Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like

1st Credit - Chasing mobile phone debt!


jono77
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 5736 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Hi

 

Just over 2 years ago I recieved a letter from 1st credit claining I owed £559 for a mobile phone bill with single point. I too called and told them I wanted proof and they advised it was up to me to proove that I didnt owe it! I requested a statement of account and they advised they would get one sent out. I got a letter saying this could take a month. Got a few more letters saying pay up, In the meantime I then sent a CCA letter enclosing a postal order and never heard anything!

 

2 Years 6 months later I recieve a letter from 1st Credit advising that they have assigned my account to Lowell Financial (Red Debt Colection services) they are now demanding payment and the usual we will send a field agent round or proceed with a CCJ for an attachment of earnings order?

I wrote again A CCA letter enclosed the postal order sent recorded etc and they have replied saying that the account agreement is not subject regulated under the consumer credit act and that their client has no obligation to supply the information and again to pay up. (they returned the postal order)

 

I have called the national debtline and they said I should write saying I will enter into no further correspondence till this information is provided, they also confirmed that my credit file is clear and shows satisfied account and 1st credit do not even appear on my records.

 

They told me its just been sold on and probibly will continue to be so.

I understand that mobile phone companies are not regulated under the CCA and wonder if anyone has any advice on my next step. I have no intention of paying as I believe the debt is wrong. I feel like calling them up and saying see you in court, but have been advised the the national debt line not to do this

 

Any ideas/help appreciated.

 

Thanx

Link to post
Share on other sites

CCA may not cover phones but they still need to proove you owe them. If they can't proove it don't pay them. Keep records of all correspondance. Next time don't send CCA letter, send the proove it letter.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi, jono77.

 

Here's the 'prove it' letter..........

 

Dear Sir/Madam

 

Account no:

 

You have contacted me/us regarding the account with the above reference number, which you claim is owed by myself/ourselves.

 

I/we would point out that I/we have no knowledge of any such debt being owed to (insert company name).

 

I am/we are familiar with the Office of Fair Trading Debt Collection Guidance which states that it unfair to send demands for payment to an individual when it is uncertain that they are the debtor in question.

 

I/we would also point out that the OFT say under the Guidance that it is unfair to pursue third parties for payment when they are not liable. In not ceasing collection activity whilst investigating a reasonably queried or disputed debt you are using deceptive/and or unfair methods.

 

Furthermore ignoring and/or disregarding claims that debts have been settled or are disputed and continuing to make unjustified demands for payment amounts to physical/psychological harassment.

 

I/we would ask that no further contact be made concerning the above account unless you can provide evidence as to my/our liability for the debt in question.

 

I/we await your written confirmation that this matter is now closed. Otherwise I will have no option but to make a complaint to the trading standards department and consider informing the OFT of your actions.

 

I/we look forward to your reply.

 

**Edit to suit**

 

Remember, don’t sign the letter.

 

Here's some info on the CCA and Mobiles.......

 

http://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/forum/telecoms-mobile-fixed/70464-mobile-phone-companies-consumer.html

 

Regards.

 

Scott.

Any advice I give is honest and in good faith.:)

If in doubt, you should seek the opinion of a Qualified Professional.

If you can, please donate to this site.

Help keep it up and active, helping people like you.

If you no longer require help, please do what you can to help others

RIP: Rooster-UK - MARTIN3030 - cerberusalert

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi thanx for that

But as I have written requesting CCA info does this not mean I have kinda admitted this is my debt and acknowledged there letters also??

Also the link says about SAR. this should go to the mobile phone company and not the DCA is this correct cos if so singlepoint no longer exist and i doubt vodaphone would have any knowledge of it as was 4/5 years ago?

Its so annoying as my credit file show everything I have as satified accounts and 1st credit dont even appear on it!

Thanx

Link to post
Share on other sites

Sending a CCA is your LEGAL right. Its not an admission of a debt but merely a request for proof that the debt exists, is enforceable and the DCA has a Legal right to claim it. Without a written contract between you and the phone company Lowells are stuffed. If it was enforceable you can rest assured Worst Credit would not have passed it on to the Leeds Losers

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...