Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • J&P Credit Solutions are specialists on debt recovery. Either way they seem to be swapping between the JandP and IDR whatever their exact definitions are.
    • Primary and secondary teachers are supporting pupils with their own money, buying food and warm clothing. Eight in 10 primary teachers in England spending own money to help pupils | Education | The Guardian WWW.THEGUARDIAN.COM Increasing numbers of children hungry and lack adequate clothing, with two-thirds of secondary teachers also supporting pupils  
    • I googled "prescribed disability" to see where it is defined for the purposes of S.92. I found HMRC's definition, which included deafness. I don't  think anyone is saying deaf people cant drive, though! digging deeper,  Is it that “prescribed disability” (for the purposes of S.88 and S.92) is defined at: The Motor Vehicles (Driving Licences) Regulations 1999 WWW.LEGISLATION.GOV.UK These Regulations consolidate with amendments the Motor Vehicles (Driving Licences) Regulations 1996...   ….. and sleep apnoea / increased daytime sleepiness is NOT included there directly as a condition but only becomes prescribed under “liability to sudden attacks of disabling giddiness or fainting” (but falling asleep isn't fainting!), so it isn’t defined there as a “prescribed disability”  Yet, under S.92(2)(b) RTA 1988 “ any other disability likely to cause the driving of a vehicle by him in pursuance of a licence to be a source of danger to the public" So (IMHO) sleep apnea / daytime sleepiness MIGHT be a prescribed disability, but only if it causes likelihood of "driving being a source of danger to the public" : which is where meeting / not meeting the medical standard of fitness to drive comes into play?  
    • You can counter a Judges's question on why you didn't respond by pointing out that any company that charges you with stopping at a zebra crossing is likely to be of a criminal mentality and so unlikely to cancel the PCN plus you didn't want to give away any knowledge you had at that time that could allow them to counteract your claim if it went to Court. There are many ways in which you can see off their stupid claim-you will see them in other threads  where our members have been caught by Met at other airports as well as Bristol.  Time and again they take motorists to Court for "NO Stopping" apparently completely forgetting that the have lost doing that because no stopping is prohibitory and cannot form a contract. Yet they keep on issuing PCNs because so many people just pay up . Crazy . You can see what chuckleheads they are when you read their Claim form which is pursuing you as the driver or the keeper. they don't seem to understand that on airport land because of the Bye laws, the keeper is never liable.   
    • The video-sharing app told the BBC that a "very limited" number of accounts had been compromised.View the full article
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like

rgeckouk Loan & PPI Help


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 5629 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Hi I stumbled across this site and was looking for a little help,

 

I took I loan out with Barclays in 2004 and was told at the time of filling out the loan application that due to it being the maxiumum amount that it was a good idea to take the PPI as it was more likley to go through. As I was in desperate need for the money I did this. The repayment amount was more than I was already paying and was told after 6 months I could come back into the branch so they could review and adjust this to a lower repayment. I was not made aware that the PPI would be added to the value of the loan and interest would incurr on this as well, as was told it was just like my car insurance policy.

 

I never recieved any PPI documents or policy number in the mean time paying nearly £780 a month to Barclays was becoming a struggle after 2 years I really hit a brick wall and started to miss payments. I made appointments at my local branch they where no help and the loan account everytime they looked at it showed that it had no PPI against it.

 

I finally got them to restructure the loan and remove the PPI but feel after 2 years paying the amount I had been to them totalling nearly £17500 for 2 years on an original loan of £25000 something is not right. I have finally got fed up with them now and have stopped paying the new monthly payment and have made an appointment with my local branch manager to get this sorted. If this meeting nothing comes of it where can I go?

 

Many Thanks R

Link to post
Share on other sites

Just to add to this I now owe more than I origianlly started out with I had a £25000 loan that is now according to Barclays as of today I owe them in the region of £32000 which is split over two £16000 loans now when it was restructured. They really are starting to get to me and I want to run and hide.

 

Any help appriciated.

Link to post
Share on other sites

If the meeting is not a success you need to contact the FOS.

 

You need them to show you all the figures relating to the loans as proof that PPI was/wasnt added. If it was added you should try to reclaim it back .Even if you had it and they removed it they may still be charging you interest on it. They should not have said that the loan was more likely to go through with PPI, was this in the bank or on the phone?

Any opinion I give is my own and given without

any liability.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Dont give up,firstly go to this meeting and get those figures.

 

1. you were verbaly mis sold and have no policy documents.

 

2. the loan showed no PPI, the figures will show what the truth is and they should compensate you for this as it should have been cancelled sooner.

 

3.The FOS will help if Barclays dont.

Any opinion I give is my own and given without

any liability.

Link to post
Share on other sites

This was all done in my local branch not over the phone, so unfortunatly no recorded call evidence.

 

That should not be to much of a problem, because it's up to them to prove it was not mis-sold!

------------------------------------------------------------

 

First Direct - Refund of Bank Charges...... **WON** (Offered full amount of £5200 2 days before court)

 

Amex - Refund of charges..... **WON** (£330 refunded without much fight)

 

First Plus PPI - **WON** (Full Refund of over £7000 + Interest)

Norton Finance - Owe me over £6000 for mis-sold PPI - Starting court action in the new year!

Barclaycard PPi - Ongoing (Being complete tos*ers!)

Link to post
Share on other sites

Right you need to ring the FOS and let them know you want to make a complaint, they will fill out bits on the phone and then send you the forms to fill in. Your complaint is for mis selling and when the forms come there will be a section to explian your complaint, tell them everything, including the last meeting.

From now on only deal with Barclays in writing, no phone calls, no meetings in branch relating to PPI.

 

The FOS only look at complaints 8 weeks after your first letter of complaint to the company or if the company have given their final response. So if neither of there apply the FOS may have to write to Barclays for their final response on your behalf. This is fine.

Any opinion I give is my own and given without

any liability.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...