Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • That isn’t actually what the Theft Act 1968 S1 actually says, BTW. https://www.legislation.gov.uk/ukpga/1968/60/section/1 (1)A person is guilty of theft if he dishonestly appropriates property belonging to another with the intention of permanently depriving the other of it;   The difference between what you’ve said and the Act? a) intent to permanently deprive rather than  just depriving (which is why the offence of “taking without consent” was brought in for motor vehicles, as otherwise "joyriders" could say "but I intended to give it back at the end") b) dishonesty : If I honestly believed A's pen belonged to B, and took it and gave it to B - B might be found guilty of theft but I shouldn't be. 
    • Received a call and follow on confirmation email from the police about my cabinets! They wanted to confirm that I was prepared to support police action for the matter and that I would be happy to provide a statement and attend court at a later date!!! I think that something might actually get done - it won't get my cabinets back I know that but hopefully it will put a stop to this so called courier doing this to people!
    • Around a month ago I had to send a sympathy card to a friend in GB. Logistically it made sense to buy a personalised one on eBay and get it sent straight to my mate, rather than faffing around getting it sent to me.  This mighty purchase set me back all of £3.05 (including postage costs). I was taken aback that, when it was sent, I got a tracking number.  For a flippin' three-quid card!  I had no idea that technology had moved on so much and that tracking was so easy.  The shop has feedback for 16,300 purchases so tracking must be easy & automatic. It's unlikely your case will get to court, but in cases that do this got me thinking that we need to aggressively challenge the PPCs where they have lied about the timescales of sending their rubbish and have no proof at all of posting - when it would be so easy to provide it.
    • Thanks for uploading the appeal.  It was a waste of time but well done in not outing the driver. Why have your friends paid £60 they don't owe to a cowboy private company that have no means of making them pay as they don't do court?  If they paid by card, as I presume they did, they should get on to their bank and do a chargeback immediately. We call the £70 the Unicorn Food Tax.  The law specifically states they are only allowed to charge the original £100 but the PPCs and their bezzies in their trade associations allow this made-up extra £70 so £100 becomes £170.  Unfortunately for them the law doesn't. Anyway, snotty letter time. There is an example in post 32 here you can tweak as it's the same company but a different car park   https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/463964-alliance-anpr-pcn-lease-car-appeals-refused-daymer-bay-cornwall/page/2/#comments  
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Being made bankrupt for mortgage debt.


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 5722 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 61
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

Not my area mate I'm afraid :) I know SFA on this!!

7 years in retail customer service

 

Expertise in letting and rental law for 6 years

 

By trade - I'm an IT engineer working in the housing sector.

 

Please note that any posts made by myself are for information only and should not and must not be taken as correct or factual. If in doubt, consult with a solicitor or other person of equal legal standing.

 

Please click the star if I have helped!!

Link to post
Share on other sites

Just a thought wwwdotcom have you ever seen any proof of what the house was sold for? any statement showing what the 20k was made up of?

 

If not then they have not proved to you what you owe which you could use as your reason of opposition, if my thinking is right, but as i said im out of my depth here so not sure if thats a valid deffence as it where

 

it will at least delay the judgment while the claiment provides that proof if it is

Link to post
Share on other sites

Just a thought wwwdotcom have you ever seen any proof of what the house was sold for? any statement showing what the 20k was made up of?

 

If not then they have not proved to you what you owe which you could use as your reason of opposition, if my thinking is right, but as i said im out of my depth here so not sure if thats a valid deffence as it where

 

it will at least delay the judgment while the claiment provides that proof if it is

 

I have not seen anything. I just assume they are watertight.

Link to post
Share on other sites

As i said i may be wrong, but in CCJ cases its the claiments place to prove the debt, a judgment cant be made until that has been done to the satisfaction of the court so i dont see why it cant apply here, it wont get you of the hook, but it might buy you time, and considering that post Debt Docter made on MSE it may give you the time to see if that applys in your case.

 

As for there case being watertight, after my dealings with the TSB i very much doubt it

 

Look at it this way if i came up to you and said you owed me £100 would you just take my word for it and pay me?

Link to post
Share on other sites

As i said i may be wrong, but in CCJ cases its the claiments place to prove the debt, a judgment cant be made until that has been done to the satisfaction of the court so i dont see why it cant apply here, it wont get you of the hook, but it might buy you time, and considering that post Debt Docter made on MSE it may give you the time to see if that applys in your case.

 

As for there case being watertight, after my dealings with the TSB i very much doubt it

 

Look at it this way if i came up to you and said you owed me £100 would you just take my word for it and pay me?

Of course I would. You seem a lovely person.

Link to post
Share on other sites

You need to throw in as much as you can to muddy the waters. As said above if they have not given you any detail of what the amount is made up of then you need to say so.

BANK CHARGES

Nat West Bus Acct £1750 reclaim - WON

 

LTSB Bus Acct £1650 charges w/o against o/s balance - WON

 

Halifax Pers Acct £1650 charges taken from benefits - WON

 

Others

 

GE Money sec loan - £1900 in charges - settlement agreed

GE Money sec loan - ERC of £2.5K valid for 15 years - on standby

FirstPlus - missold PPI of £20K for friends - WON

Link to post
Share on other sites

You need to throw in as much as you can to muddy the waters. As said above if they have not given you any detail of what the amount is made up of then you need to say so.

I could pay the full 20 if I wanted to. This would take a lot of doing but is do-able.

 

But I would not feel good offering 10k if they would have taken 7k.

 

I find the lack of haggling odd, why would thay not want some money?

 

I have sent an email to the CEO suggesting that the company owes it to it's shareholders to accept a fair offer.

 

Is this normal? Are they playing unbelievable hardball?

Link to post
Share on other sites

Do they know your financial situation? If you can convince them that BR will give them nothing it will strengthen your case to settle for a lower amount substantially.

BANK CHARGES

Nat West Bus Acct £1750 reclaim - WON

 

LTSB Bus Acct £1650 charges w/o against o/s balance - WON

 

Halifax Pers Acct £1650 charges taken from benefits - WON

 

Others

 

GE Money sec loan - £1900 in charges - settlement agreed

GE Money sec loan - ERC of £2.5K valid for 15 years - on standby

FirstPlus - missold PPI of £20K for friends - WON

Link to post
Share on other sites

Do they know your financial situation? If you can convince them that BR will give them nothing it will strengthen your case to settle for a lower amount substantially.

Yes. Over umpteen emails.

 

I am beginning to think my plea of poverty may be working against me.

 

This is the email I sent their CEO

 

To Eric Daniels

Dear sir

 

Your company is making me bankrupt for a long overdue debt that I will admit was wrong of me to accrue. I have had the debt for many years and have never been in a position to pay it off.

 

I have bankruptcy proceedings against me on the 18th of September where I shall be declared bankrupt and, due to me having no assets, your company will have no money from me.

 

I have tried to negotiate some kind of deal with your recoveries dept via your legal eagles at Sprecher Greer Halberstam LLP, namely Mr. Medcraft. Your collections team have offered to cease the bankruptcy for £15,000 which is a vast amount for me to find. I offered £3000 which is the sum that your collections dept said they would accept some time ago, the now say there will be no more negotiating and it will go to court.

 

Why is this?

 

Is it not better for the bank and it's shareholders that they recieve some money rather than bankrupt a near poverty level individual?

 

I do not want to be made bankrupt and I certainly cannot get £15,000 together, is there anything you can do so that common sense may rule the day?

Link to post
Share on other sites

wwwdotcom, you have no time to be emailing CEO,s, you will be lucky if they read it at all , let alone before next thursday.

 

If you dont want to go bankrupt you must send that form Andy said to court today, if not they may just pass it regardless.

 

Your addmision you could pay it worrys me, when we first spoke you said you had no assets of value, if thats the case how do you expect to raise the funds?

 

Goldlady is correct, if you can demonstrate to the court your not insolvent, and there is a real prospect that the bank will re coupe there money and costs in a reasonable time frame then s/he may not pass the BO, but negotiating a lower amount at court will probebly not work, and in fact will probebly secure the order going through.

 

Your focus should be showing the court you do not recognise the amount claimed, and due proscess was not followed if you can, that at least will delay the order if you get it right.

 

You may find if you do get it right THEN they may be willing to negotiate.

 

 

There is a chance they may negotiate before the hearing, but they will leave it to the last miniute but i would not risk the chance they might, it will be too late then if they dont.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Blind

 

I have given the bennefit of my advise and it as been disgarded think its time to move off this thread

 

Regards

 

Andy

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHER

 

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group - The National Consumer Service

If you want advice on your Topic please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

Blind

 

I have given the bennefit of my advise and it as been disgarded think its time to move off this thread

 

Regards

 

Andy

Hi Andy

 

Sorry you thought your advice was ignored, it was not. I will be putting the form in today and appreciate your advice very much.

Link to post
Share on other sites

OK......firstly try and relax if you can you amongst others who have been in similar situations as yourself.....

 

What date is the hearing for the BP ?

 

Firstly if it was me in your position I would firstly send a SAR request to Lloyds bank.....

 

Common sense tells us that if you do not have all the relevant paperwork, then until that paperwork is available to you how can you totally DISPUTE the debt/debts...

 

Have you received a statutory demand ?...

 

Do you have a copy of the signed agreements ?

 

Do you have statements for the duration of the loan ?

 

These are the sorts of questions I would be asking myself and definitely Lloyds....

 

In the first instance

 

Send this to Lloyds Head Office (attn of the Data Compliance Manager) you will need to send it with a £10 postal order and send it either by recorded / guaranteed delivery...(you will need to edit it)....

 

 

 

Data Protection Act 1998

 

Subject Access Request

 

Dear Sir/Madam

 

ACCOUNT NUMBER: xxxxxxxxx (or multiple numbers if more than one account)

 

Please supply me with all data that you hold on me. This includes in particular, but is not limited to, the following:-

 

1. The original signed, executed credit agreement and any terms and conditions that applied to the account at the time of default and at the time the account was opened.

2. Transcriptions of all telephone conversations recorded and any notes made in relation to telephone conversations by your company, or by any previous creditor

3. Where there has been any event in my account history over this period which has required manual intervention by any person, I require disclosure of any indication or notes which have either caused or resulted in that manual intervention, or other evidence of that manual intervention in relation to my account formerly held with ORIGINAL CREDITOR.

4. True copies of any notice of assignment and/or default notice or enforcement notice that you or the original creditor sent me, with a copy of any proof of postage that you hold.

5. Documents relating to any insurance added to the account, including the insurance contract and terms and conditions, date it was added and deleted (if applicable).

6. Details of any collection charges added to the account; specifically, the date it was levied, the amount of the charge, a detailed financial breakdown of how the charge was calculated, and what the charge covers.

7. Specific details of the fees/charges levied by any other agency in respect of this account and a detailed breakdown of said fees/charges and what each charge relates to and on what date said fees/charges were levied.

8. A genuine copy of any notice of fair use of my data as required by the Data Protection Act 1998

9. A list of third party agencies to whom you have disclosed my personal data and a summary of the nature of the information you have disclosed.

10. Copies of statements for the entire duration of the credit agreement.

 

I enclose the statutory maximum fee of £10. You have 40 days in which to comply.

If there is specific information which you require in order to satisfy yourself as to my identity, please let me know by return. However, please note that the above address is the one which you normally use to communicate my private business to me and which you have hitherto found to be acceptable.

 

Yours faithfully,

 

 

print but don't sign your name

user_offline.gifreputation.gif report.gif

  • Haha 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

OK just read your hearing is in 7 days...!!!

 

You will need to fill out form 6.19 which is a notice of opposition to the BR petition...

 

You will also need to fill out an affadavit....(which looks like this)

 

AFFIDAVIT

I (name) of (address), (occupation)

MAKE OATH and say as follows:

____________________________________

Signature

SWORN AT (address)

this day of year

before me,

____________________________________

(A Solicitor or Commissioner for Oaths)

Please send me a PM ASAP....

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks for looking in 42man, much appreciated, BR is not my strong point as you know and since i know you've had your own battles in this arena i thought you'd be the best man for the job;)

 

Thanks again for looking in mate:D

  • Haha 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks all for looking in.

 

Hopefullly I can answer the last 3 posts by just typing what I have in front of me.

This is the first page.

 

*in a box top left* This is the Petition referred to in the Statement of Truth of Emma Victoria Lake, dated this day 30th June 2008 *then signed by her, whoever she may be*

 

rule 6.6

 

In the *my local* County Court

In bankruptcy

 

Re: Mr *my name*

 

we Lloyds TSB Bank PLC *their address* petition the court that that a bankruptcy order may be made against *my name and address*

 

occupation-Unknown

Nature of business-unknown

 

and say as follows

1 the debtors centre of main interests has been *my address*

 

2 The debtor has for the greater part of six months immediately preceding the presentation of the petition resided at *my address* within this district of this court.

 

3 The debtor is justly and truly indebted to us in the aggregate sum of £19847 in relation to a judgement dated 3 april 2007 of the *my local* county court in preceedings entitled claim number ******. The debt is in respect of monies due under a mortgage advance following the sale of the mortgaged property situated at and known as *old address*. The property was sold on 20 may 1998 in the sum of £26,950. The proceeds of sale were insufficient to redeem the mortgage account and the balance outstanding is £19847

 

4 as from 1st October 2007 pursuant to section 212 (a) of the financial services and markets act 2007, Cheltenham and Gloucester PLC debts have been transfered to lloyds TSB PLC.

 

5 The above mentioned debt is for a liquidated sum payable immediately and the debtor appears to be unable to pay it.

 

6 On the 19 May 2008 a statutory demand was served upon the debtor by personal service before 1700 hours in respct of the above mentioned debt. To the best ot my knowledge and belief the demand has neither been complied with nor set aside in accordance with the rules and no application to set aside is outstanding.

 

7 We do not, nor does any person on our behalf, hold any security on the debtors estate, or any part thereof, for the payment of the above mentioned sum.

 

There is then an endorsment on the back page

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...