Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • sorry she is a private individual, the cars are parking on her land. she can clamp the cars. only firms were outlawed from doing it bazza. thats what the victims of people dumping cars on their drives near airports did and they didn't not get prosecuted.    
    • The DVLA keeps two records of you. One as a driver and one for your car. If they differ you might find out in around a month when they will send you a reminder as well as to your other half for their car. If you receive nothing then you can be fairly sure that you were tailgating though wouldn't explain why they didn't pick up your car on one of drive past their cameras. However even if you do get a PCN later the your situation will not change. The current PCN does not comply with the Protection of Freedoms Act 2012 Schedule 4 which is the main law that covers private parking. It doesn't comply for two reasons. 1. Section 9 [2][a] states  (2)The notice must— (a)specify the vehicle, the relevant land on which it was parked and the period of parking to which the notice relates; The PCN states 47 minutes which are the arrival and departure times not the time you were actually parked. So if you subtract the time you took to drive from the entrance. look for a parking place and park in it perhaps having to manoeuvre a couple of times to fit within the lines and then unload the children followed by reloading the children getting seat belts on etc before driving to the exit stopping for cars, pedestrians on the way you may well find that the actual time you were parked was quite likely to be around ten minutes over the required time.  Motorists are allowed a MINIMUM of ten minutes Grace period [something that the rogues in the parking industry conveniently forget-the word minimum] . So it could be that you did not overstay. 2] Sectio9 [2][f]  (ii)the creditor does not know both the name of the driver and a current address for service for the driver, the creditor will (if all the applicable conditions under this Schedule are met) have the right to recover from the keeper so much of that amount as remains unpaid; Your PCN does not include the words in brackets and in 2a the Act included the word "must". Another fail. What those failures mean is that MET cannot transfer the liability to pay the charge from the driver to the keeper. Only the driver is now liable which is why we recommend our members not to appeal. It is so easy to reveal who was driving by saying "when I parked the car" than "when the driver parked the car".  As long as they don't know who was driving they have little chance of winning in court. This is partly because Courts do not accept that the driver and the keeper are the same person. And because anyone with a valid motor insurance policy is able to drive your cars. It is a shame that you are too far away to get photos of the car park signage. It is often poor and quite often the parking rogues lose in Court on their poor signage alone. I hope hat you can now relax and not panic about the PCN. You will receive many letters from Met, their unregulated debt collectors and sixth rate solicitors threatening you with ever higher amounts of money. The poor dears have never read the Act which states quite clearly that the maximum sum that can be charged is the amount on the signs. The Act has only been in force for 12 years so it may take a  few more years for the penny to drop.  You can safely ignore everything they send you unless or until they send you a Letter of Claim. Just come back to us if they do send one of those love letters to you and we will advise on a snotty letter to send them. In the meantime go on and enjoy your life. Continue reading other threads and if you do get any worrying letters let us know. 
    • Hopefully the ANPR cameras didn't pick up the two vehicles, but I don't think you're out of the woods just yet. MET's "work" consists of sending out hundreds of these invoices every week so yours might be a few days behind your partner's. There is also the matter of Royal Mail.  I once sold two second-hand books to someone on eBay.  Weirdly the cost of sending them separately was less than the cost of sending them in one parcel.  So to save a few bob I sent them seperately.  One turned up the next day.  One arrived after four days.  They were  sent from the same post office at the same time! But let's hope I'm being too pessimistic. Please update us of any developments.
    • New version after LFI's superb analysis of the contract. Sorry, but you need to redo the numbering of the paras and of the exhibits in the right order after all the damage I've caused! Defendant's WS - version 4.pdf
    • Hi  no nothing yet. Hope it stays that way 😬
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
        • Like
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
        • Like
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Gearbox failure 2nd hand car. Warranty won't pay out


cdb
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 5883 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Hello. My son bought a used Seat Ibiza (Y reg) from an independant Citroen dealer on 8th Feb this year. Last Thursday the gearbox failed (dumped it's oil and locked up). I'm waiting to go and see the gearbox for myself to confirm what the damage is, but apparently 2nd gear has gone (as in teeth missing) and there may be a hole in the gearcase. The warranty engineer has refused the claim saying it's down to a worn bearing and so wear and tear. That will save them a couple of thousand in parts and labour.:rolleyes:

 

If the above damage is true then I don't see how on earth a worn bearing can cause it. I have done some searching on the Net and apparantly VW/Seat/Audi gearboxes of this age have a problem with the rivets holding the diff together which can cause the exact problem described above. VW Gearbox Failure

 

Questions for now, until I can confirm the damage.

 

1) Does the SOGA cover my son for a used cars like it would a new car.

2) Could he reject the car due to this major fault or is it too late.

 

When I go to see the gearbox what would you suggest I do? I plan on taking a camera to photograph the damage in case it goes to the small claims court. Also, depending what I find, plan to tell them to get the warranty guy back to reassess the damage (as it's obviously not wear and tear) or tell them to repair it themselves at their cost or I (my son) will see them in the small claims court.

I was an aircraft mechanic in the RAF for 15years and a work on my own cars as much as I can, so I'm not exactly green when it comes to car mechanics and have a good engineering background. (but I'm not a qualified professional either,unless it can do mach 2 lol) So I will have an idea wether the damage is wear and tear or due to mechanical failure of the diff or some other component.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Having seen the damage, I think I'm going to struggle not to agree with their engineer.

 

The differential side bearing has totally disintergrated into lots of small bits as if it's been run for a long time while knackered.:sad:

Link to post
Share on other sites

The differential side bearing has totally disintergrated into lots of small bits as if it's been run for a long time while knackered.:sad:

 

So it is NOT wear and tear, it is bearing failure.

That may sound like a play on words, but being an engineer yourself you will understand what I am saying.

 

It would not require to be run 'knackered' or dry to fail, it can fail because one of the bearings has lost it's case hardening or the race has.

To say it is wear and tear would need the bearing intact for inspection and if I read right, the bearing has shattered.

 

Is this a purchased warranty cdb?

Link to post
Share on other sites

There wasn't alot of the bearing left, just little pieces in the box.

 

I see what you're saying.

 

They are saying it had to be driven with the car in that condition for a while for it to have got to that state. If my son had stopped straight away they may have paid out. But not being an engineer, how does my son know what to listen out for and that's even if he could hear it over the stereo.

 

It was a warranty sold at a cost of around £2-300 (I've forgot) by the dealer. The warranty is for another company, not the dealer we bought the car off.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Can you not argue with them they are selling on goods not good for the road and that in such a short space of time someone should have picked up that the gear box had a fault before the sale took place.

 

Raise the issue, what if my son had family or a child in the ehicle and they were on a motorway travelling at speed and it packed in causing themt o have an accident.

 

Tell them he bought the vehicle in good faith and expected it to be of road worthy condition and last a lot longer than less then 3 months!!!

 

Dont they somekind of vehicle inspection before sale? Question them how it passed to be sold knowing that the gear box would not last much longer?

Also raise the question as to how they would feel to being ripped off, as a reputable company that is exactly what they have done to your son, demand a manager and be reasonable if not shout as loud as you like in front of prospective customers.

I`m sure they wouldn't want you scare off potential clients which gives them their bread and butter so to speak :p

Ladidi

Link to post
Share on other sites

I had a similar situation a few years ago with a Frontera gearbox two months after purchase (had a couple of other issues as well), the company wouldn't repair it so I got another garage to do it. I went to small claims using the sale of goods act and was awarded the full cost of having it put right (although they refused my claim for the alternator as they put this down to wear and tear).

Poppynurse :)

 

If my comments have been helpful please click my scales!!!!

Link to post
Share on other sites

Defo not wear and tear, and I pressume average sort of mileage. If this was wear and tear they would all be failing at that age and mileage?

Stick to your guns with warranty provider, they never want to pay and will wriggle, many are not worth paying extra for, but ok if given free with the car. threaten to sue garage if warranty does not pay, this may get garage to put pressure on warranty provider. future business etc.

Link to post
Share on other sites

My son has decided he wants to reject the car. Can he do this under the SOGA? If so, how does he do it. Just tell the garage he wants to reject it, then wait for them to say you can't and then take them to the small claims court?

 

He's trying to arrange a meeting with the boss of the garage on Friday. The only thing I can think of is to try and argue that it's not a normal wear and tear bearing failure- that would be a noisy bearing with some play in it, not a total break up of the outer bearing race. I wouldn't expect normal bearing wear and tear to be covered by the warranty anyway.

Also, they sold the car at top book price and without any service history (we didn't realise until we got home and found no service details with it) we were assured it was dealer serviced all it's life tho. The warranty company details say they'll want to see the full service history, so I doubt they'd pay out anyway.

Link to post
Share on other sites

The Sale of Goods Act 1979 states that, if you can show the goods to be faulty, not fit for their purpose or misdescribed, you have, for a short time after purchase, a right to reject them and get a refund of the purchase price

 

How long is this short time? The car as above is a Seat Ibiza 1.4s low milage- 35800, £3200 paid.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Time to decide if you are going after the insurance company or the seller.

 

I don't think two months will be classed as a 'short time', but the soga will still apply as the vehicle should last longer than 35,000 miles from new, (and in any case, longer than 2 months) and was obviously not of merchantable quality.

 

You bought this car on the salesmans assurance and with the understanding that it had full dealer service history, so where is the service book that qualified him to give that statement. If there is no service book then it was just a statement that he made up at the time to help clinch the sale.

 

This is definately NOT fair wear and tear, so if you go after the dealer and they agree after you have mentioned the soga and service record etc then you must also (once they have agreed) ask for a reimbursment of the insurance fee you paid.

 

I would also ask the insurance company what qualifications the inspecting engineer has, and I don't mean the word of some customer service person.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I can't honestly say wether he said it had a full service history or not. I'm not even sure I asked. You just assume a dealer will only sell cars with a full service history, especially if you are paying top dealer prices.

 

He is an independant Citroen dealer, not just some back street 2nd hand car dealer.

 

I will try and push the milage issue in that a gearbox should not fail in that mileage. Seat warranty covers them for 60000miles, but unfortunately only 3 years,so had the car been young enough, the dealer would have had to cover it.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Ask again if they are willing to pay for the repair, if the answer is still no, then you need to send the garage and the warranty insurance company a letter before action.

 

Get a quote for the repair from another reputable garage and send that with a letter telling them (both) that if they don't do the repair then you will take it to another garage and sue them for the bill.

 

Make sure you mention 'Bearing Failure'.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...