Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Today , after a lotof years i recieved a letter from this lot. Very friendly, "Were writing to remind you that we havent had any contact from you in a while".  The velvet fist, followed by  a veiled threat to get their preferred debt collectors involved. Yep dead right. In 1992/3 I took out a Student load under duress from DHSS. uP TO 2000 I hadsucessfully gotten deferment on low income. But rarther thansign on as unemployed,I decided to be self employed. I applied and they asked for all sorts of documents. I obliged and then correspondance ceased from them, circa 2001. To date  I have had no correspondance from Student Loans. I was made  redundant in 2009 and  reached 65 in 2012 , at which age the loan should have been cancelled. Now ,today, 12 years on retirement and 11 ( at least years after last contact) I get a letter with veiled threats. Do I , as I smell a scam a) ignore it and hope that Erudio will think that this phishing attempt has failed or b) respond with a statute barred letter or c) remind them of legal terms that loan should be cancelled 12 years ago or d) combination of b) +c)      
    • But I'm not mixing and matching. Sure, when researching I do check multiple avenues, but when speaking, I will open a single post. The Fb post was made in March, it is now June, time has passed, and when the suggestion was made, no further information was given on how I should progress beyond "send a letter", which has meant that I've needed to start another stream - this one, but only after taking the time to research first.
    • hes not turning you away he is simply saying that you should stick to one channel of advice. he is perfectly happy with that channel being this forum, and he will help you   all he is saying, and I agree, is that you should stick to one help channel, not mix and match 3/4
    • As long as we are clear . Do the reading and post your letter of claim in draft form as requested and we can go from there.    
  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like

Redetermination Hearing - Help Please


sapphire20
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 5684 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Fantastic Andy!!! I feel so empowered!! :)

 

So I just adjust that Draft Order thingy (I bet you are impressed with my grasp of legal jargon ahem! LOL) :Dand print it as it is? Do I not sign it or anything? no not required

 

So in total, I complete the N244 and enclose with it -

 

Draft Order

My Copy of CCA Request

My Copy of S.A.R - (Subject Access Request)

My Copy of CPR 18

Fee Correct i think its £65.00

 

Is there anything else I should be including? Like the Application form they sent me attempting to pass it off as the CCA maybe? No

 

Also, at the time all this was going on I was going through a pretty harrowing miscarriage, with hospital visits every other day etc. That is one of the reasons I didn't take much notice of what was landing in my mail box really. Should I mention that, as it says on the National Debtline to let the court know if you were unwell and couldn't deal with your defence properly? Yes please do it will help in your application sorry to here that BTW Debs

 

D x

 

Ok you are all done then now Debs keep your thread updated and if anything transpires just post and i will take a look on how you are doing

 

I wish you well with your application

 

 

Kindest Regards

 

Andy:)

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHER

 

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group - The National Consumer Service

If you want advice on your Topic please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Replies 80
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

Thank you for your kind words, i'm ok now, and life goes on doesn't it.

 

Right then, that's everything done and sitting on my desk ready to be dropped off at the court tomorrow with the (extortinate) fee!! :eek: (Borrowed from my lovely Mother I might add!!)

 

I just want to thank you all for your help with this, I feel like a right plonker (or insert other descriptive expletive LOL) for letting us get into this mess, but I just couldn't see a way out! If this is successful, then I can feel confident about tackling all my other creditors too which is brilliant!

 

Like many people on here, I don't want to get out of paying the debts I have accrued, but the charges and underhanded dealings of these companies/banks are just unbelievable! They cash in on people's misery really, adding more and more charges to already defaulting debts.

 

Right, i'm getting off my soap box now!

 

Thanks again to all of you, you have all truly brought me back from despair and made me able to smile again.

 

Back soon :)

 

Debs x

Marbles Mastercard - HFC - Weightmans - Phoenix Recoveries - CCJ Issued 25.07.08 - Letter sent to court requesting Reconsidertion 04/08/08 - S.A.R - (Subject Access Request)/CCE/CPR18 Sent 19.9.09 - Redermination Hearing 02.10.08. HELP!!

 

JJB Store Card - Creation Financial - Greenhalgh's Solicitors - Judgment for Claimant (in default) issued 14.09.08 - SAR/CCE/CPR18 sent 19.09.08.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi guys,

 

Jeeze it's busy onhere, just took me 5 minutes to find my thread!!

 

Ok, update -

 

The Application to set aside is in with the court now, fee paid. (£75 blimmin quid!!) So it's wait and see.

 

However, this morning I have recieved another Notice of Hearing. It says -

TAKE NOTICE that the Re-determination Hearing will now take place on 5th January 2009 at 2.15pm at blah blah blah.

then onthe bottom it says '

Please Note: This will be heard at the same time as the charging order hearing.

Now correct me if i'm wrong, but haven't we already had the Re-determination hearing? THEY didn't bother to turn up and the Judge had kindly already granted a charging order that morning!

 

What are they trying to pull now?

 

Thanks guys

Sapphy x

Marbles Mastercard - HFC - Weightmans - Phoenix Recoveries - CCJ Issued 25.07.08 - Letter sent to court requesting Reconsidertion 04/08/08 - S.A.R - (Subject Access Request)/CCE/CPR18 Sent 19.9.09 - Redermination Hearing 02.10.08. HELP!!

 

JJB Store Card - Creation Financial - Greenhalgh's Solicitors - Judgment for Claimant (in default) issued 14.09.08 - SAR/CCE/CPR18 sent 19.09.08.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi Sapphy,

 

Don't know what the hell is going on at your court. I thought the RD Hearing was the one you went to before when the judge flipped you off.

 

In any event, you are now taking control of events with your N244 Appl'n so who cares about the RDhearing any more ! ;)

We could do with some help from you

                                                                PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING

EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

 

                                            Have we helped you ...?  Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

 

Please give something if you can. We all give our time free of charge but the site has bills to pay.

 

Thanks !:-)

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hey Slick,

 

Good to 'see' you :)

 

To be honest, the more I read, the more it seems like people don't know their left hand from their right!

 

Ah well, "Keep gooin wit'yed dawn!" as they say in my neck of the woods ;)

 

Sapphy x

Marbles Mastercard - HFC - Weightmans - Phoenix Recoveries - CCJ Issued 25.07.08 - Letter sent to court requesting Reconsidertion 04/08/08 - S.A.R - (Subject Access Request)/CCE/CPR18 Sent 19.9.09 - Redermination Hearing 02.10.08. HELP!!

 

JJB Store Card - Creation Financial - Greenhalgh's Solicitors - Judgment for Claimant (in default) issued 14.09.08 - SAR/CCE/CPR18 sent 19.09.08.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 5 weeks later...
Hi guys,

 

Jeeze it's busy onhere, just took me 5 minutes to find my thread!!

 

Ok, update -

 

The Application to set aside is in with the court now, fee paid. (£75 blimmin quid!!) So it's wait and see.

 

However, this morning I have recieved another Notice of Hearing. It says -

TAKE NOTICE that the Re-determination Hearing will now take place on 5th January 2009 at 2.15pm at blah blah blah.

 

then onthe bottom it says '

 

Please Note: This will be heard at the same time as the charging order hearing.

 

Now correct me if i'm wrong, but haven't we already had the Re-determination hearing? THEY didn't bother to turn up and the Judge had kindly already granted a charging order that morning!

 

What are they trying to pull now?

 

Thanks guys

Sapphy x

 

 

It was an interim charging order

You may receive different advice to your query as people have different experiences and opinions. Please use your own judgement in deciding whose advice to take.

 

If in doubt seek advice from a qualified insured professional. Any advice I have offered you is done so on an informal basis, without prejudice or liability.

 

If you think I have been helpful PLEASE click the scales

 

court bundles for dummies

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...