Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Visiting scotland I came across a car park at The Falls of Shin operated by Civil Enforcement Limited. The car park requires visitors to pay using the awful Phone and Pay app or over the phone using an eqully terrible automated service. Their signs state a time limit of 10 minutes after arriving to pay, and both methods require needlessly lengthy registration process only for payment to be rejected when attempting to pay by both. The Cafe were able to offer us some assistance and register our vehicle so hopefully we sould avoid a fine but this seems like entrapment and would still stop us returning again. How is this legal without giving visitors the option to pay on site?
    • click the link. dx  
    • There are two things to immediately clarify. Firstly, why did court papers go to the wrong address?  In 99% of backdoor CCJ cases here the person moves and doesn't update the vehicle log book address.  Or they move and they don't inform the parties who they are in legal dispute with of the new address.  Does either of these apply to you? Secondly, given this has been going on for over three years without presumably any ill effects on you, how important is it for you to have a clean credit file?  I ask as, if you do absolutely nothing, the CCJ will disappear in April 2027.
    • Sorry to ask, but I know I had SB template on PC, but can't find it. Also any search for template\SB letter takes me back here.  Any help to get to SB letter would be appreciated. I know I used it on a car HP co that wouldn't honor my FCS refund and after 6 years came threatening ( or rather their DCA). Worked a treat. Thanks in advance
    • Received this letter today after all this time !! Doesn’t sound like just a threat any advice please  Thanks  Photo.pdf
  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 5722 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Hello everybody I have been searching all over the internet to see if I can find some help. My husband died aged 60 of a sudden heart attack in July. I am very distressed at losing him as we had been married for 43 years and I am having some difficulty adjusting. My husband had a stroke in November 2007 and this caused his heart to become enlarged and this went undiagnosed and caused his death. My husband had always been obese and in March 2006 when we remortgaged our house we completed an application form for Mortgage protection. He gave his then weight as 18 st. 6 lb which would have returned a BMI of 36 and would be clinically obese. He declared my diabetes. They gave a loading for the latter, but not for his weight (which surprised him, at the time.) In September of that year he weighed in at the doctor's at 23 1/2 stone so they have indicated they are unhappy at paying out on the Policy as they do not believe his weight could have increased so much in such a short space of time. they have not given me an outright refusal yet but they keep wanting me to talk to them on the telephone, which causes me great distress. they have written to the doctor twice and he has told them that in September 2006 he had not weighed my husband for several years. My Probate Solicitor has told me to do nothing until they contact me again. I am 61 years old and this is causing me financial hardship. He was honest about his obesity and his weight did used to fluctuate quite a lot where he tried to get some off but could not keep it off for long. Any suggestions would be greatly appreciated as this is doing my head in!!! Tnx.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi Nanjay and welcome to the forums.

 

I am very sorry for your loss - it must be very hard on you.

 

This isn't my area, but I'm sure someone will come along very soon and give you some advice.

 

My thoughts are with you.

All help is merely my opinion only - please seek legal advice if you need to as I am only qualified in SEN law.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I would double check with the GP first to make sure he has told them that he hadn't weighed your hubby for years.

 

My thoughts are with you also at this sad time.

  • Haha 1

 

 

If all else fails, kick them where it hurts and SOD'EM;)

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thank you for your kind replies. My husband's GP has kindly kept me in the picture regarding all his responses to their queries. I am having to phone them today, so fingers crossed. This annoys me, that they are witholding a lot of money which will make a big difference to me in my rapidly approaching old age, yet I am expected to keep ringing them on a premium rate phone number. My husband was a big man in every way, and he would be upset to know I was being treated like this so soon after losing him.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I hope it goes well for you Nanjay, let us know how you get on. We are all thinking of you at this time.

 

Lex

Please help us to help you. Download the CAG tool bar for free

HERE and use the search option for all your searches. CAG earns a few pennies every time !!!

 

Please don't rush, take time to read these:-

 

 

&

 

 

This is always worth referring to

 

 

 

 

 

Advice & opinions given by me are personal, are not endorsed by the Consumer Action Group or the Bank Action Group. Should you be in any doubt, you are advised to seek the opinion of a qualified professional.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Nanjay, use this link to get rid of Premium Rate numbers. It is a Godsend of a sight. Just click on the link below and type in ANY Premium Rate number. 0845, 0870, 0890 etc...etc...

 

99 times out of 100, it will give you an alternative 01, 02, or 03 number. Sometimes even a free 0800 number which won't cost you a penny. I use it to ring my bank, doctors, electric, gas. You name it, I use it. The site is free to use so enjoy.;)

 

SAYNOTO0870.COM - Non-Geographical Alternative Telephone Numbers

 

If you find this useful, can you click the scales on the left of my post and leave a comment please.

Edited by SOD'EM
typo
  • Haha 1

 

 

If all else fails, kick them where it hurts and SOD'EM;)

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

I phoned the woman today and was given a message she is referring the case to someone more senior and will get back to me later on in week. I will post again when I hear back from her. - Nanjay

Link to post
Share on other sites

Lets hope whoever it is listens properly and it's not a case of Chinese Whispers.

 

Good Luck

 

Did you get a cheaper number to ring off the website I gave?

 

 

If all else fails, kick them where it hurts and SOD'EM;)

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

We will keep looking out for you Nanjay, good luck.

 

Sod'em, you should put that link in the Bear Garden or even the telecom forum ;)

 

Lex

Please help us to help you. Download the CAG tool bar for free

HERE and use the search option for all your searches. CAG earns a few pennies every time !!!

 

Please don't rush, take time to read these:-

 

 

&

 

 

This is always worth referring to

 

 

 

 

 

Advice & opinions given by me are personal, are not endorsed by the Consumer Action Group or the Bank Action Group. Should you be in any doubt, you are advised to seek the opinion of a qualified professional.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Actually I rang her from work so it doesn't get much cheaper than that! It makes me feel that they are attacking the integrity of a man who is no longer here to defend himself at a time when I, his wife, feel vulnerable. I dread to think how a really elderly person would cope. I am only 61, still working and all my faculties are - hopefully - largely intact, although as a legal secretary my job is not 100% insecure in the state of the property market. These people work in little ivory towers without realising the effect they have on people's lives. So uncaring and careless. Update soon! Nanjay

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi Nanjay, you really have my deepest sympathy on the loss of your husband, and now this, I am sure that he would be in a spitting fury if he knew that this was happening to you. You need to stay strong and fight them all the way.

 

You know, I cannot remember the last time I was weighed by my doctor, why would he weigh me? and my weight fluctuates greatly too, I cannot see why they are having a problem with this, lots of people are like this

Lula

 

Lula v Abbey - Settled

Lula v Abbey (2) - Settled

Lula v Abbey (3) - Stayed

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

My husband was overweight from when he was in his 20's but late in 2006 I started becoming concerned that this would start to affect his health so I asked him to go to his Doctors about it, and I went too, hence his being weighed then. I was also very overweight until I developed diabetes which can, not always, act rather like the Atkins diet on the body. I dropped 4 dress sizes in a year. Because once diagnosed I stuck to a rigid eating plan and controlled both the weight and the diabetes, and felt better for it, I wanted my husband to feel good like that too. Thats all. He was a foodie and a bit of a couch potato but that was his choice. He did not smoke - hated it - and was a very occasional drinker. He was also great fun socially and as a companion to me and our family. You are right he would have spit fury over the way they are dealing with me. Tnx Nanjay

Link to post
Share on other sites

I will move your thread over to the insurance forum. There will be more advice in there for you.

HOW TO...DUMMIES GUIDE TO CAG...Read here

STEP BY STEP GUIDE...Read here

F&Q's... Read here

EVERYTHING YOU NEED THE A~Z GUIDE...Read here

 

Go to our Cag Toolbar Download page here

 

Please don't forget this site is run on DONATIONS If this site has helped in any way, then please give a little back. ;-)

Any opinions are without prejudice & without liability. All I know has come from this site. If you are unsure, please seek professional advice. .

Link to post
Share on other sites

If they say they're "unhappy" about paying out, it means they're fishing... Looking for a way to turn you down, but not sure how best to go about it and also see how you react, whether you might be one of those who will just take it lying down... so don't. :-x

 

I suggest this type of letter:

 

Dear Sir/Madam,

 

I am somewhat confused as to why you have failed to pay out on my policy. My husband and I both declared all relevant information truthfully at the time of taking out the insurance, and I therefore expect you to in turn comply with the terms of said insurance with the same good faith.

 

Your dragging your feet in the matter is grossly unfair and putting greater stress on me at a time where I least need it, so I expect you to either pay up in full or turn down my claim within 14 days from this letter. If you choose to turn it down, I then expect you to give me clear reasons for the refusal and state that this is your final decision in the same letter, so I may then refer the matter to the FOS.

 

Yours etc...

 

That should light a petard under their backside. ;-)

Link to post
Share on other sites

That is a fantastic letter. The solicitor who is dealing with the probate, she helped me put 1 together yesterday with a copy of the Financial Advisor's letter to me confirming the circumstances where he sat in our kitchen with my husband (I was at work) filling in the form and saying your weight is something you cant hide, and as an experienced person he accepted my husband's information and after all, they pay him his commission, don't they? They said my husband's weight was "borderline" a s to whether they would have applied a loading or not, but I found an article indicating that the previous year the industry standard was a BMI of 33 or greater so that does not make any sense to me. My Solicitor says I need to speak to a broker about whether this particular insurer was late in applying the said industry standard. Thank you all for your support. Luv Nanjay

Link to post
Share on other sites

Honey, no offence to your solicitor, but why should you do the insurers' work for them to convince them to pay out? Their job is to pay out, not to find reasons to deny you and then for you to convince them otherwise. You have done nothing wrong, so why try and justify yourself or your late husband's doings?

 

Me, I would have posted that letter to them already. :-D

Link to post
Share on other sites

I concur - they have to prove why they won't pay out, not the other way around.

All help is merely my opinion only - please seek legal advice if you need to as I am only qualified in SEN law.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Ok first off pay no attention to ANYTHING they have to say about acceptance criteria or loadings. If they accepted what you said at the time and have no way of proving it to be otherwise then they have to accept that what you were saying was the truth. Additionally if they made any mistakes in accepting you, or in pricing the product they sold you, then that is none of your concern because they offered you a price and you accepted it and they have nothing else to go on.

 

Industry standards mean absolutely nothing, so you don't need to talk to a broker. More importantly if they did make a 'mistake' in not loading your policy properly then the FSA would be completely on your side. The only thing that matters is the wording of the policy that they sold to you.

 

 

Good luck with your case. Don't accept it if they say they will call you back (demand to speak to the claims manager / underwriters directly) and if they start dragging their feet then start mentioning the distress that this is putting on you because they would end up being liable for any damages to your own health from this.

 

 

If you have not managed to get anywhere soon then write directly to their complaints department to complain about the poor treatment you are getting. Be clear to state that they have not provided any evidence to dispute what you say, and that they are effectively calling you a liar for no reason.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thank you all for your useful and kind assistance. I have now found the ABI site - thanks to this forum - and a very useful guidance booklet on this very subject issued in January of this year. If the insurance company rep phones me today I will be quoting this booklet to her extensively and if she does not I will be writing in the terms of the proforma kindly supplied by Bookworm but in addition will refer to the booklet as the insurance company concerned state on their website that they subscribe to the ABI Customer Care Code of Practice. I want them to literally put their money where their mouth is (actually I want them to put in my Bank!) - Nanjay

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...

As at today's date I have not heard further from the insurance co. - no reply to my letter - and my daughter tells me that there was a TV broadcast on ITV Tonight Show (which I missed) about people having similar experiences to me and apparently Norwich Union say they will not observe the ABI Code for any Policy taken out before it came into force, which has to be most of them! as it only came into force in January of this year. The Company I deal with is not Norwich Union, but even so I expect they will all follow the same tack. Keep you all posted - Nanjay.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Yes, I saw the programme and it highlighted one of the most glaring unfairness of the "old" system, that is non-payment for non-disclosure even if the non-disclosure is irrelevant to the cause for claiming. In other words, you don't declare that you went to your GP if you had a headache and they don't cover you when you have your foot amputated after a car crash :rolleyes:.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...