Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Just a typo change that I'd make for the last line. Maybe also add something that says "I assume you will be fully aware that you cannot rely on a clause of a contract that you do not produce."
    • Hello, Firstly, and most importantly I am sorry for your loss. I would go back to the bank with the death certificate and ask them to step in. Remind them firmly but politely that there is no limit for DD claims   Please let us know how you get on.
    • My wife is the named person to his bank account with him having Dementia being his daughter (I say named person she still is but he recently passed away and the deputyship application has now being stopped by the solicitor as it's no longer needed) We've only just got the Death Certificate so the bank will be the next step informing them. She went to the bank and explained the situation but even being his named person the bank said she didn't have the power to stop DD without any legal documents (virgin money) was the bank. She could have copies of bank statements that was about it.
    • I see you said you tried to stop the DD but it seems that didn't work. May I please ask why that didn't work? You should be asking your bank to cancel the DD and I don't see why they would have objected, hopefully you can clarify this. I agree that you should be making a claim here against your bank and ask them for a DD refund. There is no timeframes for this.
    • Thanks DX,   I wasn't aware we could do that for that length of time. I'll ask my wife to check with the bank this week
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
        • Like
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
        • Like
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

SS v Swift Advances


sues35
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 5572 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Thanks Paul, how are you getting on with yours? Im really on one now about the ERC and have evens tarted the ball rolling with GMAC lol

 

Sue

All advice :p is given purely from personal experiences :mad: . If you are in doubt you should always seek legal / financial advice;) .

If i have helped in any way please let me know via personal message, IM in aol or clicking on my scales :D go on you know you want to really!!

 

 

Halifax Claim

Data Protection Act: 20/06/06,

LBA: 11/07/06,

N1: 7/8/06,

Paid in full 25/8/06

 

Swift Claim

Data Protection Act: 5/8/06,

Request for Payment 19/8/06,

LBA 4/9/06

Sod off response with paltry offer (accepted as part payment) 22/09/06

N1 filed 25/09/06, deemed served 11/10/06

No part payment recieved to date

 

 

GMAC Claim

Data Protection Act 21/08/06

Request for Payment 11/09/06

LBA 25/09/06

N1 Filed 11/10/06, deemed served 19/10/06

 

Welcome

Data Protection Act 11/09/06

Link to post
Share on other sites

After recieving a full offer from HSBC Today for £4500 I have decided to go after "The Big One". I borrowed £40,000 from Swift Advances but got into trouble with my re-payments.

 

I decided to re-mortgage to pay off the loan and they quoted me a settlement figure of £55,000. It took me 6 months to get a re-mortgage. During this time I continued to pay the monthly payment, but was unable to reduce the arrears. On the completion day, we got a phone call from the solicitors quoting us a redemtion fee of £75,000.

 

Luckily I had negotiated to borrow some extra funds as part of the re-mortgage, but I was still faced with a shortfall of £3000, which I had to pay the same day in order for the completion to take place. This was also made harder by the fact that I was faced with re-posession within 7 days. Therefore I had no chioce but to pay up.

 

I am looking forward to finding out exactly what our charges were in this 6 month period to warrant a £20,000 difference in the settlement figure! I have sent off the Data Protection Request today and will keep you posted!!!

Link to post
Share on other sites

Keep me posted gooner i will be very intersted to see what happens in this case. We had some real awful luck during our motgage with this company so i am happy to get back what is rightfully mine however a family member was reposessed through these and if i win (or others) then i can help them reclaim their money back too...the more evidence we have of them choosing numbers out the air, doubling it then adding a couple of noughts when deciding on a settlement figure then the more chance of others winning too. Good luck and start a post in this forum so i can track your story

All advice :p is given purely from personal experiences :mad: . If you are in doubt you should always seek legal / financial advice;) .

If i have helped in any way please let me know via personal message, IM in aol or clicking on my scales :D go on you know you want to really!!

 

 

Halifax Claim

Data Protection Act: 20/06/06,

LBA: 11/07/06,

N1: 7/8/06,

Paid in full 25/8/06

 

Swift Claim

Data Protection Act: 5/8/06,

Request for Payment 19/8/06,

LBA 4/9/06

Sod off response with paltry offer (accepted as part payment) 22/09/06

N1 filed 25/09/06, deemed served 11/10/06

No part payment recieved to date

 

 

GMAC Claim

Data Protection Act 21/08/06

Request for Payment 11/09/06

LBA 25/09/06

N1 Filed 11/10/06, deemed served 19/10/06

 

Welcome

Data Protection Act 11/09/06

Link to post
Share on other sites

Just received a redemption statement fortunately have made all payments but am going to question the amount as it is not broken down,just a lump sum,any advice of next steps to take,anyone ever had success in reclaiming ERC????

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi, a few have been successful, and heres hoping i will be too along with yourself. Send the letter asking for the lump sum to be refunded unless they can provide you with the details of how this figure was arrived at. Good luck and keep us posted

All advice :p is given purely from personal experiences :mad: . If you are in doubt you should always seek legal / financial advice;) .

If i have helped in any way please let me know via personal message, IM in aol or clicking on my scales :D go on you know you want to really!!

 

 

Halifax Claim

Data Protection Act: 20/06/06,

LBA: 11/07/06,

N1: 7/8/06,

Paid in full 25/8/06

 

Swift Claim

Data Protection Act: 5/8/06,

Request for Payment 19/8/06,

LBA 4/9/06

Sod off response with paltry offer (accepted as part payment) 22/09/06

N1 filed 25/09/06, deemed served 11/10/06

No part payment recieved to date

 

 

GMAC Claim

Data Protection Act 21/08/06

Request for Payment 11/09/06

LBA 25/09/06

N1 Filed 11/10/06, deemed served 19/10/06

 

Welcome

Data Protection Act 11/09/06

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...

Just quick update. Offered small amount back (approx 8% of whats owed). Accepted this as part payment and written to say i will be filing in court for the rest.

 

They are still hiding costs, and only tell me over and over and over and over (need i go on) what fees were paid. Well i know what fees were paid cos i bl*&^% well paid them. So court here we come!!

All advice :p is given purely from personal experiences :mad: . If you are in doubt you should always seek legal / financial advice;) .

If i have helped in any way please let me know via personal message, IM in aol or clicking on my scales :D go on you know you want to really!!

 

 

Halifax Claim

Data Protection Act: 20/06/06,

LBA: 11/07/06,

N1: 7/8/06,

Paid in full 25/8/06

 

Swift Claim

Data Protection Act: 5/8/06,

Request for Payment 19/8/06,

LBA 4/9/06

Sod off response with paltry offer (accepted as part payment) 22/09/06

N1 filed 25/09/06, deemed served 11/10/06

No part payment recieved to date

 

 

GMAC Claim

Data Protection Act 21/08/06

Request for Payment 11/09/06

LBA 25/09/06

N1 Filed 11/10/06, deemed served 19/10/06

 

Welcome

Data Protection Act 11/09/06

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 5 months later...

case closed. Will continue with this in the next few months due to work pressures

All advice :p is given purely from personal experiences :mad: . If you are in doubt you should always seek legal / financial advice;) .

If i have helped in any way please let me know via personal message, IM in aol or clicking on my scales :D go on you know you want to really!!

 

 

Halifax Claim

Data Protection Act: 20/06/06,

LBA: 11/07/06,

N1: 7/8/06,

Paid in full 25/8/06

 

Swift Claim

Data Protection Act: 5/8/06,

Request for Payment 19/8/06,

LBA 4/9/06

Sod off response with paltry offer (accepted as part payment) 22/09/06

N1 filed 25/09/06, deemed served 11/10/06

No part payment recieved to date

 

 

GMAC Claim

Data Protection Act 21/08/06

Request for Payment 11/09/06

LBA 25/09/06

N1 Filed 11/10/06, deemed served 19/10/06

 

Welcome

Data Protection Act 11/09/06

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 1 year later...
  • 4 weeks later...

I have a sec loan with Swift. My next step is finding out if the agreement is fair. I will post as I get info. I was sold the loan telling me it was repayment in fact we all now know it's not. We know if we borrowed say 40k this would turn into about 160k who knows even more, after a 25yr term. That sounds more like an interest only approach to me. Their charges are the most severe case of extortion and reminds me where the regulators have let us down and where laws need to be made in the banking system.I've never worked out out how you can charge the most to the those who can least afford it, it's disaster waiting. They raise their int rates when suits, never reduced when int rates were low. How convenient. Remember to look at the PPI you were probably sold as there is a claim there. In my opinion avoid secured loans, turning back the clock I should have challenged the previous problem in Court and not be frightened into finding money quick but that was back early 2000 and not so much advice about then, but hey remember the secured loan glossy adverts! They answered our prayers we were saved, more like a sheep in wolf's clothing. The adverts seem to have gone away so maybe the message is getting through, it's the devil in disguise. Have we all got our letters saying in the current climate best to get away from them as they envisage large increases. We wish we could, let's have no redemption penalties for starters, refund all charges, re-calculate the loan i.e on 40k and you've paid 20k you owe 20k plus a fair int figure then there would be a rebate for clearing early. Now that's talking!

 

D

Link to post
Share on other sites

It has also been mentioned to me there will be new legislation passed in 2010 regarding credit agreements which will be more retrospective. I'm not sure of the benefit implications but all I know is after all this turmoil in the financial world, we sure need a fairer way of doing things.If anyone has any more details on this subject please share with us.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 1 month later...

Hi all

anyone here got a recent form from swift, have they altered it any, regarding the apr box and total loan amount

Edited by pkelly
:

pick up a penquin two systems for the price of one:?:

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 2 months later...
Just quick update. Offered small amount back (approx 8% of whats owed). Accepted this as part payment and written to say i will be filing in court for the rest.

 

They are still hiding costs, and only tell me over and over and over and over (need i go on) what fees were paid. Well i know what fees were paid cos i bl*&^% well paid them. So court here we come!!

What was the outcome of the court case?

If my post helped you feel better, click my scales.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...