Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Hello, firstly thank you for reading this. I know no one wants a long winded back story. So I’ll be breif. I entered a local store to buy some paint (which I did pay for) I am honestly not a bad person or a theif.   Didn’t have a basket or trolly as was on my lunch break. Whilst picking up the three tubs of paint placed some masking tape in my pocket (it was hanging out of so I had every intention to pay) just didn’t have a hand free. Paid for my goods (forgot about the £4.39 masking tape) I’ve got so much going on and im not well at all (like I say no one cares I get that) also have autism so wasn’t thinking particularly like others do maybe (who knows my minds going around and around) I left the store after paying, was pulled back in by security. Asked for the tape which I gave immediately  shook up. Gave them my ID and details. I was given some paper and told to expect a large fine in the post for their time and the tape and sent on my way. my questions are: I hardly ever go out without support so the ban I guess I can’t go there now for anything (their loss) - ok but is my photo going to be all over with my name? how much am I expecting in the post as a fine? I have sent them cash in the post recorded signed for delivery to arrive tomorrow (incident happened today) for my error. Their Address was on the bit of paper. i have read two posts on this page but they were from many many years ago so I hoped for updated advise please? 
    • V important you read lots of BMW threads too !  
    • So should I send them a new SAR and put my date of birth on it? Or do I need to send them some proof? Driving license? 
    • Thanks so much for your help!! I've emailed them, and when they reply saying they can't do it I'll reply and state my rights. I'm so glad I found this forum, and will read all of the posts I can find and help guides available for the future. Really can't thank you enough.
    • utter BS, doesn't matter you signed it. pers i'd be writing as per the other threads here rejecting the car as not as described under CRA etc and be done with it. as its a debit card you could also do a full chargeback within 120 days to your bank and simply dump the car back to BMW. 100's of like threads to read here. get your ducks inline. make sure you know what you are doing and off you go. dont take any BS from BMW, no matter what you sign it does NOT remove your consumer rights. p'haps it might be on the off chance you are a good manager , a quick phonecall tomorrow saying you dont want it because (no bla bla fitted) it might be resolved in 5 mins..i will guess to date you not tried
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

PC from online retailer below spec and malfunctioning


MATTYFEZ
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 5740 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Hi all,

 

Someone I know has purchased a custom built computer from a large online retailer who specialises in these things.

 

The PC he recived is below the requested specification, has build quality issues and is malfunctioning.

 

It seems distance selling regs may not apply as the computer is a custom build item, so maybe SOGA is a better route to take.

 

Rather than copy/paste everything I thought I would be neater just to post a link to the thread, http://www.custompc.co.uk/phpbb/viewtopic.php?t=290147

 

Any advice is greatly appreciated, Cheers!

 

(if the link is an issue, I will copy/paste the contents here, but in the interest of keeping the thread tidy ive just put a link up for now)

Link to post
Share on other sites

Well, to address a few points in the link:

1. The closest I could find to that board is this one: ASRock Motherboard - Product - ConRoe1333-eSATA2 - Overview which does have DDRII in its compatibility list. Whilst 800 isn't strictly there, too slow RAM is more of a problem than too quick, as it will just negotiate the fastest mutual speed - in this case 533. 533 is quick enough though, so it probably won't be the cause of the problem.

2. Likewise, the 8400 is (pending having BIOS 1.50) so I don't think we're looking at a compatibility issue. I'm not entirely sure if running on a lower bios will cause it to work at a slower speed or not to work at all but it's certainly worth checking the BIOS version.

 

I know too slow RAM does cause some boards to fail POST. But this probably isn't down to that. The poor build quality is obviously evidence there's an issue somewhere with the build, I'd be looking at either a faulty or badly configured MB as the cause. Either way, the machine isn't fit for purpose so the retailer is legally bound to prove that it was, or repair/replace the machine.

 

Normally I'd say just getting them to replace the MB with a better, fully compatible one would sort it but if there is evidence of poor build quality throughout the machine then it is probably better to ask for a replacement machine (with no re-used parts from the old build) as there is clearly an issue. Whether they will do that (ie they will claim it is too costly as opposed to replacing the board) is a different matter, and that argument is one they are legally entitled to take.

 

The DSRs won't apply to a custom build - but you can reject the goods under SOGA for a full refund too as one day is not a reasonable time to inspect a PC for faults, usually about 3 weeks is considered reasonable.

The above post constitutes my personal opinion on the facts in the post compared with my personal knowledge of the applicable legislation. I make no guarantees of its legal accuracy. If you are in doubt seek advice of a legal professional specialising in the area concerned.

 

If my post has helped you please click my scales!

Link to post
Share on other sites

The DRS do not apply to the standard right of return in the case of personalised items. however, it has been suggested that personalised means something which would be of no use to someone else. But that is an aside.

 

if there is a breach of terms, including those implied (SoGA, e.g), then you have the right of redress against the seller. This would be the normal route of repair replacement refund in that order or if the goods have not been accepted then a full refund.

 

The DSR rights of return are only on those where, e.g, you change your mind. If there is a fault, then SoGA or whatever applies and 'overrides' DSR.

Link to post
Share on other sites

The motherboard you found is the actual motherboard installed in the PC. The Bios version is P1.20.

 

I have formally rejected the goods via email and spoke to them today.

 

They are going to arrange a pick up of the goods and wish to inspect them upon receipt. They advised if they find my claims to be true they will refund.

 

I have explained that I do not wish have a replacement or repair as I have rejected them for reasons covered under the SoGA.

 

I will have to wait and see now If they decide to co-operate or not, as I get the feeling they are going to be difficult.

 

They have already offered to replace the motherboard so I am assuming this is acceptance that they are at fault.

 

I do not wish to keep the computer because I have had an extremely unpleasant experience with Eclipse and for me £800 is alot of money and I expect a high level of service and product for this money.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Even judging by the age of the item, the offer to repair still counts as them offering a reasonable remedy - though judging by the apparent build quality of the machine I'd be pushing for a replacement build.

 

Maybe flashing the BIOS to 1.50 would sort it?

The above post constitutes my personal opinion on the facts in the post compared with my personal knowledge of the applicable legislation. I make no guarantees of its legal accuracy. If you are in doubt seek advice of a legal professional specialising in the area concerned.

 

If my post has helped you please click my scales!

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...