If the house sale does not cover the mortgage then the money claim can be restored to recover the shortfall .Is my interpretation correct?

No rush-signing off for tonight-bye.

Link to post
Share on other sites

You are absolutely right regarding the money judgment...it's adjourned generally. For information any money judgment given as part of possession proceedings aren't registered until the claimant looks to enforce it, so won't affect credit ratings etc.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi Ell-enn Can you email your opinion re our N244 Q10 answer etc that i sent on Wednesday or has it become lost in the ether . My friends are still on edge despite the payment being actioned yesterday. We want to file with the court on Monday.

Your work is much appreciated. I see you all over this secured loans /repo site. It seems you rarely sleep or eat!

Link to post
Share on other sites

I couldn't read your attachment, I've sent you a PM - go to your User CP and you will see it...

Help us to keep on helping

Please consider making a donation, however small, if you have benefited from advice on the forums

 

 

This site is run solely on donations

 

My advice is based on my opinion and experience only. It is not to be taken as legal advice - if you are unsure you should seek professional help.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi there, I've read the doc now. Is this statement to accompany their N244 Q.10 statement? - while it is good supporting evidence, they will need to do one themselves- I can draft one for them if you need me to? we need to quote case law for the judge to consider.

 

Ell

Help us to keep on helping

Please consider making a donation, however small, if you have benefited from advice on the forums

 

 

This site is run solely on donations

 

My advice is based on my opinion and experience only. It is not to be taken as legal advice - if you are unsure you should seek professional help.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...

Hi All - Just a post to tidy up this thread.

A telephone call to GE confirmed the arrears payment had arrived 3 days before the repo date. Ge stated they would not request enforcement provided future monthly payments are received. No cancellation or suspension was offered. It was obvious they want to stay in control and go for eviction at short notice if needed.

As Ell-en thought there was a 30% chance of not cancelling the repo order in court we decided to delay the N244 for 1 or 2 months to allow more evidence to acrue showing the mortgage was now affordable. Also in late January there will be an unexpected further reduction in expenditure so creating an even stronger case against GE who will no doubt contest it .

My friends are so relieved at not loosing their home and now sleep at night. It would be all too easy to relax, live life and forget the lenders can threaten to jump to eviction if any problem occurs. I urge others who clear their arrears to go to court for cancellation of the order.

 

So in a few weeks chapter 2 starts.

 

Many thanks to the CAG particularly the amazing Ell-enn for the help so far .

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi, well that's a relief for the time being. I agree you're right in waiting until some payment history can be produced and evidence of affordability.

I hope your friends can now relax a bit - they are very fortunate to have you as a friend (but I'm sure they know that):)

Help us to keep on helping

Please consider making a donation, however small, if you have benefited from advice on the forums

 

 

This site is run solely on donations

 

My advice is based on my opinion and experience only. It is not to be taken as legal advice - if you are unsure you should seek professional help.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...