Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • I have just read the smaller print on their signs. It says that you can pay at the end of your parking session. given that you have ten minutes grace period the 35 seconds could easily have been taken up with walking back to your car, switching on the engine and then driving out. Even in my younger days when I used to regularly exceed speed limits, I doubt I could have done that in 35 seconds even when I  had a TR5.
    • Makers of insect-based animal feed hope to be able to compete with soybeans on price.View the full article
    • Thank you for posting up the results from the sar. The PCN is not compliant with the Protection of Freedoms Act 2012 Schedule 4. Under Section 9 [2][a] they are supposed to specify the parking time. the photographs show your car in motion both entering and leaving the car park thus not parking. If you have to do a Witness Statement later should they finally take you to Court you will have to continue to state that even though you stayed there for several hours in a small car park and the difference between the ANPR times and the actual parking period may only be a matter of a few minutes  nevertheless the CEL have failed to comply with the Act by failing to specify the parking period. However it looks as if your appeal revealed you were the driver the deficient PCN will not help you as the driver. I suspect that it may have been an appeal from the pub that meant that CEL offered you partly a way out  by allowing you to claim you had made an error in registering your vehicle reg. number . This enabled them to reduce the charge to £20 despite them acknowledging that you hadn't registered at all. We have not seen the signs in the car park yet so we do not what is said on them and all the signs say the same thing. It would be unusual for a pub to have  a Permit Holders Only sign which may discourage casual motorists from stopping there. But if that is the sign then as it prohibits any one who doesn't have a permit, then it cannot form a contract with motorists though it may depend on how the signs are worded.
    • Defence and Counterclaim Claim number XXX Claimant Civil Enforcement Limited Defendant XXXXXXXXXXXXX   How much of the claim do you dispute? I dispute the full amount claimed as shown on the claim form.   Do you dispute this claim because you have already paid it? No, for other reasons.   Defence 1. The Defendant is the recorded keeper of XXXXXXX  2. It is denied that the Defendant entered into a contract with the Claimant. 3. As held by the Upper Tax Tribunal in Vehicle Control Services Limited v HMRC [2012] UKUT 129 (TCC), any contract requires offer and acceptance. The Claimant was simply contracted by the landowner to provide car-park management services and is not capable of entering into a contract with the Defendant on its own account, as the car park is owned by and the terms of entry set by the landowner. Accordingly, it is denied that the Claimant has authority to bring this claim. 4. In any case it is denied that the Defendant broke the terms of a contract with the Claimant. 5. The Claimant is attempting double recovery by adding an additional sum not included in the original offer. 6. In a further abuse of the legal process the Claimant is claiming £50 legal representative's costs, even though they have no legal representative. 7. The Particulars of Claim is denied in its entirety. It is denied that the Claimant is entitled to the relief claimed or any relief at all. Signed I am the Defendant - I believe that the facts stated in this form are true XXXXXXXXXXX 01/05/2024   Defendant's date of birth XXXXXXXXXX   Address to which notices about this claim can be sent to you  
    • pop up on the bulk court website detailed on the claimform. [if it is not working return after the w/end or the next day if week time] . When you select ‘Register’, you will be taken to a screen titled ‘Sign in using Government Gateway’.  Choose ‘Create sign in details’ to register for the first time.  You will be asked to provide your name, email address, set a password and a memorable recovery word. You will be emailed your Government Gateway 12-digit User ID.  You should make a note of your memorable word, or password as these are not included in the email.<<**IMPORTANT**  then log in to the bulk court Website .  select respond to a claim and select the start AOS box. .  then using the details required from the claimform . defend all leave jurisdiction unticked  you DO NOT file a defence at this time [BUT you MUST file a defence regardless by day 33 ] click thru to the end confirm and exit the website .get a CPR 31:14 request running to the solicitors https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/forum/showthread.php?486334-CPR-31.14-Request-to-use-on-receipt-of-a-PPC-(-Private-Land-Parking-Court-Claim type your name ONLY no need to sign anything .you DO NOT await the return of paperwork. you MUST file a defence regardless by day 33 from the date on the claimform.
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Mackenzie Hall statute barred, advice appreciated.


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 5599 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

I've only recently found these forums and it's dawning on me that I may have made a huge mistake with Mackenzie Hall.

 

I've acknowledged a debt in writing after 8 years of no contact, and have been making payments for a few months now. I was recently told that even though I've acknowledged the debt and am making payments that I may still be able to sort this out so that I don't have to pay. (scottish law does not apply).

 

I've looked at IHTM28384 and other threads here but can't find anything definative on what happens if you acknowldege the debt after the statute barred time period of 6 years elapses except for ;

 

"Even though the lender may be barred from pursuing recovery, a debtor may decide to pay the debt after the expiry of the time limits. Because of this you should allow a debt which is otherwise statute-barred if the personal representatives pay the debt and you receive evidence that the payment has been made."

 

Am I now stuck with this debt until it's paid off ?

 

any advice appreciated,

 

p.s. I made a complaint in February 2008 to the OFT about the way I was spoken to and dealt with, as have many others. If this company has it's licence revoked eventually will I still have to pay then ?

 

:confused:

Link to post
Share on other sites

Once a debt is statute barred you can not unstatute bar it. While the debt still exists it is your choice whether you pay it or not.

 

Did the company in question threaten legal action over this account?

HAVE YOU BEEN TREATED UNFAIRLY BY CREDITORS OR DCA's?

 

BEWARE OF CLAIMS MANAGEMENT COMPANIES OFFERING TO WRITE OFF YOUR DEBTS.

 

 

Please note opinions given by rory32 are offered informally as a lay-person in good faith based on personal experience. For legal advice, you must always consult a registered and insured lawyer.

Link to post
Share on other sites

The debt IS still statute barred. Once a period of 6 years elapsed without any payment having been made or written acknowledgement of the debt by you. Starting to make payments recently DOES NOT unstatute bar the debt.

 

You can STOP paying MH immediatly. If you have a DD cancel it forthwith. If you pay by card ask your bank for a replacement card. Send this to MH by recorded delivery. DO NOT SIGN IT

 

Dear Cretins

 

Acc/Ref No

 

You have contacted us regarding the account with the above reference number, which you claim is owed by ourselves.

 

We would point out that under the Limitation Act 1980 Section 5 “an action founded on simple contract shall not be brought after the expiration of six years from the date on which the cause of action accrued.”

 

We would also point out that the OFT say under their Debt Collection Guidance on statute barred debt that “it is unfair to pursue the debt if the debtor has heard nothing from the creditor during the relevant limitation period”.

 

Prior to recent payments I felt forced into making under duress the last payment of this alleged debt was made over six years ago and no further acknowledgement or payment had been made since that time. Unless you can provide evidence of payment or written contact from us in the relevant period under Section 5 of the Limitation Act, we suggest that you are no longer able to take any court action against us to recover the alleged amount claimed.

 

The OFT Debt Collection Guidance states further that “continuing to press for payment after a debtor has stated that they will not be paying a debt because it is statute barred could amount to harassment contrary to section 40 (1) of the Administration of Justice Act 1970”.

 

We await your written confirmation that this matter is now closed and that no further contact will be made concerning the above account after that last letter.

 

We look forward to your reply.

 

Yours faithfully

 

I M Wise To-You

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hia, thanks, and yes........they threatende legal action, then threatened to contact my employer, then told me that they would take the whole amount out of my paypacket after applying to the court for an arrestment of earnings order,

 

When I eventually came out of the state of shock I was in I discovered

 

1) arrestment of eranings only applies to Scottish debts

2) attachment of earnings will only be granted by a judge if the applicant has proved that the debtor a) owes the debt b) has not made reasonable attempts to pay affordable amonts within an agreed timescale.e.t.c., e.t.c.,

 

unfortunately I found all this out after many months of harrassment and bullying and shocking phonecalls from MH which left me very scared.

 

My OFT complaint is progressing and in February I signed a release to disclose particulars of my complaint so that MH can be investigated - I did initially follow MH's complaints procedures as advised but suprise suprise, heard nothing back from them.

 

Is there any way that I can get proof that the debt is statute barred ?

 

It was originally for a HSB loan £2K, i paid it for 6 months then became ill, made redundant, moved 120 miles away and then got married.I never received any letters about this debt until 8 years later when I got divorced and changed my name back to my maiden name, RED contacted me first, then Mackenzie Hall.

 

 

many thanks for your help,

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi ODC,

 

thanks for your reply..........Does anyone have any idea of how they will react to this, Im not getting phonecalls or letters at the moment.

 

Has anyone tried this course of action and succeeded in getting rid of them ?

 

replies appreciated, starting to feel a bit more optimistic :D

Link to post
Share on other sites

Once you send the letter above, the onus is on them to prove it is not statute barred, not for you to prove it is.

 

You will need to escalate the complaint to the financial ombudsman as well as the OFT , considering they are not supplying you with a final or any other kind of response to your complaint.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Is there any way that I can get proof that the debt is statute barred ?

 

The onus of proof is on them to prove that it isn't statute barred (London Congregation Union Inc v Harriss and Harriss [1988] 1 All ER 15, CA at 13.3).

 

You may wish to send a SAR to HSB but as it's 8 years old they may not have records of the account.

 

Personally I would be pushing to get any monies that you have paid back from MH as they have unlawfully threatened court action on a statute barred debt in order to pressurise you into making payments.

HAVE YOU BEEN TREATED UNFAIRLY BY CREDITORS OR DCA's?

 

BEWARE OF CLAIMS MANAGEMENT COMPANIES OFFERING TO WRITE OFF YOUR DEBTS.

 

 

Please note opinions given by rory32 are offered informally as a lay-person in good faith based on personal experience. For legal advice, you must always consult a registered and insured lawyer.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Ok, thanks all, I'll be writing that letter today and won't be making any more payments.

 

I'll escalate the compaint and look at getting the £250 I've paid them back.

 

many thanks all, I'll post when I have any news on progress, excellent site !

Link to post
Share on other sites

Do not sign that letter, just print your name .

 

By what methods have you been making payments to them so far ?

I have already written and signed my name regarding the complaint where I do acknowldeg that I owe the debt, but that I hadn't deliberately intended not to pay it, will this make a difference now ?

Link to post
Share on other sites

Well it isn't good that they have a specimen of your signature . I suppose you could start signing letters in a variety of different ways, confuse them a bit as to which is the 'correct' one.

 

You need to cancel the standing order .

Link to post
Share on other sites

I've cancelled the standing order,

 

I think I must be very niaive, or stupuid or both ! ..why isn't it good that they have my signature ?

 

on that note, I also wanted to know if they had any right to search my credit file, they did when they first started dealing with this ?

 

thanks again.

Link to post
Share on other sites

You could ask for a cca as well, then serve a s(10) data protection notice on them when they fail to produce one, but the search will only stay there about 12 weeks.

 

As regards the signature, they can allegedly do a lot with photoshop these days.

Link to post
Share on other sites

CCA request :

 

Needs 2 visits to the post office for this. First trip to get the postal order which you take the number of and include in your letter, then you copy/scan it all, second to post it .

 

 

By Special Delivery

 

Dear Sir/Madam

 

Without Prejudice

 

Re:- Account/Reference Number 1234567890

 

No debt is acknowledged to you, or any other person or organisation you represent.

 

With reference to the above agreement, we would be grateful if you would send us a copy of this credit agreement.

 

We understand that under the Consumer Credit Act 1974 s.78 (1), s.77 (1) for fixed sum credit we are entitled to receive a copy of our credit agreement on request. Your obligation also extends to providing a statement of account. We enclose a £1 postal order in payment of the statutory fee, PO Serial Number xxxxx which represents the fee payable under the Consumer Credit Act.

 

This is , you will appreciate, a statutory obligation, whether you are the original creditor or not, under section 189 of the Consumer Credit Act 1974.

 

We understand a copy of our credit agreement should be supplied within 12 working days.

 

We understand that under the Consumer Credit Act creditors are unable to enforce an agreement if they fail to comply with a request for a copy of the agreement under these sections of the Act.

 

Please note, We must emphasize that the enclosed payment is the statutory fee in accordance with the consumer credit act 1974 s 77 (1) and is neither acknowledgement of nor token payment toward alleged debt .

 

Please note that We have copies of all correspondence and attached payments enclosed therein.

 

We look forward to hearing from you.

 

 

Send by special delivery in the same envelope as the statute barred letter, adopt a second new signature for these letters , one that is entirely distinguishable from your usual one. Use this second signature in all correspondence with them.

Link to post
Share on other sites

OMG ! I am niaive, but then I should really expect something like that after the load of cobblers I found out I was told by them about court action and arrestments of earnings !

 

ok I'm going to hold on that letter until I know what a CCA is :)

 

replies much appreciated if anyone has a minute to give me the dummies guide to cca's,

 

thanks.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Rahl, cheers for this, this makes sense as I have no idea where the additional >1K came from that was added to the original loan, you pre-empted me ! :) I'll get this organised to be sent recorded delivery at the same time as my letter telling them I will not be paying as the debt is statute barred.

 

many many thanks.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I took a line out of that letter . 'Without Prejudice' . It shouldn't have been there, sorry .

 

Should be :

 

 

 

By Special Delivery

 

Dear Sir/Madam

 

Re:- Account/Reference Number 1234567890

 

No debt is acknowledged to you, or any other person or organisation you represent.

 

With reference to the above agreement, we would be grateful if you would send us a copy of this credit agreement.

 

We understand that under the Consumer Credit Act 1974 s.78 (1), s.77 (1) for fixed sum credit we are entitled to receive a copy of our credit agreement on request. Your obligation also extends to providing a statement of account. We enclose a £1 postal order in payment of the statutory fee, PO Serial Number xxxxx which represents the fee payable under the Consumer Credit Act.

 

This is , you will appreciate, a statutory obligation, whether you are the original creditor or not, under section 189 of the Consumer Credit Act 1974.

 

We understand a copy of our credit agreement should be supplied within 12 working days.

 

We understand that under the Consumer Credit Act creditors are unable to enforce an agreement if they fail to comply with a request for a copy of the agreement under these sections of the Act.

 

Please note, We must emphasize that the enclosed payment is the statutory fee in accordance with the consumer credit act 1974 s 77 (1) and is neither acknowledgement of nor token payment toward alleged debt .

 

Please note that We have copies of all correspondence and attached payments enclosed therein.

 

We look forward to hearing from you.

 

Yours

 

 

Just means you can use it in court now .

Link to post
Share on other sites

A CCA request is not required at the moment. If the account is statute barred it makes no difference whether a credit agreement can be produced or not.

HAVE YOU BEEN TREATED UNFAIRLY BY CREDITORS OR DCA's?

 

BEWARE OF CLAIMS MANAGEMENT COMPANIES OFFERING TO WRITE OFF YOUR DEBTS.

 

 

Please note opinions given by rory32 are offered informally as a lay-person in good faith based on personal experience. For legal advice, you must always consult a registered and insured lawyer.

Link to post
Share on other sites

A CCA request is not required at the moment. If the account is statute barred it makes no difference whether a credit agreement can be produced or not.

rory32,

 

ok, I'll keep it simple and start with the statute barred letter, recorded delivery.

 

It's good to find out about the CCA for the future though as I didn't realise I had these rights,

 

cheers again.

Link to post
Share on other sites

The s10 notice can be sent on it's own.

HAVE YOU BEEN TREATED UNFAIRLY BY CREDITORS OR DCA's?

 

BEWARE OF CLAIMS MANAGEMENT COMPANIES OFFERING TO WRITE OFF YOUR DEBTS.

 

 

Please note opinions given by rory32 are offered informally as a lay-person in good faith based on personal experience. For legal advice, you must always consult a registered and insured lawyer.

Link to post
Share on other sites

A CCA request is not required at the moment. If the account is statute barred it makes no difference whether a credit agreement can be produced or not.

Ok, it also makes sense to keep it simple, I'll get the statute barred letter off ASAP, but it's good to know I have rights as per CCA request for the future,

 

many thanks again all.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Regarding your OFT complaint and some new powers they now have you may wish to have a read here http://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/forum/faqs-please-read-these/146460-consumer-protection-unfair-trading.html

HAVE YOU BEEN TREATED UNFAIRLY BY CREDITORS OR DCA's?

 

BEWARE OF CLAIMS MANAGEMENT COMPANIES OFFERING TO WRITE OFF YOUR DEBTS.

 

 

Please note opinions given by rory32 are offered informally as a lay-person in good faith based on personal experience. For legal advice, you must always consult a registered and insured lawyer.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...