Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Hi I have to agree with @unclebulgaria67 post#3 For the funding side of moving to a new area and it being private supported accommodation I would also suggest speaking to private supported accommodation provider about funding but also contact the Local Council for that area and have a chat with them about funding because if you are in receipt of Housing Benefit certain Supported Accommodation that meets a certain criteria is treated as ‘exempt accommodation’ for Housing Benefit purposes but you need to confirm this with that relevant Council in your new area especially since it is Private Supported Accommodation as each Council can have slightly different rules on this. If you have a certain medical condition look up the charities and also have a wee chat with them as they may be able to point you to different Grants to assist with moving costs and your question about funding for private supported accommodation as well.
    • Hi Just to be clear a Notice to Quit is only the very start of the Housing Association going down the Eviction route there is a long process to go. Also to be clear if you leave at the Notice to Quit date only and go to the Council claiming you are Homeless they will more than likely class you as Intentionally Homeless therefore you have no right to be given temporary housing by the Council. The only way that works is when the Court has Granted a Possession Order then you can approach the Council as Homeless with the Court Order. As for the Housing Association issuing the Notice to Quit because there investigation has proved it's not your main residence but you have witness statement to prove otherwise. From now on with the Housing Association you need to keep a very good paper trail and ensure to get free proof of posting from the post office with anything you send to them. You now need to make a Formal Complaint to the Housing Association and please amend the following to suit your needs:   Dear Sir/Madam FORMAL COMPLAINT Reference: Notice to Quit Letter Dated XX/XX/2024, Hand Delivered on XX/XX/2024 I note in your letter that you stated that the Housing Association has carried out an investigation into myself and came to the conclusion that I am not using this property as my main residence and have evidence of this and have therefore issued a 'Notice to Quit' by XX/XX/2024. I find the above actions absolutely disgraceful action by the Housing Association. 1. Why have I never been informed nor asked about this matter by my Housing Officer. 2. Why have I never been given the opportunity to defend myself before the Housing Association out of the blue Hand Delivered a Notice to Quit Letter. 3. I have evidence and witnesses/statements that prove this is my Main Residence and more than willing provide this to both the Housing Association and the Court. I now require the following: 1. Copy of your Complaints Policy (not the leaflet) 2. Copy of your Customer Care Charter (not the leaflet) 3. Copies of your Investigation into this not being my main residence.    As well as the above you need to send the Housing Association urgently a Subject Access Request (SAR) requesting 'ALL DATA' that simple phrase covers whatever format they hold that in whether it be letters, email, recorded calls etc. The Housing Association then has 30 calendar days to respond but that time limit only starts once they acknowledge your SAR Request. If they fail to respond within that time limit its then off with a complaint to the Information Commissioners Office (ICO).     
    • Hi Sorry for the delay in getting back to you The email excuse and I do say excuse to add to your account and if court decide LL can't recoup costs will be removed is a joke. So I would Ask them: Ask them to provide you with the exact terms within your Tenancy Agreement that allows them to add these Court Fees to your Account before it has been decided in Court by a Judge. Until the above is answered you require these Court Fees to be removed from your Account (Note: I will all be down to your Tenancy Agreement so have a good look through it to see what if any fees they can add to your account in these circumstances)
    • Thank you for your responses. As requested, some more detail. Please forgive, I'm writing this on my phone which always makes for less than perfect grammar. My Dad tries but English not his 1st language, i'm born and bred in England, a qualified accountant and i often help him with his admin. On this occasion I helped my dad put in his renewal driving licence application around 6 weeks before expiry and with it the disclosure of his sleep apnoea. Once the licence expired I told him to get in touch with his GP, because the DVLA were offering only radio silence at that time (excuses of backlogs When I called to chase up). The GP charged £30 for an opinion letter on his ability to drive based on his medical history- at the time I didn't take a copy of the letter, but I am hoping this will be key evidence that we can rely on as to why s88 applies because in the GP opinion they saw no reason he couldn't drive i need to see the letter again as im going only on memory- we forwarded the letter in a chase up / complaint to the DVLA.  In December, everything went quiet RE the sleep apnoea (i presume his GP had given assurance) but the DVLA noticed there had been a 2nd medical issue in the past, when my father suffered a one off mini stroke 3 years prior. That condition had long been resolved via an operation (on his brain of all places, it was a scary time, but he came through unscathed) and he's never had an issue since. We were able to respond to that query very promptly (within the 14 days) and the next communication was the licence being granted 2 months later. DVLA have been very slow in responding every step of the way.  I realise by not disclosing the mini stroke at the time, and again on renewal (had I known I'd have encouraged it) he was potentially committing an offence, however that is not relevant to the current charge being levied, which is that he was unable to rely on s88 because of a current medical issue (not one that had been resolved). I could be wrong, I'm not a legal expert! The letter is a summons I believe because its a speeding offence (59 in a temp roadworks 50 limit on the A1, ironically whist driving up to visit me). We pleaded guilty to the speeding but not guilty to the s87.  DVLA always confirmed to me on the phone that the licence had not been revoked and that he "May" be able to continue to drive. They also confirmed in writing, but the letter explains the DVLA offer no opinion on the matter and that its up to the driver to seek legal advice. I'll take the advice to contact DVLA medical group. I'm going to contact the GP to make sure they received the SAR request for data, and make it clear we need to see a copy of the opinion letter. In terms of whether to continue to fight this, or to continue with the defence, do we have any idea of the potential consequences of either option? Thanks all
    • stopping payments until a DN arrives does not equal automatic sale to a DCA...if you resume payments after the DN.  
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Small Claims enforcement..can I make the Managing Director pay up?


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 5660 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Hi everyone!

My first posting, but I'd be glad for any info on this.

 

I bought a resale-timeshare week for an apartment in Madeira but it was shabby etc when I viewed it a week after signing the contract.

I cancelled within the 14 days cooling off period which is my right, but the company involved (in the UK), won't repay, saying that my cancellation was outside 14 days etc. My solicitor confirmed that the contract in fact contravened the Timeshare Acts and was not enforcable anyway.

I have been through Small Claims and have been awarded Judgement last week. The company (defendents) are not going to pay as only 2 days left of the 14 day payment deadline and they have dragged out the whole thing for almost a year now. They did not show up at the hearing, and unusually, the judge awarded my solicitors costs in addition , on account that the defendeant had acted unreasonably!

I am going to take out a Warrant of Execution but am not optimistic.

 

If this goes on and the company refuse to pay up, can I transfer the judgement to the Managing Director? It seems to be a husband and wife operation only with a couple of clerks as employees. he is operating as a limited company.

 

I think I have read somewhere that this can be done to secure the debt owing? Any advice would be appreciated.

It is driving me mad that the law appears not to have any teeth against these sharks.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Don't think you can as the judgment was against the limited company. Had a similar case about 15 years ago and the MD simply put his company into liquidation. As they had no assets and the building was owned by his father, I got nothing, including the £6.400 legal fees awarded. Hope you have better luck.

 

Somebody more knowledgeable than I will be along to put you right in due course.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Cheers Trilby,

Thanks for your reply. I despair of the Small Claims procedure. The law seem to let debtors get away with murder.

 

I definitely read somewhere that this transfer to an individual can happen, but for the life of me I wish I'd "bookmarked" it. My omission. And I can't afford to throw any more money at my solicitor, otherwise the costs will outweigh the money owed.

The court make you jump through hoops to make the claim and pay up at every stage, although you may never get back even your court fees.

 

I am afraid that the defendent in my case may use the same tactic as yours, as there are no assets. He acts only as an agent on a resale transaction for a fee, and just uses the clients' funds. I'll just have to keep my fingers crossed that a CCJ will affect his business.

Fortunately, I can report him to Trading Standards for contravening the Timeshare Acts and there is a sustantial penalty I understand from the solicitor, but we'll see.

Thanks

Link to post
Share on other sites

I have some thoughts but would like to be sure.I am alerting the site team,hopefully we can clarify.

Have a happy and prosperous 2013 by avoiiding Payday loans. If you are sent a private message directing you for advice or support with your issues to another website,this is your choice.Before you decide,consider the users here who have already offered help and support.

Advice offered by Martin3030 is not supported by any legal training or qualification.Members are advised to use the services of fully insured legal professionals when needed.

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

DUTIES AND LIABILITIES OF DIRECTORS OF PRIVATE COMPANIES

 

The aim of this note is to provide a basic explanation of the main responsibilities and liabilities of directors of UK private limited companies. The information in this note is not exhaustive and not sufficiently detailed to apply to the circumstances of any particular situation. Although a company is a legal person in its own right and as such can own property and enter into contracts with others, it can only make decisions through those that own or control it. The day to day management of a company is usually entrusted to its directors. As a general rule if a person acts as a director, the law treats him or her as a director (a "shadow director") even if he or she is not called a director and has not been formally appointed as a director. A director is an officer of the company but not automatically an employee. Where a director is also a full-time employee he or she is often referred to as an "executive director". A "non-executive director" is usually part-time and is often appointed for his or her specialist knowledge and experience and/or to provide the board of directors with an impartial opinion.

A director of a company may in certain circumstances be made liable for the debts of the company of which he is a director. This might result in the director being personally required to pay some or all of the company's creditors. Directors can be found guilty of wrongful trading if he or she carries on business when the director knows that it will not be possible for the company to avoid an insolvent liquidation. It is a defence for a director if he can demonstrate that when he became aware of the likelihood of an insolvent liquidation he took all possible steps to minimise the loss to creditors. However, resigning as a director does not necessarily absolve the director from responsibility.

Have a happy and prosperous 2013 by avoiiding Payday loans. If you are sent a private message directing you for advice or support with your issues to another website,this is your choice.Before you decide,consider the users here who have already offered help and support.

Advice offered by Martin3030 is not supported by any legal training or qualification.Members are advised to use the services of fully insured legal professionals when needed.

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Directors are being targeted by disgruntled shareholders, regulators, auditors and other claimants. The cost of defending these claims aside from the eventual damages award is often beyond the pocket of all but the wealthiest individuals. Recent changes to the Companies Act 1985 have removed the uncertainty over whether insurance cover taken out by companies to meet such claims is void. Such cover is referred to as Directors and Officers (or D&O) Insurance and increasingly companies are taking out such policies. Directors should take note.

Have a happy and prosperous 2013 by avoiiding Payday loans. If you are sent a private message directing you for advice or support with your issues to another website,this is your choice.Before you decide,consider the users here who have already offered help and support.

Advice offered by Martin3030 is not supported by any legal training or qualification.Members are advised to use the services of fully insured legal professionals when needed.

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Enforcing Your Judgement hbar.gif

If a court has decided that someone must pay you an amount of money (you have 'obtained judgment against the debtor'), and you have not received a payment, you can try and get your money (called 'enforcing your judgment') by asking the court for any of the following:

 

 

  • A warrant of execution
  • An attachment of earnings order
  • A third party debt order
  • A charging order

In addition, if the amount you are owed is more than £750.00, you can also apply to make the debtor bankrupt. Alternatively, if the debtor is a limited company and seems unlikely to be able to pay the judgment quite quickly (say, in three months), this may be an indication of cashflow problems. In these circumstances, you may wish to consider winding up (Insolvency) proceedings. However, both bankruptcy and winding up proceedings can be complex and expensive.

Have a happy and prosperous 2013 by avoiiding Payday loans. If you are sent a private message directing you for advice or support with your issues to another website,this is your choice.Before you decide,consider the users here who have already offered help and support.

Advice offered by Martin3030 is not supported by any legal training or qualification.Members are advised to use the services of fully insured legal professionals when needed.

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

2 questions.

What is the company called?

How much is the Judgement entered for ?

Have a happy and prosperous 2013 by avoiiding Payday loans. If you are sent a private message directing you for advice or support with your issues to another website,this is your choice.Before you decide,consider the users here who have already offered help and support.

Advice offered by Martin3030 is not supported by any legal training or qualification.Members are advised to use the services of fully insured legal professionals when needed.

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi Martin

Thanks for your help. I just have doubts that even sending the bailiff will recover the money owed as he has prevaricated for almost a year, sending in late defences, not appearing at either hearing etc. On his website, he says he has been in business for the past 20 years.

Briefly as I can, my friend and I bought two consecutive weeks in a resale timeshare. She has also pursued a Small Claim through her own local court, and has also been awarded judgement with a different judge, which seems to speak for itself. The defendent is a company, Brantridge Park Sales Ltd, the timeshare resale side is called "Time Travellers, a division of Brantridge Park Sales Ltd".

I have spoken in the past to the Timeshare Consumers Association who name this company as one of their recommended sellers! This I will take up with them later, as I will with Trading Standards who I also consulted at the beginning of the claim.

 

Without setting out the long history of the claim, as I said in my initial post, the contract I signed was deemed invalid as it did not comply with the requirements of the Timeshare Acts. (I can go into more detail if you need it).

 

I paid by cheque £2,800 which was cashed on 11th Dec 2007.

The court judgement was for this amount, plus court fees, plus my legal costs which totalled £3,575.75. Now, also he must pay the Bailiff's fees.

 

He may buckle and pay the bailiff, but he has resisted so far, so who knows?

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...

Martin

Is there any feedback you can give me on the details of the two questions you asked me?

The defendant has paid up promptly to my friend, but the cheque has yet to clear through the court. He has not paid me although warrants were served within two days of each other (18th and 20th Nov), and my friend received notification on 28th Nov of a cheque being paid.

Any advice would be appreciated.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...