Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Thanks DX , true I was reading it as my own licence when I can now see it is the VED thanks for the clarification. As for the payments that does make sense and I will give them a call today. I have to watch the date as I have 21 days from the 29th May to respond to plea of guilty or not.
    • This is the latest response from IDR. I know exactly what has happened - I left Qatar in 2006 leaving behind card debt of QAR13,000 (unintentionally, I thought it was paid off). When I visited Qatar for a weekend in 2012, I was blocked from leaving the country - ended up having to go to the Court, met with the bank and negitiated a settlement  - they wanted about QAR90,000 in total and supposedly agreed on QAR40,000 to settle completely. Unfortunately, I only have a pay-in receipt for that and no confirmation the whole debt was settled: I was so focussed on getting the exit ban lifted. Anyway, I left and I have visited Qatar since then with no issue. My concern is that the statute of limitations  will run from 2012, rather than 2006. Should I continue to ignore or explain to IDR that I don't agree there is an exisiting debt? IDR 10062024 redacted.pdf
    • Fraudsters copy the details of firms we authorise to try and convince people that their firm is genuine. Find out why you shouldn’t deal with this clone firm.View the full article
    • as with some of your threads in the past. you are not reading things carefully and understanding things properly by going off on assumptions. not sure where you are getting your driving licence is being revoked from? nowhere do they use that word. nothing to do with it. vehicle excise licence. (Road Tax), a VEL cannot be revoked only voided. you are also wrong and nowhere does the DVLA state they cancelled the DD.  the court summons clearly states in the DVLA statement: it was your cancelling/reclaim of the DD on 15-02-2024 that caused this, NOTHING to do with the DVLA, they did not revoke the VEL. as they received no payment, on 02.05.2024 the VEL was Voided. it appears you have got the new DD setup wrong to the wrong DVLA account/ref number/VEL number. they have not received the payments to the correct VEL. i would be ringing DVLA and finding out where these payments are on their system and get them attributed to the correct VEL. that should solve the problem.
    • Its UK customers must now pay £1.99 to return clothes, with the cost deducted from their refund.View the full article
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Unpaid Work


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 5682 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Hi Everyone.

 

I have a question which has rattled on in one form or another with my present company and previous employers.

I work in I.T im called a field service engineer, I get my calls via a pda and therefore work from home using a company vehicle to get to service calls both locally and on occasions several hundred miles away !!!

 

It is company policy that we work the first and last half hour of the day unpaid, this of course adds up over a years, in fact its equivelent to our holiday entitlement.

 

My question is, can employers do this, it seems a grey area in general, I have spoken with people in simular roles, some are docked pay some are not, any advise would be really appreciated, if possible could any respondants please post links to relevant details

 

Thanks again

Link to post
Share on other sites

You say that it is company policy, so presumably this would be a term of your contract?

 

I would imagine that it is to help fit in with the Working Time Directive, whereby actual hours worked may not exceed 48 (unless by opt out) but for the purposes of calculation, normal travelling time to and from work is not included. As you do not have a fixed place of work it has been determined that a nominal 1 hour a day may be considered reasonable to account for the fact that some of your working day involved getting to the first job and home from the last.

Any advice given is done so on the assumption that recipients will also take professional advice where appropriate.

 

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING

EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

DONATE HERE

 

If I have been helpful in any way - please feel free to click on the STAR to the left!

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi sidewinder, thanks for the reply, no there is no mention in our contract, we work a standard 37.5 hour week, without going into details about the split shift which is over a six week period, basically over six weeks we average 37.5 hours per week, we start at 08:30hr and finish at 19:30hrs on a scheduled working day, one hour is unpaid lunch, the contension comes with starting at 08:30 when we are not paid until 9am and finishing at 19:30pm when we are only paid up until 19:00hrs, surely we start work the minute we get in the vehicle? I nor my collegues can find anything under working time directive or emplyment law regarding this unpaid work hense me posting here.

 

Many thanks

 

Duke

Link to post
Share on other sites

Do you always finish at 19.30, or are there days you might have a couple of short jobs near home and be back an hour or two early? Is there any allowance for that sort of thing built in?

Or are you using 19.30 as an example finish time where the last half hour of your working day is unpaid (so a 17.30 finish day is paid to 17.00)?

Link to post
Share on other sites

...but for the purposes of calculation, normal travelling time to and from work is not included. As you do not have a fixed place of work it has been determined that a nominal 1 hour a day may be considered reasonable to account for the fact that some of your working day involved getting to the first job and home from the last.

 

However it could be argued that in this case, since the employee has to travel to reach his clients, part of the working day that SHOULD be paid is the time taken travelling to visit clients when this is a regular part of the job.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Do you always finish at 19.30, or are there days you might have a couple of short jobs near home and be back an hour or two early? Is there any allowance for that sort of thing built in?

Or are you using 19.30 as an example finish time where the last half hour of your working day is unpaid (so a 17.30 finish day is paid to 17.00)?

 

Not sure if ive made myself clear, I am paid from 9am to 19:00pm, but actually work from 8:30am to 19:30pm becuase i work from home, im trying to establish if my employer can legally do this.

 

Of course i sometimes get home earlier than 19:30, but i also sometimes get home a lot later, this is all expected as a Field Service Engineer, my gripe is that we are not paid for the two half hour periods mentioned, which mounts up to a considerable time over a year.

 

Thanks for reply

 

Duke

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...