Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like

ECLIPSE computers - won't refund whats my rights?


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 5788 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Hi

We ordered a computer on the 29th July from Eclipse computers.

It was made to our specifications.

First we had to wait for a graphics card that wasn't in stock.

Then there was a problem with the motherboard.

Then it needed a different power supply.

We then got a phone call to say it was being shipped

Later that evening we got a call to say actually the monitor you want isn't in stock.

 

The computer arrived yesterday (friday), and we have encountered problems with it. Basically its not running at the speeds it should be (we paid for 3Ghz but its running at half that speed.) it looks like a configuration problem, like its not been set up properly.

 

My partner rang them to say we were goin to send it back as its not right, and they said we could return it and if it was a hardware problem they would do what was necessary but if it was a software issue, then we would be looking at an £80 charge for labour, plus costs to return it.

 

However, the quality control thing that came with the computer states that all this was tested prior to sending and it was working to specification, which is clearly not the case.

 

They are saying we are not entitled to a refund, I was just wondering where we stood in terms of rights.

 

Please can someone help?

Link to post
Share on other sites

I don't know your legal rights, but I know a little about pc's and they now have a setting that reduces the speed of the cpu when full speed is not needed, this is to reduce fan noise and electric usage. So when you check in windows a 3ghz cpu will be shown at a reduced speed.

Link to post
Share on other sites

The option that you are referring to is the power saving one which has been changed for highest performance so it shouldn't be limiting cpu speed and plus, i have benched the cpu to see if this is th case and it is ony returning a maximum of 1.2 ghz back

Link to post
Share on other sites

I really need to know whether we are entitled to ask for our money back as it is not the computer specs we believed we were getting, therefore we have been sold an item that differs to what we should have got. We only got this yesterday, so surely there is some law or rights that allow us to return it for a complete refund.

Link to post
Share on other sites

You should do a google search for the Sales of Goods Act and read that. It covers anything you need to know about your complaint.

 

I believe that during the first 6 months, possibly 3, it is up to the seller to prove that the item is fit for sale and manufactured for suitable use. or something like that.

 

If you notify them of a problem and ask for a refund, they can't refuse. Also, the fact the timespan of receiving the defective goods and notifying the company is only a couple of weeks, so that should go in your favour. Also, I wouldn't phone and speak to them, I would do it all by letter as it's unlikely you will get to speak to anyone that has even heard of the sales of goods Act, let alone read it.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Just wondering also, what would happen if I returned the computer (which i have had a day!) and they kept the computer and DIDN'T refund my money? How would I go on with that?

Link to post
Share on other sites

the more i think about this the more worked up I am getting. I have taken pictures of the faults and screen shots etc, and i am worried we're gonna end up with no computer and no monies returned, what do I do?

Link to post
Share on other sites

If you return the computer, do so with some proof. Keep records of any correspondance in case it goes to court.

 

Definitely have a look for the sales of goods Act though....send the company a letter detailing the problem, informing them that it is your belief that an item was sold to you by them on xxxx date, and was unfit for the intended purpose. Quote the Sales of Goods Act at them...

 

"If goods do not conform to contract at the time of sale, purchasers can request their money back "within a reasonable time".

 

I'd say two weeks is more than reasonable.

 

This page should answer your questions....

 

Sale of Goods Act Quick Facts - BERR

 

If they have a legal department, they should know and understand the law, if they don't then you will have to issue a claim through the small claims court.

 

Also, if the processor is running at half the speed, they should in theory be in a position to offer you some advice on why that might be....thinking about it, it depends whether a processor has to run at less than full capacity for it to not be considered 100% fit for purpose....I would suggest obtaining some technical advice from a professional before stepping up your claim.

Link to post
Share on other sites

hi....certainly consider Sales of Goods Act...but also look into Distance Selling rights and also new unfair comerciall practices law that came into effect end May...

 

also....if this is the same Eclipse computers based in Coventery (i googled it...) its in there terms and conditions

 

Quote : "7 Day Money Back GuaranteeUnder the Distance Selling Regulations you have a 7 working day cooling-off period starting from the day after receipt to cancel the order for all retail mail order transactions excluding trade/business transactions, all computers and items specifically built/assembled for you, delivery charges*, unsealed software or movies and perishable items.

 

*The Delivery service is contracted-out to a third party courier and is a separate contract that is deemed to have begun and been completed before the end of the cooling-off period, this excludes our standard 3-5 day delivery service.

 

To return goods you must send us written confirmation within the cooling-off period. You will be responsible for the cost of returning the items (or our costs for collecting them) and they must be returned complete and as new as otherwise a handling charge may apply at our discretion . "

 

Fair enough its says that specifically built for you is exempt....but if its not fit for purpose or working then i would assume this would be open to your statutory rights...

Link to post
Share on other sites

1. THE DSR 7 day return will probably not apply as its a made to order item.

2. Your claim is under Ss. 13 and 14 of Sale of Goods Act - not conforming to descrption and not of quality required.

 

3. Ignore the CPUT regs - they are for enforcement and not for breach of rights (I'm getting fed up having to say this all the time).

 

As said before - you need to write in. You are probably just within the time for getting a refund, especially with all the toing and froing.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...