Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • This time you do need to reply to them with a snotty letter to show you'd be big trouble for them if they did try court. We will help this evening.  
    • Hi, I just wanted to update the post and ask some further advice  I sent the CCA and CPR request on the 14th May, to date I have had no reply to the CCA but I received a load of paperwork from the CPR request a few days ago. I need to file the defence today and from the information I have read the following seems to be what is required.  I would be grateful if some one could confirm suitability   Claim The claim is for the sum of £255.69 due by the Defendant under an agreement regulated by the Consumer Credit Act 1974 for a PayPal account with an account reference of xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx)  The Defendant failed to maintain contractual payments required by the agreement and a Default Notice was served under s.87(1) of the Consumer Credit Act 1974 which has not been complied with. The debt was legally assigned to the claimant on 15-09-21, notice of which has been given to the defendant. The claim includes statutory interest under S.69 of the County Courts Act 1984 at a rate of 8% per annum from the date of assignment to the date of issue of these proceedings in the sum of £0.00. The Claimant claims the sum of £255.69   Defence  The Defendant contends that the particulars of claim are vague and generic in nature. The Defendant accordingly sets out its case below and relies on CPR r 16.5 (3) in relation to any particular allegation to which a specific response has not been made. 1. Paragraph 1 is noted. I have had financial dealings with PayPal  in the past but cannot recollect the account number referred to by the Claimant. 2. Paragraph 2 is denied. I am not aware of service of a Default Notice by the original creditor the Claimant refers to within its particulars of claim.  3. Paragraph 3 is noted. On the 14/5/2024 I requested information related to this claim by way of a Section 77 request, which was received and signed for by the claimant on 20/5/2024. As of today, the Claimant has failed to respond to this request, and therefore remains in default of the section 77 request and therefore unable to enforce any alleged agreement until its compliance. 4. Therefore it is denied with regards to the Defendant owing any monies to the Claimant, and the Claimant is put to strict proof to: (a) Show how the Defendant has entered into an agreement and: (b) Show the nature of the breach and evidence by way of a Default Notice Pursuant to s.87(1) of the Consumer Credit Act 1974. 5. Paypal (Europe) S.A.R.L is out of the juristriction of English Courts. 6. As per Civil Procedure 16.5 it is expected that the Claimant prove the allegation that the money is owed. 7. By reason of the facts and matters set out above, it is denied that the Claimant is entitled to the relief claimed, or any relief.
    • Thanks @dx100ukI followed the advice given on here... then it went very quiet!  The company was creditfix I think then transferred to Knightsbridge (or the other way around) The scammer independent advisor was Roger Wallis-having checked his LinkedIn profile just this morning, it does look like he's still scamming vulnerable people... I know I was stupid for taking his advice, but i do wonder how many others he has done this to over a longer period of time (it came as a  massive shock to him when our IVA suddenly failed). Lowell have our current address (and phone numbers if the rejected calls over the past couple of days is anything to go by!) No point trying the SB because of the correspondence in 2019? Thanks
    • I have received the following letter from BW Legal today.  Also includes form if I admit the debt and wanting my income details.  Do I reply to this LETTER OF CLAIM please?  Looks like they are ready for court now??  Thank You BW Legal - Letter of Claim.pdf
    • According to Wikipedia - yeah, I know - the site is owned by Croydon Council. It's at least worth a try to contact the council and ask for a contact in The Colonnades. You could then lay it on thick about being a genuine customer and ask them to call their dogs off. It's got to be worth a try  https://www.croydon.gov.uk/contact-us/contact-us  
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
        • Like
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
        • Like
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Ikea


griffitp
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 6544 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

I purchased a complete bedroom unit which comprised a PAX Stordial wardrobe system from IKEA's Wednesbury Store on June 4th 2006. The items were delivered on 23rd June 2006. In the store the wardrobe’s dimensions are given as 300 x 65 x 236. We were served by a young lady named Laura Jones, we discussed the dimensions and she commented that we were lucky that it would just fit into the space we have in our bedroom. The wardrobe alone cost £974

I paid £250.00 to have the wardrobe assembled. When the wardrobe was assembled in our home we found that the hanging brackets on the one of the doors actually takes the overall height of the wardrobe up to about 238 centimetres. My ceiling is only 237 centimetres high! Therefore, we cannot put the glass door on our wardrobe.

After speaking to various people, one of IKEA’s managers has told us that we will not be compensated for this error which is clearly the fault of IKEA staff for not informing us of the mistake in the dimensions when we purchased the wardrobe. We now have a wardrobe that only has one sliding door. I really cannot explain to you the distress and disappointment that IKEA has caused my wife and I. My wife has been in tears! We are in a state of limbo, as we cannot move back into our bedroom until this matter has been resolved.

The manager would not give his name to me over the phone last evening when I spoke to him. He was extremely rude and discourteous. He tried to insinuate that I was at fault! My blood is boiling after speaking to him!

Sending the wardrobe back is not an option as I refuse to pay again to have it disassembled after spending £250.00 to have it assembled.

 

Please can someone tell me where we stand?

Link to post
Share on other sites

You have every right to complain and I suggest right to a full refund .

 

In the first instance I would write a letter to the local store manager detailing your complaint but also send copies to the following people at the address below. You might also want to copy the UK Regional Manager and UK Director if you can find out who they are, the store concerned should be able to give you this information.

 

 

 

 

 

Ingvar Kamprad Founder

Anders Dahlvig President

Hans Gydell Vice President

 

IKEA

Leiden

South Holland

The Netherlands

 

 

 

I have found that the two little letters “cc” at the bottom of a letter followed by the names of some very important people within the organisation you are writing to have an almost magical effect.

 

It is my belief that you will receive some very special attention within a very short space of time.

 

Now I am not naive enough to believe that the people I mention above will even see your letters, but what's really more important here is showing the store manager that you have sent copies to the founder of the company, the President and VP et al. This will make him think very carefully about how he responds.

 

I would also be tempted to send it recorded delivery, but that's optional.

iGroup (GE Money) - AoS Filed late, defence late, amended defence also late despite extra time requested and granted.

Vanquis - Claim issued, no AoS or Defence received

Link to post
Share on other sites

Firstly, go to the store and take a photograph of the point of sale info giving the dimensions, also go to the website and take a copy of the page showing the dimensions.

 

Secondly, Ikea customer service is atrocious, do a search on my thread about Ikea, they always refer you back to the store but you can't phone them direct, when you do talk to them they are very unhelpful, thats why we took court action against them in the end, we're just at the point of sending in the bailiffs.

 

Thirdly, send them a letter telling them clearly what you want, I would suggest that being, that they send someone to dismantle the wardrobes, return them to the store, give you a full refund for the wardrobe, and compensate you in the order of £250 for the assembly. Give them 7 days to do this, if they do not respond, or respond in the negative begin court action via http://www.moneyclaim.gov.uk for the total cost of wardrobes and assembly, and if they refuse to send someone to dismantle them, get it done yourselves and add this to the claim.

 

I will repeat that they are very bad at dealing with things over the phone, so just do it all by letter.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi HagenUK & Podgydad

 

Thanks for the replies,

 

Just been back to the store and lo and behold, the bedroom display has now been removed. Now I've sent letters to the bigwigs in Holland and the UK MD. Lets see what they do next (if anything). Ill post again if there are any developments. It does say on the website that you need at least a 240 cm high ceiling, but we bought them in-store and we even OK'd the height with the assistant that took the order and there was no mention of height clearance at all.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...