Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • I have just read the smaller print on their signs. It says that you can pay at the end of your parking session. given that you have ten minutes grace period the 35 seconds could easily have been taken up with walking back to your car, switching on the engine and then driving out. Even in my younger days when I used to regularly exceed speed limits, I doubt I could have done that in 35 seconds even when I  had a TR5.
    • Makers of insect-based animal feed hope to be able to compete with soybeans on price.View the full article
    • Thank you for posting up the results from the sar. The PCN is not compliant with the Protection of Freedoms Act 2012 Schedule 4. Under Section 9 [2][a] they are supposed to specify the parking time. the photographs show your car in motion both entering and leaving the car park thus not parking. If you have to do a Witness Statement later should they finally take you to Court you will have to continue to state that even though you stayed there for several hours in a small car park and the difference between the ANPR times and the actual parking period may only be a matter of a few minutes  nevertheless the CEL have failed to comply with the Act by failing to specify the parking period. However it looks as if your appeal revealed you were the driver the deficient PCN will not help you as the driver. I suspect that it may have been an appeal from the pub that meant that CEL offered you partly a way out  by allowing you to claim you had made an error in registering your vehicle reg. number . This enabled them to reduce the charge to £20 despite them acknowledging that you hadn't registered at all. We have not seen the signs in the car park yet so we do not what is said on them and all the signs say the same thing. It would be unusual for a pub to have  a Permit Holders Only sign which may discourage casual motorists from stopping there. But if that is the sign then as it prohibits any one who doesn't have a permit, then it cannot form a contract with motorists though it may depend on how the signs are worded.
    • Defence and Counterclaim Claim number XXX Claimant Civil Enforcement Limited Defendant XXXXXXXXXXXXX   How much of the claim do you dispute? I dispute the full amount claimed as shown on the claim form.   Do you dispute this claim because you have already paid it? No, for other reasons.   Defence 1. The Defendant is the recorded keeper of XXXXXXX  2. It is denied that the Defendant entered into a contract with the Claimant. 3. As held by the Upper Tax Tribunal in Vehicle Control Services Limited v HMRC [2012] UKUT 129 (TCC), any contract requires offer and acceptance. The Claimant was simply contracted by the landowner to provide car-park management services and is not capable of entering into a contract with the Defendant on its own account, as the car park is owned by and the terms of entry set by the landowner. Accordingly, it is denied that the Claimant has authority to bring this claim. 4. In any case it is denied that the Defendant broke the terms of a contract with the Claimant. 5. The Claimant is attempting double recovery by adding an additional sum not included in the original offer. 6. In a further abuse of the legal process the Claimant is claiming £50 legal representative's costs, even though they have no legal representative. 7. The Particulars of Claim is denied in its entirety. It is denied that the Claimant is entitled to the relief claimed or any relief at all. Signed I am the Defendant - I believe that the facts stated in this form are true XXXXXXXXXXX 01/05/2024   Defendant's date of birth XXXXXXXXXX   Address to which notices about this claim can be sent to you  
    • pop up on the bulk court website detailed on the claimform. [if it is not working return after the w/end or the next day if week time] . When you select ‘Register’, you will be taken to a screen titled ‘Sign in using Government Gateway’.  Choose ‘Create sign in details’ to register for the first time.  You will be asked to provide your name, email address, set a password and a memorable recovery word. You will be emailed your Government Gateway 12-digit User ID.  You should make a note of your memorable word, or password as these are not included in the email.<<**IMPORTANT**  then log in to the bulk court Website .  select respond to a claim and select the start AOS box. .  then using the details required from the claimform . defend all leave jurisdiction unticked  you DO NOT file a defence at this time [BUT you MUST file a defence regardless by day 33 ] click thru to the end confirm and exit the website .get a CPR 31:14 request running to the solicitors https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/forum/showthread.php?486334-CPR-31.14-Request-to-use-on-receipt-of-a-PPC-(-Private-Land-Parking-Court-Claim type your name ONLY no need to sign anything .you DO NOT await the return of paperwork. you MUST file a defence regardless by day 33 from the date on the claimform.
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

2 policies but no claims discount only applies to one?


pj41
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 3554 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Hi All,

 

I have had a car insurace policy with Kwik fit for the last 4 years or so on the same car and now have about 9 years no claims discount.

 

Recently I purchased another car and rang them for a quote on the new car. I'm Keeping the original car and policy. I went through all the questions and was quoted a figure and paid for the years insurance in one go.

 

One of the questions being "how many years no claims do you have?" (answer above).

 

Two weeks later I receive a letter from kwik fit asking me to forward them documentation demonstrating my mime years no claims. I wrote back and said My other policy is with you etc and the advisor on phone went through this.

 

Got another letter asking for same information so wrote back generally complaining that they didn't seem to now what they were doing and sort it out amongst yourselves etc.

 

Had a phone call from complaints dept advising that no claims discount applies to ONE car/ONE policy at a time and they want to zero my discount down and charge me the difference. I advised it was their error, to which they admitted it was their mistake and would pay for any additional costs incurred from the insurance company.

 

during the conversation I did say that I may be selling the original car during the summer at my pace, if i feel like it.

 

Had a phone call tonight informing me that the insurace company will hold the original policy as valid for 60 days max by which time I must either sell the original car or pay the increased premium on the new car with zero no claims discount.

 

question : is this right? do no claims discounts apply to a policy and a vehicle. I would have thought that a driver/owner would make a claim not the car.

 

Thoughts and comments most appreciated.

 

 

Cheers

 

pj41

Link to post
Share on other sites

Yes, this is correct. you can only use your NCD on one policy at a time.

As its in use on your 1st car, you cant use it on the 2nd as well.

 

You really only have a few options.

 

1) Pay the additional premium for zero NCD on the 2nd car.

2) remove the NCD from the 1st policy, pay whatever AP is due on that one, this will free up the NCD to use on the 2nd policy.

3) see if kwik fit offer some kind of 2nd car policy whereby the offer you a discount for insuring 2 card.

4) try and find another company that will offer a discount for insuring 2 cars (tesco and admiral do for starters) and cancel both cars with kwik fit and move to the new company.

 

As a side note (and this sounds a lot more complicated than it really is, so bear with me!) If you are intending to sell your 1st car, what you could do is cancel the new policy and add the second car to the 1st policy as a temporary additional vehicle for a couple of months (time limits vary from company to company) then when you sell the 1st car, just do a change of vehicle on the 1st policy.

 

Hope that helps

 

 

DA

If you find the advice I give is useful, then please feel free to click the scales :)

 

"It is better to keep your mouth closed and let people think you are a fool than to open it and remove all doubt" :)

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 4 months later...

hi, i am having some trouble with my insurance company about NCB. i have 3 cars with 3 insurers. one being my business car, family car and run around car. i am insured on my business car, my wife and i are insured on the family car, and my son and i on the 3rd car.

Now i have NCB on my car and family car, but as the 3rd is a new addition to the household, i have no NCB on it. my son is a student and he uses it now and again.

 

Does anyone know whether you can split your NCB from other insurers to put some on another car?

 

thanks

Link to post
Share on other sites

No is the answer to that.

 

As Darkangelsdelite so eloquently explained the position earlier on a NCB applies to ONE car only, since the 3rd car you mention is a NEW car and an ADDITIONAL car to your household any NCB you are entitled to is already in use on the existing vehicle. You cannot say I have 8 years NCB so I will take 4 years on car 1 and 4 years on car 2, it is one NCB per policy (ie per vehicle).

 

As a side note as a motor claims handler I am always suspicious when I see an extra car suddenly appearing into a household where there is a young driver who drives it 'every now and again', if your son is the main user of that vehicle you really should insure it in his name as opposed to adding him as an additional driver just to save money on a premium.

 

I won't go into any great detail here but insurers are well aware this happens and should a claim be made and it transpires that your son was the main user it will have serious consequences, you would be amazed at what insurers can find out when they start looking.

 

Mossy

Link to post
Share on other sites

How would they find out such a thing MC?

7 years in retail customer service

 

Expertise in letting and rental law for 6 years

 

By trade - I'm an IT engineer working in the housing sector.

 

Please note that any posts made by myself are for information only and should not and must not be taken as correct or factual. If in doubt, consult with a solicitor or other person of equal legal standing.

 

Please click the star if I have helped!!

Link to post
Share on other sites

I believe Mossy is referring to "Fronted Risk".

 

If you do a search through the forums you will see there are is a lot of information about this subject posted elsewhere.

 

What he said is spot on though, you cant split your NCD so you would either have to start with zero or try to find a company that will cover all 3 cars with some sort of multiple discount.

 

 

DA

If you find the advice I give is useful, then please feel free to click the scales :)

 

"It is better to keep your mouth closed and let people think you are a fool than to open it and remove all doubt" :)

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks for the input, but that doesnt answer my question.

 

My question was HOW would they possibly find out that the proportion of driving time is not as stated on the policy.

7 years in retail customer service

 

Expertise in letting and rental law for 6 years

 

By trade - I'm an IT engineer working in the housing sector.

 

Please note that any posts made by myself are for information only and should not and must not be taken as correct or factual. If in doubt, consult with a solicitor or other person of equal legal standing.

 

Please click the star if I have helped!!

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks for the input, but that doesnt answer my question.

 

My question was HOW would they possibly find out that the proportion of driving time is not as stated on the policy.

 

Normally it comes after an accident.

You have a legal obligation to be truthful. (In fact it goes beyond that.) If you are not, you can find yourself with a very expensive problem.

********************************************

Nothing in this post constitutes "advice" which I may not, in any event, be qualified to provide.

The only interpretation permitted on this post (or any others I may have made) is that this is what I would personally consider doing in the circumstances discussed. Each and every reader of this post or any other I may have made must take responsibility for forming their own view and making their own decision.

I receive an unwieldy number of private messages. I am happy to respond to messages posted on open forum but am unable to respond to private messages, seeking advice, when the substance of that message should properly be on the open forum.

Many thanks for your assistance and understanding on this.

Link to post
Share on other sites

How would they find out such a thing MC?

 

MrShed

 

I really cannot answer that, I cannot disclose the techniques we (or other Companies use) to detect fraud.

 

You have seen enough of my posts to know that I try to post helpful replies and my original post on this thread was meant to try and help the OP.

 

Just trust me when I say that if the main user of a vehicle is a young driver we can usually ascertain that in a very short period of time.

 

Mossy

Link to post
Share on other sites

Fair enough MC :)

7 years in retail customer service

 

Expertise in letting and rental law for 6 years

 

By trade - I'm an IT engineer working in the housing sector.

 

Please note that any posts made by myself are for information only and should not and must not be taken as correct or factual. If in doubt, consult with a solicitor or other person of equal legal standing.

 

Please click the star if I have helped!!

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks for the input, but that doesnt answer my question.

 

My question was HOW would they possibly find out that the proportion of driving time is not as stated on the policy.

 

 

Normally we'd pick this up in CSD when you ring in to discuss the policy, we're all trained in how to detect fraud and to spot when something isn't quite right on a policy, simply by asking a few questions.

 

When you take out a policy, you agree to something called the duty of disclosure. you'll find most insurers will ask you to be honest with any answers you give as any in-accuracy's may invalidate your cover.

 

Again, echoing what mossy said, i'm not going to go into specifics, but suffice to say the entire industry is clamping down on fraud big time as its costing millions!

 

DA

If you find the advice I give is useful, then please feel free to click the scales :)

 

"It is better to keep your mouth closed and let people think you are a fool than to open it and remove all doubt" :)

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 5 years later...
Why must it only apply to one car?? cannot get a logical answer.

 

Already answered. This goes back years ago, when most people only had 1 car. It became industry practice when people started to have other cars for it to be necessary to build up another no claims discount entitlement. I can't see the industry changing this.

 

You can only use one NCD entitlement on one car for this reason.

 

If you own more than one car, you should go to a brokers and they can work out the best option.

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

 

 Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

 

If you want advice on your thread please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

Why must it only apply to one car?? cannot get a logical answer.

This thread is 6 years old, if you want further advice please start your own thread.

Any Letters I Draft are N0T approved by CAG and no personal liability is accepted.

Please Consider making a donation to keep this site running!

Nemo Mortalium Omnibus Horis Sapit: Animo et Fide:

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...