Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • They wont take you to court. I'm not sure what they'll do about the letters and if they will or wont send you the letters from their retail prevention company, but you can ignore those letters. You'll be just fine don't worry.
    • Yeah I figured, unlikely I'll need credit anyway mortgage all paid off etc so I'll take that on the chin and learn from the experience. Probably would've beaten that too had I remembered the protocol, first time ever going through the process though sob it wasn't familiar to me  Oh well  
    • This is my slightly amended WS taking on board your previous comments, any suggestions for amendments would be most appreciated.  Thank you for you time.   1.        I am the Defendant in this matter. 2.        The facts in this statement come from my personal knowledge. 3.        I became aware of original Judgement following a routine credit check on or around 14th September 2020. 4.        The alleged Letter of Claim dated 7 January 2020 was served to a previous address which I moved out of in 2018, no effort was made to ascertain my correct address. 5.        The Judgement debt was not familiar to me so I began investigations to ascertain what the debt related to and how such a figure had been equated in any event. 6.        I made immediate contact with the Court, the Claimant Solicitors and the Claimants thereafter, asking them to provide me with a copy of the original loan agreement but this was not provided to me.  7.        I sent a Data Subject access Request to Barclays but no agreement was provided – See appendix 1 which details the timeline of communication between myself and Barclaycard as well as copies of correspondence between us. 8.        I do not admit to entering an agreement with Barclaycard in 2000. 9.       The claimant has failed to comply with the additional directions ordered by District Judge Davis and therefore this claim should be automatically struck out.  10.    The claimants have failed to disclose a true executed copy of the original agreement they refer to within the particulars of this claim. They are not entitled to enforce the agreement pursuant to section 78.6 (a) of the Credit Consumer Act 1974 12.   The reconstituted standard Barclaycard agreement that the claimant has included in the court bundle does not satisfy any CCA request and so the claimant is and remains in default of my CCA request and therefore unable to enforce the alleged agreement. 13.  The claimants have failed to provide proof the assignment, such as a deed of assignment. 14.  The claimant has failed to provide a statement of account setting out how the alleged debt accrued under that agreement 15.   Despite numerous requests to the claimant, I have still not seen any evidence, such as an original agreement or deed of assignment, that substantiates the claimant’s assertion that I owe the debt to the claimant, nor evidence of how the debt was accrued. 16.   As per CPR 1.4(2)(a) the court encourages parties to cooperate with each other in the conduct of proceedings in order to try and save time and costs for the parties and to also save the time and resources of the court however, despite vast attempts at mediation the claimants have been most unreasonable and have remained unwilling to mediate. I believe that the facts stated in this Witness Statement are true.  I understand that proceedings for contempt of court may be brought against anyone who makes, or causes to be made, a false statement in a document verified by a statement of truth without an honest belief in its truth.
  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like

Message to Lloyds and HBOS employees


BankFodder
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 4935 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Maybe as many as 40,000 of you may soon lose your jobs.

 

If you have any interesting stories relating to any kind of skullduggery or other iniquity whcih has taken place within your organisation, maybe now is the time to consider to whom your loyalties lie.

 

We can put you in contact with radio and TV or print journalists who will be happy to listen to your story in confidence.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 8 months later...

bumping

Beck

"There are two ways to conquer and enslave a nation. one is by the Sword. The other is by Debt."

 

Barclaycard PPI Refund £4300:whoo:

Barclaycard = Mexican Stand Off

 

TSB = Mexican Stand Off

 

Santander = :mad2: MungyPup is coming to get yahh :mad2:

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 2 months later...

Indeed and they (Lloyds) cut the pension pot which will effect the average worker more while they carry on paying fat bonuses to the higher paid which will not be effected by any pension cut.

Finally if you succeed with your claim please consider a donation to consumer action group as those donations keep this site alive.

 R.I.P BOB aka ROOSTER-UK you have always been a Gent on these boards and you will be remembered for that.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...
  • 1 month later...

Hmmn... the £11bn loss is equivalent to about 2 years profits at 2007 levels in HBOS and the organisation was over 300 years old.....

All comments are my personal views - if in doubt then seek professional advice. If you think i've helped then please tip my scales.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 1 month later...

In case it hasn't filtered through - HBOS have finally dumped a shed load of their admin staff right in it by announcing 850 job losses in one town where they are one of the key employers locally.

 

Needless to say, some of the admin jobs will be going overseas.

 

Whilst I have nothing decent to say about the bankers, it is as usual the people on the lower end of the pecking order who are being given the boot, rather than the tossers at the top who stuffed an entire nation.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 6 months later...

Ex HBOS Financial Adviser here.....aaagh I here you all say but that's were life took me. The last 2-3 years were a nightmare working under a collection of various levels of staff members all under severe pressure due to the increasing bonus culture. If you failed to do your bit towards branch targets then 'Performance Management' quickly arrives.

 

I have many experiences of behaviours and indeed falsifications by lots of different individuals basically trying to de-fraud banks at the expense of customers to achieve bonuses...pure greed!

 

I was frustrated by the lack of supervision/risk control and for the honest group of advisers that I associated with, the pressure was brought about by being ranked against dishonest employees. Line managers/Regional managers and I suspect higher levels turning a blind eye to the shennanigans happening at branch level and beyond. I heard of several more significant shennanigans at corporate level too but basically not dealt with due to inadequate risk control/ineffective management.

 

I left the bank and all in all enjoyed working for Bank of Scotland. The merger with the Haliban was the downfall in my opinion because as time went on they integrated the sales culture throughout the Bank. Ultimately, they 'overtraded' and became bankrupt until the Government bailed them out.

 

Glad to be out.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 4 months later...

Hi Tonymacaroni

I realize it's been a while since your post but I was surfing around the site and I wondered whether you had any knowledge of the pressure put on sales people at Halifax to sell loans. I'm keen to know what triggered Sales to call someone to offer a loan. What tactics they would use to sell a loan and whether you think appropriate checks were made on the ability to repay? What kind of incentives or rewards did sales or branch staff get for selling inappropriate products? I'm sure this still goes on despite the recent financial crisis. They continue to induldge in irresponsible and unfair behaviour. It may now be more with regard to investments than loans. Ridiculous "fee" deduction for selling an inappropriate product from a different area of the group etc. I have so many horror stories from friends and relatives particularly from Halifax but Barclays and others. I don't believe the banks have been punished adequately. I don't trust banks at all. I tell as many people as I can to be very very wary when dealing with them. They are not your friends, they are not there to help or advise but merely to make money from you. Do not rely on their "advice" - it is for their advantage only. Many people are suffering severe financial detriment because of poor sales practices.

Look forward to hearing your thoughts. SJ

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...