Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • They wont take you to court. I'm not sure what they'll do about the letters and if they will or wont send you the letters from their retail prevention company, but you can ignore those letters. You'll be just fine don't worry.
    • Yeah I figured, unlikely I'll need credit anyway mortgage all paid off etc so I'll take that on the chin and learn from the experience. Probably would've beaten that too had I remembered the protocol, first time ever going through the process though sob it wasn't familiar to me  Oh well  
    • This is my slightly amended WS taking on board your previous comments, any suggestions for amendments would be most appreciated.  Thank you for you time.   1.        I am the Defendant in this matter. 2.        The facts in this statement come from my personal knowledge. 3.        I became aware of original Judgement following a routine credit check on or around 14th September 2020. 4.        The alleged Letter of Claim dated 7 January 2020 was served to a previous address which I moved out of in 2018, no effort was made to ascertain my correct address. 5.        The Judgement debt was not familiar to me so I began investigations to ascertain what the debt related to and how such a figure had been equated in any event. 6.        I made immediate contact with the Court, the Claimant Solicitors and the Claimants thereafter, asking them to provide me with a copy of the original loan agreement but this was not provided to me.  7.        I sent a Data Subject access Request to Barclays but no agreement was provided – See appendix 1 which details the timeline of communication between myself and Barclaycard as well as copies of correspondence between us. 8.        I do not admit to entering an agreement with Barclaycard in 2000. 9.       The claimant has failed to comply with the additional directions ordered by District Judge Davis and therefore this claim should be automatically struck out.  10.    The claimants have failed to disclose a true executed copy of the original agreement they refer to within the particulars of this claim. They are not entitled to enforce the agreement pursuant to section 78.6 (a) of the Credit Consumer Act 1974 12.   The reconstituted standard Barclaycard agreement that the claimant has included in the court bundle does not satisfy any CCA request and so the claimant is and remains in default of my CCA request and therefore unable to enforce the alleged agreement. 13.  The claimants have failed to provide proof the assignment, such as a deed of assignment. 14.  The claimant has failed to provide a statement of account setting out how the alleged debt accrued under that agreement 15.   Despite numerous requests to the claimant, I have still not seen any evidence, such as an original agreement or deed of assignment, that substantiates the claimant’s assertion that I owe the debt to the claimant, nor evidence of how the debt was accrued. 16.   As per CPR 1.4(2)(a) the court encourages parties to cooperate with each other in the conduct of proceedings in order to try and save time and costs for the parties and to also save the time and resources of the court however, despite vast attempts at mediation the claimants have been most unreasonable and have remained unwilling to mediate. I believe that the facts stated in this Witness Statement are true.  I understand that proceedings for contempt of court may be brought against anyone who makes, or causes to be made, a false statement in a document verified by a statement of truth without an honest belief in its truth.
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Misold Used Vauxhall


cp33c
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 5674 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Hi All

 

I'm hoping someone might be able to give some advice on a situation we've managed to get ourselves into. My apologies for the essay but a lot has happened

 

We purchased a used 53 plate vauxhall from a vauxhall garage in May this year. During the weekend just gone the car broke down. Basically it would turn over but wouldn't start. Called the AA to come take a look. After some investigation the guy says he suspects it as the fuel pump and so tows me to the nearest vauxhall dealership as I tell him that the car is covered by network

Q warranty. Anyway as it was Sunday we had to wait until yesterday to actually speak to someone. So yesterday morning phoned the garage and explained why my car is on their forecourt. I informed the guy that the car is covered by network q and the guy books it in for inspection. He gives me the number for network q so I can organise a courtesy car. So I phone network q, she takes my reg number. She then comes back on the phone and informs me that the car is not covered by network q. After regaining my thoughts I tell her that's impossible as I purchased it from one of the approved dealers. She said unless the reg is wrong then I don't have cover. She advised me to call the garage I purchased the car from to get my policy number. So I call the garage and speak to the service manager. He checks on the system and informs me that my car was not sold with a network q warranty and that I have a 3rd party warranty. He tells me that it could be due to the age of the car or how many miles it's done and tells me to speak to the sales manager. So while I'm waiting for the sales manager to arrive at the garage I phone he other garage that has my car and tell them the situation. They tell me that if it is not covered by network q then I'm in for a big bill....£700! That's if it's the fuel pump. I tell him to hold off looking at it as I can't afford that at the moment. So then I call the sales manager as he couldn't be bothered to return my call. He informs me that we have purchased the car under a 3rd party warranty and there was nothing we can do about it. Apparently my wife signed an order form that states that it has a non network q warranty. Our arguement is that all over the site it has that their used cars are sold with network q warranty and that no where does it say that the car has to meet certain criteria. Also when we were on our test drive I asked if we had to have the car with the warranty trying to shrink the cost. The sales guy replied that all cars are sold with a network q warranty and that they were unable to take the warranty off. I also spoke to another network q garage and asked if they had any criteria which they replied no we only buy network q approved vehicles which have to meet a state standard not age or mileage.

 

The good thing is that my car is covered under some sort of warranty but I'm finding that I'm not entitled to a load of stuff which I would have had if it was covered by network q which is one of the reasons we bought the car. We knew that the next couple of years money is going to be difficult. I've got a newborn and a toddler, my wife is also on maternity leave so only getting just under half of her normal salary

 

Does anyone know if we have a case here to claim that we were misold the car? Or because we've already signed an order form that states that the order included a non network q warranty do we have to put up with it?

 

Any help would be appreciated

Link to post
Share on other sites

Just thought I'd post an update. I've just got off the phone to the ConsumerDirect people. They've told me that it is very much 50/50 and that it would no doubt go to court to decided by a judge. Apparently due to the fact that we signed the order form we have acknowledged that the car was sold without the network q warranty. However, there is quite a bit of evidence to show that they did not tell us that we were not purchasing a network q car ie when haggling with the guy I suggested removing the warranty and he said that all cars are sold with the network q warranty and so they couldn't remove it.

 

After speaking with the Sales Manager he keeps telling me that there are stickers inside the car saying that it is not covered. The only problem with this is that at the time we bought the car, it was being driven around by one of their sales reps and was not in a for sale condition (no stickers, non valeted, etc)and he had removed all the stickers (we assume) and so we didn't see any of the stickers. Secondly the site itself has billboards and other notices all over their forecourt explaining that the cars come with this warranty and our car was sitting right next to one of these billboards when we looked at it and decided. We've been instructed to send a letter to the dealer and the finance company explaining whats happened. We've also been told to go and get as much evidence to support the case as at the moment it is very much hear say.

Link to post
Share on other sites

We've been instructed to send a letter to the dealer and the finance company explaining whats happened. We've also been told to go and get as much evidence to support the case as at the moment it is very much hear say.

 

You might tell the finance co that : Your not going to pay for the car due to the problems.

 

Then tell the garage where you bought it that: You will give them any amount of bad press.

Donate to keep this site open

 

Any help or advice is offered as just that, help and advice without any liability. If in doubt consult a legal expert or CAB.

 

Make Cash Flow Forecast

Link to post
Share on other sites

Ok got another update and this is not a good one.

 

After endless hastling Vauxhall to take a look at the vehicle they have finally found the problem. Apparently a broken earth cable in the wiring loom that supplied the ECU has broken. To make matters worse this has somehow also blown the ECU of the car. Total to fix it.....£2000! They then proceeded to tell me that the cost is not going to be covered under warranty as the warranty does not cover wiring faults and any damage that has been caused by a wiring fault. I then asked the question of if it would be covered under Network q. The guys answer was of course yes it would have.

 

So I have made a call to the finance company explaining the situation. They told me to contact the broker which I'm going to do shortly. The wife and I are obviously fuming about what has happened and we don't have the £2k to fix the car. If we stopped paying the finance company and they eventually had to repossess the car, is that all they're entitled to? In other words once they've taken the car would they move to extract other costs against us? Now the car is going to cost £2k to fix, it is obviously going to be worth less.

 

Our next plan of action is to speak to the broker company and see whether they are going to do anything about it. Obviously our stand point is that we have been misold the car.

Link to post
Share on other sites

It would appear that my problem has now got worse (if thats possible!) My car has just been recovered back to my house for me to find that they couldn't be bothered to put it back together again! I now have a load of parts in my boot which I have no idea where they go being a non-mechanic and when I look under the bonnet all my fuses are on show, along with loads of wiring and the all the casing has been taken off.......lets hope it doesn't rain!

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi, this is simple: You don't own the car, the finance co does. If you refuse to pay due to the problems then, they will simply send it back to the garage where you bought it. The same thing happened to me over a sofa.

Donate to keep this site open

 

Any help or advice is offered as just that, help and advice without any liability. If in doubt consult a legal expert or CAB.

 

Make Cash Flow Forecast

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...