Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Have we seen your court bundle?   If we haven't then it's probably an idea to post it up here especially the index page and the witness statement so we can see if there is anything which might need adding or changing 
    • "Care to briefly tell someone who isn't tech savvy - i.e. me! - how you did this?" Its pretty simple although not obvious. You open the google maps app > click your profile picture > Click Timeline from the list > click today > choose the date you want to see the timeline from. Then you'll see your timeline for that day. Often, places you have visited will have a question mark beside them where google wants you confirm you have actually visited. You either click 'yes' if you have, or you click 'edit' to enter the actual place you visited. Sometimes, you'll see 'Missing visit' This probably happens if your internet connection has dropped out at that time. You simply click 'Add visit' and enter the place. The internet on my crappy phone often loses connection so I have to do that alot.   OK dx, understood mate. 
    • I have now been given a court date vs Evri, 4th Sept 2024. I have completed my court bundle, when am I expected to send copies to the court and Evri and should it be in hard copy or electronic? The Notice of Allocation states that no later than 7 days before the directions hearing both parties must send to the other party their final offers to settle. Does this mean I will have to tell Evri what I'm willing to settle? Rgds, J
    • Sorry  Noted x   Ok how about this to the CEO? I know it sounds super desperate but lets call a spade a spade here, I am super desperate: Dear Sir, On 29th November 2023 I took out a loan of £5000 with you. Unfortunately very early into 2024 I found myself in financial difficulty (unexpected bills and two episodes of sickness and the tax office getting my tax code wrong resulting in less pay for two months) and I contacted you (MCB) on 13th February 2024 asking if there was any way I could extend the length of my loan to 36 months. I fully explained why I was requesting this and asked for your help. I did not receive a reply to that email so I again contacted you on 7th March 2024 to advise you of a change in my circumstances which resulted in me having to take out a DMP and asking you to confirm that the direct debit had been cancelled. You would have also received confirmation of this DMP from StepChange but you did not acknowledge receipt of my email. I have only managed to make one payment from my loan but did try and contact MCB to discuss extending my loan, help etc.  I have now therefore fallen behind on several of my debts, yours included, and as a result you have lodged a Cifas marker against my name for "evasion of payment", which has resulted in me having to change banks, which has been an extremely difficult process because of the Cifas marker. I do not feel you have been fair or given me the opportunity to fully explain my situation to you before you lodged the marker against my name. I appreciate it is a business and you have acted accordingly, but I did try to make contact to arrange alternative arrangements and at no point, not even to this day, did I ever intend to not repay my loan. I cannot stress to you enough how much this has affected my mental health. I am having trouble sleeping and my existing health condition has been exacerbated by all of this. What I would like you to do is to please, please remove the Cifas marker and let me make arrangements to pay the loan back through a DMP.  Please sir, I am begging for your help here. I am not a dishonest person and I have never been in a situation like this before. I am desperately trying to make things right but this marker is killing me. Please can you help me? I look forward to hearing from you. Yours faithfully,
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like

Reddannio v Barclays Loan


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 5866 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

HI,

 

I have contaced Barclays regarding the Single Premium payment which was £796 on a loan of £2000 which i believe was misold. They replied saying the would get back to me no later than 14th March which has now obviously passed.

 

Looking at the figures again i am paying 20.9 % interest on the loan alone which seemed very steep at the time but i was despearte (overdrawn probably due to bank charges).

 

Any ideas what my next step should be ?

 

Red

Link to post
Share on other sites

HI,

 

I have contaced Barclays regarding the Single Premium payment which was £796 on a loan of £2000 which i believe was misold. They replied saying the would get back to me no later than 14th March which has now obviously passed.

 

Looking at the figures again i am paying 20.9 % interest on the loan alone which seemed very steep at the time but i was despearte (overdrawn probably due to bank charges).

 

Any ideas what my next step should be ?

 

Red

 

Hello Red,

 

And didn't they just know how desperate you were, they know exactly who they have got by the short and curlies:rolleyes:

 

I personally would send them a section 77/78 request under the consumer credit act for a true copy of your credit agreement. You will find the link here, you need letter N, it costs £1 and they have statutory timelimit to comply.

Creditors and DCAs - Letter Templates & Budget Planner

 

 

Do you have it perchance yourself????

 

Can you post up the figures for us to have a look at it. They would have charged you interest on the ppi??????

If any of my posts are helpful, please feel free to click my scales. All information is given as my opinion only, based on my own personal experiences. I have no legal training, but have educated myself in aspects of consumer legislation. My motto "NEVER GIVE IN, NEVER SURRENDER", THERE IS A WAR ON YOU KNOW

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks HellHas,

 

Sorry i didnt mention that i requested a copy of the agreement first, although its not signed the figures are as follows :-

 

Cash Loan

Amount of Loan £2000

Total Charge for credit £1127.20

Total Amount Payable £3127.20

 

Premium Loan

Amount of Loan £509.27

Total Charge for Credit £286.93

Total Amount payable £796.20

 

Total = £3923.40

 

It says the loan is in 2 parts with the premium loan being the single premium payment to purchase Barclayloan protection.

 

I asked for the PPI to be repaid as believe it was misold which is when they said they would come back to me by March 14th but so far nothing.

 

Cheers

Red

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks HellHas,

 

Sorry i didnt mention that i requested a copy of the agreement first, although its not signed the figures are as follows :-

 

Cash Loan

Amount of Loan £2000

Total Charge for credit £1127.20

Total Amount Payable £3127.20

 

Premium Loan

Amount of Loan £509.27

Total Charge for Credit £286.93

Total Amount payable £796.20

 

Total = £3923.40

 

It says the loan is in 2 parts with the premium loan being the single premium payment to purchase Barclayloan protection.

 

I asked for the PPI to be repaid as believe it was misold which is when they said they would come back to me by March 14th but so far nothing.

 

Cheers

Red

 

Hello Red,

 

You mentioned that you requested your ca, what exactly did they send you is it a photcopy of your original agreement:???:. Did you send a request under section 77/78 of the cca 1974.

 

Now regarding the ppi, you wish to be refunded £796.20, plus contractual interest from when you took the loan:D

 

Come back regarding the ca, it may add a little more fuel to the fire:wink:

If any of my posts are helpful, please feel free to click my scales. All information is given as my opinion only, based on my own personal experiences. I have no legal training, but have educated myself in aspects of consumer legislation. My motto "NEVER GIVE IN, NEVER SURRENDER", THERE IS A WAR ON YOU KNOW

Link to post
Share on other sites

They sent me what i think is a copy of the agreement, both the bank copy to be signed and returned and a customer copy to be retained. Neither are signed although i am sure i signed and sent back the original.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Ok ive now received a 2 page letter from Barclays which basically says that they have investigated my claim and found that the rules have been adhered to and if i didnt want PPI i shouldnt have accepted it. They also sent a signed copy of the agreement.

 

I realise i agreed to it but felt at the time as if this would help my loan application by agreeing to this cover.

 

Dont know what my options are now. Is it the Ombudsman ?:(

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hello reddannio!

 

I realise i agreed to it but felt at the time as if this would help my loan application by agreeing to this cover.

 

I think there must be many thousands of us in the same position. The bankers push this useless cover for one reason only, and that's because it makes them a great deal of money for zero risk and maybe 5% outlay againt what they reap.

 

Wish I had an answer, but many are working on one.

 

Cheers,

BRW

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hello reddanio,

 

I am not familiar with your case but there is always light at the end of the PPI tunnel.

 

I have been doing a bit of research and according to various regulations and OFT documents then some CCAs may be unenforceable. If this is the case the CCA is worthless and ask for all your PPI money back.

 

The Total Charge for Credit (TCC) Regulations 1980 (which have multitudes of Statutory Instruments amending them) are specific in what charges are/are not included in the TCC.

 

If your CCA has a line showing the TCC then it can only include certain charges.

this link....

http://www.oft.gov.uk/shared_oft/business_leaflets/consumer_credit/oft144.pdf

 

give some information. (see PART 1f and note 1 also PART 2h)

 

If on your CCA the PPI is listed as optional for example, i.e. not required by the creditor as a term of you getting the loan then the cost of the PPI and I believe any Interest on that PPI should not be included in the TCC.

If it is then my understanding is the cca would be unenforceable.

 

If the PPI is not optional i.e. the creditor states no PPI no Loan then the charges can appear in the TCC, because the PPI is then not really optional.

 

If however the PPI is mandatory the I believe the bank insisting on this is in breach of the British Bankers Association Code of Practice and you should send a nice complaint to them about the actions of your bank.

 

hope this is of use to your fight:-D

 

aa

I have no legal training and the advice I offer is a matter of support. Before you commit to any Legal action you are advised to contact a qualified legal practitioner.

------------------------------------------------

Bank charge successes:

Halifax - Full settlement incl interest.

HSBC - Settlement, goodwill no admission of liability about 75% of claim.

RBS - Settlement, goodwill no admission of liability about 70% of claim.

2 ongoing claims for bank charges with HSBC with more to come. (Supreme Court ruling could have upset these claims) They did :mad:

PPI Successes

PPI 4 settlements on 9 loans. FOS involvement on 7 added on the 8 % Statutory interest another 30% to both.

2 claims settled in full with LV without FOS involvement.

2 claims settled in full with HSBC without FOS involvement

 

PPI Claims ongoing with:

Cap one Now with the FOS

Barclays. Paid up today 24/04/10 cheque received for over £4,500 and in the bank.

LTSB still have to decide on this as their SAR production was abysmal. Papers data mixed up documents missing etc

 

1 Complaint not upheld by FOS they said it was ICO issue. Complaint upheld by ICO. See this..

Post 290 from

***RBS PPI Claim Long fight but, WON***

 

Please do not PM me for advice as it may be sometime before I can respond.

 

Keep at them. Do not give way and do not accept all they tell you, they will delay and stall for as long as they can to prevent repaying you your mis-sold PPI.

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...