Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Hi T911 and welcome to CAG. As you say, an interesting screw up. So much for quality control! Anyway, our regular advice is to ignore all of their increasingly threatening missives... UNLESS you get a letter of claim, then come back here and we'll help you write a "snotty letter" to help them decide whether to take it any further with their stoopid pics. If you get mail you're unsure of, just upload it for the team to have a look.
    • Thanks @lolerzthat's an extremely helpful post. There is no mention of a permit scheme in the lease and likewise, no variation was made to bring this system in. I recall seeing something like a quiet enjoyment clause, but will need to re-read it and confirm. VERY interesting point on the 1987 Act. There hasn't been an AGM in years and I've tried to get one to start to no avail. However, I'll aim to find out more about how the PPC was brought in and revert. Can I test with you and others on the logic of not parking for a few months? I'm ready to fight OPS, so if they go nuclear on me then surely it doesn't matter? I assume that I will keep getting PCNs as long as I live here, so it doesn't make sense for me to change the way that I park?  Unless... You are suggesting that having 5 or so outstanding PCNs, will negatively affect any court case e.g. through bad optics? Or are we trying to force their hand to go to court with only 2 outstanding PCNs?
    • That is so very tempting.   They are doing my annual review as we speak and I'm waiting for their response once I have it I will consider my next steps.    The debt camel website mentioned above is amzing and helping to. Education me alot    
    • Sending you a big hug. I’m sorry your going through this. The letters they send sound aweful, and the waiting game for them to stop. But these guys seem so knowledgable and these letters should stop. Hang in there, and keep in touch. Don’t feel alone 
    • In my time I've never seen a payout/commission from a PPC to a landlord/MA. Normally the installation of all the cameras/payment of warden patrols etc is free but PPCs keep 100% of the ticket revenue. Not saying it doesn't happen mind. I've done some more digging on this: Remember, what your lease doesn't say is just as important as what it does say. If your lease doesn't mention a parking scheme/employment of a PPC/Paying PCNs etc you're under no legal obligation to play along to the PPC's or the MA's "Terms and conditions". I highly doubt your lease had a variation in place to bring in this permit system. Your lease will likely have a "quiet enjoyment" clause for your demised space and the common areas and having to fight a PPC/MA just to park would breach that. Your lease has supremacy of contract, but I do agree it's worth keeping cool and not parking there (and hence getting PCNs) for a couple months just so that the PPC doesn't get blinded by greed and go nuclear on you if you have 4 or 5 PCNs outstanding. At your next AGM, bring it up that the parking controls need to be removed and mention the legal reasons why. One reason is that under S37(5b) Landlord and Tenant Act 1987,  more than 75% of leaseholders and/or the landlord would have needed to agree, and less than 10% opposed, for the variation to take place. I highly doubt a ballot even happened before the PPC was bought in so OPS even being there is unlawful, breaching the terms of your lease. In this legal sense,  the communal vote of the "directors" of the freehold company would have counted for ONE vote of however many flats there are (leases/tenants) + 1 (landlord). It's going to be interesting to see where this goes.  
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Southern Electric messing up my credit rating!


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 5843 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Hi all, I'm new here and really hoping for some advice - I have just found out that Southern Electric have marked my credit file with a default in relation to an unpaid bill which they passed to a debt collection agency. The history behind this is as follows:

 

Jan 07 - I registered on the Southern Electric website to be able to make payments online. During the sign-up I apparently registered to receive paperless bills for my gas (I accept I may have done this but I don't remember ticking the box and if I did it was accidental - I didn't do it for the electricity; if I'd really wanted paperless billing I'd have done it for both!). Shortly after this I received a bill for the electricity which was paid - apparently I was sent a notification by e-mail for the gas but probably due to spam filters never saw it so didn't pay (having just paid a bill with them it didn't really occur to me that I should have been expecting another one)!

 

April 07- I moved house, and contacted Southern Electric with meter readings for both gas and electricity, providing my new address which is also supplied by them. Shortly after I received a "final bill" (which I now realise was just for the electric but I didn't really look at it!) from them which I paid, assuming that everything was now sorted.

 

January 08 - out of the blue I get a letter from a debt collection agency for over £100 for outstanding gas bills for my old property - the bill from January and the final bill. I phoned Southern Electric and figured out what had happened and paid the bill within a week.

 

My question is, can they really mark me with a default for this and do I have any recourse to get it removed? Although I have no dispute over whether I owed the money, during the apparently 12 months when the bill was outstanding I did not receive a single letter from Southern Electric even though I had given them my new address for the old account and am supplied by them on my new account. Any e-mails which they presumably sent must have been spam filtered as I never received anything. If they'd just written to me I'd have paid instantly! When I spoke to them the first person said they had sent me a reminder at my old address at some point (not much use when they admit I'd given them me new one!), the second person wouldn't say anything except that they have no obligation to write to me before referring to a debt company. Is this true?! I am desperate to get this removed from my credit report as I want to apply for a mortgage in a couple of years.

 

Can anyone advise me? I'm happy to pay a solicitor if it would help?! Sorry this is a bit long winded but I'm just sick with worry thinking this is going to screw up my house buying plans for the next 6 years until the default disappears!

 

Thank you!

Link to post
Share on other sites

Did they send you a default notice? this is a legal requirement before they can place a default on your file.

All help is merely my opinion only - please seek legal advice if you need to as I am only qualified in SEN law.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks for the reply. No, I've never had anything in writing from them (they admitted this when I first called although not sure if they'd try to deny it later!), just the e-mails they say they've been sending. Can a default notice be sent my e-mail?!

 

If not, how do I go about getting them to remove the default - just write to them (do you know which department I should address my letter to?)?

Link to post
Share on other sites

It is my understanding, that Default notices only apply to agreements regulated by the CCA. The provision of utilities is not regulated by the CCA. There seems to be 2 different types of default. One for utilities to use and one related to CCA. I am unfortunately not sure on the legality of the former type. I may be wrong.

Just some guy. I try to help, but all advice is my opinion.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I could do with some clarification on that point. I am trying to get 2 BGas defaults removed. I get the impression that a 'budget' account where you pay by Direct Debit is considered by some people to come under the CCA. Although the utilities info isn't put on equifax as far as I can see - only on Experian.

 

The best thing to do would have been not to pay the bill unless they agreed to take you default off - because if they don't take it off - you may as well not pay it as far as you credit rating goes.

 

At the moment - I have written to BGas registered letter - and got no response within 10 days - so I have made an energywatch complaint. I'll let you know if it works.

Link to post
Share on other sites

British Gas have very definitely put TWO separate defaults onto my experian credit file. They didn't tell me they were going to - I only found out when I was refused credit and had to order a copy to see why.

 

Equifax don't seem to have them though - so I think Experian register defaults from utility companies whereas equifax don't. Or perhaps British Gas don't register them with Equifax or something. It seems that most banks use experian anyway though - so up a gum tree if experians is bad even if equifax is ok.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...