Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Thank you very much for your letter in regard to the above mentioned shipment.  Due to the high volume of parcels coursing through the courier network each day, undergoing continuous processing and handling, certain packages may experience delays or even can get lost in the course of this journey. Please note that due to the time that has passed, this shipment has been declared as lost.  I have today processed the claim and made offers to the value of £75 as a goodwill gesture without prejudice. I do acknowledge that you have mentioned in your letter that the value was higher, however, you did not take out any protection to that amount. The protection for this shipment was £20 and we will not be increasing our goodwill offer any further.    Please log into your account online in order to accept our offer. Once accepted, our accounts department will process the claim accordingly. The claim payment will be processed and received within 7 working days.                                  In addition, a refund of the carriage fee will be processed as a separate payment and will be received within 3 working days.  If I can further assist, please feel free to contact me.   I have also just noticed that yesterday afternoon they sent me an email stating that "after my request" they have refunded the cost of shipping. I did not request the refund so will mention that in my letter as well.
    • Hi I had to leave Dubai back in 2011, during the financial crisis. And only now have I received a letter from IDRWW. Is this anything to worry about about as I have 2 years left until it’s been 15 years(statute barred in Dubai). Worried as just got a mortgage 2 years ago. Could they force me in to bankruptcy? Red lots of different threads on here. And unsure what true and what isn’t. 
    • Not that TOR will see this now he's thrown in the hand grenade. Rayner has plenty of female supporters on X, for a start. As for the council and HMRC, fair enough and I thought Rayner was already in touch with them. That's where it should be dealt with, not the police force. @tobyjugg2 Daniel Finkelstein thinks the same as you about tax. The Fiver theory. How the Fiver Theory explains this election campaign ARCHIVE.PH archived 28 May 2024 17:36:51 UTC  
    • Often with the Likes of Lowells/ Overdales that 'proof' doesn't stand up to scrutiny.   Think about it like a game of poker, they want to intimidate you into folding and giving up as soon as possible, and just get you to pay up and roll over, that is their business model, make you think your cards are rubbish. What they don't expect, and their business isn't set up for it, is for a defendant to find this place and to learn that they have an amazing set of cards to play. Overdales don't have an infinite number of lawyers, paralegals etc, and the time / money to spend on expensive court cases, that they are highly likely to lose, hence how hard they will try to get you to roll over.  Even to the extent of faking documents, which they need to do because the debts that they purchased were so cheap, in the first place. Nevertheless it works in most cases, most people chicken out, when they are so close to winning, and a holding defence is like slowly showing Overdales your first card, and a marker of intention that this could get tricky for them. In fact it may be,  although by no means guaranteed that it won't even go any further than that.  Even if it does, what they send you back will almost certainly have more holes than Swiss Cheese, and if with the help you receive here, you can identify those weaknesses and get the whole thing tossed in the bin.
    • So Rayner who is don’t forget still being investigated by the local council and HMRC  is now begging to save her seat Not a WOMAN in sight in this video other than Rayner  Farage is utterly correct this country’s values are non existent in her seat   Rayner Pleads With Muslim Voters as Pressure From Galloway Grows – Guido Fawkes ORDER-ORDER.COM Guido has obtained a leaked tape from inside a meeting between Angela Rayner and Muslim voters in Ashton-under-Lyne...  
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like

Capquest/Bank of Scotland. SD For Bankruptcy **WON + COSTS**


gilly5001
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 4606 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

I believe that this demand is frivolous and unlawful as it was delivered by 2nd class post, (according to the Insolvency Service minimum service is by registered post - unless substituted service has been granted which it appears has not been.) and feel that the Insolvency service is being used as a debt collection tool when the account is disputed entirely.

 

I quote - Judge Boggis QC - RE AWAN - [2000] BPIR 241

 

'In my judgment, bankruptcy is one of the most serious forms of execution that can be brought against a debtor. In any bankruptcy proceedings it is, in my view, absolutely clear that the provisions as to service must be followed exactly..' - JUDGE BOGGIS QC - SITTING AS A JUDGE OF THE HIGH COURT

In light of the above information, I request the judge sets aside the demand and gracefully request he/she order payment of my costs by the alleged creditor.

 

As a lone parent/low income family with limited finances I approached a solicitor by phone and asked for an estimate on how much it would cost. I was given an estimate of 3 to 6 hours at £170 per hour to prepare the Application (£510-£1020) plus extra for attending the court.

 

I respectfully request that the court give consideration to awarding these costs on the indemnity basis or, in the alternative, on the standard basis as I believe, in any case, that they have been proportionately and reasonably incurred and/or are of a proportionate and reasonable amount.

 

In support of this request, I would also like to refer the court’s attention to the authority of the High Court in the case of:-

 

Hammonds (a firm) v Pro-Fit USA Ltd [2007] EWHC 1998 (Ch)

 

In this case, Mr Justice Warren confirmed that it was usual for an indemnity award to be made:-

 

27 So far as disputed debts are concerned, the practice of the court is not to allow the insolvency regime to be used as a method of debt collection where there is a bona fide and substantial dispute as to the debt. Save in exceptional cases, the court will dismiss a petition based on such a debt (usually with an indemnity costs order against the petitioner).

 

 

Also if you have tried to call the number on the demand and have failed to get through....then you could also add this -

 

A statutory demand must show a named person or persons from the Creditor or their agent/solicitor whom you can contact directly. This is Rule 6.2 of The insolvency Rules 1986.

This means that if the statutory demand doesn't give the name of a person you can speak to then it is not valid. If you try to contact the named person and they won’t put you through then it is also invalid.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Replies 59
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

is it ok to have a statement attached to back of 6.5, can i paste details in or hand write them in, i am such a dunce I know but not used to this sort of thing, the space on the form doesnt see very big. also 6.4

the names and addresses of the persons upon whom this application should be served are: (who do iput here me or them??)

and then the applicants address for service??? thats mine right?

Link to post
Share on other sites

Gilly - doubt they will set aside without a hearing. My recent experience of a set aside hearing lasted approx 2 minutes in with the judge (1st Cretins didn't attend), judge asked me a couple of question, I answered, he set aside and awarded me costs, which 1st Cretins kindly paid me today.

 

There is nothing to worry about - good luck :)

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...

ok now i need help,

 

have today recieved letter from court to attend hearing for set aside next thursday at 10am. prob is im working and there is no way whatso ever i can have the time off. i cant even explain it will be really frowned upon. can someone ie hubbie go on behalf or can i write to court etc, im not sure what to do now, had so much tim eoff when could have gone and now working get this.

prob too getting there on time into city centre london even if work would give time which i know there is no way whatsoever on earth i could ask

any advice please!!

Link to post
Share on other sites

Looks like im gonna have to make up something. prob is in my work appointments not a good enough excuse to not be in, will have to think of something.

is there anything i need to take, defence etc or do I just make sure i know details of case in case ask questions?? any one any ideas what questions I'll be asked

dont want to mess it up at this last minute. oh and an update capquest have failed to supply the CCA and has now been 29 days, will be 34 by the time hearing on wednesday morning!!

does this put me in a good position??

Gilly

Link to post
Share on other sites

Gilly - I just listed x amount of hours @ £9.50 (I think thats the amount you might need to check) then I listed fuel for x amount of miles at 40p per mile, parking (these for the time i attended to swear affidavit and also to attend for set aside) then disbursements, like postage costs, my costs were very realistic and only came to about £140, I know some people who claim up to £300/£400. You have to head it COSTS AS LITIGENT IN PERSON as well.

 

Good luck :)

Link to post
Share on other sites

Gilly....

 

Get a piece of paper and type at the top

 

COSTS AS LITIGANT IN PERSON

 

and as an example - 10 hours of research into the Insolvency Laws @ £9.25 per hour

10 hours of research into the Consumer Credit Act @ £9.25 per hour

Parking

Postage

Time off work

Childcare

Mileage @ 40p per mile

 

Fax / Send this to the court 24 hours before the hearing....

 

OR

 

You can use the form X20 has supplied here, but change the title to Litigant In person Costs

 

http://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/forum/debt-collection-industry/156641-capquest-statutory-demand-help-4.html#post1765170

Link to post
Share on other sites

OK, I have just faxed costs to the court and capital One. what should i take to court on wednesday? should I take the defence I have already submitted (it was about 4 pages)? is there anything else, research on cca etc.

dont want to screw it up at the final hurdle. still havent decided how Im gonna get off work wednesday morning, even if it is only for half an hour!!

Link to post
Share on other sites

hi there

well what a day!

Still no CCA from capquest, so went to court this morning. They did not show.

the district judge called me in and showed me a letter she had rec'd from capquest stating that I had no grounds and therefore they would be showing up.

There was a witness statement which they hadn't signed. they had advised they had bought the debt but there w\s no notice of assignment and there was a copy of the credit agreement, which the judge noted there was only one side of. I explained to judge how I havent rec'd such agreement when I have asked for it!!

She then explained that they hadn't supplied the evidence they needed due to the claims I had made.

They also suggested that I didnt have my own defence merely a copy of one from this website and they had sent a photocopy of a defence posted on here. I again explained that whilst I had sought advice and help from here I understood what I had submitted. The judge replied that it is fine to get legal advice from the website!!

anyway, set aside awarded and costs !! yippee

 

Then got home and found letter similar to one capquest sent to court ONLY they had signed the witness statement on mine LOL!

So my question now is, whay are they withholding the credit agreeement if they have one?? I asked for it 34 days ago!!

thansk for everyones help on here

Gilly

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...