Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • I disagree with the charge and also the statements sent. Firstly I have not received any correspondence from DVLA especially a statutory notice dated 2/5/2024 or a notice 16/5/2024 voiding my licence if I had I would have responded within this timeframe. The only letter received was the single justice procedure notice dated the 29.5.2024 this was received on 4.6.2024. I also disagree with the statement that tax was dishonoured through invalid indemnity claim. I disagree that the licence be voided I purchased the vehicle in Jan 2024 from RDA car sales Pontefract with agreement to collect the car on the 28.1.2024. The garage taxed the vehicle on the 25.1.24 for eleven payments on direct debit  using my debit card on my behalf. £62.18 was the initial payment on 8.2.24  and £31 per month thereafter the second payment was 1.3.24.This would run from Jan 24 to Dec 24 and a total of £372.75, therefore the car was clearly taxed before  I took the car away After checking one of my vehicle apps  I could see the vehicle was showing as untaxed it later transpired that DVLA had cancelled my tax , without reason and I did not receive any correspondence from DVLA to state why it was cancelled or when. The original payment of £62.18 had gone through and verified by my bank Lloyds so this payment was not declined. I then set up the direct debit again straight away at my local post office branch on 15.2.2024 the first payment was £31 on 1.3.2024 and subsequent payments up to Feb 2025 with a total of £372.75 which was the same total as the original DD that was set up in Jan, Therefore I claimed the £62.18 back from my bank as an indemnity claim as this payment was from the original cancelled tax from DVLA and had been cancelled . I have checked my bank account at Lloyds and every payment since Jan 24  up to date has been taken with none rejected as follows: 8.2.24 - £62.15 1.3.24 - £31.09 2.4.24 - £31.06 1.5.24 - £31.06 3.6.23-£31.06 I have paper copies of the original DD set up conformation plus a breakdown of payments per month , and a paper copy of the second DD setup with breakdown of payments plus a receipt from the post office.I can also provide bank statements showing each payment to DVLA I also ask that my licence be reinstated due to the above  
    • You know hes had it when they call out those willing to say anything even claiming tories have reduced taxes on live tv AS Salmonella says: The Conservative Party must embrace Nigel Farage to “unite the right”, Suella Braverman has urged, following a disastrous few days for Rishi Sunak. The former home secretary told The Times there was “not much difference” between the new Reform UK leader’s policies and those of the Tories, as senior Conservatives start debating the future of the party. hers.   AND Goves replacement gets caught booking in an airbnb to claim he lives locally .. as of yesterday you can rent it yourself in late July - as he'll either be gone or claiming taxpayer funded expenses for a house Alongside pictures of himself entering a house, Mr McGuinness said Surrey Heath residents “rightly expect their MP to be a part of their community”. - So whens farage getting around to renting (and subletting) a clacton beach hut?   Gove’s replacement caught out on constituency house claim as home found on Airbnb WWW.INDEPENDENT.CO.UK Social media users quickly pointed out house Ed McGuinness had posted photos in was available to rent     As Douglas Ross says he'll stand down in scotland - if he wins a Westminster seat - such devotion.
    • I've completed a draft copy to defend and will post up here for review.  Looking over the dates and payments this all stemmed from DVLA cancelling in Feb , whereby I set up a new DD in Feb hence the overlap, why they cancelled when I paid originally in Jan I have no idea. Anyway now stuck with pending court action and a suspended licence . I am also firing off a letter to DVLa recorded disputing the licence revoke
    • Thank you both for your expert knowledge and understanding. You're fighting the good fight by standing up for people like me and others with limited knowledge of this stuff. I thank you. I know all my DVLA details are good. I recently (last year) renewed my license, and my car's V5 is current with the correct details; the same is valid for my partner. I'll continue to ignore the love letters 😂 and won't let it bother either me or my partner.  I'll revisit this post if/when I get a letter of claim.  F**k ém.
    • Please check back later on today for a fuller response and some edits
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Skoda Fabia cracked engine !


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 5410 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Hi,

 

I'm not too sure how to progress this issue and any help would be gratefully received.

 

My parents bought a new Skoda fabia back in 2002 (52 plate) it has only covered 36k miles and obviously out of the standard 3 year warranty.

 

Recently it started loosing coolant and on examination by a local dealership they discovered a 3" crack in the engine block. This is obviously a manufacturing issue, the car has been serviced on time by a Skoda dealer and looked after by my elderly parents.

 

They bought the car from a dealership in the UK but have now emigrated to Spain (lucky them) so where do we legally stand with this ?

 

Do I go after Skoda for a "goodwill" repair due to a failed part that is not consumable or poor manufacturing and quality control ?

 

Or do I quote the Sale of Goods Act to the dealer and get them to stump up the cost for a new engine plus hire car costs ?

 

Tricky one this so any help would be great.

Thanks

Simon

Link to post
Share on other sites

I'm afraid there is no such thing as 'obviously'. This could easily have been caused by frost or freezing overnight temperatures.

 

You will have to get an engineers report that must state that this is a manufacturing flaw if you hope to get recompense.

 

Skoda will want to examin it as well.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I agree with Conniff. A good way of quickly finding out whether this is widespread is do a search on the main search engines for the car and fault. I did this on Google and didn't find any other occurence of the same problem. Whilst it is by no mean solid proof, it would seem to indicate that a manufacturing fault may not be the issue.

 

As Conniff says, get a report. Let us know how it goes. :-)

Link to post
Share on other sites

Its unfortunate for you. I had an issue with a cat converter going on a car 2 month after buying it. They are not cheap! However, the warranty I had from the garage would not have covered it anyway as it is classed as a mechanical part blah blah blah! However, kicking up a stink in the sales area when it was busy is and was for me, the best route. I got a heavily discounted rate.

 

I still have to pay out but the burden was not as heavy!

Link to post
Share on other sites

I searched already on Google, etc.. but nothing. Only issue was with electrics and piston rings, checked with owners clubs as well but no joy.

 

So I concluded must be a manufacturing defect, which I know I have to prove and I am getting my parent's to find an independant engineer in Spain to do this.

 

The mechanic in the Spanish Seat dealership stated he had seen this issue before on this type of engine and has reported it. It was not due to freezing temps, lack of antifreeze, etc.. as the car is in Spain not the Antartic or UK and has been fully serviced as per Skoda's instructions.

 

The problem my parents have is the car was bought in the UK from a Skoda dealership but now they live in Spain so kicking up a fuss in the UK dealership is not going to help much as we cannot phsyically get the car back to them to look at it.

 

This is what they said on the phone, I suppose going in on busy weekend and having a "chat" in front of potential customers might get the ball rolling a bit.

 

I will of course update when I have more info, but if anyone else can help please feel free.

 

Thanks

Link to post
Share on other sites

I searched already on Google, etc.. but nothing. Only issue was with electrics and piston rings, checked with owners clubs as well but no joy.

 

So I concluded must be a manufacturing defect,

No, that's the opposite of what I said. If it was a manufacturing defect, it would be more likely to appear over and over again on the web. For example, do a search for "Mini" and "faulty windscreen" and you'll see it come up loads.

 

Anyway, let's see what the report comes up with, but I should warn you that if Skoda say they want to have a chance to inspect and/or repair the car themselves, they have the right to do so. :-|

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 3 weeks later...

Skoda have basically sent a standard fobb off letter.

 

I sent the engineers report stating this issue was not caused by neglect and would have been caused at manufacture.

 

They are not interested in viewing the faulty engine block or replying properly to the issues mentioned in my letter.

 

They state the fault would have happened under their 3 year/60k miles warranty, there was no mention of the measly 36,403 miles the car covered. If the car was driven the average 20k a year then the fault would have occured under warranty.

 

Any reasonable person can assume that a car engine should last longer than 36k, especially when looked after, full dealer service history, not modified, etc... etc...

 

I'm not letting this one lie, so do I go after the dealership or the manufacturer ? Obviously the dealership has sold faulty goods and I have a report to prove this now. Problem is the block is in Spain so if they want to see it do I have to supply it to them at my cost, it's very heavy to courier !

 

Thanks

Simon

Link to post
Share on other sites

Obviously the dealership has sold faulty goods and I have a report to prove this now.

Simon

Why obviously? They weren't faulty for the first 4 years, and I think that the dealer will rely on this argument.

 

Kick up a fuss by all means but the very fact that the block is in Spain (along with the car) means that you would probably be spending the amount needed to fix it on getting it all back to the UK, because as you correctly assume they do have every right to inspect it and they would not reasobably be expected to travel to Spain to see it!

Link to post
Share on other sites

Was this an 'engineers' report or the garage mechanic?, there is a great deal of difference.

 

If you are hoping to rely on UK legislation, it looks like the SOGA has expired.

 

Mileage isn't necessarily the be all and end all of it.

 

A new engine block isn't that expensive but the build and changeover will obviously make it probably not worth doing.

 

I would like to think you can get some redress and assistance from Skoda, but I have my doubts.

 

Anyway keep trying and please let us know what steps you take and how you get on.

Link to post
Share on other sites

This was an independant engineer's report which states this issue was caused by faulty manufacturing. Also the mechanic at Skoda/Seat dealership in Spain

report clearly states he has seen this fault before on the same type of engine and is a manufacturing issue. Skoda are not divulging any information or admitting any responsibility even though I have 2 engineer reports.

 

I thought SOGA covered a buyer against manufacturing defects for 6 years from date of purchase ? If so this is clearly within the time scale.

 

A "reasonable" person would expect an car/engine with a full dealership service history to last more than 36,403 miles before it fails.

On speaking to several mechanics and manufacturers, the engine block is a non-servicable item and therefore should not fail in the lifetime of a vehicle.

 

Luckily I can get the faulty part shipped back to the UK via work free of charge for them to inspect it, if needed.

Link to post
Share on other sites

You seem to be confusing SOLA 1980 (The limitation act) and SOGA (Sales of Goods Act).

 

SOLA gives you the right to seek redress for 6 years from the date which gave cause for action.

 

SOGA gives you statutory rights as regards conformity, durability, etc...

 

SOGA does NOT cover a buyer against manufacturing defects for 6 years from date of purchase.

 

This is by no means as clear-cut as you make it to be.

 

If Skoda refuses to deal with it, you will have to bring out a court action for redress. You will then have to satisfy a judge that on the balance of probabilities, a 6 year old car with 36k miles on the clock, having travelled (presumably) from the UK to Spain should not have developed this type of fault, and furthermore you will have to convince same judge that the fault could only have happened due to a manufacturing defect and no other reason.

 

Skoda on the other hand, as defendants, will only have to show how it could have happened through other causes to cast sufficient doubts in the judge's mind.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 4 weeks later...

Ok,

 

I have had the block shipped back to the UK and it has been examined by a qualified metallurigst at my workplace (deal with aeronautical and automotive alloys and engineering).

 

He stated it was manufactured incorrectly from a poor mould which has caused a weak spot where the crack has formed.

 

This I have in writing, so now I have an engineer's report what's the best way of handling this Dealership or Skoda ?

 

Thanks

Link to post
Share on other sites

Well done for perserverance snatch and you are lucky to have been in a possition that you could get a real experts report.

 

As the dealer would be tasked to do the replacement, I would approach them first.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 1 year later...

:sad: Please let me know how you get on. My 52 reg skoda bought from new, 38000 miles, garaged at night, serviced regularly and well loved has just been diagnosed with the same thing.

 

Hubby took it in to be looked at with small leak, next thing its radiator, gearbox and headgasket need repair/replacing. Then on further investigation lo and behold they tell us the engine is cracked! Surely it is not unreasonable to expect your vehicle to do more mileage/years than this before it requires this kind of repair?

 

I had contacted skoda the manufacturer by email listing the problems and they have told me the same as yourself 3 years or 60000 miles.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi,

 

Yes I eventually got them to refund the cost of repairs, hire car, legal fees and time. They never admitted it was a fault but refunded me as a "goodwill gesture", either way was happy.

 

I take it your engine is the old 1.3 8v pushrod engine which was bored out to a 1.4. The newer Fabia's eg. 16v had the old VW engine.

 

First step is to write to them with proof of servicing etc...

Problem is your car is outside of the 6 year limit for the sale of goods act so you won't get any comeback via the courts I'm afraid I would try your dealer to see if they will contribute a goodwill gesture towards the costs.

 

Thanks

Simon

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi,

 

Thank you both for replying.

 

Useful to know you where given some compensation.

 

Unfortunately, car is in Scotland and I am in the midlands (where it was bought). It is parked up with parts of the engine now in the boot and us unable to afford new engine and not knowing any good local garages.

 

Oh well these things are sent to try us I suppose.

 

Thanks once again.

Link to post
Share on other sites

The bigger Skodas have the 1.9 TDI as used in Audi/VW and Seat this engine is well proven and its a shame you didnt have that one.

Have a happy and prosperous 2013 by avoiiding Payday loans. If you are sent a private message directing you for advice or support with your issues to another website,this is your choice.Before you decide,consider the users here who have already offered help and support.

Advice offered by Martin3030 is not supported by any legal training or qualification.Members are advised to use the services of fully insured legal professionals when needed.

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 3 months later...

Hi Snatch.

I read your postings with interest - my inlaws have a skoda fabia, 6000 miles on the clock and just out of warrenty.

They have had a recurring fault and now the garage are saying 'water in the wiring loom' is responsible and are offering to fit a new wiring loom. As it's a known fault they are covering the parts (£1500) but expect my elderly and disabled in-laws to cough up £700 for labour.

My next port of call is trading standards but I wondered if you had any advice and which addresses/names did you use successfully?

I look forward to hearing from you, many thanks in anticipation

Elouise

[email protected]

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...